Develop Reference

Storing data in memory in Android application

I have a case in my Android application in which I need to perform a long running task. At the end of that task I will use that info. I have multiple activities that need to access that info and I do not need to recalculate it each time.
The simple answer is create a 'static' class that can store the info. If the info is not yet there, it can start an AsyncTask to get the info. If the info has already been obtained/calculated it can just give back the info.
However I am wondering if a service is a better pattern/idea in this case. Can I use a service in Android, have that service obtain the data and allow other activities to ask that service for the data?

However I am wondering if a service is a better pattern/idea in this case
If the task will take longer than a second or so, I recommend the use of IntentService. That way, if your app moves to the background while the work is going on (e.g., incoming phone call), Android is less likely to terminate your process, allowing you to complete your work.
If the task will take longer than 10-15 seconds, I recommend the use of a WakeLock as well, perhaps in the form of my WakefulIntentService. Otherwise, the device may fall asleep while the work is being done.
and allow other activities to ask that service for the data?
You only want a service around while it is actively delivering value to the user. Sitting around waiting for activities to ask it questions is not actively delivering value to the user. IntentService automatically destroys itself when the work is complete.
When the data is ready, use an in-process event bus (e.g., greenrobot's EventBus, Square's Otto, LocalBroadcastManager) to tell interested parties that the data is ready. If you also need to hold onto the results past that point, use an appropriate feature of the bus (e.g., sticky events with greenrobot's EventBus, the #Producer pattern with Otto), or have a separate singleton cache.

If the information is needed at different points of the Application life cycle then, then I would suggest storing it using shared preference. That would give you the option of accessing the information next time you would start the App.
However, if you would need to notify an activity of the availability of the information I would use some bus in the application. Incase you wanted to use Otto be mindful that it has been discontinued in faver of Rx. a link to Otto's github page

Performing Request After Android Service Binding

I have a two part question. Both are somewhat general.
I'm creating an app that relies heavily on communication with a server. I plan to have different classes for each repository I'll need. Is an Android service the correct pattern to use here? There may be certain situations where I'll want to cache things between activities. Will a service allow me to do this?
Assuming a service is what I want to use for this, how can I load content once the service is bound. When the user opens the app, I want to start loading content. However, binding a service isn't blocking, so I can't write the code that makes requests with the service in my onStart() right? Is there some helper class that will wait for the service to load then execute a function? I know I could put some code in my onServiceConnected() method but I'd like to stay away from coupling like that.
Hopefully that wasn't too abstract. Thanks in advance.

Yes, Service is the way to go, but a started service, not a bound one.
You could make async request methods, and the Service can broadcast the result back to your Activity.
The async request in this case is a startService(intent) with an
Intent containing the request parameters. The service would start a background thread for the operation, optimally you can use a networking library for this (for example Volley).
And the reply is a broadcast by the Service with the relevant data.
This answers the problem of caching, because the Service can decide what to return. So in case the Service does not have the requested resource, it will download (and return) it. But if the Service has the resource, then it will just simply return the cached version.
To start, you should get yourself familiar with these topics:
Started Services (for the requests)
LocalBroadcastReceiver (for the reply)
Event Bus (alternative to LocalBroadcastReceiver, for example Otto)
I don't know much about your concrete needs, but it seems like you want to implement a REST client with cache. There is a really good Google IO presentation on that here. Definately worth to watch!

1)If you need code to run even when your Activity isn't, the correct answer is a Service. If you just need to cache data, then storing it in a global static variable somewhere may be ok.
2)Your service can start a Thread or AsyncTask. These execute in parallel. onStartCommand generally launches it in this case.

As with most things, the answer to these questions are subjective at best. I would need more information then I currently have, but I'll take a vague, general stab at this...
If you need something persistently hitting your server repeatedly I would say use a service.
Where you call it is not nearly as important as how many times it needs to be called. That being said the answer is yes. If you need this data as soon as the application or activity loads, then the onCreate method is where it needs to be loaded.
My reccomendation is either A) service or B)AsyncTask.
Go with A if you have to hit the server repeatedly for data and need it in regular intervals. Otherwise go with an AsyncTask and load all the data you need into an object for storage. Then you can use it as you need and it will essentially be "cached".
The difference between the two is simply "best tool for the job". I see you use some javascript. To give a proper analogy, using a service for a server call rather than an async task, is the equivalent of using a web socket (node js) when you could of just used an ajax call. Hope this helps. Oh and PS, please don't use static variables in Android =).

