Develop Reference

How can I store the user number like this (1,2,3...)?

When a new user signs up, there should be a property named userNo. which should be increased by 1 in each document, so that it would be easy to pick random users from db using that userNo. Basically, like each document holds a User number similar to Uid but not like Afhghdfh4hk545, it should be like userNo.23 and so one. If a new user signs up its userNo. should be 24. Here is what I have tried.
Stream dummy =
await FirebaseFirestore.instance.collection('users').snapshots();
var doclength = await dummy.length;
var userNo = (dummy == null || dummy == 0) ? 1 : doclength;
FirebaseFirestore.instance
.collection('users')
.doc(currentUser.uid)
.update({'userNo': userNo});

Alright, you'll need a "meta document" that has a field called something like "next_user_number".
Upon creating a new user, you check the number on that field and use it as the "UserNo" for the newest user.
And after that, you increase the "next_user_number" in the "meta document" by 1. (here you want to use FieldValue increment - search for "firestore increment" for how to do it.)
But... to be absolutely sure this will work even in cases when two users are signing up at the same time or other error-prone cases, make sure you use a "batch write".
A batch write means that both operations are done together, so both incrementing the "next_user_number" and creating the new user with the right "UserNo" number are going to be accurate. (search for "firesotre batch write" to learn more).

Okay, I solved it after drinking mugs of coffee. To all of the future visitors you can get the exact length of documents in that particular collection and then use then keyword and extract the value and store it in int variable. Then you can use extractedValue.size as the userNo.

How to search in Firestore using multiple fields of documents for android?

I'm using a Firebase Firestore for android to store data. I tried to search data from documents.
My Firestore structure is:
Collection (Products) - Document (Auto Generated ID) - Field (NumberOfPeople,OfferStartDate,OfferEndDate,OfferPrice,Location)
I wrote query for search data on those fields.
CollectionReference collectionOfProducts = db.collection("Products");
collectionOfProducts
.whereEqualTo("Location", location)
.whereGreaterThanOrEqualTo("OfferPrice", offerPrice)
.whereLessThanOrEqualTo("OfferPrice", offerPrice)
.whereGreaterThanOrEqualTo("OfferStartDate", date)
.whereLessThanOrEqualTo("OfferEndDate", date)
.get()
I want search result like this: An offer which is between start date and end date, where offer price is greater than equal or less than equal on give price range. This query is not working in android studio.
How to do this in firestore firebase?

According to the official documentation regarding Cloud Firestore queries, please note that there some query limitations:
In a compound query, range (<, <=, >, >=) and not equals (!=, not-in) comparisons must all filter on the same field.
So a Query object that contains a call to both methods:
.whereGreaterThanOrEqualTo("OfferStartDate", date)
.whereLessThanOrEqualTo("OfferEndDate", date)
Is actually not possible, as "OfferStartDate" and "OfferEndDate" are different properties.
The best solution I can think of is to use only one of these method calls and do the other filtering on the client.
Another possible solution might be to use denormalization and duplicate the data
in certain intervals. In this way, you'll always know the time periods and you'll be able to create the corresponding queries.

To the best of my knowledge, Firestore only lets you use where<Greater/Less>ThanOrEqualTo() and where<Greater/Less>Than() a single field and all other filter operations on other fields can only be whereEqualTo().
Some workarounds for your specific case include -
1) Modifying your query to
collectionOfProducts
.whereGreaterThanOrEqualTo("OfferStartDate", date)
.whereEqualTo("Location", location)
.get()
And then performing the subsequent filtering on the result in your app code.
Alternately, you can perform your filter on "OfferPrice" and "Location" in your query and the remaining filters can be applied to the query result.
2) You can use firebase functions or other server code to write logic that performs customized filtering and fetch the result that way.

