Update - Thanks to #Martijn00 and #Plac3Hold3r I have managed to update my app to use the MvxCachingFragmentCompatActivity but it is just not working correctly. I am finding that if I go back sometimes the the ViewModel will be available, but the commands in the view model will be null.
Also if I go back and then forward, some of the buttons don't respond. I assume this is the same issue.
What I really need to know is what the additional functionality the caching activity gives me, and how to use it properly.
Original question follows...
I am hitting a problem where the view model for a fragment is null. I suspect my activity is being cleared up when I open a camera activity. For all my application am using a single activity and all my views are fragments.
When the camera activity is complete, the activity is reconstructed, but one of the fragments view model is null. I am currently using an AppCompatActivity for my single activity, but through my research I should probably be using a MvxCachingFragmentActivity. The problem is I have no idea how I am supposed to use it. I cannot find a clear explanation anywhere.
Has anyone got a working example of how to use the MvxCachingFragmentActivity or the MvxCachingFragmentCompatActivity.
I can't find anywhere where it tells me how I should use it.
I found this other link example but I think it is out of date and the other link given in this example is a 404.
If anyone knows of a simple sample and whether this will work with a single activity please let me know.
Thanks
Setup
MainActivity
Create an activity that inherits from MvxCachingFragmentCompatActivity or MvxCachingFragmentActivity.
[Activity]
public class MainActivity : BaseFragmentActivity<MainContainerViewModel>
{
}
MainContainerViewModel
Create a Viewmodel to associate to the Activity. You will never navigate directly using this Viewmodel. Instead you will navigate to this Viewmodel via the fragments that specifies MainContainerViewModel as their parent's Viewmodel.
public class MainContainerViewModel : MvxViewModel
{
}
XML layout example
Add a layout to your MainActivity. Make sure to include a FrameLayout that has an id. In this case content_frame. This id is important as this is how you will identify the frame where to place your fragment. You specify multiple FrameLayout's if you want more that one fragment for the same view.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<android.support.design.widget.CoordinatorLayout
xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:id="#+id/coordinator_layout"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent">
<LinearLayout
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:orientation="vertical">
<android.support.design.widget.AppBarLayout
android:id="#+id/appbar"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="?attr/actionBarSize"
android:theme="#style/ThemeOverlay.AppCompat.Dark.ActionBar">
<android.support.v7.widget.Toolbar
android:id="#+id/toolbar"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="?attr/actionBarSize"
android:background="?attr/colorPrimary">
<TextView
android:id="#+id/textview_toolbar_title"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:textColor="#android:color/white"
android:layout_gravity="left"
style="#style/TextAppearance.AppCompat.Widget.ActionBar.Title" />
</android.support.v7.widget.Toolbar>
</android.support.design.widget.AppBarLayout>
<FrameLayout
android:id="#+id/content_frame"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content" />
</LinearLayout>
</android.support.design.widget.CoordinatorLayout>
HomeFragment
In terms of fragments you need to include the MvxFragment attribute, which needs the type of Viewmodel associate to the Activity you want to place your fragment in. Additionally, you need to specify the id for the FrameLayout that is found on the activities layout, where you want to place the fragment.
[MvxFragment(typeof(MainContainerViewModel), Resource.Id.content_frame)]
[Register(nameof(HomeFragment))]
public class HomeFragment : BaseFragment<HomeViewModel>
{
}
Usage
When navigating your can now use ShowViewModel<HomeViewModel>() which will navigate to the home fragment. But, importantly it will first start up the required Activity MainActivity before doing the fragment navigation. This allows for better shared navigation with other platforms which do not require these container Viewmodels, i.e. they get handled automatically via convention.
Notes
You can specify multiple MvxFragment attributes. Is is usefully if you want the same fragment shared under multiple Activities. The Top MvxFragment attribute will be used as the default. If you are currently in the context of any of the other matching MvxFragment attributes then navigation will take place under that activity.
