Develop Reference

Executing rx.Obseravables secuentially

I'm developing an Android App using Fernando Ceja's clean architecture. One of my Interactors or Use Cases is in charge of getting the User's feed data. In order to get the data, first I have to retrieve the User's Teams from a database table and then I have to get the Feed list from the server-side.
This is how I get the Teams from the database layer:
mTeamCache.getAllTeams().subscribe(new DefaultSubscriber<List<SimpleTeam>>() {
#Override
public void onNext(List<SimpleTeam> simpleTeams) {
super.onNext(simpleTeams);
mTeams = simpleTeams;
}
});
TeamCache is basically just another Interactor that takes care of getting all the teams that I have in the database.
Here's how I get the Feed data from the server-side:
mFeedRepository.getFeed(0, 50).subscribe(new ServerSubscriber<List<ApiFeedResponse>>() {
#Override
protected void onServerSideError(Throwable errorResponse) {
callback.onFeedFetchFailed(...);
}
#Override
protected void onSuccess(List<ApiFeedResponse> responseBody) {
//Do stuff with mTeams
callback.onFeedFetched(...);
}
});
My GetFeedInteractor class has a method called execute, where I pass through the Callback that I'm later using in the UI to handle the response. The issue with all this is that currently I'm chaining the responses like this:
#Override
public void execute(final Callback callback, String userSipId) {
mTeamCache.getAllTeams().subscribe(new DefaultSubscriber<List<SimpleTeam>>() {
#Override
public void onNext(List<SimpleTeam> simpleTeams) {
super.onNext(simpleTeams);
mTeams = simpleTeams;
getFeedFromRepository(callback);
}
});
}
public void getFeedFromRepository(final Callback callback) {
mFeedRepository.getFeedRx(0, 50).subscribe(new ServerSubscriber<List<ApiFeedResponse>>() {
#Override
protected void onServerSideError(Throwable errorResponse) {
callback.onFeedFetchFailed("failed");
}
#Override
protected void onSuccess(List<ApiFeedResponse> responseBody) {
//Do stuff with mTeams
List<BaseFeedItem> responseList = new ArrayList();
for (ApiFeedResponse apiFeedResponse : responseBody) {
responseList.add(FeedDataMapper.transform(apiFeedResponse));
}
callback.onFeedFetched(responseList);
}
});
}
As you can see, once that I get the Team collection from the Cache Interactor I call the method that gets the feed from the very same Subscriber. I don't like this. I want to be able to do something nicer, like using Observable.concat(getTeamsFromCache(), getFeedFromRepository()); chain a call to another rx.Observable inside a Subscriber is not something nice to do. I guess that my question is, how can I chain two rx.Observables that are using different Subscribers?
Update:
ServerSubscriber is a subscriber that I implemted to subscribe to Retrofit services. It simply checks the error codes and some stuff. Here is:
https://gist.github.com/4gus71n/65dc94de4ca01fb221a079b68c0570b5
Default subscriber is an empty default subscriber. Here is:
https://gist.github.com/4gus71n/df501928fc5d24c2c6ed7740a6520330
TeamCache#getAllTeams() returns rx.Observable>
FeedRepository#getFeed(int page, int offset) returns rx.Observable>
Update 2:
This is how the Interactor to get the User's feed looks like now:
#Override
public void execute(final Callback callback, int offset, int pageSize) {
User user = mGetLoggedUser.get();
String userSipid = mUserSipid.get();
mFeedRepository.getFeed(offset, pageSize) //Get items from the server-side
.onErrorResumeNext(mFeedCache.getFeed(userSipid)) //If something goes wrong take it from cache
.mergeWith(mPendingPostCache.getAllPendingPostsAsFeedItems(user)) //Merge the response with the pending posts
.subscribe(new DefaultSubscriber<List<BaseFeedItem>>() {
#Override
public void onNext(List<BaseFeedItem> baseFeedItems) {
callback.onFeedFetched(baseFeedItems);
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
if (e instanceof ServerSideException) {
//Handle the http error
} else if (e instanceof DBException) {
//Handle the database cache error
} else {
//Handle generic error
}
}
});
}

