i am trying to set account data
i use ids.setAccountInfo
GSObject param = new GSObject();
GSObject profile = new GSObject();
param.put("UID", user.getString("UID"));
profile.put("firstName", "FirstName");
param.put("profile", profile);
GSAPI.getInstance().sendRequest("ids.setAccountInfo", param, new GSResponseListener() {
#Override
public void onGSResponse(String s, GSResponse gsResponse, Object o) {
Log.d("ids.setAccountInfo", "----------------------------");
Log.d("ids.setAccountInfo", "s " + s);
Log.d("ids.setAccountInfo", "gsResponse " + gsResponse);
Log.d("ids.setAccountInfo", "----------------------------");
}
}, null);
and have response
errorCode:400006
errorMessage:Invalid parameter value
errorDetails:Schema validation failed
data:{"validationErrors":[{"message":"write access mode violation","fieldName":"profile.firstName","errorCode":400025}],"statusCode":400,"errorMessage":"Invalid parameter value","time":"2015-08-13T11:48:14.664Z","errorDetails":"Schema validation failed","statusReason":"Bad Request","errorCode":400006,"callId":"e0ed6aebea144323b095849ae3ed40ee"}
If I send empty profile or not send it then success
errorCode:0
errorMessage:null
errorDetails:null
data:{"statusCode":200,"errorCode":0,"time":"2015-08-13T11:53:19.738Z","callId":"e59b00cd09bf48a398586219f817930d","statusReason":"OK"}
Since the call to ids.setAccountInfo is done from a client side (presuming android SDK is used) while the profile schema for these fields write access is 'serverOnly' or 'clientCreate'. In order for this to work these fields needs to have the 'clientModify' write access.
Get the schema with ids.getSchema and look in fields write access.
It is possible to change that with a call to ids.setSchema, look in link for further details.
writeAccess - Specifies whether to allow unsigned requests to write into this field. This property applies when using the ids.getAccountInfo method, or when setting fields through the usage of a Screen-Set. The supported values are:
"serverOnly" (default) - Only signed requests coming from the server are allowed.
"clientCreate" - Unsigned requests coming from the client are allowed to write into this field, only if it wasn't set before.
"clientModify" - Unsigned requests coming from the client are allowed to write into this field and modify existing values.
Related
I have a user with UID 1 where the custom claims are set as,
frompos=true
I am setting new custom claims to this user from the ADMIN SDK for java the following way:
Map<String,Object> claims = new HashMap<>();
claims.put("frompos",false);
FirebaseAuth.getInstance().setCustomUserClaimsAsync("1", claims).get(10000,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
I print the claims on the server side to check if the claims are set:
UserRecord user = FirebaseAuth.getInstance().getUserAsync("1").get(10000,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
LOG.debug("user new claims " + user.getCustomClaims());
The result as expected is that the claims get set:
user new claims {frompos=false}
Now on the android sdk side, I have the user already logged in so I am refreshing the ID token manually to propagate the claims as the docs say
(https://firebase.google.com/docs/auth/admin/custom-claims)
FirebaseAuth.getInstance().getCurrentUser().getIdToken(true).addOnCompleteListener(new OnCompleteListener<GetTokenResult>() {
#Override
public void onComplete(#NonNull Task<GetTokenResult> task) {
if(task.isSuccessful()){
Log.d("FragmentCreate","Success refreshing token "+(FirebaseAuth.getInstance().getCurrentUser()==null));
Log.d("FragmentCreate","New token "+task.getResult().getToken());
}
}
}).addOnFailureListener(new OnFailureListener() {
#Override
public void onFailure(#NonNull Exception e) {
Log.d("FragmentCreate","Failure refreshing token "+(FirebaseAuth.getInstance().getCurrentUser()==null)+" "+e.toString());
}
});
Now I use the printed Id Token printed here and verify it on server side and print the claims from it
FirebaseToken tokenTest = FirebaseAuth.getInstance(ahmedabadRepoApp).verifyIdTokenAsync(token).get(10000,TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
LOG.debug("Token claims are "+tokenTest.getClaims());
But the claims printed here are:
{"aud":"ahmedabadrepo","auth_time":1514724115,"email_verified":false,"exp":1514730425,"iat":1514726825,"iss":"https://securetoken.google.com/ahmedabadrepo","sub":"1","frompos":true,"user_id":"1","firebase":{"identities":{},"sign_in_provider":"custom"}}
Thus the frompos value did not propagate to the client sdk even though I did refresh the Id token manually.
