Android Oreo has imposed many restrictions on running background service. Services now don't behave like normal in Oreo as they used to before.
But what if I have to run a service in background for long periods of time.
I am developing an application to launch the flashlight when user shakes the phone. To achieve this I will have to put the Sensor listener code inside a service.
How do I prevent android system to not kill the service.
PS: I don't want to start a foreground service with a notification.
How do I prevent android system to not kill the service.
To summarize the comments: Use a foreground service, with a notification on a dedicated channel, with the channel set to IMPORTANCE_DEFAULT. Advise the user that they can mute that channel (e.g., long-press on the Notification in the notification shade). Using a dedicated channel means that you can still raise notifications on other channels. Your notification should also be useful:
Have a "stop" action to stop your service, if the user wants to shut it down for a while
Tapping on the notification itself would lead to your activity for configuring your app's behavior
I don't want to start a foreground service with a notification.
Then most likely you cannot write your app.
I cannot rule out the possibility of some bug in Android 8.x that could be exploited to have an indefinite-duration service. In fact, I'd consider it to be fairly likely that there's something floating around out there. However, this is clearly against Google intentions, meaning:
Exploiting that technique, without what Google would consider to be valid justification, might get your app banned from the Play Store, if that was how you planned to distribute it
The bug might be fixed in a future version of Android, and getting in an arms race with Google tends to be a losing proposition
There are enough "air gesture" apps floating about (i.e., do things based on a shake) that, ideally, Google would add some dedicated low-power API for it. For example, they could add functionality to JobScheduler to allow you to register for a shake event and have your JobService be invoked in that circumstance, just as they allow you to register for changes in a ContentProvider. I have no idea whether they will ever offer such an API, but you could file a feature request for it, if you wanted.
Make a service unstoppable on Oreo or later without shown notification is possible (Yes We Can).
Let me to explain how make a service stoppable ONLY BY USER and not by system (or better to say THE ONLY WAY TO STOP THEM IS UNINSTALLING YOUR APP).
Note that even I make a service unstoppable in my point of view is not a good technique and I’m CONTRARY on that for different reasons (like battery consuming, clear user experience etc.)
First of all you need to declare the service in manifest file.
The separate name “:serviceNonStoppable” make the service running in a separate process and not in main app process. Is better for background processes which need to run separately.
To make our own service process invisible to other processes or apps you need to set exported=false parameter.
The description “#string/service_description” will say to users what your service do and why user should not stop them (you create this description in strings.xml).
<service
android:process=":serviceNonStoppable"
android:name="your.package.name.serviceOn"
android:exported="false"
android:description="#string/service_description" />
Secondly we go to create a support class with static methods usable in different points.
import android.app.ActivityManager;
import android.content.Context;
import android.content.Intent;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
class Utils {
// This is a support class witch have static methods to use everywhere
final static int NOTIFICATION_INT_CHANNEL_ID = 110211; // my daughter birthday but you can change that with your number
final static String NOTIFICATION_STRING_CHANNEL_ID = "put.a.random.id.here"; //if you write "the.pen.is.on.the.table" is the same
final static int TEST_THIS = 111; // or you can put here something else
final static String BROADCAST_MSG_ID = "BROADCAST_MSG_ID"; // or you can put here something else
final static String APP_MESSAGE = "your.package.name.action.APP_MESSAGE"; // or you can put here pippo.pluto.and.papperino
static void returnUpMyService(final Context context) {
