I'm trying to build a signed apk (release) using proguard, but when generating the APK android studio reports several warnings related to "net.sourceforge.jtds" like this:
Warning:net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbcx.JtdsDataSource: can't find superclass or interface javax.sql.XADataSource
Warning:net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbcx.JtdsDataSource: can't find superclass or interface javax.naming.Referenceable
...
and finally ends with an error:
Error:Execution failed for task ':app:transformClassesAndResourcesWithProguardForRelease'.
java.io.IOException: Please correct the above warnings first.
do I have to configure proguard to "ignore" jtds? how ?
any help would be greatly appreciated.
The warning means that you are missing some dependent libraries. The missing classes (javax.naming.Referenceable or javax.sql.XADataSource) are present in a standard Java 7 SDK, but not in the android.jar (as you are building for android).
I am not aware if the used library (jtds) works well with Android, but in case it does you can add the following to your configuration to instruct ProGuard to ignore the warnings:
-dontwarn net.sourceforge.jtds.**
Otherwise you might need to add the missing libraries for android, e.g. jndi.
Related
I want to obfuscate my android apk file using proguard or any other method. tried many ways including :-
copy-pasting proguard.txt and proguard-optimise.txt file from sdk folder (sdk-tools-progurad) to my app module within the project directory
I have written minifyEnabled=true in gradle file of app.
After doing so facing further issue of some proguard errors giving warnings for external library class files.
Error: -Error:Execution failed for task ':app:transformClassesAndResourcesWithProguardForRelease'.
java.io.IOException: Please correct the above warnings first.
Even I am unable to generate signed apk.
It is strongly advised to investigate the warnings that ProGuard prints to the console and try to fix them. For this you will have to either include additional libraries or add -dontwarn directives to your proguard-project.txt file.
As a last resort, you can also use -ignorewarnings which will instruct ProGuard to continue regardless of any remaining warning.
I have integrated some third-party source into my android project and I'm having trouble getting it to build with proguard enabled. The build is failing with this:
Warning: there were 123 unresolved references to classes or interfaces.
You may need to add missing library jars or update their versions.
If your code works fine without the missing classes, you can suppress
the warnings with '-dontwarn' options.
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#unresolvedclass)
Warning: there were 201 unresolved references to program class members.
Your input classes appear to be inconsistent.
You may need to recompile the code.
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#unresolvedprogramclassmember)
Warning: Exception while processing task java.io.IOException: Please correct the above warnings first.
:app:transformClassesAndResourcesWithProguardForRelease FAILED
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
There are MANY notes and warnings to sort through and I can't make heads or tails of it. I have tried adding --keep class example.package.** { *; } for everything that seems to be causing warnings, but it is still failing. Can anyone suggest a strategy for dealing with issues like this? For example, if I see this:
Warning: info.guardianproject.netcipher.client.MyDefaultClientConnectionOperator: can't find superclass or interface ch.boye.httpclientandroidlib.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator
what should I do about it?
Adding the following to your proguard-file will solve the compile problem:
-dontwarn info.guardianproject.netcipher.**
That said, you should read up on any ramifications that would come with this. Proguard is usually giving warnings for a good reason.
The reason you get those warnings is that guardianproject messed up with dependencies. As you can see here NetCipher does not have any dependencies. And httpclientandroidlib is clearly an outern project. Inside Netcipher they have built the .jar library and not packaging it into their library. Unfortunately, httpclientandroidlib is not available through jcenter dependency.
There are two solutions:
Proposed by #Tommie: add
-dontwarn info.guardianproject.netcipher.**
to you proguard-rules.pro file if those dependecies are not necessary. You just get rid of warning, sometimes it is a good way. But usually does not work. Then go to step two
You need to add httpclientandroidlib manually to your project.
Download a project from github as .zip
Add new module to your project, name it httpclientandroidlib (name is arbitrary. I name it like that just for reference)
Copy folder structure ch.boye.httpclientandroidlib to new module's src folder
Replace module's AndroidManifest with the one from httpclientandroidlib library.
Add dependecy to your main aa module:
compile project(':httpclientandroidlib')
Then you can start working with the project.
When I try to generate a release version for my app I get the bellow error :
Error:Execution failed for task ':app:proguardRelease'.
java.io.IOException: Please correct the above warnings first.
Blockquote
You may need to add missing library jars or update their versions.
If your code works fine without the missing classes, you can suppress
the warnings with '-dontwarn' options.
(http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/troubleshooting.html#unresolvedclass)
How can I force Android Studio Gradle plugin to use -dontwarn option ?
This occurs because the release build is using Proguard. You will need to add Proguard rules in proguard-rules.pro for some of the dependencies you are using. Most libraries provide the Proguard rules needed; look on their README page.
The -dontwarn option isn't an option for Android Studio or the Android Gradle Plugin. It is a ProGuard option used to tell ProGuard not to warn you about potential problems.
From the ProGuard manual:
-dontwarn
Specifies not to warn about unresolved references and other important problems at all. The optional filter is a regular expression; ProGuard doesn't print warnings about classes with matching names. Ignoring warnings can be dangerous. For instance, if the unresolved classes or class members are indeed required for processing, the processed code will not function properly. Only use this option if you know what you're doing!
If you need to use this option, then it should go in your project-specific ProGuard file (see here if you don't know how to add your own ProGuard file).