I think you're missing the point of RxJava and reactive approach, you should not have different subscribers with OO hierarchy, and callbacks.
You should construct separated Observables that should emit the specific data it's handle, without the Subscriber, then you can chain you're Observable as needed, and at the end, you have the subscriber that react to the final result expected from the chained Observable stream.
something like this (using lambdas to have more thin code):
TeamCache mTeamCache = new TeamCache();
FeedRepository mFeedRepository = new FeedRepository();
Observable.zip(teamsObservable, feedObservable, Pair::new)
.subscribe(resultPair -> {
//Do stuff with mTeams
List<BaseFeedItem> responseList = new ArrayList();
for (ApiFeedResponse apiFeedResponse : resultPair.second) {
responseList.add(FeedDataMapper.transform(apiFeedResponse));
}
}, throwable -> {
//handle errors
}
);
I've use zip and not concat as it's seems you have 2 independent calls here that you want to wait for both to finish ('zip' them together) and then act upon, but ofcourse, as you have separated Observables stream, you can chain them together differently according to your needs.
as for your ServerSubscriber with all the response validation logic, it should be rxify too, so you can compose it along your server Observable stream.
something like this (some logic emitted to simplify, and as I'm not familiar with it...)
Observable<List<SimpleTeam>> teamsObservable = mTeamCache.getAllTeams();
Observable<List<ApiFeedResponse>> feedObservable = mFeedRepository.getFeed(0, 50)
.flatMap(apiFeedsResponse -> {
if (apiFeedsResponse.code() != 200) {
if (apiFeedsResponse.code() == 304) {
List<ApiFeedResponse> body = apiFeedsResponse.body();
return Observable.just(body);
//onNotModified(o.body());
} else {
return Observable.error(new ServerSideErrorException(apiFeedsResponse));
}
} else {
//onServerSideResponse(o.body());
return Observable.just(apiFeedsResponse.body());
}
});

RxAnadroid concatenating streams

I'm making a simple weather app to learn RxAndroid and I'm faced with the following issue.
I first load cities I'm interested in and then ask for the weather of each one of them.
getCitiesUseCase returns an Observable<List<City>> that I load from the data base. I send that list of cities to my view to display them and then ask for the weather individually (flatmap) inside the subscriber.
Subscription subscription = getCitiesUseCase.execute().flatMap(new Func1<List<City>, Observable<City>>() {
#Override
public Observable<City> call(List<City> cities) {
citiesView.addCities(cities);
return Observable.from(cities);
}
}).subscribe(new Subscriber<City>() {
#Override
public void onCompleted() {
subscriptions.remove(this);
this.unsubscribe();
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
Log.e(this.getClass().getSimpleName(), e.toString());
}
#Override
public void onNext(City city) {
getCityWeatherUseCase.setLatLon(city.getLat().toString(), city.getLon().toString(), city.getId());
getCityWeather(city);
}
});
subscriptions.add(subscription);
Now the getCityWeather() method looks like this:
private void getCityWeather(final City city) {
subscriptions.add(getCityWeatherUseCase.execute().subscribe(new Subscriber<CityWeather>() {
#Override
public void onCompleted() {
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
Log.e("error", e.toString());
}
#Override
public void onNext(CityWeather cityWeather) {
city.setCityWeather(cityWeather);
citiesView.updateCity(city);
}
}));
}
Everything works fine and as expected, but the fact that I'm subscribing to an observer inside a subcriber doesnt feel right. I know rxJava lets you play around with subscribers to prevent this kind of things but I really dont know how to improve my code further. Keep in mind that I need a city in order to ask for its weather.
Merry chrismas!