try {
//to avoid crashes when this method is called by service (from itself) make sure the service is not alredy running (maybe is in cache)
if (killServiceIfRun(context)) {
startServiceOn(context);
}
} finally {
System.out.println(" I'm trying to start service ");
}
}
private static boolean killServiceIfRun(final Context context) {
boolean isRunning = isMyServiceRunning(context);
if (!isRunning) { return true; }
try {
ActivityManager manager = (ActivityManager) context.getSystemService(Context.ACTIVITY_SERVICE);
// maybe killing process is not terminated by system in this fase
//I force to kill them by my one
if (manager != null) {
manager.killBackgroundProcesses(getServicename(context));
return true;
}
return true;
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("killServiceIfRun error: " + e.toString());
}
return false;
}
private static boolean isServiceInCache(final Context context) {
ActivityManager manager = (ActivityManager) context.getSystemService(Context.ACTIVITY_SERVICE);
if (manager != null && manager.getRunningAppProcesses() != null) {
if (manager.getRunningAppProcesses().size() > 0) {
for (ActivityManager.RunningAppProcessInfo process : manager.getRunningAppProcesses()) {
if (process.processName != null) {
if (process.processName.equalsIgnoreCase(getServicename(context))) {
// Here we know that the service is running but sleep brrrrrrrr
if (process.importance != ActivityManager.RunningAppProcessInfo.IMPORTANCE_SERVICE) {
return true;
}
}
}
}
}
}
return false;
}
static void StartMyService(Context context) {
// If the sevice is running doesn't need to restart
if (isMyServiceRunning(context) && !isServiceInCache(context)) {
return;
}
// If service is running but is in chache is the same like killed, so we need to kill them
if (isServiceInCache(context)) {
// this method at first kill and after that start the service
returnUpMyService(context);
} else {
//Otherwise we start own service
startServiceOn(context);
}
}
private static void startServiceOn(final Context context) {
// After we had been sure about that service doesn't exist
// we make a schedule to restart them
new ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor(1).schedule(() -> {
//Create an instance of serviceOn
serviceOn service = new serviceOn();
//prepare the launch intent
Intent launchIntent = new Intent(context, service.getClass());
// Now we start in background our service
context.startForegroundService(launchIntent);
// I put 50 ms to allow the system to take more time to execute GC on my killed service before
}, 50, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}
private static boolean isMyServiceRunning(final Context context) {
ActivityManager manager = (ActivityManager) context.getSystemService(Context.ACTIVITY_SERVICE);
if (manager != null && manager.getRunningAppProcesses() != null) {
if (manager.getRunningAppProcesses().size() > 0) {
for (ActivityManager.RunningAppProcessInfo process : manager.getRunningAppProcesses()) {
if (process != null && process.processName != null && process.processName.equalsIgnoreCase(getServicename(context))) {
return true;
}
}
}
}
return false;
}
static void SendMsgToService(Context context, int id, Map<String, Object> params) {
try {
Intent mServiceIntent = new Intent(APP_MESSAGE);
if (params != null) {
for (Map.Entry<String, Object> entry : params.entrySet()) {
//System.out.println(entry.getKey() + "/" + entry.getValue());
if (entry.getValue() instanceof String) {
mServiceIntent.putExtra(entry.getKey(), (String) entry.getValue());
} else if (entry.getValue() instanceof Integer) {
mServiceIntent.putExtra(entry.getKey(), (Integer) entry.getValue());
} else if (entry.getValue() instanceof Float) {
mServiceIntent.putExtra(entry.getKey(), (Float) entry.getValue());
} else if (entry.getValue() instanceof Double) {
mServiceIntent.putExtra(entry.getKey(), (Double) entry.getValue());
} else if (entry.getValue() instanceof byte[]) {
mServiceIntent.putExtra(entry.getKey(), (byte[]) entry.getValue());
}
}
}
mServiceIntent.putExtra(BROADCAST_MSG_ID, id);
context.sendBroadcast(mServiceIntent);
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
}
private static String getServicename(final Context context) {
// the name declared in manifest you remember?
return context.getPackageName() + ":serviceNonStoppable";
}
}
This is service class witch extend IntentService.
