When you're in an an Activity (we'll call it A), and you invoke a subsequent Activity (B), perhaps as a result of clicking a button in A, and then RETURN to that prior Activity A, either by clicking the Back button or explicitly calling finish() from within B, it causes A to be completely rebuilt, calling its constructor and its OnCreate() method, etc.
Is there any way to prevent that from happening, so that it actually does return to the prior, already existing, Activity A?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it should not call onCreate() here's a gross over simplification, but let's say activity's are managed much like a simple stack, let's call it AppStack
When a onCreate() for Activity A is called, the OS pushes the Activity Instance onto the AppStack
________ _________________
Activity|
___A____|_________________
When you click a button on Activity A, it launches a new intent to Activity B
Intent actB = new Intent(this, ActivityB.class);
and subsequently puts Activity A into Stopped state
When Activity B's onCreate() is called the OS pushes that Activity Instance onto the AppStack
________ __________________
Activity|Activity|
___A____|___B____|_________
Now if you call finish() or super.onBackPressed() in Activity B, the OS will pop() the Activity from the AppStack
________ __________________
Activity|
___A____|__________________
When the OS returns to the previous activity, it sees that it is Stopped and begins the process of Resuming it through onResume().
Now if there is some data that you require to be persistent, you can add it in by Overriding onResume()
Check out the activity lifecycle docs, for more info:
This is by design:
If an activity is paused or stopped, the system can drop it from memory either by asking it to finish (calling its finish() method), or simply killing its process. When the activity is opened again (after being finished or killed), it must be created all over.
See Activity Lifecycle. It's also why the Service class exists:
A Service is an application component that can perform long-running operations in the background and does not provide a user interface. Another application component can start a service and it will continue to run in the background even if the user switches to another application.
It's not a typical scenario but when onCreate() is called when going back to that activity that means the Android OS kills it in the background.
Reason: Android is experiencing some memory shortage so killing some of the background task will be a must.
Is there any way to prevent that from happening?
No, you don't have a control over it, there are many reasons why its having a memory shortage e.g. other app installed that certain device is consuming more than expected. Although you can handle this use-case by storing the current information in onSaveInstanceState() and recovering the value from onCreate().
Calling finish() on ActivityB or pressing back will just destroy ActivityB.
ActivityA will not be completely rebuilt. This means it will not call onCreate method. It will just call onResume.
This is the normal behaviour.
However, on special situations, the system could destroy ActivityA (maybe because it needs memory to perform another task), so when you go back to it, the system will have to rebuild it.
To simulate this situation, there is a setting that you can check/uncheck, called "Don't keep activities".
If you have it checked, you will be simulating the situation explained above, it will always destroy the ActivityA as soon as it is not shown, and when you come back to it, the system will have to rebuild it calling onCreate.
Related
If I have a method called onStop and it calls super.onStop();. When does this method run?
In my main activity, I start another activity as follows: startActivity(new Intent(this, MyNewActivity.class));. Does this automatically stop my main activity and call onStop?
Also, what kind of things should I do in the onStop method of my main activity. So far all I have done is unregister listeners to free up space but other than that is there anything else I should do?
Thank you, any help is greatly appreciated.
When does this method run?
This method calls when your Activity is no longer visible to the user
Does this automatically stop my main activity and call onStop
Yes when you start another Activity first onPause() function get called and then onStop().
what kind of things should I do in the onStop method of my main activity
It depends on your implemenetation and your needs but persisting data recommended to implement on onPause() callback function
In my main activity, I start another activity as follows: startActivity(new Intent(this, MyNewActivity.class)); Does this automatically stop my main activity and call onStop?
You can know yourself what happens when you call new activity takes focus just put a simple log statement and check yourself.
http://developer.android.com/guide/components/tasks-and-back-stack.html
Quoting from the docs
When the current activity starts another, the new activity is pushed on the top of the stack and takes focus.
The previous activity remains in the stack, but is stopped. When an activity stops, the system retains the current state of its user interface. When the user presses the Back button, the current activity is popped from the top of the stack (the activity is destroyed) and the previous activity resumes (the previous state of its UI is restored).
onStop()
Called when the activity is no longer visible to the user, because another activity has been resumed and is covering this one. This may happen either because a new activity is being started, an existing one is being brought in front of this one, or this one is being destroyed.
Followed by either onRestart() if this activity is coming back to interact with the user, or onDestroy() if this activity is going away.
Check the topic saving activity state
http://developer.android.com/guide/components/tasks-and-back-stack.html#ActivityState
Note: When the system stops one of your activities (such as when a new activity starts or the task moves to the background), the system might destroy that activity completely if it needs to recover system memory. When this happens, information about the activity state is lost. I believe this happens on priority basis.
If you need to store persistent data do it in onPause
For more info check the activity lifecycle
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Activity.html
As I understand it, an activity being destroyed is not equivalently to an activity being finished.
