I'm creating a post that uploads data to Firestore's sub-collection and brings it up to MyBookmark page. It's good to create a sub-collection and upload data simply. And now I'd like to add a 'data duplication prevention' function here.
If the post is already saved in the bookmark, should not upload it.
For this purpose, I would like to check if the post is already in the collection when I press the bookmark button.
IconButton(
onPressed: () async {
//get userModel
UserModelState _userModelstate =
Provider.of<UserModelState>(context, listen: false);
//=========================================
//duplication data test
DocumentReference bookmarkRef = Firestore.instance
.collection(COLLECTION_USERS)
.document(_userModelstate.userModel.userKey)
.collection(COLLECTION_BOOKMARk)
// .where(KEY_BOOKMARK_PRODUCTKEY, isEqualTo: productKey)
.document();
DocumentSnapshot bookmarkSnapshot = await bookmarkRef.get();
//test (return "No exist")
if(bookmarkSnapshot.exists) {
print("Yes exist");
} else {
print("No exist");
}
I tried writing a code to check if there was data in the collection, but it is always printed as "No exist".
How can I confirm the existence of a specific document in collection?
Thank you.
If the productKey is supposed to be unique in the Bookmark collection of the user, consider using the productKey as the document ID. Since document IDs are by definition unique within their collection, using them guarantees unique product keys without you having to write any code for it.
That said, you current code can't work because you call document(). Whenever you call document() without any parameters, it generates a reference to a new unique document. And since you immediately call get() on that reference, the document will (also: by definition) not exist yet.
To check if a document with a specific product ID exist, you will need to run a query:
CollectionReference bookmarksRef = Firestore.instance
.collection(COLLECTION_USERS)
.document(_userModelstate.userModel.userKey)
.collection(COLLECTION_BOOKMARk);
Query bookmarkQuery = bookmarksRef.where(KEY_BOOKMARK_PRODUCTKEY, isEqualTo: productKey);
QuerySnapshot bookmarkSnapshot = await bookmarkQuery.get();
if (bookmarkSnapshot.size > 0) {
print("product key already in use");
}
Hi I am pretty new to Firebase real time database and this is my first project. Sorry if this is a stupid question.
I am saving my data as follows.
firebase database structure:
Now I want to retrieve all parent chat ids on which the student is participating, using the student_id variable.
I tried as per this SO question and this structure database and retrieve data documentation, but its not retrieving values. Anybody have an idea?
I would suggest saving the chatroom IDs your students are in in a separate location. For example:
Path:
“/users/$uid/chatrooms”
Data:
{
0: 350,
1: 423
}
Thus you could retrieve the chat room ids first before getting the chatroom data.
import { initializeApp } from “firebase”;
import { getDatabase, get, set, ref } from “firebase/database”;
const userChatroomIdsRef = ref(db, ‘/users/${uid}/chatrooms‘);
get(userChatroomIdsRef).then(result => {
const chatroomIds = result.val();
if (!(chatroomIds && chatroomIds instanceof Array)) return; // firebase will return null if its an empty array.
const getChatroomInfoPromises = chatroomIds.map(id => get(ref(db, ‘/chat/${id}/${uid}’)).then(result => result.val());
Promise.all(getChatroomInfoPromises).then(chatroomInfoArray => { YOUR LOGIC HERE });
});
Removing/adding students from/to chatrooms would now be simple as you could just change the array of chatroomIds.
const userChatroomIdsRef = ref(db, ‘/users/${uid}/chatrooms‘);
get(userChatroomIdsRef).then(result => {
const oldIds = result.val();
const newChatroomIds = oldIds.filter(id => id !== ID TO DELETE);
return set(userChatroomIdsRef, newChatroomIds)
});
This is of course assuming that you know the uid of your student_id. If you do not know what uid each student_id has, you must must store a reference. I would suggest saving all student info in the “/users/$uid/” directory. Here you could save the studentId so you can programmatically use it.
In all other firebase logic I would try to use the native firebase uid for querying. This will make your life easier.
It’s always good the keep information organized on the database so your logic is simple.