I was having the same issue in angular - I set the claim using the Admin SDK on the server, but then they would not be in the user on the client.
Using the following I can see the claims in the payload:
this.firebaseAuth.auth.currentUser.getIdToken().then(idToken => {
const payload = JSON.parse(this.b64DecodeUnicode(idToken.split('.')[1]))
console.log(payload);
}
)
b64DecodeUnicode(str) {
return decodeURIComponent(atob(str).replace(/(.)/g, function (m, p) {
var code = p.charCodeAt(0).toString(16).toUpperCase();
if (code.length < 2) {
code = '0' + code;
}
return '%' + code;
}));
}
Here is a good write up of this where I copied the above:
At the moment the client-side code must parse and decode the user’s ID
token to extract the claims embedded within. In the future, the
Firebase client SDKs are likely to provide a simpler API for this use
case.
Relevant info from Firebase Docs:
Custom claims can only be retrieved through the user's ID token.
Access to these claims may be necessary to modify the client UI based
on the user's role or access level. However, backend access should
always be enforced through the ID token after validating it and
parsing its claims. Custom claims should not be sent directly to the
backend, as they can't be trusted outside of the token.
Once the latest claims have propagated to a user's ID token, you can
get these claims by retrieving the ID token first and then parsing its
payload (base64 decoded):
// https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WindowBase64/Base64_encoding_and_decoding
firebase.auth().currentUser.getIdToken()
.then((idToken) => {
// Parse the ID token.
const payload = JSON.parse(b64DecodeUnicode(idToken.split('.')[1]));
// Confirm the user is an Admin.
if (!!payload['admin']) {
showAdminUI();
}
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log(error);
This might help: https://stackoverflow.com/a/38284384/9797228
firebase.auth().currentUser.getIdToken(true)
The client sdk is caching the old token (old claims).
You should add a mechanism to refresh it after changing the claims (eg. push notification) or just wait for the old token to expires or user to lougout and login again.
It's explained here https://youtu.be/3hj_r_N0qMs?t=719
Edit
You can force the sdk to refresh the token using firebase.auth().currentUser.getIdToken(true)
I want to implement a referral system in my app using branch SDK. I want to generate a short link with my static custom endpoint (https://app.link/ABC123) for each user which can be shared by other users. I can do this by setting alias on LinkProperties. But using alias with BUO.showShareSheet gives an error.
Can I use an alias with BUO.showShareSheet?
Should the Canonical identifier unique for each URL?
Is it possible to set multiple channels using LinkProperties?
Does the same URL generate every time if all arguments are same for BUO & LinkProperties?
1. Can I use an alias with BUO.showShareSheet?
You can definitely use alias with the showShareSheet method. Here is the code I used to generate and share an alias link
final BranchUniversalObject branchUniversalObject = new BranchUniversalObject()
.setCanonicalIdentifier("/1234")
.setTitle("Test for alias")
.setContentDescription("Your friend has invited you to check out my app!") .setContentImageUrl("https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Branch_Metrics_logo_color.png/1200px-Branch_Metrics_logo_color.png")
.addContentMetadata("var1", "abc")
.addContentMetadata("var2", "def");
LinkProperties linkProperties = new LinkProperties()
.setChannel("Facebook")
.setFeature("Sharing")
.setAlias("aliastest");
ShareSheetStyle ss = new ShareSheetStyle(MainActivity.this, "Check this out!", "This stuff is awesome: ")
.setCopyUrlStyle(ContextCompat.getDrawable(this, android.R.drawable.ic_menu_send), "Copy", "Added to clipboard")
.setMoreOptionStyle(ContextCompat.getDrawable(this, android.R.drawable.ic_menu_search), "Show more")
.addPreferredSharingOption(SharingHelper.SHARE_WITH.FACEBOOK)
.addPreferredSharingOption(SharingHelper.SHARE_WITH.EMAIL)
.addPreferredSharingOption(SharingHelper.SHARE_WITH.MESSAGE)
.addPreferredSharingOption(SharingHelper.SHARE_WITH.HANGOUT)
.setAsFullWidthStyle(true)
.setSharingTitle("Share With");
branchUniversalObject.showShareSheet(this, linkProperties, ss, new Branch.BranchLinkShareListener() {
#Override
public void onShareLinkDialogLaunched() {
}
#Override
public void onShareLinkDialogDismissed() {
}
#Override
public void onLinkShareResponse(String sharedLink, String sharedChannel, BranchError error) {
}
#Override
public void onChannelSelected(String channelName) {
}
});
But please note, if you try to generate a link with the same alias and different link parameters, you will receive an alias conflict error and the showShareSheet method would, in turn, give you an error.