If your Setup.cs is not inheriting from MvxAppCompatSetup or you are using a custom presenter, you need to make sure that you also registering your presenter against IMvxAndroidViewPresenter. This is important as MvxCachingFragmentCompatActivity or MvxCachingFragmentActivity resolve IMvxAndroidViewPresenter in order to navigate to the required fragment.
protected override IMvxAndroidViewPresenter CreateViewPresenter()
{
var mvxFragmentsPresenter = new MvxFragmentsPresenter(AndroidViewAssemblies);
Mvx.RegisterSingleton<IMvxAndroidViewPresenter>(mvxFragmentsPresenter);
return mvxFragmentsPresenter;
}
You can also check out the Sample Repo for an example of this in use.
Related
I have a BottomSheetDialogFragment that contains a NavHostFragment like so:
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto">
<LinearLayout
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent">
<fragment
android:id="#+id/add_feeling_nav_host_fragment"
android:name="androidx.navigation.fragment.NavHostFragment"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="0dp"
app:defaultNavHost="true"
app:navGraph="#navigation/add_feeling_graph" />
</LinearLayout>
</layout>
When I try to get the NavController in it's class using either of the following:
activity?.findNavController(R.id.add_feeling_nav_host_fragment)
view.findNavController()
The first option crashes because it cannot find the ID and the second one does finds a parent Nav Controller and uses that.
I have an identical setup for another Fragment however it's not a dialog and it works perfectly. Any ideas to what the issue could be? Thanks
activity?.findNavController(R.id.add_feeling_nav_host_fragment) won't do the job - it will work only if the dialog fragment is active(showing) and it is a part of activity`s UI container - DialogFragment works in other instance of window that is not within the same hierarchy with the root nav graph.
Appropriate way to do it - with NavHostFragment.findNavController(fragment) or ktx extension fragment.findNavController() where fragment is your dialog fragment. The dialog fragment should be showing with its view inflated. The best way to do it - within the dialog.
Navigation graph adjustments may also be required - I cannot tell exactly since there is no code.
Hope it helps.
Well, first of all you should post more code for us to see the whole picture. One small detail is that you dont need neither <layout> and <LinearLayout> in navigation xml. Fragment is just ok. I will suggest you to look at this repository, there is exactly solution you need.
I Hope it helps.
I've been playing around with the Drawer Menu activity template from Android Studio since I haven't used a drawer menu before. Here's the layout file.
<android.support.v4.widget.DrawerLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools" android:id="#+id/drawer_layout"
android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:fitsSystemWindows="true" tools:openDrawer="start">
<!-- Includes a Toolbar and FloatingActionButton. Generated by Android Studio-->
<include layout="#layout/app_bar_drawer_menu" android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent" />
<android.support.design.widget.NavigationView android:id="#+id/nav_view"
android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:layout_gravity="start" android:fitsSystemWindows="true"
app:headerLayout="#layout/nav_header_drawer_menu"
app:menu="#menu/activity_side_menu_drawer" />
</android.support.v4.widget.DrawerLayout>
Android Studio also generated an Activity class as part of the template. My app has a main activity as well that uses a LinearLayout. I want to use Fragments to add the drawer menu to the main activity (and other activities), but I'm unsure how to do this. Do I need to create a new subclass of fragment and adapt DrawerMenuActivity's callback methods for the fragment class? Then do I add a fragment tag to activity_main.xml?
This will likely be something you need to wrap your head around...
Ideally, you want to swap fragments in a container located in the the xml for the MainActivity by using fragment transaction and calling replace with the fragment to be placed in the container. This will allow you to re-use the container and offer the drawer to the entire app.
Otherwise, you would need to include the drawer in every activity which creates a lot of extra code or not offer the drawer which depending on the activity you may be able to get away with that.
So, the drawer works with fragments being swapped in via the transaction and not so well for additional activities. Its something you need to design around.
Please, create a new project with a generated drawer for an Activity and proceed from there. Also read the android developer tutorial for fragments part on communication to see how the drawer fragment and activity communicate.
There's actually quite a bit involved for the drawer but you should be able to get a good grasp in a day or two.
