Best Scope in Dagger2 for Okhttp3 with dynamic Interceptors - android

How would the scope work with Auth Tokens? I cannot create my Retrofit instance until I can add an interceptor that signs it with my auth token. Therefore, I would like to create Retrofit when the auth tokens are available (after sign-in). How do I get scope working correctly in this situation?
Thanks a lot!

There is no best way of doing this, and it might also depend on how often you change / recreate your Retrofit instances.
What's better, or which better fits your use case depends very strongly on what you are trying to accomplish and how. There's many ways how what you are trying to achieve is possible, but in general you have 2 options
Create a new client for every retrofit instance (e.g. if you just log the user in once), so you would just add the client within the same scope
Create a #Singleton instance of okhttp3 and modify the client when required by using the newBuilder()
I think the first point is self explanatory, just create your client when you create retrofit, use the same scope and be done.
The second approach uses Okhttp3 feature of the newBuilder() method, by adding your interceptor to the okhttp client when creating your retrofit instance.
It would look something like this:
// Some singleton client to maybe also use in other parts of your app
#Singleton
OkHttpClient provideClient() { return new OkHttpClient(); }
// creating your retrofit client
#UserScope
Retrofit provideRetrofit(OkHtpClient client, Interceptor userInterceptor) {
return new Retrofit.Builder()
.client(client.newBuilder() // new builder to modify okhttp3
.addNetworkInterceptor(interceptor)
.build())
/* other settings */
.build();
}
If you get creative you can also just expose a setCredentials() method on your interceptor, then you can just create them once and reuse all the objects by adding them to the #Singleton scope. You'd then change your user by accessing and modifying your interceptor, albeit this is not a clean approach in my humble opinion.

Related

Can one set the timeout in Retrofit2 on android without creating an okHttpClient?

I'm currently building a Retrofit object as follows:
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl(BASE_URL)
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create(gson))
.build();
I don't need to pass it a client, i.e. no need to deal with the internals.
Now I would like to set a timeout, but all the examples I found involve creating an okHttpClient and assigning it to the Retrofit object.
Does it mean that okHttp is the de-facto client used by the system in all the situations?
Does it mean that okHttp is the de-facto client used by the system in all the situations?
Yes. Retrofit uses OkHttp for its network I/O. For example, in the Retrofit documentation, they mention in the section on R8/Proguard:
You might also need rules for OkHttp and Okio which are dependencies of this library

Parse.com Android SDK OKHTTP interceptor

With version 1.15 of the Parse Android SDK, the previous network interceptor model was removed in favor of OKHTTP interceptors. However, I can't find any information on how to add an interceptor. Creating an interceptor class is fine, but then what do I do with it? The Parse.Configuration.Builder class, which is where that used to be done, doesn't seem to have a method to do it.
There is nowhere to directly pass in an interceptor, but Parse.Configuration.Builder has a method clientBuilder. You make a OkHttpClient.Builder however you want, for example with a HttpLoggingInterceptor, and pass it to clientBuilder.

Adding an Interceptor to an already built okHttp3 client

Is it possible to add an Interceptor to an okHttp3 client that is already built? I use a singleton client and want to add an Interceptor to an already built client so I can add a custom cookie to the client without having to manually add it to each request.
Accessing the interceptors list directly from the client returns an immutable list.
This is what the newBuilder() method is designed for:
val modifiedClient = client.newBuilder()
.addNetworkInterceptor(MyCookieInterceptor())
.build()
You can customize a shared OkHttpClient instance with newBuilder(). This builds a client that shares the same connection pool, thread pools, and configuration. Use the builder methods to configure the derived client for a specific purpose.
See the first couple paragraphs of the javadoc for more details.

Okhttp with different configuration

I am building my OkHttp in the application class and holding a static reference to it. This way, I have one instance of OkHttp at any given time.
okHttpClient = new OkHttpClient.Builder()
.cache(new Cache(context.getCacheDir(), 50 * 1024 * 1024))
.addInterceptor(new HttpInterceptor())
.build();
Now, I am making two kind of requests, one requires OAuth2 while the other require the API key and secret supplied as parameters to the request URL. I am using an interceptor for the request that requires an OAuth2.
So the problem is the latter request uses resorts to the interceptor for authentication, thus the request fails. Is there any way I can tell it "See, ignore the interceptor for this request"? Or do I need two instances of OkHttpClient?
You will need two instances since after creating single instance wit interceptor attached to it will not ignore interceptor.
A hack can be to identify the url in the interceptor and ignore interceptor operation for that request.
The cleanest solution is to have a single OkHttp instance, but in your interceptor have the logic to decide how to authenticate.
This example ServiceInterceptor.java checks each request and decides how to authenticate in a pluggable manner. You could do something similar.
There are many benefits of this approach over different clients including
reuse of the executor
possibility that the connections can be coalesced for multiple hosts e.g. www.mysvc.com and api.mysvc.com
Support for redirection across hosts

HTTP vs HTTPS requests with Retrofit

I'm working on REST API client for Android using Retrofit.
Some of the use something like this http://my.backend.com and others use https://my.backend.com. The way I found is to create two separate interfaces and build two RestAdapters with different endpoints.
But I would like to keep my interfaces consitent and I'm wondering if it is possible for example build my Res adapter with my.backend.com and specify if the methot thould use https with #HTTPS annotation ?
Thanks.
The only thing you can change on a RestAdapter after it's been built is the log level so I'm afraid the only solution is to have two RestAdapters. Two seperate interfaces should not be necessary though, as long as the path after your endpoint (my.backend.com) is the same for both the http and the https version.
You can do the following generic method which returns retrofit and keep just one interface. "baseUrl" can be either "http" or "https" urls.
public static Retrofit getRetrofit(#NotNull String baseUrl) {
return new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl(baseUrl)
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.build();
}

Categories

Resources