2. Should the Canonical identifier unique for each URL?
The canonicalIdentifier or canonicalUrl parameter greatly improves the content analytics data Branch captures. Branch suggests that it should be unique to that piece of content. It, in turn, helps Branch dedupe across many instances of the same thing. Suitable options: a website with pathing, or a database with identifiers for entities.
3. Is it possible to set multiple channels using LinkProperties?
You cannot set multiple channels for a single link. The channel tag is used to signify the route that your link reaches users. Hence, there can be only one channel.
4. Does the same URL generate every time if all arguments are same for BUO & LinkProperties?
If all the BranchUniversalObject properties and link properties are exactly the same, the generateShortUrl and showShareSheet will return the same link.
I am sagar, i am trying to implement the Parse Push-Notification in android using REST API (Service), and i am almost got success in implement the Push-Notification in Xamarin-Android using REST API. But i got stuck with one part in sending the Data into REST service. I trying to pass the ParseObject in service, but the in parse table there is a need of Object,(). I have tried to pass the ParseObject as below:
JsonConvert.SerializeObject(ParseUser.CurrentUser)
It convert ParseObject into array and array is not accepted in table and ,i got failed to save it in table. because there i a need of object.
I need solution or suggestion from developer guys. Yours help will be appreciated. I am trying the below code to achieve the result.
public static void RegisterPush(string regristrationId)
{
if (regristrationId != null) {
string appID = "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
string restID = "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
string masterID = "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
try {
var client = new RestClient ("https://api.parse.com");
var request = new RestRequest ("1/installations", RestSharp.Method.POST);
request.AddHeader ("Accept", "application/json");
request.AddHeader ("X-Parse-Application-Id", appID);
request.AddHeader ("X-Parse-REST-API-Key", restID);
request.Credentials = new NetworkCredential (appID, masterID);
request.Parameters.Clear ();
Console.Error.WriteLine ("ParseUser.CurrentUser-->"+ (ParseObject) ParseUser.CurrentUser);
//JsonConvert.SerializeObject(ParseUser.CurrentUser)
string strJSONContent = "{\"user\" :"+ JsonConvert.SerializeObject(ParseUser.CurrentUser)+",\"owner\":\"" + ParseUser.CurrentUser.ObjectId + "\",\"deviceType\":\"android\",\"GCMSenderId\":\"1234567890\",\"appName\":\"abcdefgh\",\"pushType\":\"gcm\",\"deviceToken\":\"" + regristrationId + "\"}";
Console.Error.WriteLine("json string-->"+ strJSONContent);
request.AddParameter ("application/json", strJSONContent, ParameterType.RequestBody);
client.ExecuteAsync (request, response => {
Console.Error.WriteLine ("response for android parse installation-->" + response.Content);
});
} catch (Exception ex) {
Console.WriteLine (ex.Message);
}
}
}`
Output:{"user" :[{"Key":"dealOffered","Value":4},{"Key":"dealRequested","Value":5},{"Key":"displayName","Value":"Cook"},{"Key":"email","Value":"lorenzo#gmail.com"},{"Key":"firstName","Value":"Lorenzo"},{"Key":"lastName","Value":"Cook"},{"Key":"mobileNumber","Value":9999999999.0},{"Key":"picture","Value":{"IsDirty":false,"Name":"tfss-afd25c29-6679-4843-842c-fe01f7fcf976-profile.jpg","MimeType":"image/jpeg","Url":"http://files.parsetfss.com/profile.jpg"}},{"Key":"provider","Value":"password"},{"Key":"userType","Value":"Merchant"},{"Key":"username","Value":"merchant#sailfish.com"},{"Key":"zipCode","Value":2342343}],"owner":"3cF1vHUXkW","deviceType":"android","GCMSenderId":"1234567890123","appName":"Sailfish","pushType":"gcm","deviceToken":"APA91bE3bsTIInQcoloOBE4kdLVVHVTRVtNyA1A788hYSC15wAVu8mUg-lwk7ZPk370rngrK7J6OoLmiM9HRr1CGPaBo6LCNrSUL7erBku4vepaFFkQzgqS6BcAemp"}
Error:{"code":111,"error":"invalid type for key user, expected *_User, but got array"}
maven
I found the solution in , parse xamarin docs, in one query , the way is simple, but i little bit hard to found out.