One approach could be the following. (I'm using retrolambda - so wherever you see ->, just replace with a new anonymous inner class).
Note that I'm using flatMap to spin up the weather data requests, rather than Observable.concat like your question suggests. The reason for this is that your scheduler (e.g. io()) will handle these in parallel and send the results through when they are available. However, with Observable.concat, these requests would be serialized so they'd be forced to happen one at a time - nullifying the benefits of a thread pool like io().
private class City {
public String name;
public City(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public void setWeather(Weather weather) { /*...*/ }
}
private class Weather {
public String status;
public Weather(String status) {
this.status = status;
}
}
private Observable<Weather> getWeather(City city) {
// call your weather API here..
return Observable.just(new Weather("Sunny"));
}
#Test
public void test() {
Observable<List<City>> citiesObs = Observable.create(new Observable.OnSubscribe<List<City>>() {
#Override
public void call(Subscriber<? super List<City>> subscriber) {
// do work
final List<City> cities = new ArrayList<>();
cities.add(new City("Paris"));
cities.add(new City("Tokyo"));
cities.add(new City("Oslo"));
// send results
if (!subscriber.isUnsubscribed()) {
subscriber.onNext(cities);
subscriber.onCompleted();
}
}
});
Observable<City> obs = citiesObs
// inject a side effect
.doOnNext(list -> {
// pass `list` to your view here
})
// turn Observable<Iterable<T>> into Observable<T>
.flatMapIterable(list -> list)
// Map a city to an observable that fetches Weather data
// Your scheduler can take care of these at once.
.flatMap(city -> {
return getWeather(city)
// another side effect
.doOnNext(weather -> {
city.setWeather(weather);
})
// map baack to city, just for the heck of it
.map($ -> city);
});
TestSubscriber sub = TestSubscriber.create();
obs.subscribe(sub);
sub.awaitTerminalEvent();
sub.assertValueCount(3);
}
Also note that in order to take advantage of io(), you'd need to add a call to subscribeOn(Schedulers.io()) to tell the observable to begin doing work on the io thread pool. When you want to pass control to another thread, for example your view, you could insert a observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread()) before your side-effect (or mapping). If you want to bounce control back to the background thread(s) for your weather calls, you could then add another call to observeOn(Schedulers.io()) right before you flatMap to getWeather(City).