i was having same issue with this, but i found a work around that takes sometime to write.
lets say you want to search for a particular keyword(in this case the value of a field inside a document), and you want firebase to search multiple field instead of just looking for 1 particular field.
this is what you want to do.
const searchTerm = document.createElement('input')
db.collection('collection').where('field1', '==', `${searchTerm.value}`)
.get()
.then((snapshot) => {
if(snapshot.size === '0'){
db.collection('collection').where('field2', '==', `${searchTerm.value}`)
.get()
.then((snapshot) => {
if(snapshot.size === 0) {
db.collection......and repeat
}
})
}
})
in summary, the above code is basically telling js to search for the term again with a different field if the result of the previous query is 0. I know this solution might not be able to work if we have a large quantity of fields. But for folks out there that are working with small number fields, this solution might be able to help.
I really do hope firestore one day would allow such feature, but here is the code it worked fine for me.
the problem I have now is to allow search input to be able to search without have me to complete the word. I do currently have an idea how this would be, but just need some time to put together.

How to reference one Node value in Other Node in firebase Android [duplicate]

I've read the Firebase docs on Stucturing Data. Data storage is cheap, but the user's time is not. We should optimize for get operations, and write in multiple places.
So then I might store a list node and a list-index node, with some duplicated data between the two, at very least the list name.
I'm using ES6 and promises in my javascript app to handle the async flow, mainly of fetching a ref key from firebase after the first data push.
let addIndexPromise = new Promise( (resolve, reject) => {
let newRef = ref.child('list-index').push(newItem);
resolve( newRef.key()); // ignore reject() for brevity
});
addIndexPromise.then( key => {
ref.child('list').child(key).set(newItem);
});
How do I make sure the data stays in sync in all places, knowing my app runs only on the client?
For sanity check, I set a setTimeout in my promise and shut my browser before it resolved, and indeed my database was no longer consistent, with an extra index saved without a corresponding list.
Any advice?

