Develop Reference

Alarm Manager or Work Manager for Recurring Background Work

I'm having trouble deciding whether to run some recurring background work with Alarm Manager or Work Manager:
The work is going to consist of Room Database operations so I'll need access to Dao to complete my work.
It is going to be recurring at fixed intervals (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, etc.)
I need to set a start date and time for the recurrence intervals.
the work will recur until canceled by the user
If the user is using the app when the work is supposed to be scheduled, I want the work to be done immediately. If the user is not on the app (app is in the background or device is turned off), I don't care if the work is done after the scheduled time as long as it is at least started by the next time the user opens the app.
the work needs to continue as scheduled after device reboots and app restarts.

For recurring background work, AlarmManger isn't suitable. As the name implies, it's intended to notify the system of an event at a precise time. Just like a physical alarm that wakes a person up even if the person sleeps, AlarmManager will wake up the device from doze mode which will result in more power usage. it is suitable for suitations like setting remainders such as for calender events which the users probably set by themselves.
On the other hand, WorkManager is intended to carry out background processing or work that would persist. Workmanager is much more efficient for recurring task especially as it allows you set constraints to determine when it should start or stop the background work.
check the link form the offical documentation on WorkManger:
workmanager architecture
tabular comparison between the two

It mostly depends on how important your task is.
https://developer.android.com/guide/background is a really good entry point to help you choose what you should work with.
WorkManager is the modern, universal approach of handling background work and it fits for most use-cases, it automatically reschedules work after a device restart or an application crash, and it is very efficient in terms of battery usage.
As WorkManager does respect Android's doze mode, it does not guarantee, that the work will be done exactly on time, though it does guarantee, that your work will be done within a certain time frame.
On the other hand, AlarmManager is capable of running work precisely on time. But this means that the device will wake up when your work scheduled with AlarmManager is coming due. This will drain battery and your app will probably show up as battery-draining in the Device Health board.
But as stated in the article above, prefer using WorkManager if possible. AlarmManager should only be used for e.g. a time-sensitive calendar notification.

Alarm Manager vs Job Scheduler vs ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor

this question is just to get some ideas on these concepts to see what people in the industry use these for.
If you can just give a few example uses for each of these, I would greatly appreciate it. I know how they work and did read the google documentation on them but I still seem to be having a hard time picking one over the other. I don't need you to explain to me how they work. I am simply asking for a few of their example uses. How you ended up incorporating them into your apps and why you picked them over the others.
Thanks

AlarmManager
Using the AlarmManager to Schedule Tasks at the System Level
The AlarmManager provides access to system-level alarm services. Using the AlarmManager allows an application to schedule tasks that may need to run or repeat beyond the scope of its lifecycle. This allows the application to perform some function even after the application process or all of its Android components have been cleaned up by the system.
Typically, the AlarmManager is used to fire off a PendingIntent that will start up a Service in the future. The AlarmManager triggers Services based on an elapsed interval or at a specific clock time. Both of these options also have the ability to wake up the device when it is asleep if the alarm is urgent.
The benefits of the AlarmManager come into play when using inexact intervals or times to fire off Services. The Android system tries to batch alarms with similar intervals or times together in order to preserve battery life. By batching alarms from multiple applications, the system can avoid frequent device wake and networking.
One concern to consider while using the AlarmManager is that alarms are wiped out during device reboots. Applications need to register the RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETE permission in their Android Manifest and reschedule their alarms in a BroadcastReceiver.
Another concern is that a poorly designed alarm could cause battery drain. While the AlarmManager does have the ability to wake devices and set an exact time for an alarm, the documentation mentions that developers should be wary of these features when performing networking. Aside from draining a device’s battery by avoiding batch alarms, setting an exact time for an application to sync with a server could put high strain on a server if every application installation tries to sync with the server around the same time! This can be avoided by adding some randomness to alarm intervals or times.
AlarmManager is a great candidate for scheduling if an application needs to perform a local event at an exact time or inexact interval. Alarm clock or reminder applications are great examples for AlarmManager usage. However, the documentation discourages using AlarmManager for scheduling network-related tasks. Let’s take a look at some better options for networking.
Job Scheduler
JobScheduler helps perform background work in an efficient way, especially networking. JobServices are scheduled to run based on criteria declared in JobInfo.Builder(). These criteria include performing the JobService only when the device is charging, idle, connected to a network or connected to an unmetered network. JobInfo can also include minimum delays and certain deadlines for performing the JobService. Jobs will queue up in the system to be performed at a later time if none of these criteria are met. The system will also try to batch these jobs together in the same manner that alarms are scheduled in order to save battery life when making a network connection.
Developers might be concerned about a scheduler that frequently delays firing off its JobServices. If jobs are frequently delayed and data stale as a result, it would be nice to know about such things. JobScheduler will return information about the JobService such as if it was rescheduled or failed. JobScheduler has back-off and retry logic for handling these scenarios, or developers could handle those scenarios themselves.
Subclassing JobService requires an override of its onStartJob(JobParams params) and onStopJob(JobParams params) methods. onStartJob() is where callback logic for jobs should be placed, and it runs on the main thread. Developers are responsible for threading when dealing with long running jobs. Return true to onStartJob() if separate thread processing needs to occur, or false if processing can occur on the main thread and there is no more work to be done for this job. Developers must also call jobFinished(JobParameters params, boolean needsReschedule) when the job is complete and determine whether or not to reschedule more jobs. onStopJob() will get called to stop or cleanup tasks when initial JobInfo parameters are no longer met, such as a user unplugging their device if that parameter is a requirement.
There might be a lot to think about when implementing a JobService, but it comes with a lot more flexibility than AlarmManager. Another handy feature is that scheduled jobs persist through system reboots.
There is at least one drawback to using JobScheduler. As of the writing of this post, it’s compatable only with API level 21 and higher. Here you can find the distribution of Android devices running various API levels. While there is technically no backport of JobScheduler, a similar tool is GCM Network Manager.
REFERENCE LINK