Using AsyncTask to preload data for a new Activity

I have my MainActivity which gives the user a selection of pages to open, all of which involve downloading some data from the internet and displaying it. To save the user waiting when they choose their page I've made an AsyncTask as a subclass of MainActivity which produces an object DATAwhen the download is complete.
How would I pass DATA on to the SecondActivity in the following circumstances:
The user chooses the SecondActivity before the AsyncTask download has completed.
The download completes before the user chooses the SecondActivity.
the AsyncTask doesn't have to be a sub-class of MainActivity its just been tidy to do it that way so far,
thanks for the help!

Here's one way to do this:
Create a reference to your data in your Application. The Android Application is a good place to store global data. Next, populate the data via your AsyncTask (Watch out for the pitfalls of using an AsyncTask). You can now access your data via a call similar to this: ((MyApplication)getApplication).mydata
As you mentioned, two scenarios can come up. Either the data has been populated, or not. To handle this, use an observer that observes changes to the data. Have SecondActivity register as an observer when the data is null. When the data is available your SecondActivity's update method will get called and you can do whatever you please with it. Finally, make sure to unregister from being an observer.
Hope this helps.

Passing information directly between activities works only if it is Parcellable (via Intent). Almost anything could be made Parcellable but it is not always a good idea especially when the amount of data is large.
The next problem is that your AsyncTask most likely keeps the Context of your first activity alive when it is running longer than the activity lasts. Activity instances are quite often recreated when you rotate the device and naive implementations tend to start another asynctask in the new instance and end up with multiple tasks that download the same data. You would need to pass the reference of a running task between instances of the same Activity.
The simplest solution is probably to create a singleton (or a Service) accessible from both activities that hosts the AsyncTask & loads the data. If it requires a Context use getApplicationContext() since that's safe to use outside the lifetime of Activites.
Activities could register themselves as listeners for "data loaded" events while they are active.

I've recently struggled with AsyncTask and had difficulty having the UI behave while the task was running in the background. While there are comments around that services aren't really appropriate for the sort of thing you're describing, I've found them much easier to work with. You might check intentService as a middle ground. Good tut's can be found here and, specifically concerning intentService, here.

Android: Singleton which is used between Activity and Service

im wondering if it would be a bad idea to create a Singleton that is used between some Android Activities and a Android Service. As far as I know the static fields, in my case the Singleton, is available as long as the whole Process is alive.
My plan is to use a singleton instead of Parcelable to share data between my activities and a Background service. So my Activity1 will add some data by calling MySingleton.getInstance().addData(foo); then I would sent an Intent to inform my Service that new Data has been added to the singleton. Next my BackgroundService would handle the intent and call MySingleton.getInstance().getLatestData(); then it would process the data (takes some time). The result of the service would next be "post" back by using the singleton and fire a broadcast intent, which are handled by the Activity1 (if alive) and the Activity1 will retrieve the result from the singleton.
Do you guys think thats a bad idea?
EDIT:
What I want to implement is an peace of software that downloads data from a web server parse it and return the result. So my Activity would create DownloadJob Object. The DownloadJob-Object would be put into the DownloadScheduler (Singleton) which queues and manage all DownloadJobs. The DownloadScheduler would allow to run 5 DownloadJobs at the same time and use a queue to store the waiting. The effective Download would be done by the DownloadService (IntentService), which gets informed over an Intent that the a new DownloadJob should now be executed (downloaded) right now. The DowanlodService would retrieve the next job from the DownloadSchedulers queue (PriorityBlockingQueue) and return the Result by setting DownloadJob.setResult(...) and fires up an broadcast intent, that the Result is ready, which will be received by the DownloadScheduler which would remve the job from the queue and inform the Activity that the download is complete etc.
So in my scenario I would use the singleton to access the DownloadJobs from the DownloadService instead of making a DownloadJob Parcelable and pass it with the Intent. So i would avoid the problem, that I have two DownloadJobs in memory (one on the "Activity Site" and one on "Service site").
Any suggestions how to solve this better?
Is it true that static instances, like DownloadScheduler(Singleton), would be used by freed by the android system on low memory? So would subclassing the Application and hold there the reference (non static) avoid this problem?