Finished
The activity is removed from the back stack.
It can be triggered by the program (e.g. by calling finish()), or by the user pressing the back key (which implicitly calls finish()).
Finishing an activity will destroy it.
Destroyed
The Android OS may destroy an invisible activity to recover memory. The activity will be recreated when the user navigates back to it.
The activity is destroyed and recreated when the user rotates the screen.
Reference: Recreating an Activity
So how do I finish a destroyed activity? The finish() method requires an Activity object, but if the activity is destroyed, I have no Activity object - I am not supposed to be holding a reference to a destroyed activity, am I?
Case study:
I have an activity a, which starts b, which in turn starts c (using Activity.startActivity()), so now the back stack is:
a → b → c
In c, the user fills out a form and tap the Submit button. A network request is made to a remote server using AsyncTask. After the task is completed, I show a toast and finish the activity by calling c.finish(). Perfect.
Now consider this scenario:
While the async task is in progress, the user switches to another app. Then, the Android OS decided to destroy all 3 activities (a, b, c) due to memory constraints. Later, the async task is completed. Now how do I finish c?
What I have tried:
Call c.finish():
Can't, because c is destroyed.
Call b.finishActivity():
Can't, because b is destroyed.
Use Context.startActivity() with FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP so as to raise b to the top, thus finishing c:
// appContext is an application context, not an activity context (which I don't have)
Intent intent = new Intent(appContext, B.class); // B is b's class.
intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP);
appContext.startActivity(intent);
Failed, appContext.startActivity() throws an exception:
android.util.AndroidRuntimeException: Calling startActivity() from outside of an Activity context requires the FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK flag. Is this really what you want?
Edit: Clarification: I need to wait until the async task finishes and decide whether to finish c based on server's response.
android.util.AndroidRuntimeException: Calling startActivity() from
outside of an Activity context requires the FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK
flag. Is this really what you want?
This exception used to occur when you are starting an activity from
the background thread or service. You need to pass
FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK flag whenever you need the "launcher"
type of behavior.
Just add mIntent.addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK); to avoid this exception.
The way you are trying to kill the activity is not recommended, let the
android handle itself. There isn't any meaning to finish an activity
which is already destroyed.
Now, what you can do?
If you are facing problem in finishing activity when app is not in foreground, what you can do is to implement a security check which will finish the activity only when app is in foreground to go to back-stack activity or else just skip that step.
I think you are trying to kill the activity when app is in background. It seems a little bit difficult to do so, but you can make use of onUserLeaveHint to decide when app is going in the background in-order to finish the activity or you can finish the activity by adding finish(); in onStop(). Just make sure that asynctask's onPost() don't finish it again in-order to avoid the exception.
Have a look at android:clearTaskOnLaunch attribute and set it to true.
Google Doc says about this attribute is:
for example, that someone launches activity P from the home screen,
and from there goes to activity Q. The user next presses Home, and
then returns to activity P. Normally, the user would see activity Q,
since that is what they were last doing in P's task. However, if P set
this flag to "true", all of the activities on top of it (Q in this
case) were removed when the user pressed Home and the task went to the
background. So the user sees only P when returning to the task.
and i think this is the exact case which you want.
Hope this will give you some hint to achieve your desired task.
you can broadcast your action from the onPostExecute method in c and register a broadcast receiver to receive for that action in a and b. Then do finish in that receiver onRevice method
In c , AsyncTask,
void onPostExecute(Long result) {
----
Intent intent1 = new Intent("you custom action");
context.sendBroadcast(intent1);
}
In a and b
registerReceiver(new BroadcastReceiver() {
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
finish();
}
},new IntentFilter("you custom action"));
Personally, I'd use the notification bar to notify the user of the status of his query.
This way, I'd avoid the entire issue of having an unfinished activity. And I'd only keep the activity unfinished only if the user had not clicked on the submit button yet.
Regarding android manual onDestroy() called exactly before activity is destroyed, so you can call finish in it (even you can stop your bg thread before killing the activity completly).
We can assume that if activity was killed we don't interested in bg thread either, and for example if bg thread is to download image or etc that needs to be completed - so you have to use service instead of asynctask.
Can't finish a destroyed activity directly, so just finish() it in its onCreate() (suggested by #Labeeb P). Here's how:
If the activity is already destroyed when trying to finish it, save a boolean flag somewhere instead.
if(activity != null)
{
// Activity object still valid, so finish() now.
activity.finish();
}
else
{
// Activity is destroyed, so save a flag.
is_activity_pending_finish = true;
}
If the flag needs to stay even if the app is destroyed, use persistent storage, e.g. SharedPreferences (suggested by #Labeeb P).
In the activity's onCreate(), check the flag and call finish().
