I have an Android project, For which I need to generate Unit tests.
So Instead of writing them, I found that we can automatically generate unit tests by EVOsuite.
Info provided in the official documentation of EVOSuite is not sufficient, and plugin provided in the official site doesn't work. So, Are there any one who used EVO tests suite for Unit tests Generation.
I am refering to "http://www.evosuite.org/"
Thanks
Quoting an issue in GitHub:
In principle, it should be possible to generate tests for Android
projects given the JVM bytecode. However, it is my understanding that
in this case the Android API consists only of stubs and thus wouldn't
lead to useful tests.
Related
I have some plain old Java classes and simple JUnit tests in my Android Studio project. They currently live inside my Android Module. If I run them as Android tests they pass fine, but they're really slow as it requires launching or connecting to the emulator.
If I try to run one as a JUnit test, I hit the !!! JUnit version 3.8 or later expected JUnit version problem. This answer explains how to workaround that issue. Unfortunately, I then hit the java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/textui/ResultPrinter, which I can't figure out how to fix.
I then tried to move my JUnit tests into a separate Java module that depends on the Android Module. Everything compiles fine. I added a new configuration to launch the JUnit tests (:MyJUnitTests:test), but the tests fail with package com.myproject.util does not exist. It looks like maybe the classpath isn't including the classes from the dependent Android Module.
Does anybody know how to fix this classpath issue? I've looked at lots of related answers and none of them seem to work for me. Or is it a just a bad idea to try and keep my JUnit tests in their own Module?
I can get the JUnit tests to run fast and pass if I move my plain Java classes and their JUnit tests into a completely separate Module (e.g. here), and reverse the dependency so the Android Module depends on the Java Module. Is that the preferred solution?
The basic problem is that Android Framework classes don't work well outside the context of Android OS, so any code that has dependencies on Framework classes doesn't run in a regular JUnit environment, as you've found.
Your solution of trying to move the JUnit tests into a separate module won't work because you can't have a plain Java module depend on an Android module. Android Gradle modules don't act like Java modules, because Android builds are much more complex, and because the end result of an Android module build will be an APK or an AAR, which other module types won't understand.
If you can move your plain Java classes and unit tests into a plain Java module and have the Android modules depend on that, it will be the best approach that will get the most support from official features in the IDE. It will also have an architectural benefit in that it will keep those classes free from Android abstractions, making it more portable, and enforcing a separation of business logic from UI or storage or other things more device-specific.
If that's difficult for you to do, then a lot of developers in your shoes go with Robolectric, which is a test harness allowing code depending on many parts of the Android Framework to run in a JUnit environment without an emulator or device. It's not officially supported by Google, but Google is aware that it's widely used and tries hard to not wantonly break it.
Why do you need to have an emulator or device plugged in for the testing to take place? Why can't I just generate coverage for my tests without the use of these?
It all depends on your Unit-Test.
If you're testing classes that dont use at all the Android Framework, and only the standard Java classes, then you could run the Unit test and get a code coverage (althouhg I don't have a step by step procedure to give you).
But if you're using any part of the Android Framework (that is, any class in an android.* or com.android.* package), then you'll need to run in a DalvikVM, meaning an Android emulator.
I have code coverage with Emma for my Android projects and I get a nice html-file. But i kind of think an html-file isn't really good enough. I want to see covered and not covered code in the editor.
Is there a way to use the .em or .ec files are genereated to get Eclipse to color the code?
Thanks in advance
Roland
EclEmma the eclipse plugin gives you colored code coverage.
You just run your tests using this button:
And you get in Eclipse output like this:
Oh and I run my unit tests with Robolectric that is Android but doesn't use Dalvik, uses your native JVM
Perhaps this what you are looking for EclEmma, however it looks like it is now using JaCoCo for code coverage metrics rather than Emma perhaps there is an older version of the plug-in that still works.
I suppose it depends on what you want code coverage from Emma, or visualization in Eclipse.
Try comparing the outputs of JaCoCo and Emma, I would have thought they should give similar if not identical results, and then choose.
Does JaCoCo work against the android platform - I can't say.
According to the ECLEmma team, on http://www.eclemma.org/devdoc/eclemma20.html:
Future support for EMMA and EclEmma 1.x Maintenance
From EclEmma 2.0 on EMMA will not be supported any more as a coverage
engine. ...
Beside this we will try to maintain the EMMA based 1.x stream on a
best effort base but with no functional enhancements planned. There
will be a separate download for the 1.x versions.
