Develop Reference

Android - Create Application level fragment

For my current project, I will be using this SlidingUpPanel library.
The sliding up panel will host a fragment that will contain application/global level information. This panel will be in every activity in my application. This will be very similar to the way Google Play music works.
My question is, what is the best way to persist the sliding up panel fragment throughout my application? I see myself going about this in two ways...
Storing the fragment inside the Application class and loading it at the start of every activity (somehow, not even sure if this is a possibility).
Storing the data that it will display in the Application class & loading a new instance of the fragment, passing in the persisted data.
Which one of these two ways would be the best? Is 1. even possible? Are there any coding landmines with these approaches?

Storing a fragment to persist throughout the application lifecycle would be pretty unorthodox, mainly because the fragment class should be able to follow it's normal lifecycle events (in this case, mainly onPause and onResume) instead of being stuck somewhere in the application class.
It is definitely common practice to store the data and load it each time you display the fragment. If you want to enable some sort of cacheing or singleton pattern to access the data, it should most likely be with another object that the fragment can access but is not a member within the fragment.
There is a good video from google about leaking views and it touches briefly on the pitfalls of doing some similar to what you're proposing in bullet #1.

I think the structure of your app looks like it should be a single activity where that bar is in it, then the main content is a Fragment that you replace and use addToBackStack on in order to maintain the use of the back button. Otherwise, you are going to have a lot of repeated code with solution 2 (which means a lot of repeated work in the case of bugs etc., not very maintainable), or leak views using solution 1.
More info on providing a proper back implementation

Android activity/fragment responsibilities for data loading

When starting a new application for a client, I am asking myself again the same question about who should be responsible for loading data: activities or fragments. I have taken both options for various apps and I was wondering which pattern is best according to you in terms of:
limiting the code complexity.
handling edge cases (like screen rotation, screen going power save, loss of connectivity, etc.)
Option 1 - Activity loads data & fragment only displays it
This allows to have fragments that are just fed a bunch of objects to display. They know nothing about loading data and how we load that.
On the other side, the activity loads data using whichever method is required (for instance initially the latest 50 entries and on a search, loads the search result). It then passes it to the fragment which displays it. Method to load the data could be anything (from service, from DB, ... fragments only know about POJOs)
It's kind of a MVC architecture where the activity is the controller and fragments are the view.
Option 2 - Activity arranges fragments & fragments are responsible to fetch the data
In this pattern, fragments are autonomous pieces of application. They know how to load the data they are displaying and how to show it to the user.
Activities are simply a way to arrange fragments on screen and to coordinate transitions between application activities.