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
if(is_activity_pending_finish)
{
is_activity_pending_finish = false; // Clear the flag.
// This activity should have been finished, so finish it now.
finish();
return;
}
...
}
If there're multiple instances of the same Activity class, you may need something more than a boolean flag to identify the specific instance of activity to finish.
Calling finish() in onCreate() is actually a legimate operation, as it is mentioned in the doc:
... you might call finish() from within onCreate() to destroy the activity. In this case, the system immediately calls onDestroy() without calling any of the other lifecycle methods.
Other considerations:
It may not be a good idea to finish an activity while the app is in background, especially if it is the only activity. Make sure that you don't confuse the user.
For better user experience, if you finish an activity while the app is in background, you may want to inform the user. Consider using toasts (good for short notices) or notifications (good for long operations that the user may have forgotten)(suggested by #Stephan Branczyk and #dilix).
Of course, an activity being destroyed doesn't necessary mean that the app is in background (there might be another foreground activity). Still, the above solution (calling finish() in onCreate()) works.
When the system tries to destroy your Activity, it calls onSaveInstanceState. In here you can call finish(). That's it.
Warning: I've never tried this, so I don't know for sure if there are any issues with calling finish() from onSaveInstanceState. If you try this, please comment and let me know how it works out.
Sorry for answering this almost 10 years later.
In my understanding the premise of the question is wrong, mainly this part:
"While the async task is in progress, the user switches to another app. Then, the Android OS decided to destroy all 3 activities (a, b, c) due to memory constraints. Later, the async task is completed. Now how do I finish c?"
In my understanding if the operating system decides to destroy all three activities due to memory constraints, it won't destroy only them, but the whole process, and this should be including the AsyncTask in question. So, the async task won't be able to complete as well.
Resource: https://medium.com/androiddevelopers/who-lives-and-who-dies-process-priorities-on-android-cb151f39044f
mainly this line from the article: "Note that while we’ll talk about specific components (services, activities), Android only kills processes, not components."
In todays world, I guess that a WorkManager would be used for running work that needs to be guaranteed to run.
I have the following flow in my code:
Activity1 : startActivity(Activity2) --->
Activity2: startActivity(Activity3) --->
Activity3: startService(MyService) --->
MyService: startActivity(Activity4)
Each Activity above shows a single view and represents a step in a 4-step setup. The final Activity - Activity 4 - is started after some setup work is done inside MyService, which basically tells the user,
"The service has started, you can close the application by pressing Back or Home button"
When the user presses Back or Home, I want to destroy Activities 1-4 , and only have MyService running. Also, after stopping the Application as above, when the user navigates back to the Application via the menu and starts it, I'll be checking if MyService is already running. If it is already running, I don't want to show Activities 1-3, I want to show another Control Panel View (Another Activity), which says,
"Dude, the service is already running, do you want to Stop or Restart it?"
This view will have a Stop and Restart button, to do the appropriate tasks.
My Questions:
How do I stop Activities 1-4 from inside Activity 4 when Back or Home is pressed,safely? My thought was to add a static stopActivity() method to each Activity, and calling Activity[1-3].stopActivity() from onBackPressed() or onPause() of Activity4. Then inside each stopActivity(), I'll call finish(), thus ending each Activity. But is it safe and efficient to do it this way?
The flow I have illustrated above, is it the optimal way of doing things, or is there a cleaner way? I have BroadcastReceivers registered in these Activities, so I need to perform clean exits for each Activity, without leaked receivers, or worse, crashing the App or affect the User's phone due to unclean exit strategies.
Thanks for your suggestions.
You don't need to stop activities, Android will do it for you. Start your activities using intents with the flag FLAG_ACTIVITY_NO_HISTORY so they won't appear when the user presses back. Those activities will be stopped as soon as the user leaves them.
In the onStop method of each of your activities, write any code you want to deallocate memory if there is something you want to deallocate manually, although that wouldn't be necessary because Android will deallocate it for yourself when the device is short on memory. In those onStop methods unregister any BroadcastReceiverpreviously registered.
The main activity in my app sometimes calls startActivityForResult, expecting a result that will tell it (the main activity) what information to display next. Looking at the documentation for the process lifecycle, it appears that while the selection activity is active, the main activity is considered a "background" activity and could possibly be killed.
So what happens when the selection activity completes? I see that my activity will be re-created and onCreate is called with the SaveInstance Bundle, but then what? Is onActivityResult then called just as if my main activity had never exited and been re-created?
Also, is there any way to force this behavior in a testing environment, since it should otherwise be a very rare occurrence?
Hint: log statements
The paused state as described in docs is:
If an activity has lost focus but is still visible (that is, a new
non-full-sized or transparent activity has focus on top of your
activity), it is paused. A paused activity is completely alive (it
maintains all state and member information and remains attached to the
window manager), but can be killed by the system in extreme low memory
situations.