import android.app.IntentService;
import android.app.Notification;
import android.content.BroadcastReceiver;
import android.content.Context;
import android.content.Intent;
import android.content.IntentFilter;
import android.support.annotation.Nullable;
import android.support.v4.app.NotificationCompat;
import android.text.TextUtils;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
public class serviceOn extends IntentService {
// Needed to keep up notifying without show the icon
private ScheduledExecutorService notifyer = null;
// don't remove this. cause error becouse we declare this service in manifest
public serviceOn() {
super("put.a.constant.name.here");
}
// We need this class to capture messages from main activity
private final BroadcastReceiver broadcastReceiver = new BroadcastReceiver() {
#Override
public void onReceive(final Context context, Intent intent) {
if (intent != null) {
if (intent.getAction() != null) {
if (intent.getAction().equals(Utils.APP_MESSAGE)) {
int msgID = intent.getIntExtra(Utils.BROADCAST_MSG_ID, -1);
switch (msgID) {
case Utils.TEST_THIS:
String message = intent.getStringExtra("message");
if (!TextUtils.isEmpty(message)) {
System.out.println(message);
}
//Do your task here
//Do your task here
//Do your task here
//Do your task here
break;
}
}
}
}
}
};
#Override
protected void onHandleIntent(#Nullable Intent intent) { }
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
return START_STICKY;
}
#Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
try {
// First of all we need to register our receiver
List<String> actions = Arrays.asList(
Utils.APP_MESSAGE, // this is the string which identify our mesages
Intent.ACTION_SCREEN_ON, // this event is raised on sreen ON by system
Intent.ACTION_SCREEN_OFF, // this event is raised on screen OFF by system
Intent.ACTION_TIME_TICK);// this event is raised every minute by system (helpful for periodic tasks)
for (String curIntFilter : actions) {
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter(curIntFilter);
registerReceiver(broadcastReceiver, filter);
}
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
final Notification notificationDefault = new NotificationCompat.Builder(getApplicationContext(), Utils.NOTIFICATION_STRING_CHANNEL_ID)
.setOngoing(true) //Ongoing notifications do not have an 'X' close button, and are not affected by the "Clear all" button
.setCategory(Notification.CATEGORY_SERVICE) // indicate this service is running in background
.setSmallIcon(R.drawable.ic_radio) // put here a drawable from your drawables library
.setContentTitle("My Service") // Put here a title for the notification view on the top
// A smaller explanation witch system show to user this service is running
// in background (if existing other services from other apps in background)
.setContentText("My Service is unstoppable and need to run in background ")
.build();
// This is an efficient workaround to lie the system if we don't wont to show notification icon on top of the phone but a little aggressive
notifyer = Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor();
notifyer.scheduleAtFixedRate(() -> {
try {
// Here start the notification witch system need to permit this service to run and take this on.
// And we repeat that task every 15 seconds
startForeground(Utils.NOTIFICATION_INT_CHANNEL_ID, notificationDefault);
//immediately after the system know about our service and permit this to run
//at this point we remove that notification (note that is never shown before)
stopForeground(true);
//better not invoke Exception classes on error, make all a little heavy
} finally {
// Log here to tell you your code is called
System.out.println(" Service is running");
}
// So, the first call is after 1000 millisec, and successively is called every 15 seconds for infinite
}, 1000, 15000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}
#Override
public void onDestroy() {
// unregister the receiver
unregisterReceiver(broadcastReceiver);
// stop the notifyer
if (notifyer != null) {
notifyer.shutdownNow();
notifyer = null;
System.out.println(" notifyer.shutdownNow() ");
}
final Context context = getBaseContext();
try {
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
// The magic but dirty part
// When the system detect inactivity by our service decides to put them in cache or kill it
// Yes system you can kill me but I came up stronger than before
Utils.returnUpMyService(context);
}
}.start();
} finally {
System.out.println("You stop me LOL ");
}
}
}
And here the usage.
import android.app.Activity;
import android.os.Bundle;
import android.os.Handler;
import java.util.HashMap;
class MyActivity extends Activity {
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
// Sstart the first time
Utils.StartMyService(this);
// Test after 3 seconds
new Handler().postDelayed(() -> {
Utils.SendMsgToService(X_App.getContext(), Utils.TEST_THIS, new HashMap<String, Object>() {{
put("message", "Hello from main activity");
}});
}, 3000);
}
}
I discovered that we can run forground service without showing notification for android oreo and above, here is the solution first create notification with notification Channel also set channel id for notifications then start forground service with notification. now it's time to cancel notification Channel with id after 1 or 2 second that's means the notification will remove and the service will run alwayes . that's all
You would not be able to run background services long running in Oreo as there are behaviour changes, now Oreo to optimise system memory, battery etc, it kills background service, to solve your issue you should use foreground service.
Have a look at Background execution limits
https://developer.android.com/about/versions/oreo/android-8.0-changes
Hope this helps in understanding the issue....
Related
I need to have a Service running in Android that stores a value to database every so often. How often is based on user preferences, and also if other events have happened, which can be as often as 30 seconds or up to 30 minutes.
This is not something that is hidden from the user and in fact the user should probably be aware its running. As such I think a foreground service is probably the best approach.
I have a foreground service running, with a TimerTask that calculates how often it needs to fire. That Service is 'sticky' so it should stick around and it low on resources the OS should start it back up after a while.
My problem is that the TimerTask seems to stop running after a while when the the app is backgrounded.
