Develop Reference

Stop the Service on Destroy of Application

I am confused right now , about service concept of running and stopping:
what i want to do:
Start Location service at the very start of application.
Keep getting location updates and store them to shared preference
Stop the service in onDestroy of Application scope!
So far i have searched and studied we can only do following things with service(correct me if i'm wrong):
Stop the service automatically by binding it to related activities/fragments/views , when all of them destroyed service unbind itself automatically so we can call stopself method in unbind
return START_NOT_STICKY in onStartCommand to tell OS , don't recreate it , and create intent local service , after completion of some work it will destroy itself.
Stopping the service manually , by declaring it's intent in some kind of static scope and stopping the service in on onActivityDestroyed of Application class [I am not sure what will happen? , maybe service will destroy each time any activity will be destroyed ? or it will be destroyed only when overall application get's destroyed?]
Either way , i am bit confused and beat , been trying to adjust my Location service with given details for 2 days

If you start your Service using START_NOT_STICKY, then your app will kill your service once your entire application is closed from background i.e. you cleaned your app from home screen.
Here START_NOT_STICKY states that you need not recreate service in case it is been killed.
If this is not the case then you have to manually kill it by your self.
Like
Intent lintent = new Intent(context, LocationService.class);
context.stopService(lintent);
You can use this code at point where your application kills.
That's it. You are good to go with this.

First of all, launch the "LocationService" on your app start:
public class MyApp extends Application {
private static final String TAG = "MyApp";
#Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
Log.d(TAG, "App started up");
startService(new Intent(this, MyLocationService.class));
}
}
Second :
As you said, the Service should better run with the "START_NOT_STICKY" flag
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
return START_NOT_STICKY;
}
Thrid:
Once the system kills your app, the Service will automatically be killed, so no problems at all.
There is no onDestroy() method on the Application object, the only similar event is onTerminated() and it is not being launched on production devices.
onTerminate
Added in API level 1 void onTerminate () This method is for use in
emulated process environments. It will never be called on a production
Android device, where processes are removed by simply killing them; no
user code (including this callback) is executed when doing so.
More information:
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Application.html#onTerminate()
Btw, If you want the MyLocationService to send updates of the location to your app (when it is open), you should consider to use Otto or EventBus (I recommend you this last one because of the simplicity to use it). You can even configure the #Suscriber to receive updates of old retrieved locations if you want.

I will try to explain in a easiest way :)
There are two type of service
IntentService and Service
IntentService when started will kill itself once it treated the content of it onHandleIntent method
as for Service well this one will not end until you give it the command to do so even if your start it using the context of an activity. It will also stop when the application is stopped in an extreme case (by system (Settings/application/YourApp/stop app OR an app crash)

Easiest way is First of all start IntentService with AlarmManager at some repeating time (10 mintutes), then in onHandleIntent() get Location and store into preference.
No Need bind to your activity, the IntentService automatically stops itself after saved in preferences.

Yes you can stop the service in onDestroy() of the activity:
#Override
public void onDestroy(){
Log.v("SERVICE","Service killed");
service.stop();
super.onDestroy();
}

Android Service that constantly updates Activity

I have built an app for running. It runs an Activity with a timer shown in the user interface, a gps listener that collects coordinates and a lot of other things (the activity does a lot of work).
Now the request of my client is to move all the activity logic in a Service. In this way, when you start a running session, the Service would start and the notification (very simple, just with a static text) would appear. The activity should keep track of the work made in the Service (timer should go on, speed should be shown, ecc...). Tapping on the notification should bring up the activity. If the activity is closed or crashes the Service should keep going on and when you tap on the notification a new Activity should be brought up without the user noticing any difference (the timer should keep showing the right time, the average speed should comprehend the speeds relevated before the activity crash, ecc...).
I know there are a lot of ways to do that.
What I am asking is: what is the best way? Are there examples of such behavior from where to start? What are the common errors I should avoid? Are there best practices to follow?
Thank you

I developed an app with similar service behaviour. It also requires a service which collects data and some activities for showing the data.
For these kind of applications you want to keep the service alive until the user stopps it manualy but it is still possible for android that it kills the service if the device is low on memory.
For the service - activity interaction you need to bind to a service. A good documentation is available here: http://developer.android.com/guide/components/bound-services.html
Be sure to return START_STICKY in the onStartCommand function of the service. This will make sure the intent will be null when the service was restored by the system and tell android that you start and stop your service explicit.
When binding to the service from the activity you need to check if the service is ready (was not restored by the system). This can be done by adding a "ready" field inside the service that is false by default and is set to true if the onStartCommand intent is not null. Therefore you can react properly to a restored service and start the app from the beginning.
To keep the service alive with a high priority you need to call startForeground inside the service. This also requires to show a notification so the users knows a service is running in the background.