Please check my code for syntax errors; I wrote this on an iPhone.
I want to add a field of type array inside a collection.
if the field doesn't exist create it. if it exists overwrite it with the new array value.
the field should be called macAddress and it's of type array of String
I have tried the following:
val macInput = setting_mac_text.text.toString()
val macArray = macInput.split(",")
val macList = Arrays.asList(macArray)
val data =
hashMapOf(Pair(FirebaseConstants.USER_MAC_ADDRESS, macArray))
//save it in firebase
db.collection(FirebaseConstants.ORGANIZATION)
.document(orgID + ".${FirebaseConstants.USER_MAC_ADDRESS}")
.set(FieldValue.arrayUnion(macList))
.addOnCompleteListener { task ->
if (task.isSuccessful) {
Log.d(TAG, "successfully inserted")
} else {
Log.d(TAG, " failed ${task.exception}")
}
}
also tried to insert the list itself and hash map like this
val data = hashMapOf(Pair(FirebaseConstants.USER_MAC_ADDRESS, macArray))
db.collection(FirebaseConstants.ORGANIZATION)
.document(orgID)
.set(data))
but it keeps giving me java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid data. Nested arrays are not supported
what am I doing wrong here?
You're doing three things wrong here:
FieldValue.arrayUnion() is only meant to be used as the value of a field to add elements to that field. The way you are using it now in the first sample, it's being taken as the entire contents of the document.
set() with one parameter is only intended to create or overwrite an entire document. It can't be used to update an existing document. You would have to pass in SetOptions to tell it to merge if you want an update. Or, you would simply use update() to modify an existing document.
Your code that deals with macArray and macList isn't working the way you expect. You are creating a list with one element, which is itself an array. The error message is telling you that you can't have nested arrays like this.
I suggest taking a step back and simplifying your code, removing all the moving parts that don't have to do with Firestore. Just hard code values in your Firestore update until the update works the way you want, then add in the code that works with actual values. Get one simple thing to work, then add to it. If you get an error, you will know that the code you just added was incorrect.
To overwrite an array, you would simply call the set method and have the merge option set to true:
try {
const query = await DatabaseService.queryBuilder({
collection: CollectionName,
});
return await query
.doc(insuranceId)
.set(
{ DOCUMENT_PROPERTY_HERE: ARRAY_HERE },
{ merge: true }
);
} catch (exception) {
return Promise.reject(exception);
}
I am wondering if it's possible to get multiple documents by a list of ids in one round trip (network call) to the Firestore database.
if you're within Node:
https://github.com/googleapis/nodejs-firestore/blob/master/dev/src/index.ts#L978
/**
* Retrieves multiple documents from Firestore.
*
* #param {...DocumentReference} documents - The document references
* to receive.
* #returns {Promise<Array.<DocumentSnapshot>>} A Promise that
* contains an array with the resulting document snapshots.
*
* #example
* let documentRef1 = firestore.doc('col/doc1');
* let documentRef2 = firestore.doc('col/doc2');
*
* firestore.getAll(documentRef1, documentRef2).then(docs => {
* console.log(`First document: ${JSON.stringify(docs[0])}`);
* console.log(`Second document: ${JSON.stringify(docs[1])}`);
* });
*/
This is specifically for the server SDK
UPDATE: Cloud Firestore Now Supports IN Queries!
myCollection.where(firestore.FieldPath.documentId(), 'in', ["123","456","789"])
In practise you would use firestore.getAll like this
async getUsers({userIds}) {
const refs = userIds.map(id => this.firestore.doc(`users/${id}`))
const users = await this.firestore.getAll(...refs)
console.log(users.map(doc => doc.data()))
}
or with promise syntax
getUsers({userIds}) {
const refs = userIds.map(id => this.firestore.doc(`users/${id}`))
this.firestore.getAll(...refs).then(users => console.log(users.map(doc => doc.data())))
}
They have just announced this functionality, https://firebase.googleblog.com/2019/11/cloud-firestore-now-supports-in-queries.html .