Great question. I know of three approaches to this, which I'll list below.
I'll take a slightly different example for this, mostly because it allows me to use more concrete terms in the explanation.
Say we have a chat application, where we store two entities: messages and users. In the screen where we show the messages, we also show the name of the user. So to minimize the number of reads, we store the name of the user with each chat message too.
users
so:209103
name: "Frank van Puffelen"
location: "San Francisco, CA"
questionCount: 12
so:3648524
name: "legolandbridge"
location: "London, Prague, Barcelona"
questionCount: 4
messages
-Jabhsay3487
message: "How to write denormalized data in Firebase"
user: so:3648524
username: "legolandbridge"
-Jabhsay3591
message: "Great question."
user: so:209103
username: "Frank van Puffelen"
-Jabhsay3595
message: "I know of three approaches, which I'll list below."
user: so:209103
username: "Frank van Puffelen"
So we store the primary copy of the user's profile in the users node. In the message we store the uid (so:209103 and so:3648524) so that we can look up the user. But we also store the user's name in the messages, so that we don't have to look this up for each user when we want to display a list of messages.
So now what happens when I go to the Profile page on the chat service and change my name from "Frank van Puffelen" to just "puf".
Transactional update
Performing a transactional update is the one that probably pops to mind of most developers initially. We always want the username in messages to match the name in the corresponding profile.
Using multipath writes (added on 20150925)
Since Firebase 2.3 (for JavaScript) and 2.4 (for Android and iOS), you can achieve atomic updates quite easily by using a single multi-path update:
function renameUser(ref, uid, name) {
var updates = {}; // all paths to be updated and their new values
updates['users/'+uid+'/name'] = name;
var query = ref.child('messages').orderByChild('user').equalTo(uid);
query.once('value', function(snapshot) {
snapshot.forEach(function(messageSnapshot) {
updates['messages/'+messageSnapshot.key()+'/username'] = name;
})
ref.update(updates);
});
}
This will send a single update command to Firebase that updates the user's name in their profile and in each message.
Previous atomic approach
So when the user change's the name in their profile:
var ref = new Firebase('https://mychat.firebaseio.com/');
var uid = "so:209103";
var nameInProfileRef = ref.child('users').child(uid).child('name');
nameInProfileRef.transaction(function(currentName) {
return "puf";
}, function(error, committed, snapshot) {
if (error) {
console.log('Transaction failed abnormally!', error);
} else if (!committed) {
console.log('Transaction aborted by our code.');
} else {
console.log('Name updated in profile, now update it in the messages');
var query = ref.child('messages').orderByChild('user').equalTo(uid);
query.on('child_added', function(messageSnapshot) {
messageSnapshot.ref().update({ username: "puf" });
});
}
console.log("Wilma's data: ", snapshot.val());
}, false /* don't apply the change locally */);
Pretty involved and the astute reader will notice that I cheat in the handling of the messages. First cheat is that I never call off for the listener, but I also don't use a transaction.
If we want to securely do this type of operation from the client, we'd need:
security rules that ensure the names in both places match. But the rules need to allow enough flexibility for them to temporarily be different while we're changing the name. So this turns into a pretty painful two-phase commit scheme.
change all username fields for messages by so:209103 to null (some magic value)
change the name of user so:209103 to 'puf'
change the username in every message by so:209103 that is null to puf.
that query requires an and of two conditions, which Firebase queries don't support. So we'll end up with an extra property uid_plus_name (with value so:209103_puf) that we can query on.
client-side code that handles all these transitions transactionally.
This type of approach makes my head hurt. And usually that means that I'm doing something wrong. But even if it's the right approach, with a head that hurts I'm way more likely to make coding mistakes. So I prefer to look for a simpler solution.
Eventual consistency
Update (20150925): Firebase released a feature to allow atomic writes to multiple paths. This works similar to approach below, but with a single command. See the updated section above to read how this works.
The second approach depends on splitting the user action ("I want to change my name to 'puf'") from the implications of that action ("We need to update the name in profile so:209103 and in every message that has user = so:209103).
I'd handle the rename in a script that we run on a server. The main method would be something like this:
function renameUser(ref, uid, name) {
ref.child('users').child(uid).update({ name: name });
var query = ref.child('messages').orderByChild('user').equalTo(uid);
query.once('value', function(snapshot) {
snapshot.forEach(function(messageSnapshot) {
messageSnapshot.update({ username: name });
})
});
}
Once again I take a few shortcuts here, such as using once('value' (which is in general a bad idea for optimal performance with Firebase). But overall the approach is simpler, at the cost of not having all data completely updated at the same time. But eventually the messages will all be updated to match the new value.
Not caring
The third approach is the simplest of all: in many cases you don't really have to update the duplicated data at all. In the example we've used here, you could say that each message recorded the name as I used it at that time. I didn't change my name until just now, so it makes sense that older messages show the name I used at that time. This applies in many cases where the secondary data is transactional in nature. It doesn't apply everywhere of course, but where it applies "not caring" is the simplest approach of all.
Summary
While the above are just broad descriptions of how you could solve this problem and they are definitely not complete, I find that each time I need to fan out duplicate data it comes back to one of these basic approaches.

To add to Franks great reply, I implemented the eventual consistency approach with a set of Firebase Cloud Functions. The functions get triggered whenever a primary value (eg. users name) gets changed, and then propagate the changes to the denormalized fields.
It is not as fast as a transaction, but for many cases it does not need to be.

Firebase data flattening

I have a quick question about the best practices for data structure in a firebase database.
I want users of my app to be able to maintain a friends list. The firebase documentation recommends creating a schema (not sure if thats the proper word in this context) that is as flat as possible. Because of this I thought it would be a good idea to separate the friends section from the player section in the database like so:
{
"players":{
"player1id":{
"username":"john",...
},
"player2id": ...,
"player3id": ...
}
"friends": {
"player1id"{
"friends":{
"friend1Id":true,
"friend2Id":true
}
},
}
"player2id"{
"friends":{
"friend1Id":true,
"friend2Id":true
}
},
}
}
So my questions are as follows:
Is this a good design for my schema?
When pulling a friends list for one player, will the friends lists of EVERY player be pulled? and if so, can this be avoided?
Also, what would be the best way to then pull in additional information about the friends once the app has all of their IDs. e.g. getting all of their user names which will be stored as a string in their player profile.