Inside service you can use local broadcastmanager.
#Override
public void onCreate() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
super.onCreate();
broadcaster = LocalBroadcastManager.getInstance(this);
}
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
handler.removeCallbacks(sendUpdatesToUI);
handler.postDelayed(sendUpdatesToUI, 1000);
return START_STICKY;
}
private Runnable sendUpdatesToUI = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
DisplayLoggingInfo(); //do watever you want to push
handler.postDelayed(this, 1000); // 10 seconds
}
};

Foreground service killed when user swypes away

As the title says I am having the following problem. My foreground service is being killed when the activity that started it is swyped away from recent tasks list.
I am starting a service with
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
startForeground(notificationID, notification);
return START_STICKY;
}
Can someone please tell me why is this happening and how can I make it so the service stays running when user swypes the activity away.
I don't have access to public void onTaskRemoved (Intent rootIntent) for some reason but I don't know what to do in that method anyway...
I am starting the service like this this and it's not a bound service
serviceIntent = new Intent(this, RecordingService.class);
startService(serviceIntent);
If little use case description helps I am trying to control sound recorder from a remote view in the notification bar so restarting a service is not an option since it should continue to record even if activity is destroyed.
BTW.I did tried starting a service in another process by android:process=":recordingProcess" and the service does continue to run then but I am suspecting this is not how you should do it.

Even i had the same issue and i had access to onTaskRemoved() function.Please check this link, "Process life cycle" topic.
Try to return from onStartCommand() START_REDELIVER_INTENT, service will get start again.

From Android Developer Reference
A service can be both started and have connections bound to it. In
such a case, the system will keep the service running as long as
either it is started or there are one or more connections to it with
the Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE flag. Once neither of these situations
hold, the service's onDestroy() method is called and the service is
effectively terminated.
How are you starting your service?

IntentService not firing

My application synchronizes data with a remote database via web service calls. I make these calls in an IntentService so they can run in the background (I call it SyncService).
The code to launch my IntentService looks like so:
Intent intent = new Intent();
intent.setClass(appContext, SyncService.class);
// place additional values in intent
intent.putExtra("data_type", SyncService.ITEM_TRACKING);
intent.putExtra("user_id", intUserId);
// call SyncService
appContext.startService(intent);
This, normally, looks great. However, one of my friends, who is also a user of my app, often tells me his data doesn't sync and get displayed on our website. His device happened to be displaying the symptoms while I was around. I plugged his device into my computer and here is what I found:
The code to launch SyncService (ie: the code above) was hit.
I had a breakpoint inside the onHandleIntent method of my IntentService and it never gets hit.
I checked his device's list of running services and SyncService was there and running. Interestingly, it had been running for about 20 minutes. I was under the impression that IntentService killed itself when it was all out of Intents to process.
I force stopped the SyncService (not the app) and, all of the sudden, onHandleIntent started getting hit over and over. It was like all the Intents were queued up somewhere on the device and were just now getting thrown at the SyncService.
Does anyone have any ideas as to what may be the problem? Do you think it's an issue with my app? With Android?
Again, I am handing a message to Android saying, "Start this IntentService or send the message to the already running IntentService." At that point, I have no control. The message never gets to the IntentService. Once I force quit the app, the messages get sent to the IntentService and it does its job.
UPDATE: I think this code is fine, but I'll put it up since a lot of you may want to see it.
Every Intent that comes in to the IntentService has an Extra denoting what "type" of call is to me made (ie: do I call this web service or that web service, etc). When an Intent comes in to the IntentService, I check the "type" and, if there is already an Intent in the queue for that type, I add an Extra to it called "skip" so, when it is reached, I don't execute the search (basically the IntentService can build up lots of Intents and it makes no sense to call this web service when this webservice was called 20 seconds ago). It basically protects the app from spamming the website.
It is important to note that none of this code is hit anyway (once the problem starts occurring). onStartCommand does not get called until the app is killed
#Override
public int onStartCommand (Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
// here be dragons
// overriding this method and adding your own code is dangerous. i've wrapped
// my code in a try/catch because it is essential that the super method be called
// every time this method is entered. any errors in my code should not prevent this
// or the app will explode.
try {
if (flags == 0 && intent != null && intent.hasExtra("data_type")) {
Integer intDataType = intent.getExtras().getInt("data_type");
if (!mCurrentTypes.containsKey(intDataType)
|| !mCurrentTypes.get(intDataType)) {
mCurrentTypes.put(intDataType, true); // put this type in the list and move on
}
else {
intent.putExtra("skip", true); // mark this Intent to be skipped
}
}
}
catch (Exception e) {
// Log.e("Error onStartCommand", "error: " + e);
}
return super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId);
}
private void processIntent(Intent intent) {
// do stuff if no "skip" Extra
mCurrentTypes.put(intDataType, false);
}

