Android - JobScheduler or BroadcastReceiver? - android

In my Android app I need to do some work every time the user plugs their device. For this purpose right now I use a BroadcastReceiver, which starts my IntentService to do the work when the user plugs the device and stops it when the device becomes unplugged.
Right now I'm thinking of using JobScheduler for Android 5.0+, but what I'm seeing is that with JobScheduler, I would have to schedule my job within the app, by calling
JobScheduler.schedule(JobInfo);
But this is a problem to me, because I want my job to run every time the user connects their device to the charger, even without the user having to open my app.
For this reason, I think one way would be to schedule it the first time the user opens the app, and then always force reschedule, since I cannot trust on the user opening my app every day (which, due to the nature of my app, certainly won't happen).
So, should I stick with BroadcastReceiver or use JobScheduler for Android 5.0+?
And in the case of using JobScheduler, should I schedule my job only once and then always return true in order to force rescheduling?
Thank you.

So, should I stick with BroadcastReceiver or use JobScheduler for Android 5.0+?
Use JobScheduler, this can improve your app’s performance, along with aspects of system health such as battery life. Also, JobScheduler persists through device reboots and supports batch scheduling by which the android system can combine pending jobs thus reducing battery usage. Moreover, you can do distinguish between android versions thus using JobScheduler on Lollipop and up, and AlarmManager on older versions.
And in the case of using JobScheduler, should I schedule my job only once and then always return true in order to force rescheduling?
Now, there are 2 ways to do this :
As you guessed, scheduling your job only once and always returning true in jobFinished() - this should do the trick.
Upon completing a job (originally scheduled by you by calling JobScheduler.schedule(JobInfo)), you schedule another job by calling the same. This will schedule consequent jobs once each job is about to be completed.

Jobscheduler runs in the background and persists through reboots so you should be fine.

Related

Difference between Foreground Service and JobScheduler

I have an app where I use a foreground service to start a number N of threads that sleep most of the time and sometimes wake up to do some measurements.
I used foreground services because I need that these measurements must be done at specific and exact time without background limitations introduced by Android 8.0.
This seems to work and from documentation seems that there are no problem, but I read also about JobScheduler.
There is an advantage to use Jobs to schedule work at specific accurate time or my solution can be used without problems.
First a fact
In JobScheduler, the System execute your Job(Task) in application's JobService
and the JobService class also extend the same Service class that we use to define Foreground Service. So by using the both, we can execute code in background
Now the main difference is, Foreground Service is always running(by showing notification to user) and consuming the battery and memory of the user even, if your threads are sleeping and no code is executing.
As it's running always you can do whatever you want precisely at any moment of time. maybe it's good for your app's point of view but it's bad for user. your app draining the battery unnecessarily and consuming the RAM.
To address this problem we got JobScheduler. you can Schedule a job to be executed based on some criteria. Your app will only wake when the criteria is met, but it's not precise.it depends on many factors like doze mode etc.
you can look more about that here
The conclusion is
If your task is not needed to be execute at exact time then you should use JobScheduler (recently WorkManager is better as it use JobScheduler internally and more advance) to save your user's battery
and according official document
WorkManager is intended for tasks that are deferrable—that is, not
required to run immediately—and required to run reliably even if the
app exits or the device restarts.
For your use case, you will be better off using a WorkManager which according to the android documentation, uses JobScheduler on API 23+ and a combination of BroadcastManager and AlarmManager on API 14 - 22.
With a WorkManager your jobs will run reliably even if your app exits or the device restarts.
https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/workmanager

background task questions

I have been reading lately about how background jobs are done in Android (using Service, AlarmManager, JobScheduler, etc) and learned that these background task can go indefinitely even the app has already closed or device has screened off. I understand that the only they stop if they stop themselves or other components stop them.
Questions:
If I have a background job or an alarm that goes every 1 hour. Does it really runs forever until a component stop them? Is there an instance that the system will stop them?
What if I have periodic job or alarm that goes every 1 hour. Will they stop if I uninstall the app that started them? Cos I never read this part in any documentation.
Is there a way to check any running or pending background jobs/alarms in my device?
The explanation that is given about background tasks in your question only applies to Background Services, that to only in Android API Levels below 26.
Google recommends using JobScheduler or Foreground Service to do some work in background even when app is not in foreground.
Coming to you questions
No, If your using JobScheduler or Alarm manager the system will trigger your job to do your work depending on device idleness and conditions mentioned by you but the system can anytime come and stop your work in between when the conditions are no longer met.
If your are using JobScheduler it will inform you when system wants to stop by force so that you can handle it properly and reschedule if needed
When the App is uninstalled every job or alarm that is scheduled or in-Progress will be destroyed.
Yes, JobScheduler does provide a function 'getAllPendingJobs'
Note :
For works that should be scheduled or completed even when app is closed then try avoiding the use of Background Services or Alarm Managers.
JobScheduler is much more better replacement.
If you want to do some simple background work when the app is in foreground then try using HandlerThreads or AsyncTasks

