Develop Reference

Android List view row move vertical

I want to create List view row animation like below . I want to move row from one list view to other list view. Both list view are in same activity.
Anyone can give me idea how I can do this.

First of all because you mentioned "ListView":
In my opinion the best way to perform dynamic "lists" in android is to use to android-given class
RecyclerView.
It's easy to use like a normal ListView but like I said before it handles dynamic data.
Moreover it has some support librarys like ItemTouchHelper to drag/drop and swipe items in the list around. Its very easy to expand your RecyclerView with this upgrade. Here is a good tutorial:
Tutorial.
I would like to give you two ideas how I would proceed to implement such a list like the example of your post:
1) (Recommended) Search on Github or similar sites for 3rd library parties that already solved this.
2) Use the RecyclerView with the ItemtouchHelper-Upgrade i mentioned above and try to expand it with two lists. When an item is onMove() set the visibility of the first list on GONE and the second on VISIBLE. Now you only have to add the data of your item to the second list and remove it from the first. Then use notifyDataSetChanged() on both lists and your done.
I dont know how difficult it will be to implement it but thats the only way I know how you can do that and how the programmers of your example could have done it.

Access Adapter items of Recyclerview

I'm using Recyclerview to show a list. I want to delete some items like IOS. In my listview template I have added a button to delete item which is invisible by default. In my activity I have another button attached at bottom (Not part of listview) and on tap of this button I want to make all delete buttons of listview visible.
My Question is how can I get reference to all delete buttons of listview in activity and is it the right way to do this?
Thanks

Assuming you have ViewHolders set up, you already have references to all the buttons in your list. All you have to do is to make them visible for every item in the list with a simple loop.
In case you haven't implemented ViewHolders I suggest you check out the documentation and take a look at some simple tutorials on how to use them.
On a side note. If I understood correctly you're making a bottom tab for your app and since you referenced iOS I gotta say this; Remember that Android and iOS are two unique operating systems with their own ways of handling things. Check out Googles pure Android documentation.

In your question title you say RecyclerView, but in your text you say ListView. The solution is similar either way, but it's best to be perfectly clear what you're doing.
In either case, there are at least two different solutions.
First, you could use a boolean flag to determine if all the the item buttons should be showing or not. You check this flag at the time the item view is inflated or created and toggle the button accordingly. If the boolean flag is ever changed, the easiest thing to do is tell the RecyclerView/ListView that the underlying data has changed and to redraw all the views. Call notifyDatasetChanged on the adapter.
The other thing you can do at the time the item buttons should change is iterate all the visible item views, find the button, and change its visibility. With RecyclerView, you can do this, and with ListView you can do this.

How to create ExpandableStickyListHeaders Recycler view android

I want to create sticky header recycler view with ability to expand and collapse sections without on header click i have found this this library
but it uses listview and i want to use Recycler view because i want to use it as a list and Grid at the same time
did any body have made something like this
Thanks in advance

Actually yes, just finished to add this new feature, and it should be also the way you would like. Check my FlexibleAdapter project, but, you should also read my answer here: How can I set a listener inside a RecyclerView Header Decor?

RecyclerView vs. ListView

From android developer (Creating Lists and Cards):
The RecyclerView widget is a more advanced and flexible version of
ListView.
Okay, it sounds cool, but when I saw this example picture, I got really confused about the difference between these two.
The picture above can be easily created by ListView using custom adapter.
So, in what situation should one use RecyclerView?

RecyclerView was created as a ListView improvement, so yes, you can create an attached list with ListView control, but using RecyclerView is easier as it:
Reuses cells while scrolling up/down - this is possible with implementing View Holder in the ListView adapter, but it was an optional thing, while in the RecycleView it's the default way of writing adapter.
Decouples list from its container - so you can put list items easily at run time in the different containers (linearLayout, gridLayout) with setting LayoutManager.
Example:
mRecyclerView = (RecyclerView) findViewById(R.id.my_recycler_view);
mRecyclerView.setLayoutManager(new LinearLayoutManager(this));
//or
mRecyclerView.setLayoutManager(new GridLayoutManager(this, 2));
Animates common list actions - Animations are decoupled and delegated to ItemAnimator.
There is more about RecyclerView, but I think these points are the main ones.
So, to conclude, RecyclerView is a more flexible control for handling "list data" that follows patterns of delegation of concerns and leaves for itself only one task - recycling items.

For list views to have good performance you'll need to implement the holder pattern, and that's easy to mess up especially when you want to populate the list with several different kinds of views.
The RecyclerView bakes this pattern in, making it more difficult to mess up. It's also more flexible, making it easier to handle different layouts, that aren't straight linear, like a grid.

