When is FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().getToken() = null? - android

From where and when is the token retrieved and when is it available?
Is it a synchronous call to the Firebase server? If I call it too soon in the app lifecycle, might it not have been populated yet?

From where and when is the token retrieved and when is it available?
The token is generated by the FCM Instance ID service in the background, which starts as soon as your app runs. The details on how the token gets generated is unclear, but how I see it is that the device needs a decent connection to the internet in order for it to communicate with the FCM servers for the token.
Is it a synchronous call to the Firebase server?
Technically speaking, no. As mentioned in the docs:
FirebaseInstanceID.getToken() returns null if the token has not yet been generated.
At this time, if the token is null, you should expect a trigger in your onNewToken() where you could then call getToken() which should now contain the token.
If I call it too soon in the app lifecycle, might it not have been populated yet?
It's usually okay to call getToken() as soon as possible -- in your app's MainActivity -- in most cases, by the time your app reaches that point, it already has a value. But then again, you should still handle it properly if it is null.

Related

When should we refresh android device token?

My app sends notifications using Firebase Cloud Messaging FCM. For every user, I'm storing the device token in database and I fetch it when I want to notify him. I'm using FirebaseMessagingService with the overridden method onNewToken that updates my database with new tokens. I suppose that this method is called every 1 hour to check token's update, but I was expecting it to be also called when the service is initialized for the first time (after installing and running the app on device). However this is not the case. To remedy this, I could call onNewToken each time the user log in But I would like to know if this is an acceptable way or there is a better one.
To avoid abuse, I leave here extra information on my case :
I run my app on Android Studio emulator and I check the stored token in database, let's call it TOKEN-1.
Now I install the app on my phone and I show the token with String token = FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().getToken(); Toast.makeText(MainActivity.this, token, Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
The token is different that the first one TOKEN-1, and TOKEN-1 is still stored in my database. This means that I can receive notifications only on emulator and not my phone.
Sorry for my long text and looking forward to reading your suggestions.
The FCM SDK and server work together to manage the token in the background, and listening to onNewToken ensures that you get notified when the token changes. For this reason you should always be listening to onNewToken, and update it in your own database whenever it changes.
There is no guarantee that your FCM token will be refreshed every hour (or even ever) though, as you seem to expect. Given the 1 hour interval, you might be thinking of Firebase Authentication ID tokens, which are short-lived and are indeed refreshed every hour.
Finally: the token doesn't get refreshed when you attach a listener. In fact: if the token was already generated before you attach a listener, your listener won't be called. For this reason, you'll typically also want to grab the current token in your main activity when the app starts, and store it in the database at that point.
This last code is mostly necessary during development, as that's where you're most likely to have the scenario where the token gets generated when you don't have an onNewToken listener yet. So instead of putting code in the main activity, you can also uninstall/reinstall the app after adding your onNewToken listener, as FCM will generate a new token upon installing the app in that case - and thus call your onNewToken with this initial token.

