I have a problem with the backstack behaviour. That is what I am doing:
add(fragment1) + addToBackStack(null)
replace(fragment2) + addToBackStack(null)
What is happening:
Fragment 1 is added and in the backstack
Then the second fragment replaces the first one and it is added to the backstack.
Now I want to change my last backstacked fragment with a new transaction which put a new backstack fragment so:
[frag1, frag2] becomes [frag1, frag3]
but this transaction made by a popBackStack + replace is making the frag1 to load by calling its onCreateView and onActivityCreated. I know this is the expected behaviour since this is how backstack works, but I am trying to find a way to avoid this preload.
Edit
In this question I am using the concept of backstack fragment for the transaction to be more clear. Every transaction here is an add+remove (which is a replace).
The code for replace I am using is:
public int replaceFragment(BaseFragment newFragment, boolean addToBackStack, boolean animated, PopStackMode popMode) {
if (popMode != null) {
getSupportFragmentManager().popBackStack(newFragment.getFragmentTag(), popMode == PopStackMode.POP_INCLUSIVE ? FragmentManager
.POP_BACK_STACK_INCLUSIVE : 0);
}
FragmentTransaction ft = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
if (animated) {
ft.setCustomAnimations(R.anim.slide_in_left, 0, R.anim.slide_out_right, 0);
}
ft.replace(R.id.fragment_container, newFragment, newFragment.getFragmentTag());
if (addToBackStack) {
ft.addToBackStack(newFragment.getFragmentTag());
}
return ft.commit();
}
You can see I am creating a navigation history based on the fragment backstack, as it was kind of a browser. When a "page" is added there is a fragment and a backstack transaction. In this context, I trying to:
Remove the current fragment.
Remove the transaction from the backstack.
Add a new fragment without poping and loading the previous backstack fragment.
I hope it is more clear.
Edit 2
I have filled a request feature for a flag that supports this behavior. Find it here.
First, you should understand that the backstack doesn't save fragments, but it saves transactions instead. When you call popBackStack what it actually does is revert the previous transaction. More on this here.
I think that you can do this:
Name your transactions by providing a unique name to your addToBackStack instead of null. i.e. addToBackStack("frag1").
Don't call popBackStack + replace, but instead just call replace.
Then, in your activity, override your onBackPressed and if the current fragment being displayed is Frag3 (you can check this using findFragmentByTag if you provided a tag in the replace method) you can call getSupportFragmentManager().popBackStackImmediate("frag1", FragmentManager.POP_BACK_STACK_INCLUSIVE); (otherwise call the super.onBackPressed)
Related
Hardly can't get fragment from backstack, even start thinking of keeping in in singleton which is probably bad.
Saved to backstack like this and all time try to get it by tag or something gives me error.
Fragment fragment = UserProfileFragment.newInstance(null);
FragmentTransaction trans = getFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
trans.replace(FRAGMENT_PLACE_RESOURCES, fragment);
trans.addToBackStack("profile");
trans.commit();
It just return me null here so I can't use this fragment. No logs.
Fragment fragment2 = getFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag("profile");
getFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag("tag")
is only used when you have added a fragment with specific tag for e.g.
fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.order_container,mProfileFragment,"profile");
or
fragmentTransaction.replace(R.id.order_container,mProfileFragment,"sometag");
Then you will be able to find this fragment by the tag.
In your case you are adding a transaction to backstack so you will not be able to find that fragment by tag. You just adding a transaction to backstack thats it not a fragment. And also your fragment was removed from the activity and destroyed so you have to revert the transaction by popping backstack instead of finding that fragment by tag.
You have to call
getFragmentManager().popBackStack("profile");
to get that fragment back to the activity and make it visible on screen.
Working with fragments I've always used replace() for my transactions, but I wish I didn't have to save instance states anymore to restore a fragment's view and prevent reloading when coming back to that fragment. So, I've decided to work with add(). The thing is when I add another fragment, the previous fragment view remains in the background and that's fine (that's the behavior I expected), but the problem is I can actually interact with the views in the background. Example:
Fragment A has a Button
Fragment B has a TextView
When I add Fragment A and later add Fragment B, I'm able to click on Fragment A's Button, even staying on Fragment B's view.
I'm using:
FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction =
getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction().
add(getRootViewContainer(),fragment,fragment.getClass().getSimpleName());
if (shouldGoBack)
fragmentTransaction.addToBackStack(fragment.getClass().getSimpleName());
where getRootViewContainer() returns the id of the FrameLayout I'm using as my activity main container.
Now, is it really the default behavior of add()?
If so, is there a proper way to avoid this or one just has to use replace()?
What you can do here is just hide previous fragment at the time of transaction of current fragment.
FragmentTransaction ft = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
Fragment newFragment= new MyFragment ();
ft.hide(CurrentFragment.this);
ft.show(newFragment);
ft.commit();
It worked for me just try it.
FragmentTransaction.hide(fragmentBehind); //works for me!
example :
//I have it globally available
FragmentTransaction trans = MainActivity.getManager().beginTransaction();
//not globally
FragmentTransaction trans = getFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
MapFragment newFragment = new newFragment();
trans.add(R.id.fragmentContainer, newFragment, tag);
trans.hide(this);
trans.addToBackStack(tag);
trans.commit();
Yes, this is a default behaviour of add().