I recently migrated a project from Eclipse/Ant to Android Studio/Gradle. I am able to successfully build a signed release version of the project with proguard enabled. However, while testing the release version, I'm getting crashes from certain library projects and jars (which work fine when building a debug version).
For example, when attempting to upload a file to Dropbox (a jar dependency), I get the following error:
java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: interface not implemented
at com.dropbox.client2.session.AbstractSession.sign(SourceFile:238)
at com.dropbox.client2.DropboxAPI.putFileRequest(SourceFile:2199)
at com.dropbox.client2.DropboxAPI.putFileOverwriteRequest(SourceFile:1571)
at com.dropbox.client2.DropboxAPI.putFileOverwrite(SourceFile:1537)
Also, when attempting to sign into Box (a library project dependency), I get the following error:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.http.conn.params.ConnManagerParams.setMaxTotalConnections
at com.box.restclientv2.BoxBasicRestClient.()
at com.box.boxjavalibv2.BoxRESTClient.()
at com.box.boxjavalibv2.BoxClient.createRestClient()
at com.box.boxjavalibv2.BoxClient.()
at com.box.boxandroidlibv2.BoxAndroidClient.(SourceFile:49)
at com.box.boxandroidlibv2.activities.OAuthActivity.startOAuth(SourceFile:71)
at com.box.boxandroidlibv2.activities.OAuthActivity.onCreate(SourceFile:52)
I have other jars and library projects that work just fine...
Again, there are no issues with either of these when building a gradle debug build (no proguard). I was also able to create a release build with proguard enabled using ant without any issues (able to sign into both Dropbox and Box).
Any ideas?
You appear to be including a version of the org.apache.http library. In principle, this library is already part of the Android runtime android.jar, so you shouldn't add it to your project. ProGuard is probably printing warnings about these duplicate classes.
In practice, it may be a newer version of the library, and some of your code may be using additional classes from this version. You then probably should leave the names of the classes, fields, and methods untouched, to avoid introducing (additional) conflicts:
-keep class org.apache.http.** { *; }
A build process may filter out the classes, or it may be adding the above line, but I don't think the default Android builds currently do either.
You need to -keep Proguard from removing or renaming all the class and method names that it can't determine are referenced from code that it doesn't processes, that are referenced via reflection (e.g. XML references), etc.
Keeping all apache classes may keep more than necessary (which is OK) but it may not be enough to fix all the Proguard issues.
It's good to ask why it worked from your ant build without this -keep. Maybe the ant build didn't actually call Proguard (ant is tricky), maybe it used a different Proguard data file, or maybe the relevant libraries changed in the meantime. You can debug that by listing hypotheses and testing them. E.g. if you put a malformed command in the Proguard data file then run the ant build, you can tell whether it actually runs Proguard or not.
After updating to ADT 20 I can no longer successfully export any of my Android projects. I get:
Proguard returned with error code 1. See console
In the console I get tons of the can't find referenced class warnings and occasionally the can't find superclass or interface warning. At the end of the warnings I get something like this:
You should check if you need to specify additional program jars.
Warning: there were 199 unresolved references to classes or interfaces.
You may need to specify additional library jars (using '-libraryjars').
java.io.IOException: Please correct the above warnings first.
at proguard.Initializer.execute(Initializer.java:321)
at proguard.ProGuard.initialize(ProGuard.java:211)
at proguard.ProGuard.execute(ProGuard.java:86)
at proguard.ProGuard.main(ProGuard.java:492)
Each time I attempt to build I get different numbers of warnings (it's not very consistent). Also, when I perform a clean before export, the export completes without producing any warnings, but the resulting APK crashes on launch often due to ClassNotFoundException.
My proguard-project.txt includes the necessary -keep class rules for the Android Support Library and ActionBarSherlock.
I had no problems building this project before ADT 20. I even tried building my last release (which obviously built fine when I released it), but I get the same proguard warnings and failed export.
I've tried adding -libraryjars and/or -dontwarn rules as many other SO questions suggest, but to no avail. It will sometimes build successfully, but the APK created crashes on launch.
Any suggestions?
There is a bug in AAPT where it will only process
<fragment android:name"..." />
but not
<fragment class="..." />
We'll fix AAPT but in the meantime you can use the other attribute and it'll work.
In ADT 20, we use a feature of aapt (see the -G flag) which can create a proguard file which contains keep rules for exactly the custom views used by your code.
The old proguard config files would keep all views. When you used a library project such as the compatibility library, where you might be using only a small subset of the available code, this could end up including a lot of stuff you don't need. By removing the generic keep rules, and adding a new keep file based on your application, your .apks would get smaller since a lot of unused stuff can be removed.
One area where this can go wrong is if you update to Tools 20 (so you have the new smaller proguard-android.txt file), and you continue to use ADT 18. Make sure to use ADT 20, since it will add in not just the proguard files specified in your project.properties setting, but the generated proguard file listing the keep files from aapt -G as well. I believe the ant build will also use the -G feature.
(Note - see http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=35107 for any followups on this)
Reportedly, there are problems with a recent update of the Eclipse plugin in the ADT, which doesn't properly recompile all source code. In that case, ProGuard will print out warnings about your program classes (as opposed to the library classes). You should check if the export (and the resulting application) works without ProGuard. You should also check if the Ant build works ("ant release"). That could then be a workaround.