I am getting this error while compiling PAC ROM.. I found printf error was discussed before and adviced to include . but this doesn't seems to work for uiPrintf.
This the exact line:
device/cyanogen/msm8916-common/recovery/recovery_updated.c:171.9: error: implicit declaration of function 'uiprintf'
Pls help..
Implicit declaration means using a function without declaring it before. Generally it used to give a warning for other cm based rom but pac makes this strict.
For your info,
uiprintf function's definition is in path "bootable/recovery/updater/install.h", and the datatypes used in the function are in updater.h. You may manually add the definitions but it will give an error after long time(almost at end) about redeclaration of uiprintf function.
To get along with this error just comment out that line in recovery-updater.c. It will not hurt anything (It's just for recovery ui printing).
Related
I am trying to build an android application with OF. The application runs in two other computers. However, it does not work on mine. I am using a mac.
I run the command "make AndroidDebug" in the project folder, and this is the error I have:
/Library/openFrameworks/addons/ofxHTTP/libs/ofxHTTP/src/PostRouteFileHandler.cpp:98:46: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'class Poco::Path'
ss << Poco::Path(formFileName).getExtension();
I have installed poco, but nothing changes afterwards.
What can I do to solve this?
Thanks
Have you included Poco/Path.h?
A forward declaration might appeared earlier (possibly in another header) without complete definition.
I hit this error and found no hits for the error message, so I thought I'd share the solution I came up with to save anyone else facing the problem repeating my work.
When writing a new Android library (apklib) for use in a (large) application, I'm getting the following error during dexing when I add my new project as a dependency:
trouble writing output: Too many field references: 70185; max is 65536.
You may try using --multi-dex option.
References by package:
<...long list of packages with field counts elided...>
The particular build step it fails on is:
java -jar $ANDROID_SDK/build-tools/19.0.3/lib/dx.jar --dex \
--output=$PROJECT_HOME/target/classes.dex \
<... long list of apklib and jar dependencies elided ...>
Using --multi-dex as recommended by the error message might be a solution, but I'm not the owner of the application project and it already has a large complex build process that I would hesitate to change regardless.
I can reproduce this problem with a no-op test library project that has literally no fields, but in the error output it's listed as having 6000+ fields. Of the packages listed in the error output, there are a handful with similar 6k+ field counts, but then the vast majority have more plausible <1k field counts.
This problem is similar to the "Too many methods" problem that Facebook famously hacked their way around. The FB solution seems insane, and the only other solutions I've found (e.g., this Android bug ticket, or this one, this SO answer, this other SO answer) all involve changing the main app's code which is well beyond the scope of what I want to do.
Is there any other solution?
The solution was to change the package in the AndroidManifest to match the main application's package.
A manifest like this:
<manifest package="com.example.testlibrary" ...
resulted in 6k+ fields and build failure. Changing it to match the main application's package
<manifest package="com.example.mainapplication" ...
resulted in the project building successfully.
Note that only the package in the manifest is changing, I did not make any changes to the library's Java source or its layout (the Java package was still com.example.testlibrary with directory structure to match).
I hypothesize that the different package name is causing all the Android fields to be included again under that package. All the packages in the error listing with 6k+ fields had a different package name than the main application.
I also (later, grr), found this blog post which details the same problem and the eventual same solution.
Two days ago i read some guides about how to self compile cyanogenmod and i wanted to try on my phone (Galaxy 3 i5800). The phone's CPU architecture is ARMV6 so i downloaded from androidarmv6.github.io the CyanogenMod 10.2 source code and from https://github.com/sdadier/cm10.1_device_samsung_apollo the device folder. At first compilation went pretty good except some "Selected Thumb mode not supported..." errors which i fixed by adding "-marm" CFLAG to involved Android.mk . However now i'm stuck on libhwardware_legacy compilation because i keep getting the error:
target thumb C: libhardware_legacy <= hardware/libhardware_legacy/wifi/wifi.c
hardware/libhardware_legacy/wifi/wifi.c: In function 'update_ctrl_interface':
hardware/libhardware_legacy/wifi/wifi.c:473:5: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Wparentheses]
hardware/libhardware_legacy/wifi/wifi.c: In function 'wifi_start_supplicant':
hardware/libhardware_legacy/wifi/wifi.c:835:4: error: expected identifier before 'unsigned'
hardware/libhardware_legacy/wifi/wifi.c:895:20: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
hardware/libhardware_legacy/wifi/wifi.c:912:26: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
I searched on Google what that meant and i found lots of thread about this here on StackOverflow and on some Linux forums but none of them referred to Android, Cyanogen or libhardware_legacy. Is it a problem with my system? There is an error in the code (code here)?
Please give me some suggestion
OK! To fix the issue i removed "const prop_info *pi" and added this instead:
struct prop_info{
unsigned serial;
};
struct prop_info *pi;
but i think that if the system compiles it's not going to boot. However i will try to dump the libhardware_legacy from who compile CM10.1 successfully since the code is the same.
UPDATE: I probably found the main issue. The same error came up again and now there are 7 of them and the problem is that they are in the init so i can't workaround. However i noticed that wifi.c and property_service.c have an header in common sys/_system_properties.h probably the main error is there somewhere. Someone has a solution for this?
I have a BIXOLON mobile printer, I can print by this device in windows mobile programs.
I want to print by this device in MONODOIRD applicaiton...
there is sdk, but the lib that use that sdk is java...
is any body know how can I print by this device in monodroid?!
Is your "lib" is a .jar file? If it is, bind it, which will make it accessible from C#.
after I read xamarin help about bindding jar file, I get some errors....
I listed in the end of this post...
I need this jar file compile completly...
Warning 1 missing class error was raised while reflecting com.bixolon.android.library.BxlService : android/hardware/usb/UsbManager
Warning 2 missing class error was raised while reflecting
com.bixolon.android.library.UsbLauncher : android/hardware/usb/UsbManager
Warning 3 For ConnectThread, could not find enclosing type 'BxlService'.
Warning 4 For ConnectThread, could not find enclosing type 'BxlService'.
Warning 5 For ConnectedThread, could not find enclosing type 'BxlService'.
Warning 6 For ConnectedThread, could not find enclosing type 'BxlService'.
The conversion of my Android application to the iPhone ObjectX environment as described in the XMLVM user manual works almost fine on my MAC, but I end up with 3 errors in the resulting XCode:
The first two errors simply relate to missing files, namely:
org_w3c_dom_Node.h
android_app_DatePickerDialog_OnDateSetListener.h
These are clearly not files from the converted Android application. Where can I get these from?
The third is an error that keeps coming up in the file
java_lang_String.h
The error message is:
typedef NSMutableString java_lang_String: redefinition as different kind of symbol
This error has been reported before in the XMLVM user group but as far as I know has never been answered sufficiently.
About the first error:
this is part of the Android API that has not yet been implemented.
This is the reason why it can't find the files.
Now, the second problem is not actually an error, but a warning and shouldn't stop you form compiling.
If it does, it means that in your project you have set the option to make errors from these types of warnings.
You can safely turn this off and completely ignore this warning.