Here is my service:
public class TimerService extends Service {
private static final String LOG_NAME = TimerService.class.getName();
private Timer timer;
private final Handler timerHandler = new Handler();
#Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
Notification notification = new NotificationCompat.Builder(this, "MY_APP_CHANNEL_ID")
.setContentTitle("My Timer Service")
.setContentText("Background timer task")
.setSmallIcon(R.drawable.timer)
.build();
startForeground(1, notification);
}
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
startTimer();
return START_STICKY;
}
#Override
public void onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy();
stopTimer();
}
#Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
return null;
}
private void stopTimer() {
if (timer != null) {
timer.cancel();
timer = null;
}
}
private void startTimer() {
stopTimer();
timer = new Timer();
long frequency = // calculate frequency
long delay = // calculate delay
timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new MyTimerTask(), delay, frequency);
}
private void saveToDatabase() {
// Save some stuff to the database...
if (some condition) {
// might need to reschedule timer delay and frequency.
startTimer();
}
}
private class MyTimerTask extends TimerTask {
#Override
public void run() {
timerHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
onTimerFire();
}
});
}
private void onTimerFire() {
try {
saveToDatabase();
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.e(LOG_NAME, "Error in onTimerFire", e);
}
}
}
}
Should this work? IE can I have a simple Timer in a foreground Service that fires continuously until that service is stopped? If so is there a bug in my code?
I chose a Timer to try to keep it simple, I only ever need one timer running and I wanted it to be able to reschedule easily. I do realize that I could try a Handler, ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor, or even an AlarmManager. I thought an AlarmManager might be overkill and a drain on resources if it is firing a ton. Not to mention rescheduling.
Why won’t it run in the background?
It is running in the background. It is not running when the device is asleep, as the CPU is powered down. In Android, "background" simply means "has no foreground UI" (activity, service with a foreground Notification).
I need to have a Service running in Android that stores a value to database every so often. How often is based on user preferences, and also if other events have happened, which can be as often as 30 seconds or up to 30 minutes.
What you want has not been practical on Android since 6.0.
I thought an AlarmManager might be overkill and a drain on resources if it is firing a ton.
That is true. However, the only way to get your existing code to work would be for you to acquire a partial WakeLock, thereby keeping the CPU running forever. This will be orders of magnitude worse for power than is AlarmManager. And AlarmManager is bad enough that each Android release, starting with 6.0, has made it progressively more difficult to use AlarmManager (or JobScheduler, or Timer and a wakelock) to do anything reliably.
You are going to need to learn what Android is and is not capable of with respect to background processing, then adjust your product plans accordingly. That subject is way too long for a Stack Overflow answer.
Here is a set of slides from a presentation that I delivered last year on this subject, with Android 8.0 in mind (use Space to advance to the next slide). You might also read:
My thoughts on Android P DP2, particularly "What’s New in the War on Background Processing"
This preview of one of my book chapters, where the section on Android 8.0 and its phase in "The War on Background Processing" happens to be included
Wakelock and doze mode
IMHO, writing an app that relies upon periodic background processing is a very risky venture nowadays.
You should use ScheduledExecutorService for the same. There can be many ways to schedule background task like Alarm Manager, JobDispatcher, Sync Adapter, Job Scheduler. I will suggest ScheduledExecutorService over them.
I have one good example of using ScheduledExecutorService in service. (Currently using in highly optimised location sync service)
import android.app.Service;
import android.content.Intent;
import android.os.IBinder;
import android.support.annotation.Nullable;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
/**
* Created by KHEMRAJ on 1/29/2018.
*/
public class SyncService extends Service {
private Thread mThread;
ScheduledExecutorService worker;
private static final int SYNC_TIME = 60 * 1000; // 60 seconds
#Override
public int onStartCommand(#Nullable Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
startSyncService();
return START_STICKY;
}
#Override
public void onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy();
stopThread();
}
#Nullable
#Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
return null;
}
private void stopThread() {
worker = null;
if (mThread != null && mThread.isAlive()) mThread.interrupt();
}
private void startSyncService() {
if (worker == null) worker = Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor();
if (mThread == null || !mThread.isAlive()) {
mThread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
saveToDb();
if (worker != null) {
worker.schedule(this, SYNC_TIME, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}
}
});
mThread.start();
}
}
private void saveToDb() {
// TODO: 5/15/2018
}
}
I use RTMP on Android to download a stream. If I run the library the first time everything works fine. On second time the app doesn't initiate the RTMP download :/
I searched the last three days and know that I can't load a native library twice or just unload it and that I have three options to handle my problem:
Using a custom class loader (after System.gc() library was still loaded)
Running a service in its own process (it didn't work. The library was still loaded after killing the service).