The issue is with the data passing in json format in REST, to pass any pointer using REST API, use as below.
The solution is as below:
`{
"user":{
"__type":"Pointer",
"className":"_User",
"objectId":"qYvzFzGAzc"
},
"owner":"qYvzFzGAzc",
"deviceType":"android",
"GCMSenderId":"123456789",
"appName":"NiceApp",
"pushType":"gcm",
"deviceToken":"APA91bFeM10jdrCS6fHqGGSkON17UjEJEfvJEmGpRM-d6hq3hQgDxKHbyrqAIxMnEGgbLEZf0E9AllHxiQQQCdEFiNMF1_A8q0n9tGpBE5NKhvS2ZGJ9PZ7585puWqz_1Z1EjSjOvgZ1LQo708DeL2KzA7EFJmdPAA"
}`
It looks like your column user is set up wrong. It should show as a Pointer<_User> not Pointer
If you load this class in your Data Browser, is the "user" key defined as a string, or a Pointer <_User>
This error seems to indicate that this is a string column, which is why the Parse.User object is not being accepted as a valid value. You might have tried setting a string on this key before, which in turn type-locked the "user" key as a string column.
Found it on the examples given on this page - https://www.parse.com/docs/rest
Have you check your REST API connection while passing ParseObject?
Because your error says:
Error:{"code":111,"error":"invalid type for key user, expected *_User, but got array"}
Here "code":111This error code comes when server refuse for connection
I am creating new user on ejabberd server.The user gets created.
In the code below user 918 got created but no attribute were saved.
ejabberd server has access rule is : [register, [{allow,all}]]
However, the attributes that i pass along with createAccount(), do not get saved on the ejabberd server.
libraries used - asmack-android-8-4.0.7, dnsjava-2.1.7.
XMPP server - ejabberd 2.1.11
Code is
ConnectionConfiguration config = new ConnectionConfiguration("myserver.co");
config.setSecurityMode(ConnectionConfiguration.SecurityMode.disabled);
conn1 = new XMPPTCPConnection(config);
conn1.connect();
AccountManager accMan = AccountManager.getInstance(conn1);
Map<String, String> attributes = new HashMap<String, String>();
attributes.put("phone", "237");
attributes.put("misc", "123");
accMan.createAccount("918", "hellopass", attributes);
conn1.login("918", "hellopass");
accMan = AccountManager.getInstance(conn1);
Log.d(TAG, "acc IMEI " + accMan.getAccountAttribute("misc")); // null returned here
Log.d(TAG, "acc phone " + accMan.getAccountAttribute("phone")); // null returned here
The last 2 lines of code posted above, return null value.
I do not know what am i missing to correctly create account with attributes too getting saved.
thanks
Vilpesh.
Attributes are not stored on the account but on the Vcard. When you register a user, you can only pass username and password.
For the user information, you should look into setting your Vcard.
UPDATE 27th January 2013
I have now resolved this, Please check the accepted answer.
I am having trouble to get my refresh token and my access token when using the server side flow between my Android Application and my PHP server.
