I'm using this pattern lock view library: https://github.com/aritraroy/PatternLockView
In complete callback of this view, i can receive a string like "845321", a md5 or sha1.
Can i use this result and request the system for authenticating the result for me using the pattern pass users have set up in their phone.
That is not possible, sorry. The user has to authenticate with the device; you cannot supply authentication credentials on the user's behavlf.
Related
My current Android application requires users to login with Username and Password.
The Android application calls a REST web service for user login and I do not want to transmit the password as cleartext.
How do I go about securing my users passwords so that the server side can Identify/authenticate each user?
I am currently trying to employ the Jasypt library as follows:-
ConfigurablePasswordEncryptor passwordEncryptor = new ConfigurablePasswordEncryptor();
passwordEncryptor.setAlgorithm("SHA-1");
passwordEncryptor.setPlainDigest(true);
String encryptedPassword = passwordEncryptor.encryptPassword(userPassword);
...
if (passwordEncryptor.checkPassword(inputPassword, encryptedPassword)) {
// correct!
} else {
// bad login!
}
however my server side is written in .NET and as far as I understand the Jasypt documentation the password encryptors employ a random salt.
How can I have my server side code match the hashed users password I am sending it?
All my webservices have HTTPS endpoints, does this guarantee that no one can "see" my users passwords "in flight" when exchanging for an access token?
If you use Https(TLS) then your password is inaccessible to anyone intercepting the network.
You should hash the password string in your server side code not in the client
Also you can use OkHttp CertificatePinner to pin Https(TLS) certificate to your connection for avoiding man in the middle attacks.
A good solution would be to avoid using the traditional Email/Password approach to authentication and go with what another answer here suggested of OTP or One-Time-Password.
Consider the user experience: typing an email and password on a mobile device is cumbersome and annoying and awkward. Then they have to remember their password as well? The average person in the Western world probably uses 10 to 15 apps per day and we want to tax their human memory banks for another password to awkwardly type onto their phone while they are on a packed subway train?
Although it's deceptively challenging to put together, consider One Time Password. With it, a user enters in a phone number as an identifying token.
In theory, every single user has their own unique phone number and thats easy for a user to remember. Since your user is on their Android device, makes sense so far, right? And no awkward typing of email and password.
After they enter their phone number, we then text them a code to the mobile device, which is a 4 to 6 digit number. The user enters that code in the application, thereby proving they are the owner of the device that the phone number is tied into.
The benefit of OTP over Email/Password is that it requires very little memory on the users part. And yes, it's even better than OAuth because what if the user never signed in to a Gmail account or Github account via their mobile browser? Then they are back to Email/Password awkward style authentication for mobile device.
One-Time password is user friendly.
But you say okay, but is it secure and more importantly to the question: How can I have my server side code match the hashed users password I am sending it?
Right, so One Time Password technology is always an ambitious project to undertake IMO.
So we need to persist the code that the user should be entering into the device so we can compare it at some point in the future. When you generate a code, save it to Firebase so at some point in the future you can reach back out to Firebase and say the user with phone number 212-555-1212 just sent you the code 1234, is that the correct code?
So, the way Firebase works with OTP is you can store the code in Firebase. The challenge though is actually texting the user a code. This is an actual SMS message. To handle that, you can't use Firebase alone, you can integrate the extremely popular Twilio. Twilio is all about interacting with users via phone SMS messages and so we can make use of Twilio to text the user a code.
You can also take care of authentication or user system inside of Firebase. Once the user enters an OTP, we generate the JSON Web Token through Firebase.
So all the JSON storage and all the info that reflects who the user is, all that can be saved on Firebase.
But there is another part to that question I have not answered:
How do I go about securing my users passwords so that the server side
can Identify/authenticate each user?
Okay, so you need to compare the code on some server. It can't be Firebase because Firebase is simply a datastore, it is a place to store JSON data, it does not give us ability to run custom code.
