I just took a look at the two following examples of the fragment as a task holder approach:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/development/+/master/samples/ApiDemos/src/com/example/android/apis/app/FragmentRetainInstance.java
http://www.androiddesignpatterns.com/2013/04/retaining-objects-across-config-changes.html
Why did they need UiFragment in the first example? Messages from the task holder fragment can be sent to its activity directly as it's done in the second example.
Why did they need UiFragment in the first example?
They did not need that Fragment.
It's just a simple example, seems like they chose to use a Fragment for the content instead of calling setContentView() on the Activity.
There are two Fragments basically in the Google example:
A Fragment for the UI
A worker Fragment to retain the state of a Thread through the re-creation of the Activity (in case of an orientation change for example).
They could have just ditch the UI Fragment and call setContentView() on the Activity and it wouldn't make a difference. The point of the example is the worker Fragment.
Related
i am trying to alter the activity content from fragment. for that i want to pass the activity handle inside fragment and do the required changes.
If i can do that why there is more difficult way of interface etc.
You can call getActivity() from the Fragment.
If you want to get your activity specifically you can cast it
((MyActivity) getActivity()).someMethod()
This will tightly couple your Fragment to your activity and prevent you using the fragment in a different activity easily so be careful.
Also you need to be careful with lifecycles and such as a fragment can become detached from an activity causing a NullPointerException from time to time. So it is recommended to wrap this in a null check
Fragment transaction has method add(Fragment fragment, String tag), which does not place fragment to container, so it cannot have view. For what it can be used?
From the Android Documentation:
However, a fragment is not required to be a part of the activity layout; you may also use a fragment without its own UI as an invisible worker for the activity.
How about this purpose ?
Simple example: an Activity starts an AsyncTask, but when device rotated activity restarts, causing AsyncTask to lose connection with the UI Thread. But this Activity can hold a Fragment (invisible, with no UI at all) that can handle all the AsyncTask work. When Activity recreated the Android OS takes care reattaching the Fragment, thus no data loss will occur.
For Dialogs you don't have any container on normal app layer. It is directly added on Window with WindowManager(See WindowManager.LayoutParams for various types of layers).
DialogFragment has an API like DialogFragment.html#show(android.app.FragmentManager, java.lang.String) which corresponds to this.
You can use fragments without UI (container) as a background worker (one benefit is that you can retain it during rotations etc) and for retaining data during rotations and other changes.
Reading http://developer.android.com/guide/components/fragments.html is strongly recommended.
Example of instance retaining: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/development/+/master/samples/ApiDemos/src/com/example/android/apis/app/FragmentRetainInstance.java
Also, here are similar questions (so this questions seems to be a duplicated but cannot be flagged due to bounty):
What is the use case for a Fragment with no UI?
Android non-UI Fragment usage
As #Lucius Hipan mentions, it can be used to prevent data loss.
Almost always this king of fragments are used as Retained container ( setRetainInstance(true) called in onCreate method), then after device configuration changes (e.g. orientation changing) fragment will not be recreated but remembers previous state.
It's recommended way to use asynctask.
Here is an example:
There is login activity. The user enters their credentials and presses the Login button. After that configuration change occurs (user rotates phone). So, network task was completed, but your handlers was not listening for it now. If you show any login animation, it can be stored via savedInstance, but listeners not. And instead of creating service you can simply create new retained fragment with persistant asynctask and interface to communicate with activity.
This method is a good compromise for small projects where using bus libraries is overstatement.
By calling the method add(Fragment fragment, String tag) internally calls add(int containerId, Fragment fragment, String tag) with a 0 containerId.That will be add(0, fragment, tag).
If 0 is supplied as containerId, it will not be placed the fragment in a container.
I would like to understand the following:
If we do a design of an activity that the UI is composed by multiple "child" fragments of that activity, if 1 of those fragments does something "costly" in the UI thread in the onCreateView does this affect all of the fragments?
Because if I understand correctly onCreateView is called only once
Yes it will affect all the Fragments if the Actvity they are attached to is affected.