Per my comment below, ECLEmma 2.0 uses JaCoCo which is currently incompatible with Android due to not supporting off-line instrumentation that can be processed into Dalvik. To use Emma with Eclipse, you need ECLEmma 1.0, so see here: http://www.eclemma.org/installation1x.html
I have a Robolectric test project setup, but I'd like to also run these tests on my device to check that I don't get bit by JVM vs Dalvik implementation differences.
Unlike robolectric tests, I won't run these tests frequently. My concern is that there's little effort to maintain the test suite and that they verify actual device functionality.
What's the best way to do that?
What I've currently got:
My robolectric test project as a test case TestPackage. I created an Android Test project with a test case TestRoboOnAndroid. It creates a TestPackage and has a test for each test in TestPackage.
Right now, every time I add a test to my robolectric suite, I need to manually add it to my device suite. Is there some way to do that automatically with reflection?
Also, Robolectric uses JUnit 4 (by default) and Android uses JUnit 3. So I have to write all of my Robolectric tests using JUnit 3 style (importing from junit.framework instead of org.junit).
The whole point of Robolectric is NOT to run it on the device and the design is based on that. If you want to run something on the device look at the default instrumentation tests from the SDK or Robotium.
It is totally feasible to run your Robolectric tests on the JVM and in addition create Robotium tests that rely on device specific interaction (e.g. creating screenshots, hardware differences...) and run on devices and emulators all combined into one build.
The easiest way to do that is to use the Android Maven Plugin.
I use a tiered system, where I prefer earlier tiers where possible:
Pure unit tests. I try to make as much code as possible fully independent of Android APIs, and then use "pure" unit tests which can run on any JVM. These tests are the fastest, and it helps keep code that has no need to be Android-specific portable.
Robolectric-supported unit tests. Where my code has only small dependencies on Android APIs, that can be satisfied by Robolectric shadows, I test it with Robolectric. There is a little more setup time for Robolectric compared to pure tests, but it's still faster than starting/running on an emulator.
Android framework tests. Where Robolectric doesn't cut it - either because the shadows don't exist, or because I'm heavily using Android APIs (and therefore want to test against the Real Thing) - I write test that run on the emulator/device with the default framework.
The point of the tiers is to keep things as simple as possible, which keeps the full suite faster and helps promote cleaner code.
We use Robolectric for unit testing against the JVM and Calabash-Android for system testing against Dalvik. Both can be integrated into our Jenkins CI build and between the two tools I feel that we cover all the bases.
Is anyone using Junit and Android? Or is that just a worthy hope? Is there a tutorial anywhere?
Android has great support for JUnit 3
From Testing Fundamentals on Android Developers:
The Android testing framework, an integral part of the development environment, provides an architecture and powerful tools that help you test every aspect of your application at every level from unit to framework.
The testing framework has these key features:
Android test suites are based on JUnit. You can use plain JUnit to test a class that doesn't call the Android API, or Android's JUnit extensions to test Android components. If you're new to Android testing, you can start with general-purpose test case classes such as AndroidTestCase and then go on to use more sophisticated classes.
The Android JUnit extensions provide component-specific test case classes. These classes provide helper methods for creating mock objects and methods that help you control the lifecycle of a component.
Test suites are contained in test packages that are similar to main application packages, so you don't need to learn a new set of tools or techniques for designing and building tests.
The SDK tools for building and tests are available in Eclipse with ADT, and also in command-line form for use with other IDES. These tools get information from the project of the application under test and use this information to automatically create the build files, manifest file, and directory structure for the test package.
The SDK also provides monkeyrunner, an API testing devices with Python programs, and UI/Application Exerciser Monkey, a command-line tool for stress-testing UIs by sending pseudo-random events to a device.
This document describes the fundamentals of the Android testing framework, including the structure of tests, the APIs that you use to develop tests, and the tools that you use to run tests and view results. The document assumes you have a basic knowledge of Android application programming and JUnit testing methodology.
I have been using Roboelectric which is awesome because it does not launch the simulator making the run time for the tests very very quick. A sample project is provided as an example and can be found here at github
You can also use Robotium to drive the UI from within JUnit for more functional style testing.
"Note that the Android testing API supports JUnit 3 code style, but not JUnit 4." (Source)
If you want to use JUnit4 or have existing JUnit4 tests you can use JUnit4Android.