That means, under normal circumstances , your main activity should just transfer the control to onActivityResult() when the selection activity completes.
However, docs also state that:
A background activity (an activity that is not visible to the user and
has been paused) is no longer critical, so the system may safely kill
its process to reclaim memory for other foreground or visible
processes. If its process needs to be killed, when the user navigates
back to the activity (making it visible on the screen again), its
onCreate(Bundle) method will be called with the savedInstanceState it
had previously supplied in onSaveInstanceState(Bundle) so that it can
restart itself in the same state as the user last left it.
In such cases, the main activity can be redrawn.
One important point to note is that the docs have never mentioned onActivityResult() as one of their lifecycle methods here
So, it might also be the case where android system treats a sub activity and parent activity (read startActivityforResult() and onActivityResult()) in the same manner as it treats an activity - dialog as stated here:
A visible activity (an activity that is visible to the user but not in
the foreground, such as one sitting behind a foreground dialog) is
considered extremely important and will not be killed unless that is
required to keep the foreground activity running.
The answer is basically "yes": The activity is recreated and the control flows through onCreate(), onActivityResult(), onStart(), and so on.
An activity is also destroyed if the user rotates the device, e.g. from portrait to landscape, unless the application did not explicitly prevent this behavior. So simply rotate the device (CTRL-F11 on the emulator) to test.
Suppose there are two activities A and B and Activity A calls Activity B through startOnActivityResult(intent,200) then your Activity goes to background and Activity B is called (onCreate,onStart,onResume) depends on what you have overridden.
Whenever your B activity calls finish() then your Activity B is destroyed and Activity A comes to foreground. In this case now ie Activity A the call will be onActivityResult -> onStart -> onResume but your onCreate will not be called as it is only called when you call a certain Activity.
Suppose you have not called finish() from activity B and called Activity A through intent then only you onCreate() will be called.
Also onActivityResult() is very useful when you want to retain value of your spinners or you want to notifydatasetchanged() your ListView of your First activity after the event of Third activity. You just have to check your resultCode from the Activities in onActivityResult and perform your actions
I have an Android activity we'll call A which has a button and another activity B. When the user clicks the button in Activity A, I'd like to finish A (let both onStop and onDestroy finish running) and then start up the instance of B. When I put a finish() and startActivity() call in the button click listener, the instance of B starts up before the old instance of A finishes. Can someone help me figure out a way to do what I'm looking for?
What you are looking for is not possible and actually is against Android's activity lifecycle implementation.
Correction
It is possible with android:noHistory="true" tag in your manifest, but for what you are trying to do it seems wrong (read the EDIT)... Messing with the activity stack makes a non intuitive application!
Android OS doesn't let you control when activities will be removed from memory (or killed), and therefore all these fancy "Task killers" are so popular (DONT use them, they only make things worse).
When your activity's onStop() is being called, the activity stops completely, and it just hangs in your memory, but that's fine...
If you want to reset the state of activity A, or close the app when exiting activity B, just create a set of rules in both onResume() and onStop(), you can do everything you wish by creating a set of rules in those functions.
for example: have a boolean in activity A that turns true just before calling activity B,call finish() on your activity A's if this boolean is true
I suggest that you take a look at Android's Activity lifecycle diagram, and make sure that everything you do follows the best practice.
EDIT
I saw your comment, it seems like you are trying to create things that are already in your memory, don't recreate them, it's a waste of CPU time, memory, and battery.
Instead, create a static class with a singleton that will hold all your shared data !
I believe you're looking for
onPause()
which is what gets called when the activity is sent to the background. You can do whatever cleanup you want in there. onStop should only be called when a user is exiting out of your program (or launching another one)
onPause is a better place to do this cleanup. See the Saving Persistent State section of the Activity doc.
When an activity's onPause() method is called, it should commit to the backing content provider or file any changes the user has made. This ensures that those changes will be seen by any other activity that is about to run. You will probably want to commit your data even more aggressively at key times during your activity's lifecycle: for example before starting a new activity, before finishing your own activity, when the user switches between input fields, etc.
While I'm not definite that your cleanup is for user changes, the bold sentence above implies that onPause will complete before the next Activity is created. Of course that probably implies that you'll have to move some setup to onResume...
Alternatively, you could move all your cleanup code to a method, let's just call it cleanup and then just call it before you start activity B. You'll have to put in appropriate guards for your onDestroy cleanup too of course.
override finish() method.
implement cleanUp() method.
create boolean isClean=false in the activity
in cleanUp() write your clean up code.
call cleanUp() in your finish()
check for isCleaned in finish() or in cleanUp() if its true then ignore the clean
now before you start B , call cleanUp() and set isCleand=true
after you call B , call finish()
Start activity A
from inside A startService(c) and finsh A
from inside the service , start Activity B