Android Studio split APK over Density - android

splits {
// Configures multiple APKs based on screen density.
density {
// Configures multiple APKs based on screen density.
enable true
reset()
// Specifies a list of screen densities Gradle should create multiple APKs for.
include 'ldpi', 'mdpi', 'hdpi', 'xhdpi', 'xxhdpi', 'xxxhdpi'
// Specifies a list of compatible screen size settings for the manifest.
//compatibleScreens 'small', 'normal', 'large', 'xlarge'
}
// Configures multiple APKs based on ABI.
abi {
// Enables building multiple APKs per ABI.
enable false
// By default all ABIs are included, so use reset() and include to specify that we only
// want APKs for x86, armeabi-v7a, and mips.
// Resets the list of ABIs that Gradle should create APKs for to none.
reset()
// Specifies a list of ABIs that Gradle should create APKs for.
include 'armeabi-v7a', 'arm64-v8a', 'x86', 'x86_64'
// Specifies that we do want to also generate a universal APK that includes all ABIs.
universalApk true //generate an additional APK that contains all the ABIs
//'armeabi' - Not surported by Realm since v2.0.0
}
}
I'm trying to split my APKs by Desity in order to reduce APK size, using the above Gradle it splits the APKs into densities but the drawable resources for each APK are identical.
Should the result of this not be that the xhdpi APK only contains only drawable-ldrtl-xhdpi-v17, drawable-xhdpi-v4 and mipmap-xhdpi-v4?

Example of density apk split in gradle:
apply plugin: 'com.android.application'
android {
compileSdkVersion 19
buildToolsVersion = rootProject.ext.buildToolsVersion
defaultConfig {
versionCode 12
minSdkVersion 16
targetSdkVersion 20
buildConfigField "String", "FOO", "\"bar\""
}
splits {
density {
enable true
exclude "ldpi", "tvdpi", "xxxhdpi", "400dpi", "560dpi"
compatibleScreens 'small', 'normal', 'large', 'xlarge'
}
}
}
// map for the version code
ext.versionCodes = [all:1, mdpi:2, hdpi:3, xhdpi:4, xxhdpi:5]
android.applicationVariants.all { variant ->
// assign different version code for each output
variant.outputs.each { output ->
def key = output.getFilter(OutputFile.DENSITY) == null ? "all" : output.getFilter(OutputFile.DENSITY)
output.versionCodeOverride = project.ext.versionCodes.get(key) * 100 + android.defaultConfig.versionCode
}
}

Related

Genereting Android density splits for 560dpi and 420dpi devices

While generating density Gradle splits are working fine for the named densities (like xxxhdpi). I am yet to find a way to create a density split for some different densities like 560dpi or 420dpi (e.g., for Google Pixel 3XL).
Here is how I am generating ABI + density splits
// ABI Splits related code
splits {
// Configures multiple APKs based on Application Binary Interfaces (ABI)
abi {
enable true // enables the ABIs split mechanism
reset() // Clears the default list from all ABIs to no ABIs
include 'arm64-v8a', 'armeabi-v7a', 'x86', "x86_64" // Spcifies a list of ABIs Gradle should createa APKs for.
universalApk false // false to skip generting the universal APK
}
// Configures multiple APKs based on screen density.
density {
enable true
reset() // Clears the default list from all densities to no denstities
include "mdpi", "hdpi", "ldpi", "xhdpi", "xxhdpi", "xxxhdpi" // Specifies a list of screen densities Gradle should create multiple APKs for.
compatibleScreens 'small', 'normal', 'large', 'xlarge' // Specifies a list of compatible screen size settings for the manifest.
}
}
And then, I am generating different versions for the generated APKs.
project.ext.abiCodes = ['armeabi-v7a': 1, 'arm64-v8a': 2, 'x86': 3, "x86_64": 4].withDefault{0}
project.ext.densityCodes = ["mdpi": 10, 'hdpi': 20, 'xhdpi': 30, "xxhdpi": 40, "xxxhdpi": 50, "ldpi": 60].withDefault{0}
android.applicationVariants.all { variant ->
variant.outputs.each { output ->
def baseAbiVersionCode = project.ext.abiCodes.get(output.getFilter("ABI"), 0)
def baseDensityVersionCode = project.ext.densityCodes.get(output.getFilter("DENSITY"), 0)
if (baseAbiVersionCode != null) {
output.versionCodeOverride = ((baseDensityVersionCode + baseAbiVersionCode) * 100000) + variant.versionCode
}
}
}
However, with the above, some newer devices that are using densities like 560dpi are marked as not supported. The universal APK is a no go for me as I am hitting the maximum APK size (and I can't use extension files).
Any ideas on how to generate density split for those unnamed densities?