If you really don't want to user replace(), you can try to disable views which are inside "old" fragment.
Hello I am working with sliding menu with fragment.
Indivisual fragment works properly. But suppose user navigates From fragment A->B , now 'B' works perfect and now if user goes from B->A than fragment 'A' is called from onAttach() .
I want such a condition if any fragment is opened , than reopening it should not load whole fragment , it should be resumed just like we handle activity with Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_REORDER_TO_FRONT.
Here is my code...
FragmentManager fm = MainActivity.this.getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction ft = fm.beginTransaction();
Layout1 fragment = new Layout1();
ft.add(R.id.activity_main_content_fragment, fragment,Layout1.class.getName());
ft.addToBackStack(Layout1.class.getName());
ft.commit();
Answer updated:
Reading the documentation, there is a way to pop the back stack based on either the transaction name or the id provided by commit. Using the name may be easier since it shouldn't require keeping track of a number that may change and reinforces the "unique back stack entry" logic.
Since you want only one back stack entry per Fragment, make the back state name the Fragment's class name (via getClass().getName()). Then when replacing a Fragment, use the popBackStackImmediate() method. If it returns true, it means there is an instance of the Fragment in the back stack. If not, actually execute the Fragment replacement logic.
private void replaceFragment (Fragment fragment){
String backStateName = fragment.getClass().getName();
FragmentManager manager = getSupportFragmentManager();
boolean fragmentPopped = manager.popBackStackImmediate (backStateName, 0);
if (!fragmentPopped){ //fragment not in back stack, create it.
FragmentTransaction ft = manager.beginTransaction();
ft.replace(R.id.content_frame, fragment);
ft.addToBackStack(backStateName);
ft.commit();
}
}
If you return to a fragment from the back stack it does not re-create the fragment but re-uses the same instance and starts with onCreateView() in the fragment lifecycle, see Fragment lifecycle.
So if you want to store state you should use instance variables and not rely on onSaveInstanceState()
Check this link. it will help How to resume Fragment from BackStack if exists
I'm trying to decide and show a fragment in activity's onResume method, but in case a previously added fragment is chosen again, then the activity goes blank.
Sample code (with one fragment):
#Override
protected void onResume(){
FragmentTransaction trans = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
trans.replace(R.id.myLayout, fragA);
trans.commit();
getSupportFragmentManager().executePendingTransactions();
}
With above code, when the activity is created for the first time, it shows fragA correctly, but in case I press Home Key and then switch back to my activity (in order to provoke onResume again), it all goes blank (seems like fragA is removed).
Is replacing a previously added fragment removes itself? or how not to loose a fragment if it is replaced by itself?
You can't replace a fragment with itself. The first half of a replace is a removal of the previous fragment at that id. Once a fragment is removed it can no longer be added or used by the fragment manager (so the add portion of the replace will not work properly).
Depending on your use case, you have two options:
Create a new fragment instead of reusing the existing instance
Use some other method to see if its necessary to replace your fragment
Finally, you probably don't need to call executePendingTransactions.
You can try:
if( !(getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.myLayout) instanceof FragmentA) ) {
FragmentTransaction trans = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
trans.replace(R.id.myLayout, fragA);
trans.commit();
}
And I assume that fragA is FragmentA class object.
Finally, I had to put a check before replacing fragments. In case, an (already added) fragment is requested for replace again, I had to check if its already added then ignore the replacement, else proceed. For example:
#Override
protected void onResume() {
if (!fragA.isAdded()) {
FragmentTransaction trans = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
trans.replace(R.id.myLayout, fragA);
trans.commit();
//getSupportFragmentManager().executePendingTransactions(); //unnecessary
}
}
When referencing back to a created Fragment please do make sure to try adding the
fragmentTransaction.addToBackStack(null);
method right before committing so that your Fragment is resumed instead of destroyed as mentioned in the developer guides.
If you don't call addToBackStack() when you perform a transaction that removes a fragment, then that fragment is destroyed when the transaction is committed and the user cannot navigate back to it. Whereas, if you do call addToBackStack() when removing a fragment, then the fragment is stopped and is later resumed if the user navigates back.
You can find this at the end of this page.
I'm currently using a ViewGroup (SwipeyTab implementation) to switch between Fragments. However, some Fragment "pages" get replaced by other Fragments on the same Tab, so I initially tried:
FragmentTransaction ft = fragment.getFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
ft.remove(currentFragment);
ft.add(newFragment,"");
ft.commit();
That code would remove the current fragment but not add newFragment (from Logcat, it would get instantiated but not appear).
I ended up adding it in the FragmentPagerAdapter.getItem(int position) call based on current state (based on this: Replace Fragment inside a ViewPager). However, I'd like to be able to add each newly replaced fragment to be part of the back stack.
I tried adding to backstack before removing the fragment:
currentFragment.getFragmentManager().beginTransaction().addToBackStack(null).commit();
FragmentTransaction ft = fragment.getFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
ft.remove(currentFragment);
ft.commit();
and that didn't work - it added the last fragment to the backstack, so when I pressed back, it would just reload the current fragment.
Is there anyway I can add a fragment to the backstack that has been replaced in the "non traditional" way?