Is there any possible way to share layout(part) between activities? For example, in my app, all activities have similar layout, the top part is long operation indicator (a progress bar, hidden when no operation is being executed), the bottom part is for showing errors. Only the middle part is different for all activities. See the picture below.
so my question is, is it possible to reuse the common layout(loading and error part) for all activities in my app? (currently I don't want to use fragment to do it for some reasons)
maybe the layout resources should like this:
layoutfolder
activity_common.xml
activity_one_content.xml
activity_two_content.xml
thanks
You can create an abstract 'base' activity that all your activities extend from, overriding setContentView to merge the base, and sub activity layouts.
This way you can handle all the loading/error code in the base activity, and simply toggle between hiding and showing the views in the sub activities.
The abstract activity:
public abstract class BaseActivity extends Activity {
protected RelativeLayout fullLayout;
protected FrameLayout subActivityContent;
#Override
public void setContentView(int layoutResID) {
fullLayout = (RelativeLayout) getLayoutInflater().inflate(R.layout.activity_base, null); // The base layout
subActivityContent = (FrameLayout) fullLayout.findViewById(R.id.content_frame); // The frame layout where the activity content is placed.
getLayoutInflater().inflate(layoutResID, subActivityContent, true); // Places the activity layout inside the activity content frame.
super.setContentView(fullLayout); // Sets the content view as the merged layouts.
}
}
the layout file:
<RelativeLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent">
<!-- The main content view -->
<FrameLayout
android:id="#+id/loading_frame"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content" />
<!-- The main content view -->
<FrameLayout
android:id="#+id/content_frame"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent" />
<FrameLayout
android:id="#+id/error_frame"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content" />
</RelativeLayout>
You could use include in XML to, well.. include the re-useable part of your layout code.
As an example, here's my layout file for the Toolbar I used in my app:
// /res/layout/component_toolbar.xml
<android.support.v7.widget.Toolbar xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:taggr="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
android:id="#+id/toolbar"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:background="#color/primary"
android:minHeight="?attr/actionBarSize"
taggr:popupTheme="#style/ThemeOverlay.AppCompat.Light"
taggr:theme="#style/ThemeOverlay.AppCompat.Dark.ActionBar" />
Now, say if I want to use that Toolbar again in a different Activity, this is all I'd have to write:
// /res/layout/whatever_layout_this_might_be.xml
<include layout="#layout/component_toolbar" />
Bear in mind that this would only copy the layout - not the actual behavior of said widget/component.
If you want to actually copy all of the aspects (layout, behaviour) I'm afraid Fragment is the only way to go.
Although ActivityGroup is deprecated fro API 13 but if you don't wish to go with fragments then this can be your best choice.
According to documentation, an ActivityGroup is:
A screen that contains and runs multiple embedded activities.
You can find a tutorial here and here Although the mentioned tutorial uses a Tablayout you can replace that with your common layout in XML.
A second Approach could be Reuse the layout with include tag, in this approach you could just reuse your once created common layout everywhere in the app.
On Android 3.0 and above, the android team is driving hard that you should use fragments over activities. And I see this being useful, but I want to be able to handle click events in my app. I'm using a list fragment on the right side of my app, so doing an onclick (or any click listeners) happens in the activity that hosts the fragment. So I had to move from putting a item in XML to using the fragment manager.
In the design documents they show this picture:
http://developer.android.com/training/basics/fragments/fragment-ui.html
What I want is the Fragment A/B tablet UI. However, nowhere in this page does it actually give you an example of doing this - it seems that fragment manager only works with ONE fragment at a time - which is entirely opposite of what the picture portrays. Which makes me think it uses in XML... but then how would I get an onclick? These documents don't make a lot of sense to me. It shows one thing and then says something else. What if I wanted to remove fragment A on the tablet? Add fragment C that doesn't yet exist? Is that even possible if you tried to use Fragment Manager????
I guess I don't get if Fragment manager uses more than 1 fragment, and if it does, how am I supposed to use this to get an item in the picture like the tablet - the left (A) being a listview, and the right (B) being whatever. Without an ID of the fragment I don't how to access it.