In theory you can do whatever you want, if it works.
Actually, the fragments and activities display data and deal with their own life cycles.
Since fragments belongs to activity so you have to use both in conjunction to better handle all the data but mostly it depends on your needs.
If you keep in mind the idea that the Fragment should provide the UI and the Activity should provide the processing then you have a good division of concerns and code which should allow the Fragment or the Activity to be reused.
If you know about the MVC - Model View Controller - design pattern then you can think of the Fragment as the View and the Activity as the Model.
Things get much more interesting when you build an application with multiple Fragments.
Some key points as a decide factor -
The idea of a Fragment is that it is a wrapped up chunk of UI that
can be used by any Activity that needs it. On this basis you have to
ask yourself if the event that has to be handled is the same for
every Activity or unique to each Activity. If it is the same then the
event handler is better written within the Fragment.
The Fragment doesn't have a UI of its own - it is displayed by an
Activity that the Fragment is associated with. The events are
generated by objects in the View hierarchy, which is owned by the
Activity. If you try to use Android Studio to add an event handler,
for example, it will add it to the Activity and not to the Fragment.
You can define the EventListener that you want to handle the event
in the Fragment and then hook it up to the View object in the
Activity in which you want to generate the event.
A Fragment is a class that implements the onCreateView method to
supply a View hierarchy that can be displayed by an Activity.
To use a Fragment in an Activity you have to add it using a
FragmentManager and a FragmentTransaction. You can add the Fragment
using the add method but nothing happens until you call the commit
method.
After the method that used the commit, usually the Activity's
onCreate, terminates the CreateView event runs the Fragment's
onCreateView and the Fragments View hierarchy is added to the
Activity's content.
You have to write code to save and restore any additional state the
Fragment may have.
If a task is common to all instances of the Fragment then its code
should live in the Fragment.
In particular the code to handle events can be defined within the
Fragment.
The Activity should be used to host code that processes the data
provided by the UI.
Attaching Activity event handlers to the Fragment's UI or is
difficult to do correctly.
From scenarios make decision what your app will be. Is it service,
activity, widget , even a content provider or a complex system,
including some different components. Test your decision against
scenarios.
All of these have to work after the Fragment has been destroyed and
recreated.
(1) Initialization of the Fragment, (2) Saving and restoring the Fragment's
state and (3) Implementing something like an event mechanism so the Fragment
can get the Activity's attention
The hardest part is implementing something like an event mechanism.
In the case of the complex system, distribute functionalities and
data entities among application components. Make a list of components
and what they are (activities or smth else).
Make the list of UI components with description what they do (not HOW
yet) These will be widgets and activities or fragments or layouts
later.
Often you will want one Fragment to communicate with another, for example
to change the content based on a user event. All Fragment-to-Fragment
communication is done through the associated Activity. Two Fragments
should never communicate directly.
When your app is perfectly modular, fragments don't know about each
other. You can add a fragment, remove a fragment, replace a fragment,
and they should all work fine, because they are all independent, and
the activity has full control over the configuration.
You can't do anything with a Fragment unless you start a transaction.
Within the transaction you can set up what you want to happen,
usually add the Fragment to the current layout, but nothing happens
until you use the commit method.
Efficient handling of data with Screen Orientation -
When screen orientation changes, Android restarts the running Activity (onDestroy() is called, followed by onCreate()).
To properly handle a restart, it is important that your activity restores its previous state through the normal Activity lifecycle, in which Android calls onSaveInstanceState() before it destroys your activity so that you can save data about the application state. You can then restore the state during onCreate() or onRestoreInstanceState().
However, you might encounter a situation in which restarting your application and restoring significant amounts of data can be costly and create a poor user experience. In such a situation, you have two other options:
1) Retain an object during a configuration change
Allow your activity to restart when a configuration changes, but carry a stateful Object to the new instance of your activity.
2) Handle the configuration change yourself
Prevent the system from restarting your activity during certain configuration changes, but receive a callback when the configurations do change, so that you can manually update your activity as necessary.
What I would do is manage all data flow (bluetooth, database storage, etc)
in the Activity and use Fragments only for UI display or handling user input.
This way is easier to handle configuration changes/ screen rotations.
Also, if data flow things are heavy to be on UI thread, consider using a Service with a background thread.
If it is a "one shot" thing, you can use an IntentService,
otherwise you can implement a Bind Service and request a bind from anywhere you have Context.
For more read - fragment-and-activity-working-together.

Ideally neither Activity nor Fragment with UI should contain any "model" logic - these classes should be lightweight and responsible only for UI logic. But when you decide to make a separate model object you have a dilemma to choose where to initialise and store this object and how to deal with configuration changes. And here comes some handy trick:
You can create a model Fragment without UI, make it retain instance to deal with configuration changes (it's AFAIK the simplest way to save data across config. changes without troubles) and retrieve it anywhere you need via findFragmentById(). You make all expensive operations inside it once (using background thread, of course), store your data and you're done.
For more info, see Adding a fragment without a UI section.
UPD: There's now a better way to deal with configuration changes: ViewModel from Google's Architecture Components. Here's a good example.

I prefer and always implemented Option-2 over Option-1.
Reasons for not selecting Option-1:
We should have listeners for events triggered in Fragments and pass it back to activity to load data, process it and push it back to fragment, which makes work more complex.
An Activty can load any number of Fragments, Typically you end up questioning these questions to yourself in a scenario where your app is highly scalable and is already huge. Writing all the events in an activity and passing it over to fragment will be an complex altogether.
As #Ved Prakash mentioned, Handling screen orientation becomes complex if orientation is handled by Activty.

