I'm working with mobile apps and RESTful APIs and I have some doubts about security when registering a new user. I'm developing an android client that will communicate with a backend through REST requests.
It is very clear to me about the usage and implementation of the OAuth Authorization Server and how the communication is made between the android client (frontend) and the resource server or the authorization server (backend).
Most of the documentations mention that the client_id and client_secret must be stored in the server instead of the mobile app to avoid that such data to be figured out in an eventual decompilation proccess.
If I wish to perform an activity to create a new user, directly in the app (as it is the case in apps like snapchat, pinterest and so on), how could I perform the communication of the client with the REST API without the client_id and client_secret (or any kind of credentials) in the app?
The first and easiest solution would be to redirect the user to a signup webpage, but how could it be made in the APP?
https://stackoverflow.com/a/14572051/5055317
Simple answer: no data on the .apk is safe.
There are many ways to hide your API keys inside the apk. For example, using obfuscators like ProGuard/DexGuard, using Base64 encoding or hiding these Strings with JNI. But at the end they just create some delay to obtain the keys.
The only way to keep this information safe is if it is stored in a server, and your app gets it when needed.
Here is an article by Michael Ramirez review about hide techniques: https://rammic.github.io/2015/07/28/hiding-secrets-in-android-apps/
And here a discussion about this topic with some google employees: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-places-api/SmujrL-pDpU
Related
I am creating an Android app that will be using a Django backend, along with the Django Rest Framework. I have been reading the OAuth2 documentation, but am still struggling to understand a few key points about its authentication.
These are my main questions/things I'm struggling with:
In OAuth2, I am given the oppurtunity to create 'apps'. Would the 'app' in this case be specific to my Android app (and presumably in the future I would create a different one for a potential iOS app?).
Will all users of the (Android) app be using the same token, or is each user granted an individualized token?
I am using the Volley library for Android to deal with networking. How do I go about getting the Android app to 'store' the needed credentials? Would I be storing the token, id, and secret, or just the token?
If it is worth noting, I do not plan on adding social media logins (Facebook, Google, etc) I will just have login be with a username and password.
I'm sorry if these questions seem a bit elementary, this is my first experience will authentication of any sort.
Thank you
I'll be using the word "app" to mean two different things:
app, to indicate Oauth2 app, which you'll create to register your mobile app(s)
app, to indicate mobile app.
Answer 1:
An app is basically a way of registering a client (in this case, your mobile app) with the resource server (in this case, you Django backend). You can go either ways, creating two separate apps or a single app for your Android and iOS apps. Unless you are not planning to give users of one app some more privileges or features, I don't see benefit in creating two separate apps.
Answer 2:
Each user is granted a different access token.
Answer 3:
You'll have to store client_id and client_secret in some secure way on your mobile app(s). Because that's what will help you gain an access token for a user, in first place. You'll also store access token after obtaining it, because it will be needed in making authenticated HTTP requests.
For more information on Oauth2 Protocol in general, you can read this answer, and Oauth2 Protocol RFC.
I have a simple Google App Engine backend (written in Python) for an Android client. All the backend is responsible for is accepting a key and returning a value; it is a classifier in general, implemented simply by looking up the key in a Cloud SQL table, though this specific behavior will change in the future.
The backend and client communicate via Google Cloud Endpoints. I want to restrict access to my backend's API to only accept requests incoming from my client, and am wondering if OAuth 2.0 is really the way to do this.
I don't need any contextual or extra information from the user, and as such, don't want to have user action to grant any type of authorization. All I need to do is be certain the request came from my app. I was considering simply generating a static key and hardcoding it in my client and backend, but I thought there must be a more elegant way to do this.
TL;DR: How can I restrict access to my backend only to my client/app without needing user context/input, by OAuth 2.0 or otherwise?
I don't know if the OP solved their problem but I am posting this here for others. I have wasted quite a few hours on this particular issue.
Steps :
1.Create an oAuth 2.0 client ID for your Android client.
2.Specify the Client IDs in the allowed_client_ids argument of the endpoints.api. In this case (Android), supply both its Android client ID and a web client ID in allowed_client_ids.
3.Supply the audiences argument as well in endpoints.api which is set to the web client ID.
4.Add a user check to the protected methods.
5.Redeploy the API backend.
6.Regenerate the client libraries.
I don't know whether i am asking a stupid question here.
I am just starting to learn and program android applications.
I wondered :
How is the mechanism of an application and its back-end server works?
How to have a user login and only the contents related to that user is shown?