Not sure if this is relevant but here is some of my code:
Adds a fragment to the single framelayout I made like in the guide
//Activity
FragLaunch launchPane = new FragLaunch();
// In case this activity was started with special instructions from an Intent,
// pass the Intent's extras to the fragment as arguments
// firstFragment.setArguments(getIntent().getExtras());
// Add the fragment to the 'fragment_container' FrameLayout
getFragmentManager().beginTransaction()
.add(R.id.launch_frag_container, launchPane).commit();
}
Also, in portrait mode of 7" tablets, I want it to use a viewpager that is swipeable. It worked like a charm when I designed it in XML but now that I have to access the listfragment it doesn't work (no way to access since I can't have two fragments)
XML of FragLaunch's content view:
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:paddingLeft="16dp"
android:paddingRight="16dp"
android:gravity="center_vertical"
android:orientation="vertical" >
<TextView
android:id="#+id/initial_directions"
style="#style/textScalar.Roboto.Light"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:layout_gravity="center"
android:text="#string/initial_directions"
android:layout_marginBottom="30dp"
tools:context=".Launch" />
</LinearLayout>
I want to have this one appear as Fragment A in the photo:
FragHistory.java/xml for fragment:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:orientation="vertical" >
<Button
android:id="#+id/spamhistory"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:text="Spam History" />
<ListView
android:id="#android:id/list"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="0dip"
android:layout_weight="1"
android:drawSelectorOnTop="false" />
</LinearLayout>
Does anyone have any insight on this?
If you want your fragments to be able to communicate then you need to use interfaces, like this.
For onClick events you simply set an onClickListener for the view that you need to receive the onClick event from. Like so:
sampleView.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
#Override
public void onClick(View v) {
//Your code here
}
});
As for fragment transactions, it says somewhere in there (I can't remember exactly where) that when two fragments are displayed on the screen at once (as with larger screens) that instead of swapping the fragments it simply updates it. All you have to worry about is making the correct calls. So if you want to remove fragment A just call remove(). Or if you want to replace it with fragment C call replace() and pass fragment C in as the parameter.
Can you clarify your question about the ViewPager? What do you mean "have to access it"?
Hope this helps!
EDIT: I apoplogize, I misunderstood your question. Here's kind of a quick run down of how to add more than one fragment to the screen at once.
1. Perform a runtime check to make sure that the device screen is big enough to display more than one fragment.
2. If the screen is big enough, set the content view to use a layout that has a FrameLayout for each fragment that you want to add.
3. After that grab a reference to each fragment that you want to use.
4. Then use the FragmentManager to add a fragment to each layout. Like this:
FirstExampleFragment fragment1 = new FirstExampleFragment();
SecondExampleFragment fragment2 = new SecondExampleFragment();
getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction().add(R.id.example_framelayout1, fragment1)
.add(R.id.example_framelayout2, fragment2).commit();
Another great way to allow communication between fragments is to use an event bus, such as the Otto event bus. Otto allows components to publish events and subscribe to events in a decoupled manner.
In your particular case, when a user selects an item in the list, your list fragment can publish an event (which can include the item that has been selected) and your content fragment can subscribe for these events and update its content accordingly when it receives a new event. This all being done without the two fragments being directly coupled and without having to define additional interfaces.
I know this doesn't answer your entire question, but thought it might be useful when it comes to the communications between your fragments....YMMV.
I am developing an applications that is aimed at Tablets and Google TVs. It will be like many standard Google TV applications with a LeftNavBar and a top Search bar that is common to all application screens. It will look something like the following image:
Main Screen
The RED area will be different for all other screens. It may contain data like following screens mockups:
Activity One loaded into main container
Activity Two loaded into main container
So you can see that completely different sections can be loaded in the main area.
Screen 3 can be loaded as a detailed section when selecting any list item in Screen 2 (say in fragment list) OR it can be loaded as a result of selecting a tab (which will appear in LeftNavBar).
Here is how I am trying to implement it.