I have an example:
your application have 2 features A and B. the 2 features are independent each other. and each feature has a lot of screen.
you should create 2 activities A and B because when Activity A is used, Activity B should be released to reduce memory of app. And the same when B is used, A should be released. The memory of Context A and B are independent, if you want to send data from Activity A to B you must use intent or use global variable in Application Context. intent is managed by OS, not by application. When A send intent to B, if A is destroy is no problem with intent send to B. Activity is App module, it is can call by other applications (fragment is impossible).
for example: feature A has a lot of screen (ex: Fragment1, Fragment2). they use the same data and depend on each other. each screen should be a fragment. and when process with data you can get reference to data by calling function getActivity() and then get reference to variable of Activity context (or Activity memory) to write or read it. Fragment1 and Fragment2 are belong to Activity A Context.it means that Fragment 1 and Fragment 2 can transfer data with each other via variable of Activity context, it is easy to do . noticed that Intent is managed by OS,it is so expensive when send data via Intent.

Android Service > Activity > Fragment with ViewPager

First, I'd to state that I've been searching for a solution for this problem for three days now, that may means either I'm not asking the right question or not using a good approach. If any, please guide me in the right direction.
This is the scenario: I've an Activity and a bound Service. The Service holds some data and processes it as necessary while posting a persistent (ongoing) notification with some information. The Activity has three Fragments inside a ViewPager that displays the data processed by the Service.
The Fragments are a List Fragment, that shows the active data entries available, a Details Fragment that displays the details for each data and a Parameters Fragment where the user can modify how the data is processed.
[Service] <-> ([Activity] -> [ViewPager([List], [Details], [Parameters])])
Everything works just fine. My Activity binds to the Service, the ViewPager is created after and then the Fragments fetch information trough an Interface.
Here comes the fun part... Screen Rotation!
As the Service binds asynchronously, when the user rotates the screen the Fragments no longer have the data because the Activity is bounding the service while they're already present and not recreated thanks to the ViewPager.
I've been trying to figure this out but it seems that I don't have the knowledge to solve it. I've tried making static references to the fragments, setting them up before the service is rebound but I can't get a stable solution.
I'd be using android:configChanges in my manifest but there are different layouts for each orientation.
Again, if I'm using a bad approach, please, guide me!

Difficult to suggest when I don't know your code but thinking out loud....
Can you have a "worker fragment" that is never displayed (i.e headless) and has setRetainInstance(true) set so it does not lose any state you have set.
Your worker fragment would bind to the service instead of the activity and maintain a reference to it.
If you need to communicate with your Activity, you can do this with callbacks.
Your other fragments could communicate with the worker instead of the Activity.
This process would basically make the activity little more than a shell into which the rest of your components are hosted. Rotation would lose nothing because all data is held in the retained fragment.

During the screen rotation process the activity is completely destroyed and use of android:congfigChange is discouraged. but what you can do is you can override saveInstanceState(bundle) method in which you can save the data present in your activity at the time it is destroyed by the system in response to the screen rotation. and later receive it as the system passes the bundle to the activities onCreate(bundle) method or get it from the restoreInstanceState(Bundle) method.

Why can't I launch activities via reference?

The Android Developer Guide states that activities are launched via Intents:
Intent intent = new Intent(this, SignInActivity.class);
startActivity(intent);
For Fragments, the usual way to display it on the screen is as follows:
ExampleFragment fragment = new ExampleFragment();
fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.fragment_container, fragment);
fragmentTransaction.commit();
Why is it that in one case I have to specify a class, and in the other an object? I.e., I would like to use something like
Activity nextActivity = new SignInActivity();
Intent intent = new Intent(this, nextActivity);
startActivity(intent);

Because Activity lifecycle is managed by Android whereas Fragment lifecycle is tied to the Activity in which it is contained.
As mentioned, Activity lifecycle is managed by Android. This is required, among other things, for Android to manage the system resources and also to take care of the back stack.
Fragment, on the other hand, was introduced to modularize and better organize the UI for devices with different sizes. According the the documentation:
Starting with HONEYCOMB, Activity implementations can make use of the
Fragment class to better modularize their code, build more
sophisticated user interfaces for larger screens, and help scale their
application between small and large screens.
To answer the latter part of your question, you can indeed pass the results of an activity to a second activity. But you should never create an instance of an Activity class for that. The right way is to use the startActivityForResult() and send the resulting value to the destination activity through the Intent.