Handling API exceptions in RxJava

I'm trying to wrap my head around RxJava currently, but I'm having a little trouble with handling service call exceptions in an elegant manner.
Basically, I have a (Retrofit) service that returns an Observable<ServiceResponse>. ServiceResponse is defined like so:
public class ServiceResponse {
private int status;
private String message;
private JsonElement data;
public JsonElement getData() {
return data;
}
public int getStatus() {
return status;
}
public String getMessage() {
return message;
}
}
Now what I want is to map that generic response to a List<Account> contained within the data JsonElement field (I assume you don't care what the Account object looks like, so I won't pollute the post with it). The following code works really well for the success case, but I can't find a nice way to handle my API exceptions:
service.getAccounts()
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.map(new Func1<ServiceResponse, AccountData>() {
#Override
public AccountData call(ServiceResponse serviceResponse) {
// TODO: ick. fix this. there must be a better way...
ResponseTypes responseType = ResponseTypes.from(serviceResponse.getStatus());
switch (responseType) {
case SUCCESS:
Gson gson = new GsonBuilder().create();
return gson.fromJson(serviceResponse.getData(), AccountData.class);
case HOST_UNAVAILABLE:
throw new HostUnavailableException(serviceResponse.getMessage());
case SUSPENDED_USER:
throw new SuspendedUserException(serviceResponse.getMessage());
case SYSTEM_ERROR:
case UNKNOWN:
default:
throw new SystemErrorException(serviceResponse.getMessage());
}
}
})
.map(new Func1<AccountData, List<Account>>() {
#Override
public List<Account> call(AccountData accountData) {
Gson gson = new GsonBuilder().create();
List<Account> res = new ArrayList<Account>();
for (JsonElement account : accountData.getAccounts()) {
res.add(gson.fromJson(account, Account.class));
}
return res;
}
})
.subscribe(accountsRequest);
Is there a better way to do this? This does work, onError will fire to my observer, and I will receive the error that I threw, but it definitely does not seem like I'm doing this right.
Thanks in advance!
Edit:
Let me clarify exactly what I want to achieve:
I want to have a class that can be called from the UI (e.g. an Activity, or Fragment, or whatever). That class would take an Observer<List<Account>> as a parameter like so:
public Subscription loadAccounts(Observer<List<Account>> observer, boolean forceRefresh) {
...
}
That method would return a subscription that can be unsubscribed when the UI is detached/destroyed/etc.
The parameterized observer would handle onNext for the successful responses passing in a list of Accounts. OnError would handle any exceptions, but would also get passed any API exceptions (e.g. if the response status != 200 we would create a Throwable and pass it to onError). Ideally I don't want to just "throw" the Exception, I want to pass it directly to the Observer. That's what all the examples I see do.
The complication is that my Retrofit service returns a ServiceResponse object, so my observer cannot subscribe to that. The best I've come up with is to create an Observer wrapper around my Observer, like so:
#Singleton
public class AccountsDatabase {
private AccountsService service;
private List<Account> accountsCache = null;
private PublishSubject<ServiceResponse> accountsRequest = null;
#Inject
public AccountsDatabase(AccountsService service) {
this.service = service;
}
public Subscription loadAccounts(Observer<List<Account>> observer, boolean forceRefresh) {
ObserverWrapper observerWrapper = new ObserverWrapper(observer);
if (accountsCache != null) {
// We have a cached value. Emit it immediately.
observer.onNext(accountsCache);
}
if (accountsRequest != null) {
// There's an in-flight network request for this section already. Join it.
return accountsRequest.subscribe(observerWrapper);
}
if (accountsCache != null && !forceRefresh) {
// We had a cached value and don't want to force a refresh on the data. Just
// return an empty subscription
observer.onCompleted();
return Subscriptions.empty();
}
accountsRequest = PublishSubject.create();
accountsRequest.subscribe(new ObserverWrapper(new EndObserver<List<Account>>() {
#Override
public void onNext(List<Account> accounts) {
accountsCache = accounts;
}
#Override
public void onEnd() {
accountsRequest = null;
}
}));
Subscription subscription = accountsRequest.subscribe(observerWrapper);
service.getAccounts()
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(accountsRequest);
return subscription;
}
static class ObserverWrapper implements Observer<ServiceResponse> {
private Observer<List<Account>> observer;
public ObserverWrapper(Observer<List<Account>> observer) {
this.observer = observer;
}
#Override
public void onCompleted() {
observer.onCompleted();
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
observer.onError(e);
}
#Override
public void onNext(ServiceResponse serviceResponse) {
ResponseTypes responseType = ResponseTypes.from(serviceResponse.getStatus());
switch (responseType) {
case SUCCESS:
Gson gson = new GsonBuilder().create();
AccountData accountData = gson.fromJson(serviceResponse.getData(), AccountData.class);
List<Account> res = new ArrayList<>();
for (JsonElement account : accountData.getAccounts()) {
res.add(gson.fromJson(account, Account.class));
}
observer.onNext(res);
observer.onCompleted();
break;
default:
observer.onError(new ApiException(serviceResponse.getMessage(), responseType));
break;
}
}
}
}
I still feel like I am not using this correctly though. I definitely haven't seen anyone else using an ObserverWrapper before. Perhaps I shouldn't be using RxJava, though the guys at SoundCloud and Netflix really sold me on it in their presentations and I'm pretty eager to learn it.