If you are using the singleton just as shared memory between a background service which I assume is performing operations on a different thread, you may run into synchronization issues and or read inconsistent data.
If the data in the singleton is not synchronized, you have to be careful because you are relying on your "protocol" to be sure that nobody is reading while your background thread is writing (which may lead to errors).
On the other hand, if it is synchronized, you are risking to face anr error because the activity which reads the data may be blocked waiting the service to finish to write the data in the singleton.
As the other said, you also have to keep in mind that your singleton may be freed if the os needs resources, and that your data may not be there anymore.
I'd rather use an event bus such as otto or eventbus
EDIT:
Using a singleton as the entry point of background (intent) service is the approach suggested in 2010 Virgil Dobjanschi talk about building rest client applications for android.
The suggested approach is having a singleton that performs as controller of ongoing requests. Please consider also that request to intent service are already queued by the os, so you can throw several intents that will be processed sequentially by the intent service.
Some time ago I also tried take that as a starting point for a library, which still remains unfinished. YOu can find the sources here
What I would certainly not do is to store your data in the singleton. The approach I would prefer is to store the data in some persistent storage (such as sql / preferences / file / content provider) and let the client know of the change through a broadcast message (or, if you are using a content provider, through an observer).
Finally, to some extent this is the approach followed by the robospice library, which looks quite mature and ships a lot of interesting features such as caching.

A better idea is to subclass Application and put any long living objects in there. By subclassing Application you can properly handle startup and shutdown of the application something you can't easily do with a singleton. Also by using an Application Activites and Services can share access to the models within your program without resorting to parcelables. And you can avoid all of the problems Singletons bring to your program.
You also don't have to resort to storing everything in a database which requires lots of boiler plate code just to shove a bunch of data in there. It doesn't do anything for sharing behavior between parts of your application and doesn't do anything to facilitate communication and centralization of activities. If you really need to persist state between shutdowns great use it, but if not you can save yourself a lot of work.
You could also look into using something like Roboguice which makes injecting shared models into your Activities and services.
You might find this helpful:
what's design pattern principle in the Android development?

Using a singleton like this is not necessarily a bad idea, but you will lose it's state if Android decides to stop your process. You may want to consider storing your state instead in a SQLite database or a persistent queue (take a look at tape for a good example).

android design considerations: AsyncTask vs Service (IntentService?)

I'm designing an android app which will need to do the following steps:
user pushes a button or otherwise indicates to "sync data".
sync process will use REST web services to move data to and from the server.
the data will be stored locally in a sqlite database.
the sync process should provide status updates/messages to the UI
the user should not be allowed to wander off to other parts of the application and do more work during the sync process.
The first time the sync process runs, it may take 10-20 minutes.
After the initial sync, less data will be transferred and stored and
I expect the process to take 1-2 minutes or less.
I've been doing a lot of reading about android's AsyncTask and various examples of using a Service ... But I don't fully understand the design considerations and trade-offs of choosing one design over the other. I currently have my demo project stubbed out using an AsyncTask. After watching (most of) Developing Android REST client applications: http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/developing-RESTful-android-apps.html# I'm left confused the design patterns described here feel overly
complex, perhaps because I just "don't get it" yet.
I come from a java, spring, web and desktop application background. Thinking and designing in terms of a handheld device is quite new to me. (What happens when the screen layout is changed? What happens when the phone rings while I'm running a sync?) Taking 2 steps back, if the initial sync IS going to be such a long running process, is there a better way for me to think about the problem->solution, the user experience, the user expectations of an application running on a phone?
Would love to hear from some more experienced android developers out there who have already wrestled with these questions.

In my opinion this is the most tricky/hard part of a mainstream/average Android development. For instance on BlackBerry this is IN TIMES easier.
Definitely you need to use a Service.
AsyncTask does not suit, because it is tightly "bound" to your Activity via a Context handle (otherwise you would not be able to update UI of the Activity from your AsyncTask). However an Activity can be killed by OS once the Activity went in background. An example reason of going to background can be an incoming call - user switches to Phone application so your Activity becomes invisible. In this case (depending on the current RAM state) OS may decide to kill one of the background (invisible to the user) activities.
Some devs workaround this by arranging a static stuff for having a long-running actions inside of. Some recommend to use Application instance. This is because static stuff and Application exist while the whole app process exists. However those are incorrect workarounds. Processes in Android are also may be killed when OS decides it is time to. Android OS have its own considerations about what it can kill and in what order. All processes are devided to 5 levels of "killability". Here is the doc where those levels are specified. It is interesting to read there:
Because a process running a service is
ranked higher than one with background
activities, an activity that initiates
a long-running operation might do well
to start a service for that operation,
rather than simply spawn a thread —
particularly if the operation will
likely outlast the activity. Examples
of this are playing music in the
background and uploading a picture
taken by the camera to a web site.
Using a service guarantees that the
operation will have at least "service
process" priority, regardless of what
happens to the activity.
Your Activity where users initiate a long-running action should show a ProgressDialog to make sure user does not do anything else while the action is running. The guide is here.
Also, you'd most likely want to use the NotificationManager for notifying the user about your long-running action completion (or failure) if your Activity is currently invisible. Here is the NotificationManager info to start from.