While adding fragment, you are already specifying where exactly to insert that fragment into. So, the ideal way is to,
Create your fragment.
Insert into a layout of your current activity.
Use transactions to remove/manage your fragments, added to the current activity.
In no way, you could launch or use just a fragment, without attaching it to an existing activity.

Android handles Activity life cycle by itself. Just look at the methods of Activity class, they're just like a fill in the blanks. Android calls the shots here. Through these methods it just ask if you want to do something when this activity is created, resumed, paused etc.
The reasons for Android handling activity life cycle internally, are many:
Properly setting up an Activity involves lots of boiler plate code, better let system do it for you. The whole Context and window management is set up for you behind the scenes. Imagine the amount of extra work, if you had to do it for every Activity you created.
Activities are shared, home screen and other applications might want to launch/use them. How would be this possible if they have to call new MyActivity() of some obscure package ? . This is why Activities and other externally invokable components must be declared in application manifest.
Activities from many applications can be parts of an android task ( a piece of work from user's perspective). And are automatically placed/removed/re-arranged on a back-stack. Again, its better Android manage their creation and destruction rather than developers messing with this whole setup.
All user cares is that an Activity must show up when asked for, and just get out of the way if user navigates somewhere else. Android enforces this. Making an Activity appear on its own, or refuse to go away, just because its allowed to be programmed that way, is unacceptable.
Now Fragments , on the other hand are internal. They live inside an Activity and are not accessed from or shared with outside applications or tasks in any way. Fragments are even not a part of application manifest and hence are not exposed outside. Android need not worry about each fragment separately, because fragment life-cycle is bound to that of its parent Activity. Android doesn't care what you do with fragments internally, it can just end the activity and everything inside it is destroyed as well.

Android: launch different activities in a stack, using the same class

I have a similar issue with this one:
Android: Multiple activity instances launched by same intent. Bring one uniquely to foreground?
I need to create a stack of activities, all created by using the same class: it is a class defining a news list, only there needs to be multiple children activities that are also news lists, but from different categories. (I do need to have these activities in a stack)
The trouble is I need to change data on each of these activities after they are shown, but I can't find a way to access each one of these activities separately, since they are all using the same class, so if I used static methods, I would change the data on all these activities at the same time. Ideally, there could be a way to use references of each activity, so that I can access methods on each one separately, but I don't think there is a way of doing this.
I might as well pass parameter IDs when starting each activity, and instantiate objects at the same time, for each activity, and using these IDs later access the respective objects' methods...
Edit to clarify: Let me use an example to what I am trying to achieve. I have an A class and I am using this same class to instantiate multiple activities, in a stack. After the creation of these activities, I need to alter data, say, on one of these activities statically, so by calling A.alterData(); , but not when the activities are created, so there is no way of doing this by starting the activities with different data.. Since there are multiple instances of this class, if I do so, this will result on altering the data on all these activities, that are using the A class. Would I be able to somehow use objects and methods to these objects to alter data on different activities that are using the same class?
any other ideas?

You could use an ActivityGroup. It basically holds a list of activities and you need to control the navigation around them. It sounds like it suits your situation. There are many examples of them that can be found through google.
How I would approach changing the data on the other screens is by using shared preferences. You can store whatever data you need in there, and then (through your activity group) when you change screen, the data is refreshed. This is faster and a little more efficient than restarting the intent every time.
Another way is to change the data in the background without the user noticing. This can be done because an Activity group loads all of the Activity it holds and they are always there in the background, running, unless the developer states otherwise.
You could grab a a hold of the appropriate instance of the class you want to change the data on and then just change it.
Does any of this make sense?
I can elaborate more if needed.

I would supply the parameters to each activity, such as:
intent.putExtra("category", categoryId);
That way you aren't managing too much global state.
About changing the data - if you are talking about refreshing the data from its original source, then you should probably be doing this in the onResume() method of the Activity. Check out the Activity Lifecycle.
This has a few benefits:
you will have access to all of the context of that Activity
you won't have to do something nasty like access another Activity's data
you won't waste time refreshing data the user isn't looking at
Even if you have to make updates to the data, there are ways to make sure each Activity "minds its own business".