Please read below I've added an edit.
It's perfectly correct to throw within an Action/Func/Observer with RxJava. The exception will be propagate by the framework right down to your Observer.
If you limit yourself to calling onError only then you'll be twisting yourself to make that happen.
With that being said a suggestion would be to simply remove this wrapper and add a simple validation
Action within the service.getAccount... chain of Observables.
I'd use the doOnNext(new ValidateServiceResponseOrThrow) chained with a map(new MapValidResponseToAccountList). Those are simple classes which implements the necessary code to keep the Observable chain a bit more readable.
Here's your loadAccount method simplified using what I suggested.
public Subscription loadAccounts(Observer<List<Account>> observer, boolean forceRefresh) {
if (accountsCache != null) {
// We have a cached value. Emit it immediately.
observer.onNext(accountsCache);
}
if (accountsRequest != null) {
// There's an in-flight network request for this section already. Join it.
return accountsRequest.subscribe(observer);
}
if (accountsCache != null && !forceRefresh) {
// We had a cached value and don't want to force a refresh on the data. Just
// return an empty subscription
observer.onCompleted();
return Subscriptions.empty();
}
accountsRequest = PublishSubject.create();
accountsRequest.subscribe(new EndObserver<List<Account>>() {
#Override
public void onNext(List<Account> accounts) {
accountsCache = accounts;
}
#Override
public void onEnd() {
accountsRequest = null;
}
});
Subscription subscription = accountsRequest.subscribe(observer);
service.getAccounts()
.doOnNext(new ValidateServiceResponseOrThrow())
.map(new MapValidResponseToAccountList())
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(accountsRequest);
return subscription;
}
private static class ValidateResponseOrThrow implements Action1<ServiceResponse> {
#Override
public void call(ServiceResponse response) {
ResponseTypes responseType = ResponseTypes.from(serviceResponse.getStatus());
if (responseType != SUCCESS)
throw new ApiException(serviceResponse.getMessage(), responseType));
}
}
private static class MapValidResponseToAccountList implements Func1<ServiceResponse, List<Account>> {
#Override
public Message call(ServiceResponse response) {
// add code here to map the ServiceResponse into the List<Accounts> as you've provided already
}
}
Edit:
Unless someone says otherwise I think it's best practice to return errors using flatMap.
I've thrown Exceptions from Action in the past but I don't believe it's the recommended way.
You'll have a cleaner Exception stack if you use flatMap. If you throw from inside an Action the Exception stack
will actually contain rx.exceptions.OnErrorThrowable$OnNextValue Exception which isn't ideal.
Let me demonstrate the example above using the flatMap instead.
private static class ValidateServiceResponse implements rx.functions.Func1<ServiceResponse, Observable<ServiceResponse>> {
#Override
public Observable<ServiceResponse> call(ServiceResponse response) {
ResponseTypes responseType = ResponseTypes.from(serviceResponse.getStatus());
if (responseType != SUCCESS)
return Observable.error(new ApiException(serviceResponse.getMessage(), responseType));
return Observable.just(response);
}
}
service.getAccounts()
.flatMap(new ValidateServiceResponse())
.map(new MapValidResponseToAccountList())
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(accountsRequest);
As you can see the the difference is subtle. The ValidateServiceResponse now implements the Func1 instead of Action1 and we're no longer using the throw keyword. We use Observable.error(new Throwable) instead. I believe this fits better with the expected Rx contract.

You could read this good article about error handling http://blog.danlew.net/2015/12/08/error-handling-in-rxjava/