There are multiple considerations that you must weigh in order to best decide how to approach your situation. It sounds like you need a good comparison between the two approaches... So here is a list of similarities, and differences and additional considerations that must be taken into account when working on a handheld device.
A Service is a part of your Application that has no UI. It may be called by a UI(Activity) to be started, or may be started by any other component of your Application. When developing, you have the freedom to place it on a different thread, or even run it in a different Task or Process. This allows you to ultimately separate it from your UI. Additionally, you may start the Service to run independently (startService) or bind your activity to it (bindService) depending upon your needs. By using custom Handlers, you can set callbacks to update the UI with your progress. A Service does not necessarily end if a User changes Activities, but may be ended at ANY time by the OS.
A AsyncTask is always instantiated from the UI thread. It only allows specific callbacks, but simplifies the process of multi-threading for the purposes of relatively short transactions (as compared to dedicated separate threaded services) that are inherently tied to actions performed by an Activity. Whenever a User changes Activities, the AsyncTask is put on "pause" and may even die because there is no UI thread for your Activity any longer.
The thing that I would be most concerned about is if the app is going to take 10-20 minutes the first time, I would ASSUME that the User will either change tasks temporarily or set the phone down until it completes (which can cause all of the same complications if the phone sleeps). Given this consideration, a threaded service bound to your activity may be your best choice. To protect your UI, I would make a Progress Dialog for your Activity that receives your progress callbacks. This limits user input in YOUR app and allows your service to continue the way that it needs to. Then override the Activity onResume to check the status of your Service and if it is running. Then you can reset the Dialog immediately.
Given that this is my preferred method, I would also take into account that the OS may kill the App at any time anyway. So make sure to have some way to detect an incomplete or partial sync. Then you may resume automatically when your Activity or Service restarts.

With AsyncTask if the user goes to another Activity you can't transfer that object to the other Activity so it dies. There are tricks you can play when say the user rotates the screen or something like that, but that doesn't extend to general purpose destruction. AsyncTask can randomly die.
Google Sync is run as a Service in the background because syncing can take a while to complete. You might need to follow their path and create your own sync service that you can communicate with. Here is some thoughts how to accomplish that:
http://mylifewithandroid.blogspot.com/2008/01/about-binders.html
You can definitely communicate between Service and Activity, but it's tricky to do it right.

The choice is mainly dependent on the app design. Since both AsyncTask and IntentService stands their ground, what you may want from the app(user experience) is more important and then choose either or both. Some scenarios are mentioned below (mostly what I experienced while developing apps)
Assume apps that have feeds pages - where more than one api calls are made to make the page presentable ( /getFriends, /getDates, /getPictures etc.) you can warp all such api calls to a single AsyncTask with executor which is multithreaded and the sequence of execution doesn't matter. In contrast to IntentService which runs all calls in sequence in a single worker thread. For a high end device with multi-core the call from AsyncTask is more effective. And if you start the AsyncTask on UI thread then updating IU is a piece of cakes(read less boiler plate code). And even if an user leaves the page, with intelligent use of not holding on to the context the app doesn't crash.
Assuming you are trying to write an app which doesn't need the user to be on view/activity/fragment and the total execution time to show something is not mission critical (assume sync service or user notification/alarm) then IntentService is a better choice. (no hassle to start Asynctask on UI thread so that you don't need to write a Handler to force changes on UI etc. etc. and less boiler plate code)
From my experience - write small app for both and compare the pros and cons to get a better idea. (p.s I'd suggest take a look at the iosched app from google to get a better idea - they use both Asynctask and IntentService)

I tend to prefer the IntentService + BroadcastReceiver combo because they give you a really strong degree of control
You definitely have to make sure the UI is running if you are updating something on the screen. ASyncTask crashes were at once reported to be one of the top causes of Android crashes. This can be avoided by keeping some sort of "activityIsAlive" variable and skipping or delaying a UI update if the activity is dead.
The IntentService + BroadcastReceiver combo is a little more resistant to the crash because most tutorials tell you to shut off the BroadcastReceiver onPause or onStop. If you do not do this, again you'll have to turn off the UI update. There's a runOnUiThread command somewhere that will help you do UI updates.
The IntentService + BroadcastReceiver combo is also more extensible. You can create functions and extend BroadcastReceiver to make a more elegant REST processing solution. However, it does require more plumbing vs an ASyncTask
If you do delay the UI update, you may be able to rig it on OnWindowFocusChangedListener. When that function receives true, it means that the UI is alive.
tldr; Make sure the Activity and/or Fragment is alive before updating the UI if you are running something in the background
2015 Edit: check out Loaders as well. A little harder to grasp because there's a lot going on behind the scenes