Adding Flutter to Existing Apps: libflutter.so missing in the APK for "armeabi-v7a"

I an android project in native android. I created a module inside my project inside which I am writing my code in flutter based on docs:https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Add-Flutter-to-existing-apps
build.gradle for my app looks like:
...
defaultConfig {
applicationId "com.something.somethingelse"
minSdkVersion 21
targetSdkVersion 28
versionCode vcode
versionName "1.0." + vcode
multiDexEnabled true
testInstrumentationRunner "androidx.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner"
}
dataBinding {
enabled = true
}
buildTypes {
debug {
signingConfig null
ext.enableCrashlytics = false
}
release {
signingConfig null
minifyEnabled true
testProguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android-optimize.txt'), '../android-lib/proguard-rules.pro', '../android-lib/proguard-test-rules.pro'
proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android-optimize.txt'), '../android-lib/proguard-rules.pro'
}
}
// Refer to https://developer.android.com/studio/build/configure-apk-splits
splits {
// Configures multiple APKs based on ABI.
abi {
// Enables building multiple APKs per ABI.
enable true
// By default all ABIs are included, so use reset() and include to specify that we only
// want APKs for x86 and x86_64.
// Resets the list of ABIs that Gradle should create APKs for to none.
reset()
// Specifies a list of ABIs that Gradle should create APKs for.
include "x86", "x86_64", "arm64-v8a", "armeabi-v7a"
// Specifies that we do not want to generate a universal APK that includes all ABIs.
universalApk false
}
}
// Map for the version code that gives each ABI a value.
def abiCodes = ['x86':1, 'x86_64':2, 'armeabi-v7a':3, 'arm64-v8a':4]
// APKs for the same app that all have the same version information.
android.applicationVariants.all { variant ->
// Assigns a different version code for each output APK.
variant.outputs.each {
output ->
def abiName = output.getFilter(OutputFile.ABI)
output.versionCodeOverride = abiCodes.get(abiName, 0) * 100000 + variant.versionCode
}
}
When I look at APKs generated in the APK analyzer, apks for "x86", "x86_64", "arm64-v8a" contain libflutter.so but apk for "armeabi-v7a" doesn't contain libflutter.so. I am using latest version of flutter i.e. 1.9.1
Due to missing libflutter.so for this apk, application crashes on some of the devices which use "armeabi-v7a". Is there known fix for this issue? How can I go about debugging this issue?