FCM: onNewToken vs FirebaseInstanceId

Firebase has deprecated some of the messaging calls in the com.google.firebase:firebase-messaging:17.1.0 release. This post goes over those changes nicely.
Question: Can someone tell me if is it considered bad practice to not implement onNewToken and instead just call the below block each app launch This probably seems excessive to Android folks but feels like home from an iOS point of view.
FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().instanceId.addOnSuccessListener(this) { instanceIdResult ->
// Just use this call
val newToken = instanceIdResult.token
Log.i("newToken", newToken)
}
#Override
public void onNewToken(String s) {
super.onNewToken(s);
// Leave this unimplemented
}
I am more familiar with iOS which calls its onNewToken equivalent on every app launch. So for iOS I put logic there to determine if my backend needs to be updated.
getInstanceId() docs say This generates an Instance ID if it does not exist yet, which starts periodically sending information to the Firebase backend. This makes me assume I can just call FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().instanceId.addOnSuccessListener each launch.
Something very important that no one has mentioned yet:
If you check for the current device token only after an app launch, you might loose the event of the token being updated while your app is in the background (of course) and you won't be able to receive remote push messages from your server until the user launches the app again and you send the new token to the server.
The whole purpose of having that callback which can also be called while your app is in the background is to prevent loosing backend messages (important if your app or some important features of it relies a lot on push notifications). It is important to be aware that this callback will not only deliver you the token when you register the device for the first time but also: Called if InstanceID token is updated. This may occur if the security of the previous token had been compromised.
So:
Can someone tell me if is it considered bad practice to not implement onNewToken and instead just call the below block each app launch This probably seems excessive to Android folks but feels like home from an iOS point of view.
Yes, it is actually a bad practice to not implement onNewToken().
First of all, I'm highly skeptical of any logic that suggests that if something is OK in iOS, that it would be OK on Android!
The implementation of push messaging between Android and iOS is extremely different. On Android, it's dependent on Play Services, which runs in another process. On iOS, it's something completely different. The rules of engagement are simply not at all the same.
Note that the suggested token retrieval method is via callback. That is suggesting that token generation is essentially asynchronous. In other words, at app launch (in whatever way you actually define that), the background stuff that manages to token might not be done with that yet. There simply might not be any token available when you ask for it. And who knows how long that takes? You're better off just accepting the token when the system tells you it's ready instead of making a guess about when it's ready. Follow the recommended implementation path.
Despite the documentation says that onNewToken is called upon the first app start, it is not. That is why I use FirebaseInstanceId respectively getToken() when I need the Id while onNewToken has not been called before although the app is already running for a while. (So we do both in our project)
What I observe is that Firebase will call onNewToken shortly after I was fetching the token via FirebaseInstanceId. It seems that fetching the token this way initiates something within the Firebase service.
However, it works that way and that is good enough for our current project.
Edit: As getToken() of FirebaseInstanceId got deprecated recently, please refer to Arthur Thompson's answer.
Calling FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().getInstanceId().addOnCompleteListener on every app launch is an option (an unnecessary option), onNewToken is there specifically to provide you access to the token when available.
Note that calling FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().getInstanceId().addOnCompleteListener on every app launch would require you to handle the case when the token is not yet available, using onNewToken avoids that.
Let's simplify this equation - you should do both.
In our app we were not manually checking FirebaseMessaging.getInstance().getToken(), but did have the onNewToken override set up. This worked for most users, but we had instances of people who would stop receiving notifications unless they reinstalled the app.
So if you really want to be sure you always have an up to date token, you need to do both here. Check at startup with getToken() to make sure you didn't miss an update, and subscribe to onNewToken to get notified if it changes in between app launches. Firebase documentation does allude to this, although to be honest it could be more clear:
The onNewToken() function works like it's predecessor, onTokenRefresh().
Implementing the first block on your post requests and waits for a token. This guarantees that a token (or an exception) would return. However, that token isn't guaranteed to stay the same forever. Similar with onTokenRefresh(), onNewToken() is triggered when a token for the corresponding app instance is generated, which in turn you should use and replace with the old token you got.
My answer here has more details.

Realm - Does the .currentUser() deliver the current logged in on the mobile device or ist there another meaning to it?

I have checked the class SyncUser and the definition for the method currentUser() is: Returns the current user that is logged in and still valid.
What I want to know is, what exactly is delivered, when this method is executed? How reliable is the delivered value and what is the limitation regarding the definition of "current user".
Thanks for any information!
SyncUser.currentUser() is just a convenience method for retrieving a single SyncUser that have logged in on that particular device using either SyncUser.login() or SyncUser.loginAsync(). It only works if a single user is logged in, otherwise, you need to use SyncUser.allUsers().
This is commonly needed when the app is restarted. You can then check if the SyncUser already exists and thus there is no need for them to log in again. This can be useful in the case when the device is offline and logging in is not possible.
The SyncUser is represented by what is called an access token, which has a default lifetime of 10 years, so valid in this context just means "Access token granted by the Server that has not expired yet".
Of course, that information cannot be fully validated on the client, e.g if the Server was restored from a backup losing information about a particular token, then the Client might think the token is valid while the server will reject it. In that case, you will receive a callback on the SyncConfiguration.Builder.errorHandler(..) with an event you can react to and log the user in again.
You can see an example of this in practice in this example here: https://github.com/realm/realm-java/tree/master/examples/objectServerExample

FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().getToken() reliability

As I read from documentation and other sources it is advised to call FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().getToken(); inside onTokenRefresh() to make sure that we get the updated token
what I tried was to call it every time the app is opened and its returning value always, and I am wondering is that a thing to trust ?(is it guaranteed to generate the token every time its called? ) or is there any case it might return null ?
since I don't want users logged in to multiple devices with the same account I am hoping to use it as unique identifier.
As per my knowledge and experience I will try to resolve your doubts:
Is it guaranteed to generate the token every time its called?
No it will not generate token every time you call this method. It will just return current token.
Is there any case it might return null ?
Yes it returns null if your token is not yet generated.
I am hoping to use it as unique identifier
Yes you can use it as a unique identifier for each device not for each account. Every device has its unique token.
This is from the official doc:
Retrieve the current registration token
When you need to retrieve the current token, call
FirebaseInstanceId.getInstance().getToken(). This method returns null
if the token has not yet been generated.
For more information refer this link.

Best method for running a "common" REST call before any other REST call

I have a REST API secured with JWT. The client is an Android app and a web app. Android app gets a new token when a user login, after that it works with that token. However the token will expire in 60 minutes, so I have to refresh it. I know there are 3 approaches for this.
issue a fresh token in every request
issue a fresh token when the current one is close to expire. e.g. 10
min
let client app request a new token when it needs it using a "refresh
service" of your api.
Please consider the following...
I am not happy about the first suggestion above
I did try the third suggestion. However in my android app I got like 60 REST calls. Then what I should be doing is with every REST call (ex: getUsers()), I first have to check whether the token is about to expire and if yes, get a new token from REST API (That means I have to run another REST call to the refresh() method in API). After this check and getting the new token I can execute the getUsers() method. The problem here is that every REST call should run inside the onResponse() method of my refresh() method (I am using Retrofit) and that is simply not possible as I have to then duplicate the same method for 60 times with 60 names. I am sure the same issue will arise with the web app as well.
Due to the above reasons I am considering the 2nd suggestions in my first list, renewing the token at the server it self. If the token is "valid" and if it is "about to expire" I will refresh it from server and will send to app as a header.
I need to know whether that method is an industry practicing method and whather it is the best choice. If not, how I can proceed with the 3rd suggestion in my first list.
I have recently implemented the similar setup with JWT in one of my Android apps. I don't know if my suggestion will help you, but it might give you an insight on how others are doing it.
Option 1: This is very much redundant, and it violates the sole purpose of using JWT in the first place. If I get a new JWT on every request, I can use that for further requests, thus practically have a token with no expiration.
Option 2: This requires server side extra operation, plus this is not feasible. How do you plan to detect which tokens are already distributed and "about to expire" so that you can renew them? Tons of users will have tons of tokens and if you plan to save JWT in database, then it would get too messy.
Option 3: This method is too redudndant and requires client side operation on checking whether token is about to expire and calling refresh service based on that. I always prefer lesser operation to do more work.
What I did, is that, I used two tokens for the system. One as a Refresh Token (token used to request JWT refresh) and one as JWT (for every request validation).
With successful login, received a refresh token and saved it locally in app (SharedPref). This token is also preserved in database too. Next, requested and validated JWT with that with that refresh token. From now onwards, every request contains this JWT in header. I also request new JWT everytime when my app is opened, i.e, in my Splash page.
Now, if any request contains expired JWT, simply return a common response like "Session expired" with a fixed status code. If any HTTP request has this specific status code in its response, I requested another API call with the refresh token to get fresh JWT for future requests.
As I needed to add this check (whether contains "Session Expired") in every HTTP response, I wrote a common function and passed the HTTP responses via that method, so that, I do not need to rewrite or copy-paste every bit of it.
This requires very less code and minimal operation on both server and app end. My system has a JWT expiration time of 20 minutes and I haven't faced any problem till now. Worst what happens is, in a single request, user receives token expired, gets token, and recalls that function. This results in a slightly delayed operation for users that is already in my app continuously for more than 20 minutes. If any user is in my app for that long, it's a good problem to have, right? :)
It's not clear whether the users have to log-in in your app every time or session is held so that logged-in users can directly enter the app. If session is hold, just keep the refreshToken in app locally (SharedPref) and use that to get JWT every time the app is opened. If any user is misusing your API (scraping or for any other purpose), simply move that specific refresh token to a black-list so that this user doesn't get new JWT.
Please let me know if anything's not clear. Thanks.

Categories

Resources