I am trying to create a contact using ContentProviderOperation where basic idea is to create a contact which might don't have Phone or Mobile number at all but may have some other type of contact number which is adding using Phone.TYPE_CUSTOM with different label. Here is a code:
//ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> ops;
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, rawContactInsertIndex)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Contacts.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, mobileNumber)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE_MOBILE)
.build());
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, rawContactInsertIndex)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Contacts.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, phoneNumber)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE_HOME)
.build());
and some contact type:
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, rawContactInsertIndex)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Contacts.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, phoneNumber)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE_CUSTOM )
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.LABEL, "Emergency: "+name+" "+surname+" 11111")
.build());
it don't create a main contact if both mobileNumber and phoneNumber are empty so if i provide some value of phoneNumber/mobileNumber then contact is create which containing custom contact information as well. So is there any way to create contact without Phone.TYPE_HOME/Phone.TYPE_MOBILE ?
Related
This is the problem I am facing. I already have a contact named "Frank" in my contact. I need to add a new contact named "Frank". However, If I add using the below method, The new number gets added to the existing "Frank contact".
How to properly add contacts with the same name?
ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> ops = new ArrayList<>();
int rawContactInsertIndex = ops.size();
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTENT_URI)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_TYPE, accountType)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_NAME, accountName)
.build());
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, rawContactInsertIndex)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.DISPLAY_NAME, HelperMethods.capitalize(name_et.getText().toString()))
.build());
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.
newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, rawContactInsertIndex)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, number_et.getText().toString())
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE_CUSTOM)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.LABEL, phone_label_spinner.getSelectedItem().toString())
.build());
getContentResolver().applyBatch(ContactsContract.AUTHORITY, ops);
Found the answer from here: Android not adding all contacts with duplicate fields
Adding AGGREGATION_MODE column will work.
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTENT_URI)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_TYPE, accountType)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_NAME, accountName)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.AGGREGATION_MODE, ContactsContract.RawContacts.AGGREGATION_MODE_DISABLED)
.build());
I developing an app in which I need to store data related to a contact.
I list the contacts in a recycleView using a cursor and each itemView has a star button to set the contact as favorite (not the same as the system).
I managed to store the data in ContactsContract.Data, doing this:
private void addContactData(long contactId, String displayName, boolean favorite) {
// displayName same as the value for Contacts.DISPLAY_NAME_PRIMARY
ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> ops =
new ArrayList<>();
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTENT_URI)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_TYPE, CUSTOM_ACCOUNT_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_NAME, CUSTOM_ACCOUNT_NAME)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTACT_ID, contactId)
.build());
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.DISPLAY_NAME, displayName)
.build());
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, CustomData.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(CustomData.IS_FAVORITE, favorite)
.build());
try {
ContentProviderResult[] contentProviderResults = cr.applyBatch(ContactsContract.AUTHORITY, ops);
return contactUri;
} catch (RemoteException | OperationApplicationException e) {
Log.e(getClass().getSimpleName(), e.getMessage(), e);
return null;
}
}
The problem I have is when two contacts have the exact same name ej. "Tom" and "Tom" if I press the fav button, is adding a third contact that is even listed in the device contacts app.
Some search guied me to add more data to distinguish the contacts using:
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, phone)
.build());
// OR
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.ADDRESS, email)
.build());
And it worked just fine, except if the fields are equals in both contacts. What do I need to avoid this behavior, and Why the CONTACT_ID isn't enough to do this kind of operations?
You need to tell Android to merge the new RawContact you've just created with some (one or more) existing RawContacts.
You do that using the AggregationException table, adding a row for each such "link".
See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/40869351/819355
Code snippet:
Builder builder = ContentProviderOperation.newUpdate(AggregationExceptions.CONTENT_URI);
builder.withValue(AggregationExceptions.TYPE, AggregationExceptions.TYPE_KEEP_TOGETHER);
builder.withValue(AggregationExceptions.RAW_CONTACT_ID1, yourNewRawContact);
builder.withValue(AggregationExceptions.RAW_CONTACT_ID2, someExistingRawContact);
ContentProviderOperation op = builder.build();
How can I add a phone number to the android phone book including the respective country code.
Code I Have
private void addContact(Context context,String phone){
String DisplayName = "Programmer";
String MobileNumber = phone;
String emailID = "coder#gmail.com";
String company = "Programmers Inc";
String jobTitle = "Duhhh";
ArrayList <ContentProviderOperation> ops = new ArrayList < ContentProviderOperation > ();
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(
ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTENT_URI)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_TYPE, null)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_NAME, null)
.build());
//------------------------------------------------------ Names
if (DisplayName != null) {
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(
ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.DISPLAY_NAME,
DisplayName).build());
}
//------------------------------------------------------ Mobile Number
if (MobileNumber != null) {
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.
newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, MobileNumber)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE_MOBILE)
.build());
}
//------------------------------------------------------ Email
if (emailID != null) {
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.DATA, emailID)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.TYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.TYPE_WORK)
.build());
}
//------------------------------------------------------ Organization
if (!company.equals("") && !jobTitle.equals("")) {
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Organization.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Organization.COMPANY, company)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Organization.TYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Organization.TYPE_WORK)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Organization.TITLE, jobTitle)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Organization.TYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Organization.TYPE_WORK)
.build());
}
// Asking the Contact provider to create a new contact
try {
context.getContentResolver().applyBatch(ContactsContract.AUTHORITY, ops);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
Unfortunately when run
addContact(this,"+27622730XXX"); // +27 is country code, 0622730XXX is my cell number
In my phone book the contact has been saved with phone number +2727622730XXX with duplication of the country code.
Question
How can i make sure that the phone does not try to guess the country code and avoid this duplication.
If you can obtain the phone number in +272xxxxxxx format, you can force this number to be recognized by setting NORMALIZED_NUMBER in addition to NUMBER value.
As per Android documentation, NORMALIZED_NUMBER should be the E164 representation of the number. If it is not set, the system tries to guess it automatically.
i want to enter contact list: "contact_name" , and "contact_number" into phone's contact list i used following code for that :
ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> ops = new ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation>();
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTENT_URI)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_TYPE, null)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_NAME, null)
.build());
//------------------------------------------------------ Names
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.DISPLAY_NAME, name).build());
//------------------------------------------------------ Mobile Number
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, phone)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE,
ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE_MOBILE)
.build());
// Asking the Contact provider to create a new
// contact
try
{
getContentResolver().applyBatch(ContactsContract.AUTHORITY, ops);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), "Exception: " + e.getMessage(), Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
}
it run successfully, but i want to prevent insertion of duplicate entry,
for that i have used below link but could not find out proper solution
contact exists in contacts
This code is only insert new contact into All other contacts in "Display Options".
I don't know how to add to System group: my contacts.
here my code:
//Add contact type
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTENT_URI)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_TYPE, "com.google")
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_NAME, "aa#gmail.com")
.build());
//Add contact name
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.DISPLAY_NAME, (!name.toLowerCase().equals("unavailable") && !name.equals("")) ? name : phoneNumber)
.build());
//Add phone number
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, phoneNumber)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.TYPE, phoneType)
.build());
//Add contact
context.getContentResolver().applyBatch(ContactsContract.AUTHORITY, ops);
have any properties support for this solution?