So do you write a server for the comparison of codes? We do NOT want to do this comparison on the user's device.
So what do we do? Also, how do we generate a code? Don't use the user's device for that either.
So where do we generate the code? We know to use Firebase data storage to store the code, but how do we generate it?
That's a good job for Google Cloud Functions.
So Google Cloud Functions are code snippets that run one time on demand on Google servers. GCF have tight inter-operability and integration with Firebase data stores.
We can add some logic or processing to the data sitting inside of Firebase. GCF will allow you some custom logic to generate your codes and save them to Firebase and GCF can also compare the code once the user sends it in.
AWS Lambda and GCF are nearly identical in functionality so that could be an option as well.
You have to be careful about what you do. Consider implementing a common two-factor key-sharing algorithm, such as TOTP.
A pretty uncommon, but really good practice, is the client-side hashing. This of course doesn't stop the hacker from logging in to the user's account, but it stops them from obtaining the potentially reused plain-text password.
I recommend that changing E-mail and password are done under the reset password formula, such that E-mail/SMS confirmation is required. And finally, as you do it is extremely important that the connection, where the login happens is secure, for example, https/tls.
There are couple of things you need to consider while implementing authentication and authorization between client(Mobile app) and server.
Firstly, what authentication and authorization mechanism does your server have to request api endpoints? (Is it Two-Factor Auth? Is it bearer token (grant-type username and password) based? Is it bearer token (grant-type access-token) based?
Secondly, as you have mentioned server programming is .Net based but can you be more specific whether your service layer (Api ) written in WebApi 2 or OData ?
Finally, does your server allow to communicate with or without SSH i.e. HTTP vs HTTPS? If it's with SSH then its okay to transfer user credentials i.e. username and password over othewise it will be never secured to transer credentials over HTTP.
Then only it comes at your end i.e. in Android Mobile App to impelement the authentication and authorization mechanism as per server requirement to communicate with api endpoints.
For example, my server requires to implement token-based authentication (bearer token and grant-type password) to make every server request (GET, POST, DELETE, PUT) and I have implemented using retrofit client as like :
public Retrofit getRetrofitClient() {
// first add the authorization header
OkHttpClient mOkClient = new OkHttpClient.Builder().addInterceptor(new Interceptor() {
#Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request newRequest = chain.request().newBuilder()
.addHeader("Authorization", "XXXXXXXXXXXX")
.build();
return chain.proceed(newRequest);
}
}).build();
if (retrofit==null) {
retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.client(mOkClient)
.baseUrl(BASE_URL)
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.addCallAdapterFactory(RxJava2CallAdapterFactory.createWithScheduler(Schedulers.io()))
.build();
}
return retrofit;
}
and my service is
public interface LoginService {
#POST("/api/token")
#FormUrlEncoded
Call<TokenModel> getToken(#Field("username") String username,
#Field("password") String password,
#Field("grant_type") String grantType);
}
Now I can use this token in every request to commuicate with server. I don't need to transfer username and password over public internet rather I use just token and it has 24 hours expiration ( as server has implemented this token expiration date).
Hope it helps you to understand the authenticaiton and authorization mechanism between cleint(Android Mobile App) and server.
KeyGenParameterSpec.Builder.setUserAuthenticationRequired(true) signifies that a Key in the Android Key Store is only authorized when:
The user is authenticated using a subset of their secure lock screen
credentials (pattern/PIN/password, fingerprint).
If enabled, UserNotAuthenticatedException will be thrown any time a Key is generated or the KeyStore is accessed when the user is not authenticated.
Is there an API call to reliably check that the user is indeed authenticated prior to interacting with the KeyStore?...rather than relying solely on catching the exception after the fact.
Android provides the ability to check this through KeyguardManager
Here is some Kotlin code to help you out:
val kgManager = getSystemService(Context.KEYGUARD_SERVICE) as KeyguardManager
kgManager.isKeyguardSecure //true if the user set up their Lock Screen securely.