Not able to Upload 64-bit build in Google play Store

We are trying to upload the 64bit & 32bit build, according to the recent Google policy change.
We have included respective abifilter "ndk.abiFilters 'armeabi-v7a','arm64-v8a','x86','x86_64'" in the Build.gradle.
We were able to generate the build but when we upload the build to Play console for Beta review. It gives a warning saying "Release is not compliant with 64-bit Google Requirement".
We tried all approach, generating 4 builds (x86,x86_64,armeabi-v7a,arm64-v8a), generating two builds or uploading the universal build with all abifilter, it gives the same warning. We tried all possible approaches.
Please help us out in perfect steps of uploading the build to Play store or if we are making any mistake in generating the build please do let us know on that ends also.
Please check the build.gradle code:
{
minSdkVersion 19
applicationId 'com.xxx.xxx'
targetSdkVersion 28
testInstrumentationRunner 'android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner'
versionCode 32 // 27-30
versionName '1.2.1'
ndk.abiFilters 'armeabi-v7a','arm64-v8a','x86','x86_64'
proguardFile 'proguard-android.txt'
}
Also, we tried with another approach given below:
splits {
// Configures multiple APKs based on ABI.
abi {
// Enables building multiple APKs per ABI.
enable true
// By default all ABIs are included, so use reset() and include to specify that we only
// want APKs for x86 and x86_64.
// Resets the list of ABIs that Gradle should create APKs for to none.
reset()
// Specifies a list of ABIs that Gradle should create APKs for.
include "x86", "x86_64", "arm64-v8a", "armeabi-v7a"
// Specifies that we do not want to also generate a universal APK that includes all ABIs.
universalApk true
}
}
ext.abiCodes = ["x86": 1, "x86_64": 2, "armeabi-v7a": 3, "arm64-v8a": 4]
import com.android.build.OutputFile
// For each APK output variant, override versionCode with a combination of
// ext.abiCodes * 1000 + variant.versionCode. In this example, variant.versionCode
// is equal to defaultConfig.versionCode. If you configure product flavors that
// define their own versionCode, variant.versionCode uses that value instead.
android.applicationVariants.all { variant ->
// Assigns a different version code for each output APK
// other than the universal APK.
variant.outputs.each { output ->
// Stores the value of ext.abiCodes that is associated with the ABI for this variant.
def baseAbiVersionCode =
// Determines the ABI for this variant and returns the mapped value.
project.ext.abiCodes.get(output.getFilter(OutputFile.ABI))
// Because abiCodes.get() returns null for ABIs that are not mapped by ext.abiCodes,
// the following code does not override the version code for universal APKs.
// However, because we want universal APKs to have the lowest version code,
// this outcome is desirable.
if (baseAbiVersionCode != null) {
// Assigns the new version code to versionCodeOverride, which changes the version code
// for only the output APK, not for the variant itself. Skipping this step simply
// causes Gradle to use the value of variant.versionCode for the APK.
output.versionCodeOverride =
baseAbiVersionCode * 1 + variant.versionCode
}
}
}
After a couple of days of struggle found the working solution here: diego.org
Basically, if you need the 64-bit library you first need to download the correct library from the source site(Respective library site). Check whether you are using the version of the Library whose 64-bit library is available or not.
Then install it to the local maven repository(Basically your Local Maven will be used in generating the 64-bit apk's):
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId= (library group for e.g.org.xwalk) -DartifactId= (library name for e.g.xwalk_core_library) \
-Dversion=(version no for e.g.23.53.589.4-64bit) -Dpackaging=aar \
-Dfile=(file name for e.g.xwalk_core_library-23.53.589.4-64bit.aar) \
-DgeneratePom=true
And update your build gradle so that the repositories point to your local maven repo:
repositories {
mavenLocal()
}
and you compile the correct lib:
compile 'org.xwalk:xwalk_core_library:23.53.589.4' // Use this library for generating "armeabi-v7a" & "x86" build
compile 'org.xwalk:xwalk_core_library:23.53.589.4-64bit' // Use this library for generating "arm64-v8a" & "x86_64" build
Use the gradle Config:
ndk.abiFilters 'armeabi-v7a','arm64-v8a','x86','x86_64' // For your flavor or defaultConfig
Following these steps will generate two builds one with 32bit and another with 64bit, doing these will also help you to avoid errors like "Fully Shadowed apk"
Hope this helps.
Use the Android App Bundle Publishing method to avoid these errors.
Your application will be built for all types of devices by google.
FIRST OF ALL YOU SET Universal APK = False
Follow This Gradle
android {
compileSdkVersion 28
defaultConfig {
applicationId "photo.abc.video"
minSdkVersion 17
targetSdkVersion 28
versionCode 2
versionName "2.0"
multiDexEnabled true
ndk {
moduleName "andengine_shared"
}
}
useLibrary 'org.apache.http.legacy'
sourceSets {
main {
jni.srcDirs = []
}
}
buildTypes {
release {
minifyEnabled false
proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
}
}
lintOptions {
checkReleaseBuilds false
abortOnError false
}
splits {
abi {
enable true
reset()
include "armeabi-v7a", "arm64-v8a", "x86", "x86_64"
universalApk false
}
}
}
ext.abiCodes = ['x86':1, 'x86_64':2, 'armeabi-v7a':3, 'arm64-v8a':4]
i fix my proplem it is easy you dont need mvn install:install-file
just go to download page
https://download.01.org/crosswalk/releases/crosswalk/android/maven2/org/xwalk/xwalk_core_library/21.51.546.7/
and download 2 library
1- 32 bit
2- 64 bit
this
xwalk_core_library-21.51.546.7-arm64.aar
and this
xwalk_core_library-21.51.546.7-x86.aar
after download you need to open file use winrar
take the x86 libart out and add to arm64 file
so now we have 2 library on the file 32 bit and 64 bit
now add this library to android stiduo
file - new - new module - jar/aar
add you libary
after that
add your library on your project
in your build gradle
defaultConfig {
minSdkVersion 16
targetSdkVersion 28
versionCode 17
versionName "3.2"
testInstrumentationRunner "android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner"
multiDexEnabled = true
ndk {
abiFilters 'armeabi-v7a', 'arm64-v8a', 'x86' ,'x86_64'
}
that all
apk analyze yes you have 2 library 32 bit and 64 bit now you can Update your application