Android Oreo killing background services and clears pending alarms, scheduled jobs after entering doze mode

My app has a background service running that gets users current location and update it to a server every five minutes. To run this location update process continuously, I use alarm manager to set its next execution time from the service itself. However, when I install the app in my Nokia 6 running Android 8.1 it works for some time and if I keep the phone idle for some time, my service will get killed with the next alarms by the application also being cleared from system alarm manager. My guess was that the idle time makes the phone enter doze mode. However, I don't understand why the alarm managers got cleared. To my understanding, the doze mode should open up maintenance windows periodically to execute any pending tasks.
To mitigate this issue, I tried to apply a JobScheduler service on top of AlarmManager, which runs every 15 minutes. Purpose of this jobscheduler was to re-start the service which has the alarmmanager in it, so even if it gets killed and the alarm is cleared, jobscheduler would re-up the service.
After I tested this patch and keeping it for some time to go into idle mode, it resulted in getting both JobScheduler Service and Service which has the alarm in it killed with the scheduled jobs and alarms getting cleared from the system.
It is said in the Android documentation that we can use JobScheduler to mitigate its background execution limitations. And to test this out I forced killed the two services when I tested the app, but the already scheduled job did not get cleared, and it made the service with the alarm run again successfully. I don't understand the reason for this behavior, although the Evernote guys give an explanation that could match this scenario in here Android Job by Evernote
Any ideas for this abnormal behavior?
Test Environment Details
Device : Nokia 6 (TA-1021)
OS : Android 8.1.0
You would not be able to run background services long running in Oreo as there are behaviour changes, now Oreo to optimise system memory, battery etc, it kills background service, to solve your issue you should use foreground service.
Have a look at Background execution limits https://developer.android.com/about/versions/oreo/android-8.0-changes
A suggestion from me, if you can use FCM then go for it, becasue apps like WeChat, Facebook uses it, to deliver notifications and they don't face any problem...
Hope this helps in understanding the issue....
In Doze more, the alarms do not get reset, but get deferred to a later time. You have two mainstream options here:
Use either setAndAllowWhileIdle() or setExactAndAllowWhileIdle(). However, these too can fire at the maximum frequency of 1 time per 9 minutes. So you'll have to decrease the frequency at which you get location in your app.
Use a foreground service by way of showing a foreground notification. Everyone does that (apps like Uber, Google Maps etc). That way, your service won't get killed, and be treated as though you have an app open.
I'm currently facing the same issue and doing the same workaraound like you do. That is, setting the Jobscheduler to a periodic job to launch my Foreground Service every 15 min in case it is getting killed for whatever reasons like a killed task. This works like a charm on pre Oreo Versions.
For Oreo the only solution I am awared of at the moment is, to allow the app to autostart in the settings. Under installed apps that is. Then it should work like pre Oreo again.
What Ive heard but not tested yet, is to set the setPersisted(true) option in the Job Scheduler.
Let me know if that helps
I assumed currently DOZE mode not allowed to background service so you need to find a way that DOZE mode will not affect on your app.To solve your issue you should use foreground service. or make some battery setting. Any way my better option is you should go with Firebase Cloud Messaging

Android. Is WorkManager running when app is closed?