Is this a good design for my schema?
You're already thinking in the right direction. However the "friends" node can be simplified to:
"friends": {
"player1id": {
"friend1Id":true,
"friend2Id":true
}
}
Remember that Firebase node names cannot use the character dot (.). So if your IDs are integer such as 1, 2, and 3 everything is OK, but if the IDs are username be careful (for example "super123" is OK but "super.duper" is not)
When pulling a friends list for one player, will the friends lists of EVERY player be pulled? and if so, can this be avoided?
No. If you pull /friends/1 it obviously won't pull /friends/2 etc.
Also, what would be the best way to then pull in additional information about the friends once the app has all of their IDs. e.g. getting all of their user names which will be stored as a string in their player profile.
Loop through the IDs and fetch the respective nodes from Firebase again. For example if user 1 has friends 2, 3, and 4, then using a for loop fetch /players/2, /players/3, and /players/4
Since firebase pull works asynchronously, you might need to use a counter or some other mechanism so that when the last data is pulled you can continue running the completion code.

How to do a simple search in string in Firebase database?

I want to create a simple search in my app, but cannot find anything on interwebs about it, that's more recent than 2014. There must be a better way. There are startAt and endAt functions but they don't work as expected and are case sensitive. How do you guys solve this problem? How can this functionality still not exist in 2016?

In my case I was able to partly achieve a SQL LIKE in the following way:
databaseReference.orderByChild('_searchLastName')
.startAt(queryText)
.endAt(queryText+"\uf8ff")
The character \uf8ff used in the query is a very high code point in the Unicode range (it is a Private Usage Area [PUA] code). Because it is after most regular characters in Unicode, the query matches all values that start with queryText.
In this way, searching by "Fre" I could get the records having "Fred, Freddy, Frey" as value in _searchLastName property from the database.

Create two String variables
searchInputToLower = inputText.getText().toString().toLowerCase();
searchInputTOUpper = inputText.getText().toString().toUpperCase();
Then in the Query set it to:
DatabaseReference reference = FirebaseDatabase.getInstance().getReference().child("Products");//Your firebase node you want to search inside..
FirebaseRecyclerOptions<Products> options =
new FirebaseRecyclerOptions.Builder<Products>()//the Products is a class that get and set Strings from Firebase Database.
.setQuery(reference.orderByChild("name").startAt(searchInputUpper).endAt(searchInputLower + "\uf8ff"),Products.class)
.build();
the "name" it's the node inside the Products Main Node.
the .startAt(searchInputUpper) & .endAt(searchInputLower + "\uf8ff") to make the search as contains all characters that typed in the inputText.getText() that you get.

finally I got it you can use where clause to get you result like SQL
LIKE keyword like% or %like
syntax :
Firestore.collection(collectionName).orderBy(field).where(field, ">=", keyword.toUpperCase()).where(field, "<=", keyword.toUpperCase() + "\uf8ff").get()

I my case used:
var query = 'text'
databaseReference.orderByChild('search_name')
.startAt(`%${query}%`)
.endAt(query+"\uf8ff")
.once("value")
In this way, searching by "test" I could get the records having "Test 1, Contest, One test" as value in 'search' property from the database.