Mock Retrofit Observable<T> response in Android Unit tests

I have an API interface and I'm testing a View that involves network calls.
#Config(emulateSdk = 18)
public class SampleViewTest extends RobolectricTestBase {
ServiceApi apiMock;
#Inject
SampleView fixture;
#Override
public void setUp() {
super.setUp(); //injection is performed in super
apiMock = mock(ServiceApi.class);
fixture = new SampleView(activity);
fixture.setApi(apiMock);
}
#Test
public void testSampleViewCallback() {
when(apiMock.requestA()).thenReturn(Observable.from(new ResponseA());
when(apiMock.requestB()).thenReturn(Observable.from(new ResponseB());
AtomicReference<Object> testResult = new AtomicReference<>();
fixture.updateView(new Callback() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(Object result) {
testResult.set(result);
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable error) {
throw new RuntimeException(error);
}
});
verify(apiMock, times(1)).requestA();
verify(apiMock, times(1)).requestB();
assertNotNull(testResult.get());
}
}
For some reason apiMock methods are never called and verification always fails.
In my view I'm calling my api like this
apiV2.requestA()
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(new Observer());
What am I missing here?
Update #1:
After some investigation it appears that when in my implementation (sample above) I observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread()) subscriber is not called. Still do not know why.
Update #2:
When subscribing just like that apiV2.requestA().subscribe(new Observer()); everything works just fine - mock api is called and test passes.
Advancing ShadowLooper.idleMainLooper(5000) did nothing. Even grabbed looper from handler in HandlerThreadScheduler and advanced it. Same result.
Update #3:
Adding actual code where API is used.
public void updateView(final Callback) {
Observable.zip(wrapObservable(api.requestA()), wrapObservable(api.requestB()),
new Func2<ResponseA, ResponseB, Object>() {
#Override
public Object call(ResponseA responseA, ResponseB responseB) {
return mergeBothResponses(responseA, responseB);
}
}
).subscribe(new EndlessObserver<Object>() {
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
Log.e(e);
listener.onError(e);
}
#Override
public void onNext(Object config) {
Log.d("Configuration updated [%s]", config.toString());
listener.onSuccess(config);
}
});
}
protected <T> Observable<T> wrapObservable(Observable<T> observable) {
return observable.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io()).observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread());
}

I'm still wrapping my head around how to properly use rxjava myself but I would try to modify your code so that you only observeOn(mainThread) on the final zipped Observable instead of doing it on both of the original request response's Observable. I would then verify if this affect the fact that you have to advance both Loopers or not.
To simply your tests and remove the need for Looper idling I would take the threading out of the equation since you don't need background processing when running tests. You can do that by having your Schedulers injected instead of creating them statically. When running your production code you'd have the AndroidSchedulers.mainThread and Schedulers.io injected and when running tests code you would inject Schedulers.immediate where applicable.
#Inject
#UIScheduler /* Inject Schedulers.immediate for tests and AndroidSchedulers.mainThread for production code */
private Scheduler mainThreadSched;
#Inject
#IOScheduler /* Inject Scheduler.immediate for tests and Schedulers.io for production code */
private Scheduler ioSched;
public void updateView(final Callback) {
Observable.zip(wrapObservable(api.requestA()), wrapObservable(api.requestB()),
new Func2<ResponseA, ResponseB, Object>() {
#Override
public Object call(ResponseA responseA, ResponseB responseB) {
return mergeBothResponses(responseA, responseB);
}
}
).observeOn(mainThreadSched)
.subscribe(new EndlessObserver<Object>() {
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
Log.e(e);
listener.onError(e);
}
#Override
public void onNext(Object config) {
Log.d("Configuration updated [%s]", config.toString());
listener.onSuccess(config);
}
});
}
protected <T> Observable<T> wrapObservable(Observable<T> observable) {
return observable.subscribeOn(ioSched);
}

what version of rxjava are you using? I know there was some changes in the 0.18.* version regarding the ExecutorScheduler. I had a similar issue as you when using 0.18.3 where I wouldn't get the onComplete message because my subscription would be unsubscribe ahead of time. The only reason I'm mentioning this to you is that a fix in 0.19.0 fixed my issue.
Unfortunately I can't really explain the details of what was fixed, it's beyond my understanding at this point but if it turns out to be the same cause maybe someone with more understand could explain. Here's the link of what I'm talking about https://github.com/Netflix/RxJava/issues/1219.
This isn't much of an answer but more a heads up in case it could help you.