Android N: dealing with lack of CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE

My AppWidgetProvider (which is of course a BroadcastReceiver) is registered to receive CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE, so that I can update the widgets as soon as network is restored (though only if required, i.e. if a previous update was missed due to lack of connectivity).
But as set out here, this will no longer be possible in Android N. The suggestion is to use JobScheduler, which allows you to specify that the Job should run only when connected to a network by way of the .setRequiredNetworkType(JobInfo.NETWORK_TYPE_ANY) method.
However, I can't see how this can be used to replicate my desired behaviour. It seems to me that the .setRequiredNetworkType(JobInfo.NETWORK_TYPE_ANY) method will cause the Job not to run at all if there is no network at the time that the Job is scheduled, and it will not cause the Job to wait patiently until there is a network and then run (which is what I need).
So, how do I retain the behaviour I need, with Android N?

I am using Job Schedulers and it does not depend on whether network is available or not while scheduling the job. It provides certain conditions and when those conditions are satisfied job is scheduled. You can set a repetitive job and also specify minimum time gap between the jobs. For example whenever I connect my phone to charging PlayStore start updating apps as the Job has charging constraint.
If you schedule a job and conditions are not met, it will schedule when network is available. Try to disconnect network and open someone profile on Facebook. It will ask you to load profile on network availability. Now, connect to network and you will get the notification once profile is loaded.

try to add google ping for network change that will help you for
network change and all cause i have same issue when i was developing
with socket services. So may be it will also helps you.

Syncing the website account with android app

i was thinking if there is anyway to sync android app with a web/website account. Basically, if the user logs in through the web, i want the android app to log in/start up/show notification. Should i use a background service in android to monitor the account or something else
Please help
Thanks

As far as I can see, you have a couple of options:
Use a background service (as you suggested) which is constantly running and checking. This will be battery consuming.
Use the AlarmManager to schedule a repeating alarm to check on a scheduled interval. This will be less battery consuming but also less immediate (unless you set a low interval which will consume a lot of battery).
Use a push message. This will be the most accurate and least battery consuming for your phone, but it's also the most advanced (difficult) to set up.

Based on your requirement, optimized solution is to use GCM - Push Notification. Based on the whatever action occurs at web, you just need to send a push notification to clients. Based on the push notification IDs, client needs to perform appropriate action.

Best way to have an Android app poll periodically in the background

Take the Gmail app as an example. Whether the phone is on or not, it polls every 10 minutes or so to download new emails which may have arrived since you last checked.
I know how to create a new service and bind to it. But I can see a few ways to accomplish this:
Bind once, and have the service run in an infinite loop, sleeping for 10 minutes between each loop
Bind and unbind right when it's done, scheduling the next bind somehow in 10 minutes
Using the AlarmManager class to schedule future polls
What are the trade offs? How does the Gmail app accomplish it?
Thanks!

Gmail app uses pushing, not polling. I suggest using this technique instead, polling is a battery killer in mobile devices.
To implement pushing, take a look at C2DM.
If you still want to poll, the recommended way would be to set up a periodic alarm in the AlarmManager.
UPDATE: Google has deprecated C2DM and replaced it with Google Cloud Messaging (GCM)
UPDATE: Google has deprecated GCM and replaced it with
Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM)

For a continuous, but not intensive poll like the one you comment (in the range of minutes between polls), I would implement it with AlarmManager. That way you make sure the phone wakes up to poll without the need for a wakelock, which would destroy your battery. As CommonsWare pointed out, you will still need to implement a wakelock for the time your code is executing, but you can release it as soon as the code is done, avoiding keeping the phone on while just waiting. See his comment for an example on how to implement it.
I would use a Service if, instead, you need faster polls during a shorter period of time (seconds between each poll), since setting alarms does not make sense to such short periods, and the battery would drain anyway.