ListView is the ancestor to RecyclerView. There were many things that ListView either didn't do, or didn't do well. If you were to gather the shortcomings of the ListView and solved the problem by abstracting the problems into different domains you'd end up with something like the recycler view. Here are the main problem points with ListViews:
Didn't enforce View Reuse for same item types (look at one of the adapters that are used in a ListView, if you study the getView method you will see that nothing prevents a programmer from creating a new view for every row even if one is passed in via the convertView variable)
Didn't prevent costly findViewById uses(Even if you were recycling views as noted above it was possible for devs to be calling findViewById to update the displayed contents of child views. The main purpose of the ViewHolder pattern in ListViews was to cache the findViewById calls. However this was only available if you knew about it as it wasn't part of the platform at all)
Only supported Vertical Scrolling with Row displayed Views (Recycler view doesn't care about where views are placed and how they are moved, it's abstracted into a LayoutManager. A Recycler can therefore support the traditional ListView as shown above, as well as things like the GridView, but it isn't limited to that, it can do more, but you have to do the programming foot work to make it happen).
Animations to added/removed was not a use case that was considered. It was completely up to you to figure out how go about this (compare the RecyclerView. Adapter classes notify* method offerings v. ListViews to get an idea).
In short RecyclerView is a more flexible take on the ListView, albeit more coding may need to be done on your part.

The RecyclerView is a new ViewGroup that is prepared to render any
adapter-based view in a similar way. It is supossed to be the
successor of ListView and GridView, and it can be found in the
latest support-v7 version. The RecyclerView has been developed
with extensibility in mind, so it is possible to create any kind of
layout you can think of, but not without a little pain-in-the-ass
dose.
Answer taken from Antonio leiva
compile 'com.android.support:recyclerview-v7:27.0.0'
RecyclerView is indeed a powerful view than ListView .
For more details you can visit This page.

Following are few key points/differences between RecyclerView & ListView. Take your call wisely.
If ListView works for you, there is no reason to migrate. If you are
writing a new UI, you might be better off with RecyclerView.
RecylerView has inbuilt ViewHolder, doesn't need to implement our own
like in listView. It support notify at particular index as well
Things like animating the addition or removal of items are already
implemented in the RecyclerView without you having to do anything
We can associate a layout manager with a RecyclerView, this can be
used for getting random views in recycleview while this was limitation
in ListView In a ListView, the only type of view available is the
vertical ListView. There is no official way to even implement a
horizontal ListView. Now using a RecyclerView, we can have a
i) LinearLayoutManager - which supports both vertical and horizontal
lists, ii) StaggeredLayoutManager - which supports Pinterest like
staggered lists, iii) GridLayoutManager - which supports displaying
grids as seen in Gallery apps.
And the best thing is that we can do all these dynamically as we want.

Major advantage :
ViewHolder is not available by default in ListView. We will be creating explicitly inside the getView().
RecyclerView has inbuilt Viewholder.

Advantages of RecyclerView over listview :
Contains ViewHolder by default.
Easy animations.
Supports horizontal , grid and staggered layouts
Advantages of listView over recyclerView :
Easy to add divider.
Can use inbuilt arrayAdapter for simple plain lists
Supports Header and footer .
Supports OnItemClickListner .

I think the main and biggest difference they have is that ListView looks for the position of the item while creating or putting it, on the other hand RecyclerView looks for the type of the item. if there is another item created with the same type RecyclerView does not create it again. It asks first adapter and then asks to recycledpool, if recycled pool says "yeah I've created a type similar to it", then RecyclerView doesn't try to create same type. ListView doesn't have a this kind of pooling mechanism.

RecyclerView info
The RecyclerView was introduced with Android 5.0 (Lollipop). it is included in the Support Library. Thus, it is compatible with Android API Level 7.
Similarly to the ListView, RecyclerView’s main idea is to provide listing functionality in a performance friendly manner. The ‘Recycler’ part of this view’s name is not there by coincidence. The RecyclerView can actually recycle the items with which it’s currently working. The recycling process is done thanks to a pattern called View Holder.
Pros & Cons of RecyclerView
Pros:
integrated animations for adding, updating and removing items
enforces the recycling of views by using the ViewHolder pattern
supports both grids and lists
supports vertical and horizontal scrolling
can be used together with DiffUtil
Cons:
adds complexity
no OnItemClickListener
ListView info
The ListView has been around since the very beginning of Android. It was available even in API Level 1 and it has the same purpose as the RecyclerView.
The usage of the ListView is actually really simple. In this aspect, it’s not like its successor. The learning curve is smoother than the one for the RecyclerView. Thus, it is easier to grasp. We don’t have to deal with things like the LayoutManager, ItemAnimator or DiffUtil.
Pros & Cons of ListView
Pros:
simple usage
default adapters
available OnItemClickListener
it’s the foundation of the ExpandableListView
Cons:
doesn’t embrace the usage of the ViewHolder pattern