Write a native library that loads the RTMP library via dlopen and closes it via dlclose.
I don't know any further option :/ I even don't know how to write the native library to load other library :/
I used this RTMP dump: https://github.com/eschriek/rtmpdump-android
OK, I found found a way to do it :) Maybe it is not a beautiful one, but it works fine:
Create a service:
import android.app.Service;
import android.content.Intent;
import android.os.AsyncTask;
import android.os.IBinder;
public class rtmpdumpService extends Service {
#Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
return null;
}
#Override
public void onStart(Intent intent, int startId) {
super.onStart(intent, startId);
config = this;
String extras = "";
if(intent != null){
//Get needed information
extras = intent.getExtras().getString("rtmp");
}
else {
this.stopSelf();
}
doWork(extras);
}
#Override
public void onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy();
}
public void doWork(String rtmp){
//Do work here: for example rtmpdump
Rtmpdump dump = new Rtmpdump();
dump.parseString(params[0]);
System.exit(0);
this.stopSelf();
}
}
Register in AndroidManifest as service with these attributes
android:name=".rtmpdumpService"
android:exported="false"
android:process=":rtmp"
Start service:
Intent rtmpdumpIntent = new Intent(getApplicationContext(), rtmpdumpService.class);
eSendIntent.putExtra("rtmp", "RTMP CODE");
startService(rtmpdumpIntent);
Sometimes you have to wait until it finishes:
After the Service is started (startService(rtmpdumpIntent):
do {
try {
Thread.sleep(500);
}
catch (InterruptedException e) {
//Log
}
} while( isServiceRunning(rtmpdumpService.class) == true);
isServiceRunning function:
private boolean isServiceRunning(Class cl) {
ActivityManager manager = (ActivityManager) getSystemService(Context.ACTIVITY_SERVICE);
for (RunningServiceInfo service : manager.getRunningServices(Integer.MAX_VALUE)) {
if (cl.getName().equals(service.service.getClassName())) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
I am used to developing standalone applications, ones that you click on, it runs, and when you are done, you exit.
I am now interested in tackling a new type (not sure if that's the right word) of app, and was wondering how I should go about it. I am not sure what to research, and would appreciate your advice to help me get the ball rolling. I'll give you an idea about what I have in mind.
My app would need to perform a special action in the dialer. When the user dials a number and is in the middle of a call, I would like the user to be able to press the Menu key, and find an option to scroll through all their contacts (either the stock app, or my own list which I grab from the contacts stored in the phone), and select one. Upon selection, that contact's number is pasted into the dialer (keep in mind, in the middle of a call).
I certainly don't expect an answer telling me how to do this exactly, I just need some guidance as I have never written an app of this nature before. On top of that, is it even possible to do what I want to do?
Thank you.
You need to go through Android Service or IntentService. A Service is an application component that can perform long-running operations in the background and does not provide a user interface(UI).
The following example is taken from android blog which is an implementation of the Service class
public class HelloService extends Service {
private Looper mServiceLooper;
private ServiceHandler mServiceHandler;
// Handler that receives messages from the thread
private final class ServiceHandler extends Handler {
public ServiceHandler(Looper looper) {
super(looper);
}
#Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
// Normally we would do some work here, like download a file.
// For our sample, we just sleep for 5 seconds.
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + 5*1000;
while (System.currentTimeMillis() < endTime) {
synchronized (this) {
try {
wait(endTime - System.currentTimeMillis());
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
}
// Stop the service using the startId, so that we don't stop
// the service in the middle of handling another job
stopSelf(msg.arg1);
}
}
#Override
public void onCreate() {
// Start up the thread running the service. Note that we create a
// separate thread because the service normally runs in the process's
// main thread, which we don't want to block. We also make it
// background priority so CPU-intensive work will not disrupt our UI.
HandlerThread thread = new HandlerThread("ServiceStartArguments",
Process.THREAD_PRIORITY_BACKGROUND);
thread.start();
// Get the HandlerThread's Looper and use it for our Handler
mServiceLooper = thread.getLooper();
mServiceHandler = new ServiceHandler(mServiceLooper);
}
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
Toast.makeText(this, "service starting", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
// For each start request, send a message to start a job and deliver the
// start ID so we know which request we're stopping when we finish the job
Message msg = mServiceHandler.obtainMessage();
msg.arg1 = startId;
mServiceHandler.sendMessage(msg);
// If we get killed, after returning from here, restart
return START_STICKY;
}
#Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
// We don't provide binding, so return null
return null;
}
#Override
public void onDestroy() {
Toast.makeText(this, "service done", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
}
}
On the other hand, The same thing can be achieved using IntentService, which is a base class for Services that handle asynchronous requests on demand.
public class HelloIntentService extends IntentService {
/**
* A constructor is required, and must call the super IntentService(String)
* constructor with a name for the worker thread.