after split APK which one should I choose?

I split my apk application and I got multiple apk
now which one I will choose to import to my play store ?
You add all of them, Play Store chooses the right one for the user, depending on their device. Just be sure to use different version codes for every apk.
See official documentation for more information.
you can let gradle auto configure your version code, then upload ALL of the apps to the play store.
google's example below will auto append 001, 002 or 003 depending on the variant ('armeabi-v7a':1, x86:2, x86_64:3).
do note that you will have to upload the play store from the smallest number to the biggest number.
see https://developer.android.com/studio/build/configure-apk-splits.html#configure-APK-versions
android {
...
defaultConfig {
...
versionCode 4
}
splits {
...
}
}
// Map for the version code that gives each ABI a value.
ext.abiCodes = ['armeabi-v7a':1, x86:2, x86_64:3]
// For per-density APKs, create a similar map like this:
// ext.densityCodes = ['mdpi': 1, 'hdpi': 2, 'xhdpi': 3]
import com.android.build.OutputFile
// For each APK output variant, override versionCode with a combination of
// ext.abiCodes * 1000 + variant.versionCode. In this example, variant.versionCode
// is equal to defaultConfig.versionCode. If you configure product flavors that
// define their own versionCode, variant.versionCode uses that value instead.
android.applicationVariants.all { variant ->
// Assigns a different version code for each output APK
// other than the universal APK.
variant.outputs.each { output ->
// Stores the value of ext.abiCodes that is associated with the ABI for this variant.
def baseAbiVersionCode =
// Determines the ABI for this variant and returns the mapped value.
project.ext.abiCodes.get(output.getFilter(OutputFile.ABI))
// Because abiCodes.get() returns null for ABIs that are not mapped by ext.abiCodes,
// the following code does not override the version code for universal APKs.
// However, because we want universal APKs to have the lowest version code,
// this outcome is desirable.
if (baseAbiVersionCode != null) {
// Assigns the new version code to versionCodeOverride, which changes the version code
// for only the output APK, not for the variant itself. Skipping this step simply
// causes Gradle to use the value of variant.versionCode for the APK.
output.versionCodeOverride =
baseAbiVersionCode * 1000 + variant.versionCode
}
}
}
For more examples of alternate version code schemes, see Assigning version codes (https://developer.android.com/google/play/publishing/multiple-apks.html#VersionCodes)
Yeah, It depends on which device you want to target. For more information Below - stackoverflow and developer's official links are also be helpful to you:
Publish Multiple APKs to Google Play Store
https://developer.android.com/studio/build/configure-apk-splits.html#build-apks
Depends on which device you want to target. Play store will tell you how much device you have left out after uploading an apk. Make sure you have version code different for each flavor if you want to upload multiple ones. For example,I have XXXn where n is the code for cpu architecture.
I can't publish multiple release
the problem is the release code or version
ext.abiCodes = ['x86_64':1,'x86':2,'armeabi':3,'armeabi-v7a':4,'arm64-v8a':5,'mips':6]
android {
compileSdkVersion 27
defaultConfig {
applicationId "com.book.walid.resumephilosophie"
minSdkVersion 15
resConfigs "ar"
targetSdkVersion 27
testInstrumentationRunner "android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner"
}
splits {
abi{
enable true
reset()
include 'x86_64','x86','armeabi','armeabi-v7a','arm64-v8a','mips'
universalApk false
}
}
android.applicationVariants.all { variant ->
def baseAbiVersionCode =
project.ext.abiCodes.get(com.android.build.OutputFile.ABI)
if (baseAbiVersionCode != null) {
output.versionCodeOverride =
baseAbiVersionCode * 1000 + variant.versionCode
}
}
buildTypes {
release {
minifyEnabled true
shrinkResources true
proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
}
}