In addition to above differences following are few more:
RV separates view creation and binding of data to view.
In LV, you need to check if convertView is null or not for creating view, before binding data to it.
So, in case of RV, view will be created only when it is needed but in case of LV, one can miss the check for convertview and will create view everytime.
Switching between Grid and List is more easy now with LayoutManager.
No need to notify and update all items, even if only single item is changed.
One had to implement view caching in case of LV.
It is provided in RV by default. (There is difference between view caching n recycling.)
Very easy item animations in case of RV.

In my opinion RecyclerView was made to address the problem with the recycle pattern used in listviews because it was making developer's life more difficult.
All the other you could handle more or less.
For instance I use the same adapter for ListView and GridView it doesn't matter in both views the getView, getItemCount, getTypeCount is used so it's the same.
RecyclerView isn't needed if ListView with ListAdapter or GridView with grid adapters is already working for you.
If you have implemented correctly the ViewHolder pattern in your listviews then you won't see any big improvement over RecycleView.

I worked a little with RecyclerView and still prefer ListView.
Sure, both of them use ViewHolders, so this is not an advantage.
A RecyclerView is more difficult in coding.
A RecyclerView doesn't contain a header and footer, so it's a minus.
A ListView doesn't require to make a ViewHolder. In cases where you want to have a list with sections or subheaders it would be a good idea to make independent items (without a ViewHolder), it's easier and doesn't require separate classes.

You can use an interface to provide a click listener. I use this
technique with ListViews, too.
No divider: Simply add in your row a View with a width of
match_parent and a height of 1dp and give it a background color.
Simply use a StateList selector for the row background.
addHeaderView can be avoided in ListViews, too: simply put the
Header outside the View.
So, if efficiency is your concern, then yes, it's a good idea to replace a ListView with a RecyclerView.

Simple answer: You should use RecyclerView in a situation where you want to show a lot of items, and the number of them is dynamic. ListView should only be used when the number of items is always the same and is limited to the screen size.
You find it harder because you are thinking just with the Android library in mind.
Today there exists a lot of options that help you build your own adapters, making it easy to build lists and grids of dynamic items that you can pick, reorder, use animation, dividers, add footers, headers, etc, etc.
Don't get scared and give a try to RecyclerView, you can starting to love it making a list of 100 items downloaded from the web (like facebook news) in a ListView and a RecyclerView, you will see the difference in the UX (user experience) when you try to scroll, probably the test app will stop before you can even do it.
I recommend you to check this two libraries for making easy adapters:
FastAdapter by mikepenz
FlexibleAdapter by davideas

There are many differences between ListView and RecyclerView, but you should be aware of the following in particular:
The ViewHolder pattern is entirely optional in ListView, but it’s baked into RecyclerView.
ListView only supports vertical scrolling, but RecyclerView isn’t limited to vertically scrolling lists.

I want just emphasize that RecyclerView is a part of the compatibility package. It means that instead of using the feature and code from OS, every application carries own RecyclerView implementation. Potentially, a feature similar to RecyclerView can be a part of a future OS and using it from there can be beneficial. For example Harmony OS will be out soon.The compatibility package license can be changed in the future and it can be an implication. Summery of disadvantages:
licensing
a bigger foot print especially as a part of many apps
losing in efficiency if some feature coming from OS can be there
But on a good note, an implementation of some functionality, as swiping items, is coming from RecyclerView.
All said above has to be taken in a consideration.

Android - ListView with only 1 expandable item

I have a listview with tickboxes, which uses an Adapter and which works well.
And I know how to make a whole list expandable.
But, it it possible to have just a single item expandable, or does it have to be the whole list?? If so, how is it done?

You would need to use Lists of one item each. Unfortunately there is no SDK widget that handles the special case you need.

You can insert (or remove) the 'child' items in the right place within your adapter's data set when the 'parent' is clicked using a normal ListView.

You could actually use an ExpandableListView and think of the non expandable items as group item with no child.
That's the way I have done it. I have my own adapter which handles showing/hiding the indicator depending on whether the group item has children or not.