I have a parseobject which consists of many objects, notably an array of consisting of ParseUser pointers.
When an individual clicks a button, the array should remove a certain User.
I don't get how to do this,
I have tried:
mRideEdit.removeAll("Participant", (Collection) childuser);
Where mRideEdit is my ParseClass, Participant is the array consisting of ParseUsers, and childuser is the user I want to remove
Please help,
I've recently faced the same problem.
It originates from how the ParseObjects (including ParseUser) are saved on the server.
If you look at the console, you'll see it is actually an array of strings created from the JSONObject toString method.
The simple answer is - You're using it wrong.
There is no sense in saving objects in such a way (though it's very intuitive).
As you probably noticed - you don't receive them as objects with the getJSONArray method either and have to get them from their objectIds.
The best way to do this is using relations.
If you're set on avoiding relations, what I'd suggest is saving them as strings from the get go (objectId). That way add, addUnique and removeAll will work just fine.
Hope this helps.
Related
I have a list of comment objects inside of an object. If I want to add a comment without touching the other comments how would I do that? I have used transactions in the past for editing an integer efficiently but I don't know if I can do that with a list. The end goal is for multiple users to be a ble to add comments at the same time without cutting eachother off (overriding their edits).
Here is an example of my database:
Solved it! Super simple. Just had to add push() to the end of my DatabaseRefercence like so. It gives every comment a key.
commentRef = pollRef.child("comments").push();
commentRef.setValue(comment);
I need a little help with an issue in App Inventor 2. The case is that I have a JSON result that is parsed, and then have it stored in a tinyDB tag as a list (storeparseData).
Problem is that, I have this function done as screen initiates, so to have the tinyDB tag populated with that JSON list and then searched for a specific value on user request.
As the app is running and I input a search criteria, I get the following error "The arguments [empty-string] are the wrong number of arguments for GetValue". I suppose that, it finds nothing yet to be stored in the tinyDB tag to search for, cause the JSON data take some time to be fetched and parsed.
Here is what I have done for now for checking if the stored list is in the tinyDB:
Here I check the stored list in tinyDB for an item:
So how can I check if the tinyDB is populated in this tag with the JSON results list, so I can then have it searched? Is this possible in App Inventor 2?
Please someone advise on this issue with a sample code blocks if possible, or a similar tutorial, if there is any. Thank you all in advance for your answers.
This looks very strange... a complicated if then else structure, loads of empty sockets and your comparison if "storeparsedData" = <empty string> always will be false... obviously this does not make sense...
it looks like you are thinking too complicated?
what about this:
As already recommended in my answer to your other question you should learn how to work with lists...
how to work with lists
how to work with list of lists (pdf) by appinventor.org
see also An example of a complex List of Lists
Also doing some more tutorials might help to learn some more basics...
To answer your question "Can you explain why you've chosen to create an empty list there.": if you are working with lists as in the example and you are trying to read a list from TinyDB, then you also have to think about what should happen, if that tag is not available in TinyDB (for example after starting the app the first time). And for lists, in this case an empty list should be returned. Note: the is list empty? block always expects a list. If you set valueIfTagNotThere to an empty string, then you will get a runtime error...
You can use Clock function to delay the time. Firstly, just set the global DelayCountdown to specific number in "when Screen1.Initialize" part. Then, by using "when Clock1.Timer" function, you just need to add another check whether the DelayCountdown is equal to zero before you do another function.
The parse android documentation states this:
Objects can have relationships with other objects. To model this behavior, any ParseObject can be used as a value in other ParseObjects. Internally, the Parse framework will store the referred-to object in just one place, to maintain consistency.
What I understand by this is when I do this for put :
firstObject =new ParseObject("A");
secondObject= new ParseObject("B");
secondObject.put("A",firstObject);
According to the last line of the blockquote, this means that the object is not created in B, it simply stores a pointer in B (for A)
Now this createwithoutdata:
You can also link objects using just their objectIds like so:
// Add a relation between the Post with objectId "1zEcyElZ80" and the comment
myComment.put("parent", ParseObject.createWithoutData("Post", "1zEcyElZ80"));
This also means that a pointer is used in place of the object, right?
What is the difference between put and createwithoutdata and what are the usecases where you use each one?
EDIT:
ParseObject parseObject=new ParseObject("TestClass");
ParseObject parseObject1=new ParseObject("TestObject");
parseObject.put("ps1",ParseObject.createWithoutData("TestObject",parseObject1.getObjectId()));
parseObject.saveEventually();
In this each time a new instance is getting created...
You're not asking the right question, actually. The difference between put and createWithoutData is that they're completely different methods with totally unrelated purposes. In both cases you described, you're using the same put method. The difference is in how you're creating the ParseObject to put. In your first example, I believe when you write that to the database, it will insert the B row, then insert the A row with a pointer to the B. In the second example, you are using the ID from a Post row that is already in the database, and writing a pointer to that row into the Comment row.
I have a Fragment, and once the user presses OK, an Item is added to my database and its ID is added to the ArrayAdapter. Immediately after, the adapter tries to draw the view, but the first time it tries to get its attributes, it returns a null HashMap (it gets drawn properly the following times).
Is there a way to make sure the item is in the table before trying to get its attributes?
Even putting the attribute retrieval into a while loop until it returns a not-null HashMap doesn't work so it doesn't look to be an issue of time.
You need to do Select or GetAttributes with ConsistentRead=true as Amazon SimpleDB supports two read consistency options: eventually consistent read and consistent read. Eventually consistent read is default. For more detail please refer doc. link
Try using AsynTask.
Add item to database in doInBackground.
Read it in postExecute.
You are done.
So I have JSON, I parsed in and it's sitting there. From my code below it looks like I have put everything into an ArrayList but then what? I mean for example I need the "title" of each JSON object to be an onClick on the first page, is that possible?
Essentially my onPostExceute() is empty/not doing much. Eventually I need to separate each object into it's own page via the onlicks I'm mentioning, but I think I can do that by separating the JSONObjects...? guess I'll come to that when I can.
If I want to separate things should I even be using an ArrayList? It's just what I used for a server test I ran with different code.
Would really appreciate some help. Basically stuck at the last hurdle is how I perceive it. Maybe I'm wrong though. The logs see that the JSON is showing up as one big chunk.
Edit: Removed my code, this is more of a theory question. ListView being the best thing to go with.
yes you can make spearate arraylist for them..and can store them in diferent listviews...on google click you can open new listview showing id and link for google ..and same you can do for microsoft and your other trem.And using onItemClick is a gud option,you can easily get the index of item clicked//