I am able to turn on/off Bluetooth without any prompt using the following code. It requires BLUETOOTH and BLUETOOTH_ADMIN permissions.
boolean isEnabled = bluetoothAdapter.isEnabled();
if (enable && !isEnabled) {
return bluetoothAdapter.enable();
} else if (!enable && isEnabled) {
return bluetoothAdapter.disable();
}
But didn't find any way to set Bluetooth discoverable without user prompt. It's wired to prompt every time to user. There is no "don't ask me again" feature I afraid. Is there any good way to make Bluetooth device discoverable? I don't care about the duration. Also my device is not rooted.
More Info
I found source code of BluetoothAdapter.java and it has a public method named setDiscoverableDuration. But why I can't access it? Why some public methods are hidden in Api documentations? How did they even do that? all methods are public.
Finally I have found a way to do this using reflection.
Method method;
try {
method = bluetoothAdapter.getClass().getMethod("setScanMode", int.class, int.class);
method.invoke(bluetoothAdapter,BluetoothAdapter.SCAN_MODE_CONNECTABLE_DISCOVERABLE,120);
Log.e("invoke","method invoke successfully");
}
catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
Warning: Above method is trying to invoke hidden method. So in future maybe it will not work.
Related
I am developing an application with NFC and wifi direct. I get the MAC address using NFC and the Wifi Direct to transfer data. I call discoverpeers() and could get success. But there is no callback WIFI_P2P_PEERS_CHANGED_ACTION, the callback comes only when I go to settings and the select wifidirect.
This was discussed in the other question
Can I turn on WiFi-Direct from code? on Android API-14 (ICS)
"I'd like to add that WiFi direct on JB and above (at least on AOSP) is not active all the time - it only appears to be. If you look at listeners for WiFi direct, it turns itself off after some time. It turns itself back on if you open the wifi direct menu, however. You might have to have the host do a peer search or initialize itself in order to be able to be found. Likely a battery saving trick. I have also found that it's blocking, since as it accepts a connection, the entire system will lock up and fail to connect sometimes. (The system invitation) – Mgamerz "
Can anyone suggest the solution for the problem WIFI_P2P_PEERS_CHANGED_ACTION callback is not got and can get only when manually go to settings->wifi->tap on wifidirect
I used two devices Samsung galaxy nexus and nexus 7 both running on 4.2.2
There is no available API to enable wifiP2P but you can invoke method "enableP2p" from android settings 4.0.1
WifiP2pManager manager = (WifiP2pManager) getActivity().getSystemService(Context.WIFI_P2P_SERVICE);
Channel channel = manager.initialize(getActivity(), getActivity().getMainLooper(), null);
try {
Method method1 = manager.getClass().getMethod("enableP2p", Channel.class);
method1.invoke(manager, channel);
//Toast.makeText(getActivity(), "method found",
// Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
} catch (Exception e) {
//Toast.makeText(getActivity(), "method did not found",
// Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
}
To disable wifiP2P use this method
Method method1 = manager.getClass().getMethod("disableP2p", Channel.class);
Not from code. The user has to. That's why the demo has the link to wifi settings in the action bar.
When you call manager.discoverPeers(channel, new WifiP2pManager.ActionListener()
define onFailure and look at the reasonCode. If it's 0, then either the Wifi or WiFi direct is off.
If you look at the WiFi Direct demo app, the WifiDirectBroadcast Reciever, this piece of code looks at whether p2p is enabled specifically
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
String action = intent.getAction();
if (WifiP2pManager.WIFI_P2P_STATE_CHANGED_ACTION.equals(action)) {
// UI update to indicate wifi p2p status.
int state = intent.getIntExtra(WifiP2pManager.EXTRA_WIFI_STATE, -1);
if (state == WifiP2pManager.WIFI_P2P_STATE_ENABLED) {
// Wifi Direct mode is enabled
activity.setIsWifiP2pEnabled(true);
} else {
activity.setIsWifiP2pEnabled(false);
activity.resetData();
}
Then when discover peers is called it looks at the variable set by setIsWifiP2pEnabled
thanks user3093354. to continue with your solution, in order to disable the p2p you have to invoke:
Method method1 = manager.getClass().getMethod("disableP2p", Channel.class);
//Try this it may be help you
WifiManager wifiManager = (WifiManager)this.getSystemService(this.WIFI_SERVICE);
wifiManager.setWifiEnabled(true); //True - to enable WIFI connectivity .
//False -disable WIFI connectivity.
//add this permissions in Manifest file :
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.CHANGE_WIFI_STATE"/>
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.ACCESS_WIFI_STATE"/>
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.INTERNET"/>
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.CHANGE_NETWORK_STATE"/>
You can load the wifi driver from a command prompt with the desired concurrency level if you are rooted:
/system/bin/insmod /system/lib/modules/wlan.ko con_mode=3
These are the values:
typedef enum
{
VOS_STA_MODE=0,
VOS_STA_SAP_MODE=1,
VOS_P2P_CLIENT_MODE,
VOS_P2P_GO_MODE,
VOS_MONITOR_MODE,
VOS_FTM_MODE = 5,
VOS_IBSS_MODE,
VOS_P2P_DEVICE_MODE,
VOS_MAX_NO_OF_MODE
} tVOS_CON_MODE;
This is for an Atheros card.