Android Gradle 1.0 Computing Version code in multi-flavor setup

The code to compute version code for different product flavors is no longer working in the Android Gradle 1.0 system. I used the example code below before successfully.
http://tools.android.com/tech-docs/new-build-system/tips#TOC-Computing-Version-code-in-multi-flavor-setup.
productFlavors.get(0).versionCode is now computed as null.
Gradle code..
android {
buildscript {
repositories {
mavenCentral()
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.android.tools.build:gradle:1.0.0'
}
}
// This actual the app version code. Our given range is [0, 99999]
defaultConfig.versionCode = 123
// 2 dimensions of flavors. API is more important than ABI.
flavorGroups "api", "abi"
productFlavors {
gingerbread {
flavorGroup "api"
minSdkVersion 10
versionCode = 1
}
icecreamSandwich {
flavorGroup "api"
minSdkVersion 14
// this must be higher than the gingerbread version to ensure update of the
// app when the device gets a system update from GB to ICS
versionCode = 2
}
x86 {
flavorGroup "abi"
ndk.abiFilter "x86"
// this is the flavor part of the version code.
// It must be higher than the arm one for devices supporting
// both, as x86 is preferred.
versionCode = 3
}
arm {
flavorGroup "abi"
ndk.abiFilter "armeabi-v7a"
versionCode = 1
}
mips {
flavorGroup "abi"
// It must be higher than the arm one for devices supporting
// both, as mips is preferred.
ndk.abiFilter "mips"
versionCode = 2
}
fat {
flavorGroup "abi"
// fat binary, lowest version code to be
// the last option
versionCode = 0
}
}
// make per-variant version code
applicationVariants.all { variant ->
// get the version code of each flavor
def apiVersion = variant.productFlavors.get(0).versionCode
def abiVersion = variant.productFlavors.get(1).versionCode
// set the composite code
variant.mergedFlavor.versionCode = apiVersion * 1000000 + abiVersion * 100000 + defaultConfig.versionCode
}
}
From Google user guide
Multi-flavor variants
In some case, one may want to create several versions of the same apps
based on more than one criteria. For instance, multi-apk support in
Google Play supports 4 different filters. Creating different APKs
split on each filter requires being able to use more than one
dimension of Product Flavors.
Consider the example of a game that has a demo and a paid version and
wants to use the ABI filter in the multi-apk support. With 3 ABIs and
two versions of the application, 6 APKs needs to be generated (not
counting the variants introduced by the different Build Types).
However, the code of the paid version is the same for all three ABIs,
so creating simply 6 flavors is not the way to go. Instead, there are
two dimensions of flavors, and variants should automatically build all
possible combinations.
This feature is implemented using Flavor Dimensions. Flavors are
assigned to a specific dimension android {
...
flavorDimensions "abi", "version"
productFlavors {
freeapp {
flavorDimension "version"
...
}
x86 {
flavorDimension "abi"
...
}
} }
flavorGroups was replaced by flavorDimensions, so you need to use next code at build.gradle
// 2 dimensions of flavors. API is more important than ABI.
