Is IntentService queue is maintained when service is killed (closed)? - android

Currently, I developing SNS application that can post comments on a article. and I want to process some network processes in background (e.g. Service, etc.). But I have some worry about that. Is it safe when user killing the application If I implement that features through IntentService?
I have planned all of 'Comment Request' stores into IntentService queue. but It takes a risk when user kill the application. (I guess Android OS have to destroys IntentService Queue)
So, I want to question about that. IntentService's intent queue is maintaining when user close (kill) the application? If not, how I handle this problem? using database or something to save IntentService queue? Absolutly, I have no idea with this.

If the user kills the application, services are safe. If they wish to go into their phones application manager and stop the service, that's entirely different, something that can't be stopped, so that's when the service would end. Your intent service will be fine. For more information: [https://developer.android.com/training/run-background-service/create-service.html]

Related

Create a Long Running service

I need to create a service that runs alongside the android app,irrespective of which screen of the app the user is on.
The app is a chat application so when the device is offline the service should queue up all the messages that are being sent offline and when the device is connected it should sync all messages.
I have written code for the job scheduler to sync data automatically when the device is online but while the app is active i would like to handle this manually.
Creating a Long Running service.
Operating system still can terminate the service in low memory and possibly other situations. There are 2 ways to overcome this:
If you are implementing the service, override onStartCommand() and return START_STICKY as the result. It will tell the system that even if it will want to kill your service due to low memory, it should re-create it as soon as memory will be back to normal.
AlarmManager .A system service, which will execute actions periodically. That will ensure that if your service will be terminated, or even the whole process will die(for example with force close) - it will be 100% restarted by AlarmManager.
Thank you.
You can do this by simple following steps:
Create Simple Service and after first launch of app just start at splash screen.
In Service after getting one data you can call another request.
After that you can create one broadcast action globally which will always call every network changed.
At background you can sync again data and saved it to shared preferences or as per your your requirement.
For interval you can also using AlarManager.
A part from this you can simply create Service using JobSheduler in this you can assign job and time as well.
Refer link :
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/job/JobScheduler.html
Hopefully this logic will helps you.
You have to use a intent service with sticky instead of service for this which will be executed in a queue and do your work. And since it is a intent service it will be started automatically after sometime, when system kills the service process.

How to make service running even after manually swiping off of recent apps?

I am trying to build a count down timer that runs in the background in a separate thread. I am using a foreground service and passing a handler to the background thread from this service. So essentially, the activity will communicate with the service and the service will communicate with the thread.
Essentially, when the user swipes the app off from the recent apps, i need the timer to keep running.
What is the best design that does this?
You will need to use a started Service and startForeground().
Check this question for details.
Also if you create service in a separate process it will solve your issue.
Here is a great tutorial
A started service can use the startForeground(int, Notification) API
to put the service in a foreground state, where the system considers
it to be something the user is actively aware of and thus not a
candidate for killing when low on memory.
Like Ivan previously said, it is a combination of startService(), binding calls and startForeground() call to keep the service running in the background. Don't really require a separate process to do this.

What is the best practice for always running networking android app?

I am implementing app that is going to be always running and connected to server.
So the tablet has nothing to do other than running this app, and checking the server all the time for updates to show on the screen.
What can be the best practice to keep the app always running and connected?
In my experience, i have 2 options to solve this problem:
Service always running and connected to my activity to keep it updated.
Keep the work in threads within the activity, since the activity will stay always on. The app will be always on.
My questions are:
What is the best practice for keeping the app running all?
What is the best practice to keep the app connected ? Threads within activity? or service connected to activity?
Is there any preferable structure for such application type?
thank you
Battery is something that i will always take into consideration especially when networking task has to be done. So analyze the point where the is absolute necessary to connect to server.
Whenever you server needs to contact the device use GCM push notification that will save your battery juice which you will spend in polling the server
Well for
Service v/s Thread
is concern the use service in which you should spawn worker threads which will perfrom the networking task
these threads will notify the main service thread when they are done for that you need to user Handlers in android
i will favor service over thread because if you close the activity network request will still be fulfilled once request is complete save it in some storage form(database/share pref/content provider) and retrieve it from them. Once you are done dont for get to destroy the service by all stopSelf a appropriate point or else the service will keep exhausting you phone resource. which will make you app a bad citizen.
A simple implementation of the about pattern i mentioned is IntentService which will automatically spawn the worker thread i.e you just have to override handleIntent method and do all the heavily lifting there which will not be on main thread. And IntentService kills it self when if finds itself doing nothings
The question which you have asked to my understanding is related to syncing with server you can find more about in from android docs
http://developer.android.com/training/building-connectivity.html
If you read the official docu from Android. The best solution is using a service for your kind of app. It's prepared to run continuosly in background. You can implement it to check the network in a transparent way and you can bind the information to another activity. Furthermore, it's more scalable if later you want to change your connection or requirements (it won't affect to your apps activities).
EDIT.
The good point is, that if someday for a reason your app is not in foreground. The service can still be running. Services are prepared for long running tasks http://developer.android.com/guide/components/services.html