I need to find a way to (using an Android application) programmatically connect and disconnect an Android device from a host.
I am using a Galaxy Nexus. My goal is to keep everything as close to stock as possible, though I have already enabled verbose debug messages in the kernel and in order to view them have enabled root access on the phone to access /proc/kmsg (and the shell command dmesg).
I am certain that there is a way to leverage root access to do what I need to do, but all of my attempts have lead to nix.
Mess with /proc/bus/usb
Mess with /dev/bus/usb
Change between MTP/PTP (unable to do programatically)
Making the Android USB gadget driver into a module <- ???
I am going to try to figure out how to do the last object on the list, as then I would be able to rmmod and insmod the resulting *.ko in my application and that would connect and disconnect the phone. I am unsure of the feasibility of this option though.
Solution came when close to a deadline, so I am almost sure it is not the best way of doing things, but it met my requirements.
Build Modded kernel (to allow hooking of particular function)
Modify kernel config to support Kprobes (set CONFIG_KPROBES to Y)
Remove "static" keyword from android_setup() definition (driver/usb/gadget/android.c)
Build that kernel
Build kernel module (which gives the actual functionality of connecting and disconnecting)
Use Kallsyms to dynamically pull the absolute address of android_setup()
Using kprobes, hook android_setup()
Set up two timers to execute every time android_setup() is called
First timer set for 2 seconds from now, Second set for 2.005 seconds from now
Both timers take a pointer to the struct usb_gadget as their data
In respective callback functions, call usb_gadget_connect() and usb_gadget_disconnect(), which forces physical disconnect followed by reconnect on the Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Build Application
Gotta have a rooted device
Simply make a shell call with SU privilege - "insmod module_name." Until you call rmmod, the module will force the device into an enumeration cycle, disconnecting and reconnecting continuously.
If you are interested in repeating these results, read the document posted here and feel free to send me any questions.
https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B9WchRkSOWwJbi10MGhLWUljT2s
You can try to enable/disable some secured settings like Settings.Secure.USB_MASS_STORAGE_ENABLED or Settings.Secure.ADB_ENABLED (depending on what you call "connect" !)
This code should work (disabling USB mass storage):
Settings.Secure.putInt(getContentResolver(),Settings.Secure.USB_MASS_STORAGE_ENABLED, 0);
Settings.Secure.putInt(getContentResolver(),Settings.Secure.USB_MASS_STORAGE_ENABLED, 0);
InternetControl.java
public class InternetControl {
public static void EnableInternet(Context context)
{
try {
Log.i("Reached Enable", "I am here");
setMobileDataEnabled(context,true);
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
}
}
public static void DisableInternet(Context context)
{
try {
Log.i("Reached Disable", "I am here");
setMobileDataEnabled(context,false);
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
}
}
private static void setMobileDataEnabled(Context context , boolean enabled) throws Exception{
final ConnectivityManager conn = (ConnectivityManager) context.getSystemService(Context.CONNECTIVITY_SERVICE);
final Class connClass = Class.forName(conman.getClass().getName());
final Field iConnectivityManagerField = connClass.getDeclaredField("mService");
iConnectivityManagerField.setAccessible(true);
final Object iConnectivityManager = iConnectivityManagerField.get(conn);
final Class iConnectivityManagerClass = Class.forName(iConnectivityManager.getClass().getName());
final Method setMobileDataEnabledMethod = iConnectivityManagerClass.getDeclaredMethod("setMobileDataEnabled", Boolean.TYPE);
setMobileDataEnabledMethod.setAccessible(true);
setMobileDataEnabledMethod.invoke(iConnectivityManager, enabled);
}
}
Manifest.xml
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE" />
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.CHANGE_NETWORK_STATE"/>
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.INTERNET" />
Enable or Disable function are static so you can call by using
classname.functionname();
I am trying to code an app that calls a method in android StatusBarManager. I did it the same way as the hack to expand the android status bar:
try {
Object service = getSystemService("statusbar");
Class<?> statusbarManager = Class.forName("android.app.StatusBarManager");
Method expand = statusbarManager.getMethod("disable", new Class[] { int.class });
expand.invoke(service, 0x00200000);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("DISABLE HOME ERROR");
}
Except the method I want to call is disable() instead of expand().
However, I am getting a security exception "neither and user nor the current process has permission android.permission.STATUS_BAR.
I tried adding it to the manifest but because it is a system apps permission, it only works if I copy my app to /system/app.
I messed around with RootTools http://code.google.com/p/roottools/ but couldn't figure out how to set the permissions. I tried setPermissions(0) and setUserPermissions("android.permissions.status_bar") but none works. I am not really sure how to use this library.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
I have 2 Android devices using WiFi Direct. On one device I can get information about the other device using the WifiP2pManager class, and request a connection to the other device. However when I request a connection, the other device pops up a little window and asks the user if they want to accept the connection request.