flavorDimensions "api", "abi"
productFlavors {
gingerbread {
flavorDimension "api"
minSdkVersion 10
versionCode = 1
}
icecreamSandwich {
flavorDimension "api"
minSdkVersion 14
// this must be higher than the gingerbread version to ensure update of the
// app when the device gets a system update from GB to ICS
versionCode = 2
}
x86 {
flavorDimension "abi"
ndk.abiFilter "x86"
// this is the flavor part of the version code.
// It must be higher than the arm one for devices supporting
// both, as x86 is preferred.
versionCode = 3
}
arm {
flavorDimension "abi"
ndk.abiFilter "armeabi-v7a"
versionCode = 1
}
mips {
flavorDimension "abi"
// It must be higher than the arm one for devices supporting
// both, as mips is preferred.
ndk.abiFilter "mips"
versionCode = 2
}
fat {
flavorDimension "abi"
// fat binary, lowest version code to be
// the last option
versionCode = 0
}
}
// make per-variant version code
applicationVariants.all { variant ->
// get the version code of each flavor
def apiVersion = variant.productFlavors.get(0).versionCode
def abiVersion = variant.productFlavors.get(1).versionCode
// set the composite code
variant.mergedFlavor.versionCode = apiVersion * 1000000 + abiVersion * 100000 + defaultConfig.versionCode
}
Update:
Add these lines to be able see versionCode at generated names of apk
applicationVariants.all { variant ->
variant.outputs.each { output ->
def apk = output.outputFile;
def newName = "${output.name}-${variant.mergedFlavor.versionCode}"
if (variant.buildType.versionNameSuffix) {
newName += "-${variant.buildType.versionNameSuffix}"
}
if (output.zipAlign) {
output.zipAlign.outputFile = new File((File) apk.parentFile, newName + '-aligned.apk');
}
output.packageApplication.outputFile = new File((File) apk.parentFile, newName + ".apk")
}
}
See bellow result of build:
gingerbreadArmDebug-1100123.apk
gingerbreadArmDebug-1100123-aligned.apk
gingerbreadFatDebug-1000123.apk
gingerbreadFatDebug-1000123-aligned.apk
gingerbreadMipsDebug-1200123.apk
gingerbreadMipsDebug-1200123-aligned.apk
gingerbreadX86Debug-1300123.apk
gingerbreadX86Debug-1300123-aligned.apk
icecreamSandwichArmDebug-2100123.apk
icecreamSandwichArmDebug-2100123-aligned.apk
icecreamSandwichFatDebug-2000123.apk
icecreamSandwichFatDebug-2000123-aligned.apk
icecreamSandwichMipsDebug-2200123.apk
icecreamSandwichMipsDebug-2200123-aligned.apk
icecreamSandwichX86Debug-2300123.apk
icecreamSandwichX86Debug-2300123-aligned.apk
gingerbreadArmRelease-1100123.apk
gingerbreadFatRelease-1000123.apk
gingerbreadMipsRelease-1200123.apk
gingerbreadX86Release-1300123.apk
icecreamSandwichArmRelease-2100123.apk
icecreamSandwichFatRelease-2000123.apk
icecreamSandwichMipsRelease-2200123.apk
icecreamSandwichX86Release-2300123.apk
Info from one of them, extracted by apktool:
version: 2.0.0-RC3
apkFileName: gingerbreadArmDebug-1100123.apk
isFrameworkApk: false
usesFramework:
ids:
- 1
sdkInfo:
minSdkVersion: '10'
targetSdkVersion: '21'
packageInfo:
forced-package-id: '127'
versionInfo:
versionCode: '1100123'
versionName: '1.0'
compressionType: false
Update 2:
Published my test project at GitHub

Categories

Resources