There is definitly something that keeps your service running on your friend's device. If so all subsequent call to this intent service are queued until the current one finishes. If it doesn't finish then you will get what you have : next services won't start.
You should double check that :
you give proper timeouts to nework operations
you give proper timeouts to nework connections operations
there is no race condition between threads.
you log any exception that can occur inside the service, you don't wanna loose that kind of information.
Afterwards, if you think everything is green : just log what the service does and use some bug reporting mechanism to get it automatically sent from your friends device. A simple solution could be to use bugsense or equivalent.
Next, put in place some kind of watchdog : a thread that will go on running until your service stops (you just tell your thread to stop when service is stopped). The thread will have to stop your service after some time limit has been passed.
This watchdog thread could be put inside the service itself, or outside, although this may be more complex to put in place.

This answer suggests a solution that worked for me in similar situations. It doesn't fix your current code but suggests another, perhaps simpler (and easier to debug) option:
Add a BroadcastReceiver to your calling Activity that listens for SUCCESS Intents from the IntentService.
In your calling Activity, include the logic for when to start the IntentService (and don't include it in the IntentService). The logic is:
Call startService() and set a flag in the calling Activity to CANNOT_CALL.
If the Activity's BroadcastReceiver has not received a SUCCESS broadcast from the IntentService, then startService() can not be called again.
When the Activity does receive a SUCCESS intent, set the flag to CAN_CALL, and startService() can be called when the timer hits again.
In your IntentService, write your onStartCommand() like so:
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId);
return START_STICKY;
}
In you IntentService, when you've received, parsed and stores the web service response, call sendBroadcast() with an Intent with custom action SUCCESS.
This logic is just an outline and has to be fine-tuned for error messages from the web service that have to be broadcast from IntentService to the listening Activity.
Hope this helps.

It seems to me that setting a set of flags to your Intent may solve the problem.
Intent intent = new Intent();
intent.setClass(appContext, SyncService.class);
// This way
intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_MULTIPLE_TASK|Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK|Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_EXCLUDE_FROM_RECENTS);
You can make your Service start as fresh using the above flag in a fresh task.

One more comment. It's not an answer for your question. However, it may affect overall behavior of a service.
You do following:
return super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId);
Internally Service.onStartCommand() looks like following
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
onStart(intent, startId);
return mStartCompatibility ? START_STICKY_COMPATIBILITY : START_STICKY;
}
mStartCompatibility is false if your app target SDK API 7 or later (which is most likely a case).
So, as result your service will be started as START_STICKY.
Here is piece from documentation:
For started services, there are two additional major modes of operation they can decide to run in, depending on the value they return from onStartCommand(): START_STICKY is used for services that are explicitly started and stopped as needed, while START_NOT_STICKY or START_REDELIVER_INTENT are used for services that should only remain running while processing any commands sent to them. See the linked documentation for more detail on the semantics.
Base on what you have described, I recommend to replace "return super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId);" to "return START_NOT_STICKY;"

android long running service without notification

I see this example with programs like Advance Task killer, Watch Dog, eBay, battery widgets, ect. There is a background service running that monitors device activity, a broadcastreceiver, but there is an option to disable the notification icon displayed. Currently my application works flawlessly by calling:
Context context = getApplicationContext();
Intent intent = new Intent(context, SomeBackGroundService.class);
context.startService(intent)
and then in my service I am calling:
startForeground(NOTIFICATION_ID, notification);
Now how is it that these other applications can have a long running broadcastreceiver running without a notification icon? What do I need to do in order to disable/set ect as to hide the icon and add this feature to my application?
Thanks in advance

I'm not expert on this, but I disagree with the accepted answer.
Your startForeground is key to ensuring that your service continues running.
Without that, it might keep running, but it has a much lower priority so it is much more likely to be killed by the system.

Your service is entirely independent of whether or not a notification exists for it. If you removed the line, startForeground, the service would continue to run. The only time a service stops is if you call context.stopService() or stopSelf(). Throw some logs into your service, and you'll see that it continues to run.
Override the onStartCommand to determine behavior of your service after garbage collection:
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId() {
super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId);
doWork();
return START_STICKY;
}
START_STICKY recreates your service after garbage collection. START_REDELIVER_INTENT will recreate your service after garbage collection using the original intent, use this only if you need extra intent data.

Create a notification that contains an icon made with a png and is only 1 pixel in height and width and make that pixel transparent.