Now you can use queries like, but mind that the input size can't be greater than 10.
userCollection.where('uid', 'in', ["1231","222","2131"])
With Firebase Version 9 (Dec, 2021 Update):
You can get multiple documents by multiple ids in one round-trip using "documentId()" and "in" with "where" clause:
import {
query,
collection,
where,
documentId,
getDocs
} from "firebase/firestore";
const q = query(
collection(db, "products"),
where(documentId(), "in",
[
"8AVJvG81kDtb9l6BwfCa",
"XOHS5e3KY9XOSV7YYMw2",
"Y2gkHe86tmR4nC5PTzAx"
]
),
);
const productsDocsSnap = await getDocs(q);
productsDocsSnap.forEach((doc) => {
console.log(doc.data()); // "doc1", "doc2" and "doc3"
});
You could use a function like this:
function getById (path, ids) {
return firestore.getAll(
[].concat(ids).map(id => firestore.doc(`${path}/${id}`))
)
}
It can be called with a single ID:
getById('collection', 'some_id')
or an array of IDs:
getById('collection', ['some_id', 'some_other_id'])
No, right now there is no way to batch multiple read requests using the Cloud Firestore SDK and therefore no way to guarantee that you can read all of the data at once.
However as Frank van Puffelen has said in the comments above this does not mean that fetching 3 documents will be 3x as slow as fetching one document. It is best to perform your own measurements before reaching a conclusion here.
If you are using flutter, you can do the following:
Firestore.instance.collection('your_collection_name')
.where(FieldPath.documentId, whereIn:["list", "of", "document", "ids"])
.getDocuments();
This will return a Future containing List<DocumentSnapshot> which you can iterate as you feel fit.
Surely the best way to do this is by implementing the actual query of Firestore in a Cloud Function? There would then only be a single round trip call from the client to Firebase, which seems to be what you're asking for.
You really want to be keeping all of your data access logic like this server side anyway.
Internally there will likely be the same number of calls to Firebase itself, but they would all be across Google's super-fast interconnects, rather than the external network, and combined with the pipelining which Frank van Puffelen has explained, you should get excellent performance from this approach.
You can perform an IN query with the document IDs (up to ten):
import {
query,
collection,
where,
getDocs,
documentId,
} from 'firebase/firestore';
export async function fetchAccounts(
ids: string[]
) {
// use lodash _.chunk, for example
const result = await Promise.all(
chunk(ids, 10).map(async (chunkIds) => {
const accounts = await getDocs(
query(
collection(firestore, 'accounts'),
where(documentId(), 'in', chunkIds)
));
return accounts.docs.filter(doc => doc.exists()).map(doc => doc.data());
})
);
return result.flat(1);
}
Here's how you would do something like this in Kotlin with the Android SDK.
May not necessarily be in one round trip, but it does effectively group the result and avoid many nested callbacks.
val userIds = listOf("123", "456")
val userTasks = userIds.map { firestore.document("users/${it!!}").get() }
Tasks.whenAllSuccess<DocumentSnapshot>(userTasks).addOnSuccessListener { documentList ->
//Do what you need to with the document list
}
Note that fetching specific documents is much better than fetching all documents and filtering the result. This is because Firestore charges you for the query result set.
For some who are stucked in same problem
here is a sample code:
List<String> documentsIds = {your document ids};
FirebaseFirestore.getInstance().collection("collection_name")
.whereIn(FieldPath.documentId(), documentsIds).get().addOnCompleteListener(new OnCompleteListener<QuerySnapshot>() {
#Override
public void onComplete(#NonNull Task<QuerySnapshot> task) {
if (task.isSuccessful()) {
for (DocumentSnapshot document : Objects.requireNonNull(task.getResult())) {
YourClass object = document.toObject(YourClass.class);
// add to your custom list
}
}
}
}).addOnFailureListener(new OnFailureListener() {
#Override
public void onFailure(#NonNull Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
});
For the ones who want to do it using Angular, here is an example:
First some library imports are needed: (must be preinstalled)
import * as firebase from 'firebase/app'
import { AngularFirestore, AngularFirestoreCollection } from '#angular/fire/firestore'
Some configuration for the collection:
yourCollection: AngularFirestoreCollection;
constructor(
private _db : AngularFirestore,
) {
// this is your firestore collection
this.yourCollection = this._db.collection('collectionName');
}
Here is the method to do the query: ('products_id' is an Array of ids)
getProducts(products_ids) {
var queryId = firebase.firestore.FieldPath.documentId();
this.yourCollection.ref.where(queryId, 'in', products_ids).get()
.then(({ docs }) => {
console.log(docs.map(doc => doc.data()))
})
}
I hope this helps you, it works for me.