Firebase is noSQL therefore it does not have searches built in like you'll find in SQL. You can either sort by values/key or you can equalto
https://firebase.google.com/docs/database/android/retrieve-data
You can find examples at the link above. That is the latest documentation for firebase.
If you are looking for SQL like searches. Then take a look at elastic search. But that will increase the complexity since you need a platform to put it on. For that i could recommend Heroku or maybe GoogleCloudServers
Here is a blog post about advanced searches with elastic search
https://firebase.googleblog.com/2014/01/queries-part-2-advanced-searches-with.html

This question might be old but there is a documented way of how to achieve this way, It is simple to implement. Quoted:
To enable full text search of your Cloud Firestore data, use a third-party search service like Algolia. Consider a note-taking app where each note is a document:
Algolia will be part of your firebase functions and will do all the searches you want.
// Update the search index every time a blog post is written.
exports.onNoteCreated = functions.firestore.document('notes/{noteId}').onCreate(event => {
// Get the note document
const note = event.data.data();
// Add an 'objectID' field which Algolia requires
note.objectID = event.params.noteId;
// Write to the algolia index
const index = client.initIndex(ALGOLIA_INDEX_NAME);
return index.saveObject(note);
});
To implement the search, the best way is to use instant search - android
Sample Search Image: GIF

The feature you're looking for is called full-text search and this is something most databases (including Firebase) don't provide out-of-the-box because it requires storing the data in a format that's optimized for text search (vs optimized for filtering) - these are two different problem sets with a different set of trade-offs.
So you would have to use a separate full-text search engine in conjunction with Firebase to be able to do this, especially if you need features like faceting, typo tolerance, merchandizing, etc.
You have a few options for a full-text search engine:
There's Algolia which is easy to get up and running but can get expensive quickly
There's ElasticSearch which has a steep learning curve but uber flexible
There's Typesense which aims to be an open source alternative to Algolia.

I don't know about the certainty of this approach but using the firebase version 10.2.6 on android, i get to do something like this:
firebaseDatabase.getReference("parent")
.orderByChild("childNode")
.startAt("[a-zA-Z0-9]*")
.endAt(searchString)
It seems to work well sometimes

Finally joined SO just to answer this.
For anyone coming here from/for the python firestore.client here's a solution that seems to work for me.
It's based on the accepted answer's concept but via the client rather than db.reference() and mixed with the answer from user12750908.
from firebase_admin import firestore
users = db.collection("users")\
.order_by("last_name")\
.where("last_name", ">=", last_name.upper())\
.where("last_name", "<=", last_name.lower() + "\uf8ff")\
.stream()
It works for the simple test I did, but I'll update my answer if I have issues with it later. And just a reminder, this is similar to
LIKE search%
and not
LIKE %search%.
Edit 1
I didn't see any tags for the question, but the title attribute mentions Android so this may not necessarily answer the question directly, but if you have a python API, this should work. I'm unfortunately not sure if there's an equivalent client/db separation in the Android version like there is in the Firebase Admin for Python. I didn't want to delete the answer since I hadn't seen any answers for firestore client during my search for a similar answer and hope it helps anyone else stumbling around.
Edit 09-03-2020 This works a portion of the time it seems. Most of the time I didn't seem to have an issue, but when I applied it to another project I was getting unexpected results. Long story short you may need to replicate how you save the data you're comparing against. For example, you may need to have a field to save the last_name in all caps and another field to save it in all lowercase, then you change the first where clause to compare last_name_upper and the second to compare last_name_lowercase. In my second project so far this seems to yield more accurate results so you may want to give that a try if the previous answer doesn't work well
EDIT 09-07-2020 Previous edit from 09-03-2020 is partially accurate. During my haste of thinking I had it fully resolved I completely forgot firebase doesn't let you use <, >, <=, >= across different fields. You may need to do two queries and merge them, but you'd probably still be reading more docs than you really intend. Doing the comparison against either the upper or lower version with the appropriate search term seems to give the original results expected from the original answer. For example:
.orderBy("last_name_upper")
.where("last_name_upper", ">=", this.searchForm.text.toUpperCase())
.where("last_name_upper", "<=", this.searchForm.text.toUpperCase() + "\uf8ff")

As firebase documentation, firebase doesn't support full text search.
But to do that you can use third-party tools.
Check this link to learn more https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/solutions/search