So I have managed to get my One Time Code by using the below:
AsyncTask<Void, Void, String> task = new AsyncTask<Void, Void, String>() {
#Override
protected String doInBackground(Void... params) {
Bundle appActivities = new Bundle();
appActivities.putString(GoogleAuthUtil.KEY_REQUEST_VISIBLE_ACTIVITIES,
"http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity");
String scopes = "oauth2:server:client_id:" + SERVER_CLIENT_ID +
":api_scope:" + SCOPE_STRING;
try {
code = GoogleAuthUtil.getToken(
OneTimeCodeActivity.this, // Context context
mPlusClient.getAccountName(), // String accountName
scopes, // String scope
appActivities // Bundle bundle
);
} catch (IOException transientEx) {
// network or server error, the call is expected to succeed if you try again later.
// Don't attempt to call again immediately - the request is likely to
// fail, you'll hit quotas or back-off.
System.out.println(transientEx.printStactTrace());
return "Error";
} catch (UserRecoverableAuthException e) {
// Recover
code = null;
System.out.println(e.printStackTrace());
OneTimeCodeActivity.this.startActivityForResult(e.getIntent(), REQUEST_AUTHORIZATION);
} catch (GoogleAuthException authEx) {
// Failure. The call is not expected to ever succeed so it should not be
// retried.
System.out.println(authEx.printStackTrace());
return "Error";
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(authEx.printStackTrace());
}
}
Which will then store the token in the variable "code" and I call up the async task as
task.execute();
The code above will always bring up a popup message and throw UserRecoverableAuthException Need Permission that requires the user to grant offline access, which means the above will need to be called twice to retrieve the code and store it in "code"
I am now trying to send this across to my server which is implemented in PHP.
I have used the quick start https://developers.google.com/+/quickstart/php and managed to get that working.
In here, there is a sample signin.php
In here and according to the documentation this already implements a One Time Authorisation Server Side Flow.
So now my problem is sending this One Time Code to the server.
I used the photohunt Android Auth example for this located here.
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-photohunt-client-android/blob/master/src/com/google/plus/samples/photohunt/auth/AuthUtil.java
I used the "authorization" method of the code and called up signin.php/connect through a post method shown below
$app->post('/connect', function (Request $request) use ($app, $client) {
$token = $app['session']->get('token');
if (empty($token)) {
// Ensure that this is no request forgery going on, and that the user
// sending us this connect request is the user that was supposed to.
if ($request->get('state') != ($app['session']->get('state'))) {
return new Response('Invalid state parameter', 401);
}
// Normally the state would be a one-time use token, however in our
// simple case, we want a user to be able to connect and disconnect
// without reloading the page. Thus, for demonstration, we don't
// implement this best practice.
//$app['session']->set('state', '');
$code = $request->getContent();
// Exchange the OAuth 2.0 authorization code for user credentials.
$client->authenticate($code);
$token = json_decode($client->getAccessToken());
// You can read the Google user ID in the ID token.
// "sub" represents the ID token subscriber which in our case
// is the user ID. This sample does not use the user ID.
$attributes = $client->verifyIdToken($token->id_token, CLIENT_ID)
->getAttributes();
$gplus_id = $attributes["payload"]["sub"];
// Store the token in the session for later use.
$app['session']->set('token', json_encode($token));
$response = 'Successfully connected with token: ' . print_r($token, true);
}
return new Response($response, 200);
});
Now when I send the code using the above implementation, I get an 500 messages that says the below
Google_AuthException Error fetching OAuth2 access token, message: 'invalid_grant'
in ../vendor/google/google-api-php-client/src/auth/Google_OAuth2.php line 115
at Google_OAuth2->authenticate(array('scope' => 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login'), '{ "token":"xxxxxxxx"}') in ../vendor/google/google-api-php-client/src/Google_Client.php line 131
at Google_Client->authenticate('{ "token":"xxxxxxx"}') in ../signin.php line 99
at {closure}(object(Request))
at call_user_func_array(object(Closure), array(object(Request))) in ../vendor/symfony/http-kernel/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/HttpKernel.php line 117
at HttpKernel->handleRaw(object(Request), '1') in ../vendor/symfony/http-kernel/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/HttpKernel.php line 61
at HttpKernel->handle(object(Request), '1', true) in ../vendor/silex/silex/src/Silex/Application.php line 504
at Application->handle(object(Request)) in ../vendor/silex/silex/src/Silex/Application.php line 481
at Application->run() in ../signin.php line 139
Funny enough I have had to worked once where I did receive a 200, but I cannot recreate it.