getCartGoodsData(id) {
const goodsIDs: string[] = [];
return new Promise((resolve) => {
this.fs.firestore.collection(`users/${id}/cart`).get()
.then(querySnapshot => {
querySnapshot.forEach(doc => {
goodsIDs.push(doc.id);
});
const getDocs = goodsIDs.map((id: string) => {
return this.fs.firestore.collection('goods').doc(id).get()
.then((docData) => {
return docData.data();
});
});
Promise.all(getDocs).then((goods: Goods[]) => {
resolve(goods);
});
});
});
}
Yes, it is possible. Sample in .NET SDK for Firestore:
/*List of document references, for example:
FirestoreDb.Collection(ROOT_LEVEL_COLLECTION).Document(DOCUMENT_ID);*/
List<DocumentReference> docRefList = YOUR_DOCUMENT_REFERENCE_LIST;
// Required fields of documents, not necessary while fetching entire documents
FieldMask fieldMask = new FieldMask(FIELD-1, FIELD-2, ...);
// With field mask
List<DocumentSnapshot> documentSnapshotsMasked = await FirestoreDb.GetAllSnapshotsAsync(docRefList, fieldMask);
// Without field mask
List<DocumentSnapshot>documentSnapshots = await FirestoreDb.GetAllSnapshotsAsync(docRefList);
Documentation in .NET:
Get all snapshots
Field mask
This doesn't seem to be possible in Firestore at the moment. I don't understand why Alexander's answer is accepted, the solution he proposes just returns all the documents in the "users" collection.
Depending on what you need to do, you should look into duplicating the relevant data you need to display and only request a full document when needed.
if you are using the python firebase admin sdk this is how you query for multiple documents using their uids
from firebase_admin import firestore
import firebase_admin
from google.cloud.firestore_v1.field_path import FieldPath
app = firebase_admin.initialize_app(cred)
client = firestore.client(app)
collection_ref = client.collection('collection_name')
query = collection_ref.where(FieldPath.document_id(), 'in', listOfIds)
docs = query.get()
for doc in docs:
print(doc.id, doc.to_dict())
Instead of importing FieldPath you can also simply use the string __name__. Now your query will be collection_ref.where('__name__', 'in', listOfIds)
The best you can do is not use Promise.all as your client then must wait for .all the reads before proceeding.
Iterate the reads and let them resolve independently. On the client side, this probably boils down to the UI having several progress loader images resolve to values independently. However, this is better than freezing the whole client until .all the reads resolve.
Therefore, dump all the synchronous results to the view immediately, then let the asynchronous results come in as they resolve, individually. This may seem like petty distinction, but if your client has poor Internet connectivity (like I currently have at this coffee shop), freezing the whole client experience for several seconds will likely result in a 'this app sucks' experience.
I am trying to fetch data from Sqlite database using a sqlite plug-in in phonegap but I seem to be missing something. It doesn't report error when I checked the logcat but instead the database was opened successfully but my code won't fetch the data.
Below is my code so far...
function ViewData(id){
var db = window.sqlitePlugin.openDatabase("mydb", "1.0", "mydb", 100000);
db.transaction(function(transaction) {
transaction.executeSql('SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE userid=?', [id],
function(transaction, result) {
var row = result.rows.length;
if(row>0){
//fetch saved data
alert(result.rows.item(0)['lname']);
}
},errorHandler);
},errorHandler,nullHandler);
return ;
}
Note:
1. The error handler, success handler and null handler are well coded.
Please, any help is appreciated.
Sorry guys, i was calling the function before onDeviceReady