There is no such API, you have to catch the exception and handle it to ask user authentication when using pattern/PIN/password.
One solution if targeting API 23+ and only using Fingerprint is to use the FingerprintManager : https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/fingerprint/FingerprintManager.html
You have an example on how to use it there:
https://github.com/deivitaka/AndroidFingerprintAPI
https://github.com/googlesamples/android-FingerprintDialog
I am currently working on implementing a mobile app for our site that uses Ruby on Rails and Devise. The idea here is, at first, create a mobile login form that on successful login opens a web frame that is authenticated and allows the normal use of the (mobile optimised) site. Theoretically that should be possible.
I am having trouble with the following issues:
How do you get the pure session key for the user session via a json request? What methods can be used to manually generate it from devise, something that the sign_in(:user, user) method does?
Is it even possible to take that key and put it into the browser cookie the way it normally happens in devise, but on the mobile side?
I know that this is not the standard method of making mobile applications for the site, but I believe it should be possible.
You might want to consider using Devise Token Auth and treating your mobile application like just another webapp that requests permission from your main site. DTA is particularly nice since it takes care of managing the session tokens (renewing/expiring) and passing them onto the app requiring access. The issue is overriding your session controllers so that it automatically logs in after you already log in on the mobile app (or just rewriting your log in so it occurs in conjunction with the Rails site, rather than before). Considering you're already using Devise, this may also be more refactoring than you'd like.
If you want to put your authentication form on the mobile UI and pass the credentials over to the web frame, you need a way to pass data from the mobile app to the web frame.
How you accomplish this depends on what platform you're building on. I'm not really a mobile developer so I don't know for certain how difficult / easy these options are:
When opening the web frame, instantiate it with session data
Find a way to call methods on the client from the web frame. Something like getSessionData.
You could generate a fingerprint for the web frame, have the mobile UI send this data to the server, and then have the web frame authenticate with the server by sending the fingerprint.
Again, I'm not entirely sure how possible all these options are.
You should use token authorization and Android deep linking. It will allow you to login in the web browser and send a token to your app via deep linking.
OK, so I decided to make a webframe solution as follows, basically you post the login and password to a certain sign_in method specially designed to generate one-time sign in tokens for the application. You need two methods in the system to do that:
routes.rb
devise_scope :user do
get "sign_in_with_token/:token" => "sessions#sign_in_with_token"
post "get_login_token" => "sessions#get_login_token"
end
sessions_controller.rb (don't forget to add the method that increases the failed_sign_in_count on wrong password, otherwise that can allow brute force attacks)
def get_login_token
user = User.find_by_email(sign_in_params["login"])
password = sign_in_params["password"]
if user and user.valid_password?(password)
token = SecureRandom.hex(16)
user.update_attribute(:authentication_token, token)
render json: {token: token}, status: 200
else
render json: {error: "error"}, status: 403
end
end
and the method to sign in with that token
def sign_in_with_token
#user = User.where(authentication_token: params[:token], email: Base64.decode64(params[:email])).first
if #user
#user.update_attribute(:authentication_token, nil)
sign_in(#user, bypass: true)
end
redirect_to '/' # or user_root_url
end
That way the mobile app will work like this:
use the generic web frame to send ajax requests to the server and get that token for the user email if password is correct.
make a /sign_in_with_token/#{token from ajax}?email=#{base46 encoded email} link inside the app.
open that link inside the web frame and use the app as though you were logged in normally. Now the app can save email and password locally and use that logic to get the token again for another session. Later logging in will also be able to set the app id so that push notifications can be sent.
Appreciate any feedback or criticism on this solution.