According to Android Developer Guide on Fragment, once the Fragment is attached to the Activity, it's Life Cycle is controlled by the Activity e.g. if Activity is Destroyed the Fragment is too.
Fragment is just a like a little Activity so if there is possibility that fragment operation is likely to be long then AsyncTask or any other suitable service should be used. See below link for more details on Background Services;
https://developer.android.com/training/run-background-service/create-service.html
yes
it is effect all of the app
I have one Activity which handles 5 fragments. Every time the activity replaces each fragment onCreate and onCreateView are being called. In order to avoid this i created a HashMap where i store each fragment. Before the activity replaces a fragment it checks the hashmap if this fragment already exists. If it exists it replaces the old fragment with the instance from the map. In other case it instatiates the fragment and after that it replaces the old own.
Despite i avoid the instation of the fragment when i find it on hashmap, the onCreate and onCreateView are being called. How can i avoid this? Is there any other way to achieve my goal?
First of all there is no use for a HashMap to save the references of your Fragments. You can set a tag to a Fragment at the point you add/replace it. Have a look at the FragmentTransaction.add(int, Fragment, String) and FragmenTransaction.replace(int, Fragment, String) methods. If you provide a unique String for the tag you can retrieve the Fragment with the FragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(String) method. A container for Fragment references is redundant.
To the point:
If you use the replace/add method to show a Fragment the onCreate() and onCreateView() is called. To avoid the onCreate() call you can just attach and detach your Fragments. This way only onCreateView() will be invoked. But it's not possible to prevent the onCreateView() call.
Maybe update your question with some details what you want to achieve, because it sounds you are completely on the wrong track.
Your goal is not very cleared.
When you deal with fragment, keep in mind that your control over their life cycle is limited, you only extend (system controlled) object. You can read on the life cycle of the fragment here: Creating a Fragment.
Assuming your goal is to switch between 5 active fragments, I can think of two options:
option 1: design your fragment so they can be recreated quickly, maintain the data in some other place, and provide it to the fragment, which only do the work of display the data.
option 2: The android support library has two fragment adapters, FragmentPagerAdapter, and FragmentStatePagerAdapter. The first is an adapter which keep the fragments in memory.
How can i avoid this? Is there any other way to achieve my goal?
If you really want to avoid your activity instance to be recreated again and again just use android:launchMode="singleTop".
Example:
<activity
android:name=".YourActivity"
android:label="SomeLabel"
android:launchMode="singleTop">
</activity>
From developer docs,
If an instance of the activity already exists at the top of the target
task, the system routes the intent to that instance through a call to
its onNewIntent() method, rather than creating a new instance of the
activity.
Source: http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element.html
I have a scenario and I an not sure on what path to go.
Scenario
The app has a Home activity which displays various fragments. The data in the fragments can come either from the web or a local database and is retrieved using an asynctask.
From what I saw, I have 2 alternatives:
Put the Asynctask in parent activity and then use fragment.newInstance(parameters) to pass the result to the fragment. However, if in my asynctask I need to update the progress or some info on the fragment, each time I will have to call newInstance with the new set of parameters.
Add the fragment and put the asynctask in it, in this way when progress is needed, I can update the fragment's views, as I have access to them + when the asynctask is done, I can populate the list with the info.
What would be the correct approach ?
LE: actually for point 1 in order to update the fragment I can call fragment's public methods after I find it with findFragmentById in the parent activity
A better way if you have multiple tasks would be to use an IntentService :
http://mobile.tutsplus.com/tutorials/android/android-fundamentals-intentservice-basics/
You would have a better control to what you're requesting and what you want to cancel.
I would go with the second approach.
My primary reason though would be to avoid the issues that can happen on screen orientation change while the AsyncTask is working.
I would go with method 2, but take it a step further.
Have a separate fragment to run your async task. This way, you can handle any configuration changes (not just rotating screen) without any issues.
In another fragment, you can display the data. You can pass the data from your async task fragment via callbacks to the activity, and have the activity call a method in the display fragment to update the data.