So I know I have definitely got the implementation wrong, but I have no clue on how to send it and get my refresh token. I can't find anywhere on the web that explains this. Is someone able to help me please.
UPDATE 16 Jan 2014
Using https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/tokeninfo?access_token= I can see that the token being produced from getToken is valid and is indeed valid for 1 hour.
I can confirm the json formation is correct by changing the way I am inputting into the Post request and if I don't do it properly I get a total failure.
Now I am going deeper into the php and look at this section Google_OAuth2.php line 115 where it is breaking it is throwing a Google_AuthException. The code is below and this is provided in the quick starter pack
/**
* #param $service
* #param string|null $code
* #throws Google_AuthException
* #return string
*/
public function authenticate($service, $code = null) {
if (!$code && isset($_GET['code'])) {
$code = $_GET['code'];
}
if ($code) {
// We got here from the redirect from a successful authorization grant, fetch the access token
$request = Google_Client::$io->makeRequest(new Google_HttpRequest(self::OAUTH2_TOKEN_URI, 'POST', array(), array(
'code' => $code,
'grant_type' => 'authorization_code',
'redirect_uri' => $this->redirectUri,
'client_id' => $this->clientId,
'client_secret' => $this->clientSecret
)));
if ($request->getResponseHttpCode() == 200) {
$this->setAccessToken($request->getResponseBody());
$this->token['created'] = time();
return $this->getAccessToken();
} else {
$response = $request->getResponseBody();
$decodedResponse = json_decode($response, true);
if ($decodedResponse != null && $decodedResponse['error']) {
$response = $decodedResponse['error'];
}
throw new Google_AuthException("Error fetching OAuth2 access token, message: '$response'", $request->getResponseHttpCode());
}
}
$authUrl = $this->createAuthUrl($service['scope']);
header('Location: ' . $authUrl);
return true;
}
I edit the code above to make sure the code, the client id and secret were correct and they were. So that is where I am now, I don't think it is scope issues as well as I hard coded it in the client setup and still does not work. Not too sure.
UPDATE 23rd January
OK, I think it is a time issue. I used https://developers.google.com/+/photohunt/android and base my design on the BaseActivity in the Photohunt using the AuthUtil, and I get invalid grant on my server. How do I move the time back on my server in code. I read somewhere I can do time() - 10 somewhere but not sure where...
It sounds like you may be sending the same authorization code multiple times. On Android GoogleAuthUtil.getToken() caches any tokens that it retrieves including authorization codes.
If you ask for a second code without invalidating the previous code, GoogleAuthUtil will return the same code. When you try to exchange a code on your server which has already been exchanged you get the invalid_grant error. My advice would be to invalidate the token immediately after you retrieve it (even if you fail to exchange the code, you are better off getting a new one than retrying with the old one).
code = GoogleAuthUtil.getToken(
OneTimeCodeActivity.this, // Context context
mPlusClient.getAccountName(), // String accountName
scopes, // String scope
appActivities // Bundle bundle
);
GoogleAuthUtil.invalidateToken(
OneTimeCodeActivity.this,
code
);
invalid_grant can be returned for other reasons, but my guess is that caching is causing your problem since you said it worked the first time.
This issue is now resolved. This was due to the implementation on the One Time Code exchange with the server
As specified in the my issue above, I used the photohunt example to do the exchange with my server. The Android code can be found on the below link
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-photohunt-client-android/blob/master/src/com/google/plus/samples/photohunt/auth/AuthUtil.java
One line 44 it reads this
byte[] postBody = String.format(ACCESS_TOKEN_JSON, sAccessToken).getBytes();
This will only work if on the server side you handle the JSON. I did not.
When calling up $client->authenticate($code); in php, $code had a JSON string and therefore when calling https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token the authorization code was wrong.
So it was easy as I was not sending the code in the right format.
I found this out when digging and testing https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token and created a manual cURL to test the token.
As provided in the Google+ API it was stated that all examples included a One Time Code exchange, but I think the code across all platform are not consistent and one has to double check themselve to make sure everything flows correctly, which was my mistake.