Is it possible to auto-accept these connection requests? I.E to be able to connect to the other device without user confirmation?
It can be easily done with the help of Xposed framework. You just need to replace the single method inside one of android java classes (see the link from snihalani's answer). But of course to use Xposed your device must be rooted. The main idea can be expressed in the following code (using Xposed)
#Override
public void handleLoadPackage(LoadPackageParam lpparam) {
try {
Class<?> wifiP2pService = Class.forName("android.net.wifi.p2p.WifiP2pService", false, lpparam.classLoader);
for (Class<?> c : wifiP2pService.getDeclaredClasses()) {
//XposedBridge.log("inner class " + c.getSimpleName());
if ("P2pStateMachine".equals(c.getSimpleName())) {
XposedBridge.log("Class " + c.getName() + " found");
Method notifyInvitationReceived = c.getDeclaredMethod("notifyInvitationReceived");
final Method sendMessage = c.getMethod("sendMessage", int.class);
XposedBridge.hookMethod(notifyInvitationReceived, new XC_MethodReplacement() {
#Override
protected Object replaceHookedMethod(MethodHookParam param) throws Throwable {
final int PEER_CONNECTION_USER_ACCEPT = 0x00023000 + 2;
sendMessage.invoke(param.thisObject, PEER_CONNECTION_USER_ACCEPT);
return null;
}
});
break;
}
}
} catch (Throwable t) {
XposedBridge.log(t);
}
}
I tested it on SGS4 stock 4.2.2 ROM and it worked.
I guess the same could be done with the help of Substrate for android.
From my current understanding of the API, You cannot really accept connections automatically without user's intervention. You can initiate a connection, that doesn't require user intervention. If both of your devices are mobile devices, you will have to accept connection request on one end.
I have put this as a feature request in android project hosting.
You can monitor their response here: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=30880
Based on the comments, do you really need to connect to the devices if you just want to track and log the vehicles around you ?
I don't know the scope of the project, but you could simply use the WifiP2pDeviceList that you get when you request the peers in the WifiP2pManager. You could get the list of the devices (~= vehicles) around you and could log this.
Connection is useful if you want to send more detailed information I guess.
If you can modify the framework, you can ignore the accept window and direct send the "PEER_CONNECTION_USER_ACCEPT".
Base on Android 5.0, "frameworks/opt/net/wifi/service/java/com/android/server/wifi/p2p/WifiP2pServiceImpl.java".
You must find the "notifyInvitationReceived", and modify to ...
private void notifyInvitationReceived() {
/*Direct sends the accept message.*/
sendMessage(PEER_CONNECTION_USER_ACCEPT);
/*
... old code
*/
}
I'm writing an Android app which receives information from a Bluetooth device. Our client has suggested that the Bluetooth device (which they produce) will change its name depending on certain conditions - for the simplest example its name will sometimes be "xxx-ON" and sometimes "xxx-OFF". My app is just supposed to seek this BT transmitter (I use BluetoothAdapter.startDiscovery() ) and do different things depending on the name it finds. I am NOT pairing with the Bluetooth device (though I suppose it might be possible, the app is supposed to eventually work with multiple Android devices and multiple BT transmitters so I'm not sure it would be a good idea).
My code works fine to detect BT devices and find their names. Also, if the device goes off, I can detect the next time I seek, that it is not there. But it seems that if it is there and it changes name, I pick up the old name - presumably it is cached somewhere. Even if the bluetooth device goes off, and we notice that, the next time I detect it, I still see the old name.
I found this issue in Google Code: here but it was unclear to me even how to use the workaround given ("try to connect"). Has anyone done this and had any luck? Can you share code?
Is there a simple way to just delete the cached names and search again so I always find the newest names? Even a non-simple way would be good (I am writing for a rooted device).
Thanks
I would suggest 'fetchUuidsWithSdp()'. It's significance is that, unlike the similar getUuids() method, fetchUuidsWithSdp causes the device to update cached information about the remote device. And I believe this includes the remote name as well as the SPD.
Note that both the methods I mentioned are hidden prior to 4.0.3, so your code would look l ike this:
public static void startServiceDiscovery( BluetoothDevice device ) {
// Need to use reflection prior to API 15
Class cl = null;
try {
cl = Class.forName("android.bluetooth.BluetoothDevice");
} catch( ClassNotFoundException exc ) {
Log.e(CTAG, "android.bluetooth.BluetoothDevice not found." );
}
if (null != cl) {
Class[] param = {};
Method method = null;
try {
method = cl.getMethod("fetchUuidsWithSdp", param);
} catch( NoSuchMethodException exc ) {
Log.e(CTAG, "fetchUuidsWithSdp not found." );
}
if (null != method) {
Object[] args = {};
try {
method.invoke(device, args);
} catch (Exception exc) {
Log.e(CTAG, "Failed to invoke fetchUuidsWithSdp method." );
}
}
}
}
You'll then need to listen for the BluetoothDevice.ACTION_NAME_CHANGED intent, and extract BluetoothDevice.EXTRA_NAME from it.
Let me know if that helps.