I'm developing an application (as a part of team) for android that interacts with server (asp.net web service) for synchronize and update information in client side.
for preventing attack to server we use SSL connection and also authenticate users with soap header message contains username and password.
here is the scenario for synchronization:
users send web service request with header contains : username , password , time of request , and(for preventing man on the middle attack) hash code of all three parameters(username+password+time) as message signature
web service check that :
is this a new message by checking the signature of message stored in server
if this is a new message (and its not duplicated) then check that signature is true by hashing all three parameters(username+password+time)
then check expiration time : is the message new ( in 5 minute ) for expiring old messages
Authenticate username and password
validate datatype and length of parameters ( in this case only time of device's last sync )
response to request
device get the response as xml file
the question :
because of this scenario we have to give user's devices authentication information so they could interact with server in future and also we don't want to get any information like username and password from users ( for user experience purpose! )
so we build a Web Handler Captcha in server and when users are new, we send them a captcha image generated by their device code(it is uid generated by device something like : https://www.server.com?appid=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 ) and when if user sends the correct captcha to server we add a new user to our database ( auto username and random password ) and save to the android's account manager for future use
in your opinion is this a good approach for authentication and security?
Thank you for tips
Https and a method to get a sessionId is enough security for most apps, anyhow my opinion:
Unless you include a secret within the hashed variables a "man in the middle" can change the parameters and forge a valid hash.
I would recomend a registration method. It's going to take device information as parameter, and the captcha if you will.
It's going to return a deviceId and a deviceSecret. The deviceSecret must not be transmitted again, just used as part of the hashes.
Also consider using a counter instead of time. It can help against replay attacks and it's easier overall.
I've set up a REST API on my site in order to return information from my database.
I'm implementing login and registration on my app right now. However, I'm not sure how to handle verifying user credentials (checking if an email is already registered, if a password meets its requirements, etc).
Since my REST API is not open to the public, would it be safe to pass the data like this:
/users/verify/email/{email_address}
/users/verify/password/{password}
Or is there a better (safer) way to do this? In other words, how can I authenticate and validate users when the login/register?
In REST you're talking about resources. A resource will have some state expressed through their properties.
With your example I would ask myself: "why verify an email", "why verify a password". Because you want to verify if a user can be registered.
So your resource will not be an email or a password but a user.
Verification is an action. Something which does not go well with a REST architecture.
What do you want to verify? You want to register a new user but also verify if he's allowed to register. So you'll try with some conditions to add a user to your collection of users. In REST with HTTP this can be done with a POST which acts like an add(User). The logic behind the request can then implement the verification rules on the user.
To post data just use the content body and use the headers for additional info. So I'd change my API to:
HTTP method: POST
Path: /users
Content-Type: application/json
Body:
{"email_address":"qsdfg#sdfgh.com", "password":"qlmkdjfmqlsk"}
Which simplifies your API to a single entrypoint for adding a user. Allowing or refusing to register the user can be communicated through the use of HTTP status codes and messages.
Of course sending passwords in plaintext is not a good practice but you can setup a secure connection with SSL or TLS to communicate.
Sending sensitive data in a URL is not a good practice btw. Servers can log the url which will show everyone with access to the log the password of the user.
The login is a bit different but not that much.
You'd need a resource which uniquely links a user to his conversation with your system.
HTTP method: POST
Path: /authentication
Content-Type: application/json
Body:
{"email_address":"qsdfg#sdfgh.com", "password":"qlmkdjfmqlsk"}
Response
Status-Code: 200
Content:
unique-id-to-my-user
The authentication could call your user api to enforce the rules and then generate the id.
You could use an OAuth2 implementation to handle this.
If your web service is Asp.Net WebAPI which will return an access token for the valid user, you can use Http POST request with username and password as body content.
For sample code, please take a look at my answer in the following question
Implementing Oauth2 with login credentials from native login page
For better security, use Https instead of Http.
Hope this helps!
You can use POST method.
/register with name, email, password for User registration
/login with email, password for User login.
Just make sure that you do not pass the password in clear. Perform some kind of encryption on it.