*/
public HelloIntentService() {
super("HelloIntentService");
}
/**
* The IntentService calls this method from the default worker thread with
* the intent that started the service. When this method returns, IntentService
* stops the service, as appropriate.
*/
#Override
protected void onHandleIntent(Intent intent) {
// Normally we would do some work here, like download a file.
// For our sample, we just sleep for 5 seconds.
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + 5*1000;
while (System.currentTimeMillis() < endTime) {
synchronized (this) {
try {
wait(endTime - System.currentTimeMillis());
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
}
}
}
You can also go through SO post https://stackoverflow.com/a/4353653/432903
If your app isn't mainly written in javascript/webview/phonegap, then all you have to do is look at the Service class. That class and the linked documents tell you everything you need to know.
maybe you can use an IntentFilter so you can get a system notify when the user uses a dialer.
and you should learn the Service component which can work in background in android.
Even after a lot of research I am still not completely sure if the way how I implement a WakeLock for a Service started by a BroadcastReceiver is correct - even though it seems to work fine. The broadcast receiver gets intents sent to it from an alarm, so to start with, from the API docs of AlarmManager:
If your alarm receiver called Context.startService(), it is possible
that the phone will sleep before the requested service is launched. To
prevent this, your BroadcastReceiver and Service will need to
implement a separate wake lock policy to ensure that the phone
continues running until the service becomes available.
So, in onReceive() I do:
Intent serviceIntent = new Intent(context, SomeService.class);
context.startService(serviceIntent);
if(SomeService.wakeLock == null) {
PowerManager powerManager = (PowerManager)context.getSystemService(Context.POWER_SERVICE);
SomeService.wakeLock = powerManager.newWakeLock(
PowerManager.PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK,
SomeService.WAKE_LOCK_TAG);
}
if(! SomeService.wakeLock.isHeld()) {
SomeService.wakeLock.acquire();
}
and in the service I do:
try {
// Do some work
} finally {
if(wakeLock != null) {
if(wakeLock.isHeld()) {
wakeLock.release();
}
wakeLock = null;
}
}
The SomeService.wakeLockfield is package private, static and volatile.
What I am unsure about is the check using isHeld() - does it really tell me if a WakeLock is acquired or not, and do I need to do this check at all?
What I am unsure about is the check using isHeld() - does it really tell me if a WakeLock is acquired or not, and do I need to do this check at all?
Actually slightly tricky to answer. Looking at the source for PowerManager and PowerManager.WakeLock here the WakeLock.acquire() and WakeLock.acquireLocked() methods are as follows...
public void acquire(long timeout) {
synchronized (mToken) {
acquireLocked();
mHandler.postDelayed(mReleaser, timeout);
}
}
private void acquireLocked() {
if (!mRefCounted || mCount++ == 0) {
// Do this even if the wake lock is already thought to be held (mHeld == true)
// because non-reference counted wake locks are not always properly released.
// For example, the keyguard's wake lock might be forcibly released by the
// power manager without the keyguard knowing. A subsequent call to acquire
// should immediately acquire the wake lock once again despite never having
// been explicitly released by the keyguard.
mHandler.removeCallbacks(mReleaser);
try {
mService.acquireWakeLock(mToken, mFlags, mTag, mWorkSource);
} catch (RemoteException e) {
}
mHeld = true;
}
}
...mService is an IPowerManager interface and the source for it isn't available so it's hard to tell what may or may not go wrong when attempting to call acquireWakeLock(...).
In any case, the only exception that can be caught is RemoteException and the catch block does nothing. Immediately after the try/catch, mHeld is set true regardless.
In short, if you call isHeld() immediately after acquire() the result will always be true.
Looking further into the source for PowerManager.WakeLock shows similar behaviour for release() which calls release(int flags) where the mHeld member is always set to false regardless of what happens.
In conclusion I'd suggest it is always a good idea to check isHeld() just as a best practice in case later versions of Android change this behaviour of the WakeLock methods.