I want to schedule nightly database updates. So I use new Android WorkManager. My understanding is that once scheduled it will always run in the background independently from the app's lifecycle.
Is that right? My first tests show that Work is only being performed when the app is running.
val locationWork = PeriodicWorkRequest.Builder(UpdateDatabaseWorker::class.java, 24, TimeUnit.HOURS)
.addTag("DATABASE_UPDATE_SERVICE")
.build()
WorkManager.getInstance().enqueue(locationWork)
Based on various issues reported on the WorkManager bugtracker, their documentation is not completely precise about the exact behavior of the WorkManager in such edge cases.
On certain devices, apps are force stopped when the app is cleared from task manager, so that part is expected. ... source
Unfortunately, some devices implement killing the app from the recents menu as a force stop. Stock Android does not do this. When an app is force stopped, it cannot execute jobs, receive alarms or broadcasts, etc. So unfortunately, it's infeasible for us to address it - the problem lies in the OS and there is no workaround. source
The only issue that we have come across is the case where some Chinese OEMs treat swipe to dismiss from Recents as a force stop. When that happens, WorkManager will reschedule all pending jobs, next time the app starts up. Given that this is a CDD violation, there is not much more that WorkManager can do given its a client library. source
To add to this, if a device manufacturer has decided to modify stock Android to force-stop the app, WorkManager will stop working (as will JobScheduler, alarms, broadcast receivers, etc.). There is no way to work around this. Some device manufacturers do this, unfortunately, so in those cases WorkManager will stop working until the next time the app is launched. source
With intense testing of a OneTimeWorkRequest (without constraints) on a Pixel 2 XL with stock android the behavior is the following:
Task manager close:
Work continues (after a bit)
Reboot device (work running):
Work continues after reboot done
App info "Force stop":
Work stops, will only continue when app is started again
Reboot device (work was "Force Stopped"):
Work does not continue until the app is started again
You can find a complete list of different OEM behaviors on dontkillmyapp.com. It seems the Android team also acknowledges this issue and added a test for this into their CTS test for Android Q. source
My understanding is that once scheduled it will always run in the
background independently from the app's lifecycle. Is that right?
Yes. Based on the documentation
The task is still guaranteed to run, even if your app is force-quit or
the device is rebooted.
WorkManager chooses the appropriate way to run your task based on factors such as the device API level and the app state. If WorkManager executes one of your tasks while the app is running, WorkManager can run your task in a new thread in your app's process. If your app is not running, WorkManager chooses an appropriate way to schedule a background task--depending on the device API level.
WorkManager might use JobScheduler, Firebase JobDispatcher, or AlarmManager depending on the API level. It will repect the Doze and conaider all other constraints before executing the Work. You can expect some delay in Doze mode since it could wait for maintenance window.
Note:
WorkManager is intended for tasks that require a guarantee that the system will run them even if the app exits, like uploading app data to a server. It is not intended for in-process background work that can safely be terminated if the app process goes away; for situations like that, we recommend using ThreadPools.
This is what documentation is saying:
Note: WorkManager is intended for tasks that require a guarantee that the system will run them even if the app exits, like uploading app data to a server. It is not intended for in-process background work that can safely be terminated if the app process goes away; for situations like that, we recommend using ThreadPools.
But there must be some condition. if that condition meet then WorkManager will run the task (this is important). Conditions like "only while device is charging and online"
Read this carefully, The WorkManager attempts to run your task at the interval you request, subject to the constraints you impose and its other requirements.
Here I found a good tutorial about how to use WorkManager for scheduling tasks : https://android.jlelse.eu/how-scheduling-work-with-new-android-jetpack-component-workmanager-852163f4825b

Android Studio - The operation of 'AlarmManager'

Recently, I'm working on an app that needs to run a Service every day at a certain time.
To do this, I use AlarmManager.
My question is: After activating the AlarmManager (from the Service), can I destroy the Service, and the AlarmManager will still call me in time?
If not, is there any way at a certain time to send me BroadcastRecerver, without running a Service all the time in OS?
Would appreciate help
The short answer to your question: service can still be started from the alarm manager anytime the alarm receiver is able to run. The long answer: usually it's good practice trying to use job schedulers though. They can both decide a better time to run, while ensuring you have the necessary resources to run successfully, such as network or high battery among other criteria.
Alarm managers are only reasonably reliable before Nougat. It's been long announced that developers should stop using it, and start using job schedulers for most use cases. They are meant to replace both the alarm setup and receiver, and allow the phone to save more battery by putting the phone in doze mode for longer and waking up and doing multiple tasks all at once.
Even if you get alarm manager working on your particular phone google makes less and less reliable with each OS release. There are very specific cases where alarms are still the way to go, but unless you're certain to be in one of these try to use job schedulers for all devices running lollipop and later. You can still use alarm manager reliably for kitkat and older, where job schedulers don't exist. More details on: https://developer.android.com/training/monitoring-device-state/doze-standby.html
In either case I think you need to listen for phone's boot so you can register your alarm/job scheduler:
https://developer.android.com/training/scheduling/alarms.html
Job scheduler info:
https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/scheduling.html
For reliability issues: Android AlarmManager not working on some devices when the app is closed

Categories

Resources