Repeating IntentService using Timers- is it advisable?

I have an IntentService that downloads data from a server and I would like the IntentService to check for server updates at a certain interval. The following posts however advice against repeating a Service using a Timer - and instead emphasize on using an AlarmManager:
Why doesn't my Service work in Android? (I just want to log something ever 5 seconds)
Android - Service: Repeats only once
Android service stops
From Android's reference manual, an IntentService is described as:
IntentService is a base class for Services that handle asynchronous requests (expressed as Intents) on demand. Clients send requests through startService(Intent) calls; the service is started as needed, handles each Intent in turn using a worker thread, and stops itself when it runs out of work.
This "work queue processor" pattern is commonly used to offload tasks from an application's main thread. The IntentService class exists to simplify this pattern and take care of the mechanics. To use it, extend IntentService and implement onHandleIntent(Intent). IntentService will receive the Intents, launch a worker thread, and stop the service as appropriate.
All requests are handled on a single worker thread -- they may take as long as necessary (and will not block the application's main loop), but only one request will be processed at a time.
The part I don't really understand is why an IntentService (the posts have questions that are directed towards a Service and not an IntentService) is not allowed to execute repetitively using a Timer as it creates its own worker thread for execution. Is it permissible to use a Timer within an IntentService ? Or are AlarmManagers the only solution to periodically execute an IntentService ?
An explanation to this would be most appreciated .
Or are AlarmManagers the only solution to periodically execute an IntentService ?
If you want it to work reliably, yes. Using AlarmManager is also much more friendly to the user.
First, do not have a Service of any form running except when it is actively delivering value to the user. Watching the clock tick is not actively delivering value to the user. Having a Service running gives your process a bit higher priority than other processes, in terms of what processes get terminated to free up system RAM for future work. Having a Service around unnecessarily -- such as simply watching the clock tick -- hampers the user's ability to multitask well, as you tie up system RAM unnecessarily.
This behavior will cause some users to attack you with task killers, such as swiping your app off the recent-tasks list. This will terminate your process, and therefore your Timer goes away too. Similarly, because too many sloppy developers keep their Service around for a long time, Android will automatically terminate such processes after some time, Service notwithstanding.
Finally, usually one facet of "check for server updates at a certain interval" is that you want this work to occur even if the device goes into sleep mode. With your everlasting-service approach, that will require you to keep the CPU on all the time, using a WakeLock. This will significantly impact the user's battery, causing your app to appear on the Settings app's "battery blame screen". That, in combination with the tying-up-system-RAM "feature", will likely incite some poor ratings for your app.
Instead, by using AlarmManager:
Your IntentService only needs to be running while it is doing its work ("check the server updates"), going away in between these events, so your process can be terminated to free up system RAM for other things that the user is doing
By use of the WakefulBroadcastReceiver or WakefulIntentService patterns, you can wake up the device briefly to do this work, then let the device go back to sleep again, thereby minimizing the impact on the battery

Receiving messages in background - asynctask or service

I am writing a messenger app. When the app is started (and maybe in the future at boot time without UI), a background process should launch and receive the new messages. If a new message is received, it should show notification.
What should I use: AsyncTask or Service?
I think whatsapp uses Service.
AsyncTasks should be used for short lived tasks, like downloading file (small), processing data files, sending data to server. Services are for tasks which lifetime is a lot longer, as you say your app is all the time connected to server. So, you should use Service. You will have to maintain you own thread inside service for your networking tasks. You of course can create notifications from service.
Using service also causes that its less likely for your app to be killed by system if it is low on resources. Its good for such background app to keep notification with information that your app is working, also to make your app even less likely to be killed use foreground service (Service.startForeground() method).

Categories

Resources