Manage you wakeLock inside a singleton (unique instance accessible through all your context and object)
Use a singleton instance of a custom class, then you may get wakelock object reference from call to call ,
here an singleton example
class MyData {
private static MyData mMydata= null; // unique reference ( singleton objet container)
private PowerManager.Wakelock myobject = null; // inside the unique object container we have the unique working object to be use by the application
// can't make instance from outside... we want to have single instance
// we want that outside use method "getInstance" to be able to use the object
private MyData() {
}
// retrieve and/or create new unique instance
public static MyData getInstance() {
if (mMydata == null) mMyData = new MyData();
return mMyData;
}
// Works with your memory stored object
// get...
public PowerManager.WakeLock getMyWakelock() {
return myobject;
}
// set ...
public void setMyWakeLock(PowerManager.WakeLock obj) {
myobject = obj;
}
}
in your application to handle your "wakelock" object your may access it like
// set a created wakelock
MyData.getInstance().setMyWakeLock(wl);
// get the saved wakelock object
PowerManager.WakeLock obj = MyData.getInstance().getMyWakeLock();
All this job can be done by a helper and native class called WakefulBroadcastReceiver
I think android.os.Messenger may be a better way
for the receiver:
public class MessengerReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {
private static final String TAG = "MessengerReceiver";
private final MessengerHandler mHandler = new MessengerHandler();
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
// TODO: This method is called when the BroadcastReceiver is receiving
// an Intent broadcast.
mHandler.mWakeLock = ((PowerManager)context.getSystemService(Service.POWER_SERVICE)).newWakeLock(PowerManager.PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK, "myreceiver");
mHandler.mWakeLock.acquire();
Log.e(TAG, "onReceive:: mHandler.mWakeLock=" + mHandler.mWakeLock + ", intent=" + intent + ", this=" + this);
context.startService(new Intent(context, MessengerService.class).putExtra("messenger", new Messenger(mHandler)));
}
static class MessengerHandler extends Handler {
WakeLock mWakeLock;
#Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
if(mWakeLock != null){
mWakeLock.release();
Log.e(TAG, "handleMessage:mWakeLock=" + mWakeLock);
}
super.handleMessage(msg);
}
}
}
for the service:
public class MessengerService extends Service {
private static final String TAG = "MessengerService";
public MessengerService() {
}
#Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
// TODO: Return the communication channel to the service.
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not yet implemented");
}
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
Log.e(TAG, "onStartCommand:: intent=" + intent);
final Messenger messenger = intent.getParcelableExtra("messenger");
try {
messenger.send(Message.obtain());
} catch (RemoteException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
return super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId);
}
}
This method work properly even if service & receiver run in different process.
I am starting a service using startService(Intent intent) method. When i call this function it reaches the onCreate of service but it is unable to call onStartCommand. Here is my code--
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
// Send a text notification to the screen.
Log.e("mudit", "Action: " + intent.getAction());
try {
ConnectivityManager connManager = (ConnectivityManager) context
.getSystemService(Context.CONNECTIVITY_SERVICE);
NetworkInfo info = connManager.getActiveNetworkInfo();
Log.e("mudit", "getType: " + info.getType());
Log.e("mudit", "isConnected: " + info.isConnected());
if (info.isConnected()) {
Intent newinIntent = new Intent(context, service.class);
context.startService(newinIntent);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
Intent newinIntent = new Intent(context, service.class);
context.stopService(newinIntent);
}
}
Service Code --
package com.android.service;
import android.app.Service;
import android.content.Intent;
import android.os.IBinder;
import android.widget.Toast;
public class service extends Service {
#Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent arg0) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return null;
}
#Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
Toast.makeText(this, "Service created...", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
}
#Override
public void onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy();
Toast.makeText(this, "Service destroyed ...", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
}
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
Toast.makeText(this, "onStartCommand...", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
return 1;
}
}
Manifest.xml --
<receiver class=".AReceiver" android:name=".AReceiver">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.net.conn.CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE" />
</intent-filter>
</receiver>
<service class=".service" android:name=".service"
android:enabled="true" android:icon="#drawable/icon">
</service>
Unbound Service: it runs in the background indefinitely even started activity with service ends also.
Bound Service : it will run till life time of activity.
Activity can start service via startService() and it will stop via stopService().
If activity wants to interact with service, it can use bindService().
First onCreate() is called, after onStartCommand is called with the intent data provided by the activity.