As #champ016 stated there were issues with RxJava versions that are lower than 0.19.0.
When using 0.19.0 the following approach works. Although still don't quite get why I have to advance BOTH loopers.
#Test
public void testSampleViewCallback() {
when(apiMock.requestA()).thenReturn(Observable.from(new ResponseA());
when(apiMock.requestB()).thenReturn(Observable.from(new ResponseB());
AtomicReference<Object> testResult = new AtomicReference<>();
fixture.updateView(new Callback() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(Object result) {
testResult.set(result);
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable error) {
throw new RuntimeException(error);
}
});
ShadowLooper.idleMainLooper(5000);
Robolectric.shadowOf(
Reflection.field("handler")
.ofType(Handler.class)
.in(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.get().getLooper())
.idle(5000);
verify(apiMock, times(1)).requestA();
verify(apiMock, times(1)).requestB();
assertNotNull(testResult.get());
}

Using Observable in custom Application subclass

Is it acceptable to create Rx Observables in custom Application subclass. Reason for doing is, I can create BehaviorSubject inside the Application and will ask for changes every 10 minutes from Server, every Activity or Fragment which subscribes to this Observable will get only last state of changes.
Question is whether this architecture could be considered safe in terms of application lifecycle handling and easy to use?
class CustomApplication extends Application {
...
BehaviorSubject<Friends> mFriends = new BehaviorSubject<Friends>;
public void createObservables() {
Observable.create(new Observable.OnSubscribe<Friends>() {
public void call(Subscriber<?> s) {
while(true) {
mFriends.onNext("randomFriendN");
sleep(10sec);
}
}
})
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.newThread())
.subscribe(new Observer<List<NewsCategory>>() {
public void onNext(Friends f) { //empty }
});
}
public BehaviorSubject<Friends> getFriends() {
return mFriends;
}
}
UPDATE:
Everytime when new activity created and it wants to get data it can get it ApplicationContext's BehaviorSubject then subscribe to it, and Subject will emit last emitted value;
Why I want to do like this? E.g. Lets say you have news items, you fetched news feed and you want to start background task which fetches news item full content, in that case I can start fetching data while you are scrolling news list, and when you click detailed activity, we can show it from already fetched, or just download it.

I think this is perfectly safe as long as createObservables() is only called once during application initialization. A few suggested changes...
I wouldn't expose the BehaviorSubject part of mFriends in the returned value from getFriends(). That way callers of getFriends() will not be tempted to call onNext(). Change it to:
public Observable<Friends> getFriends() {
return mFriends;
}
If you want to be super safe use .asObservable() and callers will not even be able to cast the return value back to a BehaviorSubject.
public Observable<Friends> getFriends() {
return mFriends.asObservable();
}
I would also update your createObservable() method to call the BehaviorSubject onNext() from the subscribe callback. Here is your code slightly modified to use NewsItems.
BehaviorSubject<List<NewsItem>> mNewsItemSubject = BehaviorSubject.create();
void createObservables() {
Observable
.timer(10, 10, TimeUnit.SECONDS, Schedulers.newThread())
.flatMap(new Func1<Long, Observable<List<NewsItem>>>() {
#Override
public Observable<List<NewsItem>> call(Long aLong) {
// Normally you would create a network API that returns Observable<NewsItem>.
// For now just pretend this returned Observable makes an Observable
// network request.
return Observable.just(
Arrays.asList(
new NewsItem("fakeNewsItem"),
new NewsItem("fakeNewsItem1")
)
);
}
})
.subscribe(new Action1<List<NewsItem>>() {
#Override
public void call(List<NewsItem> newsItems) {
mNewsItemSubject.onNext(newsItems);
}
});
}
public Observable<List<NewsItem>> observeNewsItems() {
return mNewsItemSubject;
}
Your Android Activities can then call ((CustomApplication)getApplication()).observeNewsItems() to get the latest news items and any updates while the Activity is visible.
final Observable<List<NewsItem>> newsItemsObservable =
((CustomApplication) getApplication()).observeNewsItems();
newsItemsObservable
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(new Observer<List<NewsItem>>() {
#Override
public void onCompleted() {
// All done.
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
// Notify user of error (maybe)
}
#Override
public void onNext(List<NewsItem> newsItems) {
// Update the UI with newsItems.
}
});