Step 1. I Created a main Activity with the following XML:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:orientation="vertical" >
<LinearLayout
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="50dp"
android:background="#9ccc" >
<!-- Top Bar -->
</LinearLayout>
<FrameLayout
android:id="#+id/mainContainer"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="0dp"
android:layout_weight="1">
<!-- main Red Container that will load other Activities -->
</FrameLayout>
</LinearLayout>
mainContainer is the RED container where I want to load the Activities. LeftNavBar will be added to this Activity as its the parent of All.
Step 2 I created ActivityOne & ActivityTwo with two & three Fragments in them respectively (as shown in above second & third image).
*Step 3 I am trying to load the ActivityOne in main page's mainContainer FrameLayout... But I cannot add it.
I tried by adding the ActivityOne to mainContainer as follows:
View v = (new ActivityOne()).getWindow().getDecorView();
FrameLayout mainContainer = (FrameLayout) findViewById(R.id.mainContainer);
mainContainer.addView(v);
but the getWindow() returns null....
Other issue occurs because all the data comes from a remote services .. so please also suggest how would I be able to hold references to all the loaded Activities in mainContainer in a some kind of stack ... so I can just reload the already loaded activity instead of creating its new instance.. This will be used on BACK button press.
OR
Instead of loading an activity into the above RED container, I should create two Activities each with their own Fragments & a LeftNavBar. This might be easier than the aforementioned approach. or this might be the only solution.... however I feel that saving state for BACK buttons might get messy .. but I will try implementing this
What would you do if you had to create this type of application?
How would you design the UI layout for best performance/practice?
Your suggestions in helping me setting this app's layout are much appreciated.
Disclaimer
This is where fragments can get tricky. The problem would be simple if Activity 1 & 2 had identical layouts so that you could simply attach/detach fragments and use the fragment back stack to unwind.
Because you want 2 unique layouts to house your fragments, things are going to be a little more involved. If at all possible I would try to use the same layout so that you can take the easy path.
As another option, you could use two activities as you outline above and send data back and forth with Intents.
That said, if I really had to implement this solution as written, here is what I would do. Note that I am not advocating this solution but myself do not know of a better way of doing things.
The Solution
Create a FragmentActivity whose view would be Main Screen as you've defined above. The layout for the Main Screen would contain:
Left nav bar
Top bar
2 layouts. layout1 and layout2. These would be contained in a parent layout i.e. RelativeLayout or LinearLayout and would contain the necessary FrameLayout elements for your fragments.
Example using your XML (note, tags are a bit brief):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:orientation="vertical" >
<LinearLayout
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="50dp"
android:background="#9ccc" >
<!-- Top Bar -->
</LinearLayout>
<LinearLayout android:id="#+id/layout1">
<FrameLayout android:id="#+id/listFragment" />
<FrameLayout android:id="#+id/contentFragment" />
</LinearLayout>
<LinearLayout android:id="#+id/layout2">
<FrameLayout android:id="#+id/imageFragment" />
<FrameLayout android:id="#+id/boxFragment1" />
<FrameLayout android:id="#+id/boxFragment2" />
<FrameLayout android:id="#+id/boxFragment3" />
</LinearLayout>
</LinearLayout>
The main idea is that you then show/hide layout1 & layout2 i.e. set android:visibility="gone" based on the state of your app.
The disadvantages of this method are:
Using fragment backstack may be impossible, instead you'll have to track where the user is in your UI flow and manage the back button to show/hide layout
You may need to take special care to attach/detach fragments when you show/hide their parent view to reduce resource consumption while the fragments are invisible
The advantages are:
Easy communication between fragments and the base activity since only 1 activity is used
Re: The nested Fragments problem
To get around the 'nested Fragments' problem in our application where (as you correctly note) Fragments cannot add Fragments I hosted a single templating Fragment under the activity whose only purpose was to define a set of place holders for other fragments to anchor to. When adding further Fragments to the activity past this point I used the templating Fragment's view place holder +#ids to identify the "root" or parent view Id for the Fragment being added.
getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction().add(#someIdFromTheTemplateFrag, fragment, fragmentTag).commit();
The Fragment I was adding then knew where to anchor itself in the current layout and of course then went about it's merry way of add it's view. This had the effect of attaching a Fragment to another Fragment hence achieving the desired visual 'nesting'...