Source
larsVogel solves this problem (and many others like it) in this excellent post.
this is how i adapted his code to create a connectivity receiver that monitors when the user connects to a WIFI network so as to batch upload usage data:
in the Manifest file, place a receiver and declare a service right before the end tag for your < / application >:
<receiver android:name=".ConnMonitor" android:enabled="true">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.net.conn.CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE" />
</intent-filter>
</receiver>
<service android:name=".BatchUploadGpsData" ></service>
</application>
create a broadcast receiver class in a separate file called ConnMonitor.java (please uncomment the Log calls to be able to properly monitor the flow)
import android.content.BroadcastReceiver;
import android.content.Context;
import android.content.Intent;
import android.net.ConnectivityManager;
import android.net.NetworkInfo;
import android.util.Log;
public class ConnMonitor extends BroadcastReceiver {
private String TAG = "TGtracker";
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
//String typeName = "";
String state = "";
int type = -1;
ConnectivityManager connectivityManager = (ConnectivityManager) context.getSystemService( Context.CONNECTIVITY_SERVICE );
NetworkInfo test = (NetworkInfo) connectivityManager.getActiveNetworkInfo();
//Log.v(TAG,"there has been a CONNECTION CHANGE -> "+intent.getExtras().get(ConnectivityManager.EXTRA_NETWORK_INFO));
try {
//typeName = test.getTypeName().toString();
type = test.getType();
state = test.getState().toString();
//Log.i(TAG,"type -> '"+typeName +"' state -> '"+state+"'" );
} catch (Exception e) {
//typeName = "null";
type = -1;
state = "DISCONNECTED";
//Log.i(TAG,"type -> error1 "+e.getMessage()+ " cause = "+e.getCause() );
}
if ( (type == 1) && (state == "CONNECTED") ) {
//Log.i(TAG, "I am soooo friggin uploadin on this beautiful WIFI connection ");
Intent batchUploadDataService = new Intent(context, BatchUploadGpsData.class);
context.startService(batchUploadDataService);
} else {
//Log.e(TAG,"NO FOUND MATCH type -> '"+typeName +"' state -> '"+state+"'" );
}
}
}
and, finally, create a service BatchUploadGpsData.java like this:
import android.app.Service;
import android.content.Intent;
import android.os.IBinder;
import android.util.Log;
public class BatchUploadGpsData extends Service {
final String TAG = "TGtracker";
#Override
public void onCreate() {
Log.e(TAG, "here i am, rockin like a hurricane. onCreate service");
// this service tries to upload and terminates itself whether it is successful or not
// but it only effectively DOES anything while it is created
// (therefore, you can call 1 million times if uploading isnt done, nothing happens)
// if you comment this next line, you will be able to see that it executes onCreate only the first it is called
// the reason i do this is that the broadcast receiver is called at least twice every time you have a new change of connectivity state with successful connection to wifi
this.stopSelf();
}
#Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
//Log.i(TAG, "Received start id " + startId + ": " + intent);
Log.e(TAG, "call me redundant BABY! onStartCommand service");
// this service is NOT supposed to execute anything when it is called
// because it may be called inumerous times in repetition
// all of its action is in the onCreate - so as to force it to happen ONLY once
return 1;
}
#Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return null;
}
}
this is not pseudocode, this is actual code, tested and running on android 2.2 and up.
the way to test this service is to shut down and restart your WIFI services on your android (powering off the wifi router will also do the trick). BUT this code does not verify if you are effectively connected to the net. for that, i recomend that you make an httpclient request and check out the result of the call. beyond the scope of this discussion.
NOTE: since services run on the same thread as the UI, i highly recommend that you implement the uploading proper on a separate thread or asynctask, depending your specific needs. you can also run the whole service on a separate thread, but that is once again not the scope of this discussion, despite being standard practice in these cases.
First you should add #Override before onStartCommand(..) then make sure that the target for the Android project is higher than 2.0 .
I believe, that you cannot access any UI components like Dialog or even a Toast in a service.
try this.
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
/* Toast.makeText(this, "onStartCommand...", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
return 1; */
Log.i("YourService", "Yes this works.");
}
First of all name your class to something else is my recommendation to avoid confusion down the line. Second here is an example of my manifest call of a service I have that works. I use full path names when calling services and such since they are not in the same package as my application.
<service android:name="com.public.service.UploaderService" android:icon="#drawable/vgbio"></service>
Here is the gist of my service class,
package com.public.service;
....
public class UploaderService extends Service{
....
}
Third make sure you use #Override to the onStartCommand().