Which is something like when we login a Facebook account, we will have access to our information only.
Had a looked at SQL server and Data store and it seems like the database is shared for everyone using the application.
Android supports client apps, AppEngine supports server apps, communication between them is HTTP(S).
Endpoints are libraries of client code generated from server projects. Endpoints perform authentication by passing client credentials to the AppEngine server. Client app developers use Endpoint libraries instead of developing networking software themselves.
One of the AppEngine services is the optional Users Service to look up information related to the client credentials. If a server app needs to implement access control, it can be programmed to accept or reject requests per request detail and per user. The application author is responsible for implementing such security.
I'm currently designing a service that will be half web app, half android app. Each user will need to be able to log in from either the android app or the web app, using an openID account. I'm hoping to target Google first for easiest integration with Android, but I'll also need some OAuth stuff later so that I can integrate with Google contacts.
The bit I'm having trouble with is how to authenticate users. The structure I've planned is that the server (probably using web.py, although that's flexible right now) serves data for the client in JSON, whether the client is the javascript browser client or the android client. However, each call needs to make sure the client is allowed access to that data.
What would be the easiest way to standardise this across the platforms?
Should I be using a session system to authenticate after logging in? Can that be made to work from an Android app? Otherwise, should I simply authenticate with google for every request?
When authenticating from the app, where should the authentication happen, through the server or straight from the app? Where should the auth token be stored in this case? (I'm assuming for a straight webapp the token should just be stored in a table in the user database?)
Sorry for the barrage of questions, but I haven't really found any resources online that clarify these issues very well.
As long as you are using HTTP, the platform doesn't matter. You can use the same form of authentication and/or sessions. The only difference would be that on Andorid you might be able to get an authentication token using the platform's AccountManager, without having to type the username and password in Google's login page.
There's a subtle difference between Authorization (OAuth) and Authentication (OpenId). Make sure you know what you are doing.
I am in the planning phase a new project. I want to be able to control multiple relays from my android powered phone over the internet. I need to use an HTTP based server as a middleman between the phone and the relays. Django is my preferred platform because Python is my strongest skill set. This would not be a "web app" (with the exception of the admin interface for managing the user and their access to the relays). Rather, the server would simply provide an API in the form of HTTPS requests and JSON encoding. Though, I should note that I have never done any web development in my life, so I don't know best practices (yet). The authentication method should meet the following criteria:
Works over HTTPS (self-signed SSL)
Provides multi-factor authentication (in the form of something you have and something you know)
Be reasonably secure (Would be very difficult to fool, guess at. or otherwise bypass)
Is simple in implementation for the server operator and end user on the mobile client
Is lightweight in in terms of both CPU cycles and bandwidth
I plan to use the following scheme to solve this:
An administrator logs into the web interface, creates a user, and sets up his/her permissions (including a username and a password chosen by the user).
The user starts the client, selects add server, and enters the server URL and his/her credentials.
The client attempts to authenticate the the user via HTTP auth
(over SSL). If the authentication was successful, the server will generate an API key in the form of a UUID and sends it to the client. The client will save this key and use it in all API calls over HTTPS. HTTP auth is only used for the initial authentication process prior to reviving a key, as a session scheme would not be nessessary for this application. Right? The client will only work if the phone is configured to automatically lock with a PIN or pattern after a short timeout. The server will only allow one key to be generated per user, unless an administrator resets the key. Hence, simple, mobile, multifactor authentication.
Is this sound from a security standpoint? Also, can anyone point me to an example of how to use the HTTP auth that is built into Django? From a Google search, I can find a lot of snipits witch hack the feature together. But, none of them implement HTTP auth in the wayit was added to Django in 1.1. The official documentation for REMOTE_AUTH can be found here, but I am having difficulty understanding the documentation as I am very new to Django.
I'm not entirely sure of how basic auth would work on Django, but I can take a shot.
The basic auth article on wikipedia covers a pretty standard usecase for logging in. For Android I've personally skipped the first part (401) and just pass my credentials in right away.
With your auth request you will have to just grab the user credentials from the request headers (WWW-Authenticate) and then do all the necessary work for that. With the credentials you can then just use the authentication framework provided in Django to verify that the user then generate their UUID (I guess).
As for basic auth on Android it's a little bit tricky at first and may leave you pulling your hair. I've found this article on Basic HTTP auth for android which helps explain how to do it.
As for the security part of it, I'm not too sure. It's pretty simple, which I'd say is a good thing :)