My data model looks like this:
Dummy:
id: String
title: String
content: List
object1
object2
object3
...
Lets image I've a table "Dummy" in realm, where I have 4 Dummy objects. I do a sync from backend and receive 4 Dummy objects, but this time, the first Dummy object has different content - for instance 2 more items. I would like to update local DB with new content. I tried to use insertOrUpdate and copyOrUpdate, but they did not work. Then I thought - maybe I should just delete Dummy table and insert new data - turns out, I can't even do that (commented code does not work). Any ideas on how to succeed and what am I missing?
private fun storeDataToLocalDB(data: ArrayList<Dummy>) {
Realm.getDefaultInstance().use { realmInstance ->
realmInstance.executeTransaction {
realm ->
//val result: RealmResults<Dummy> = realm
//.where(Dummy::class.java)
//.findAll()
//result.deleteAllFromRealm()
realm.insertOrUpdate(data)
}
}
}
Related
matching multiple title in single query using like keyword
I am trying to get all records if that matches with given titles.
below is the structure of database please see
database screenshot
when i pass single like query it returns data
#Query("SELECT * FROM task WHERE task_tags LIKE '%\"title\":\"Priority\"%'")
when i try to generate query dynamically to search multiple match it return 0 data
val stringBuilder = StringBuilder()
for (i in 0 until tags.size) {
val firstQuery = "%\"title\":\"Priority\"%"
if (i == 0) {
stringBuilder.append(firstQuery)
} else stringBuilder.append(" OR '%\"title\":\"${tags[i].title}\"%'")
}
this is function I have made
#Query("SELECT * FROM task WHERE task_tags LIKE:tagQuery ")
fun getTaskByTag(stringBuilder.toString() : String): List<Task>
The single data is fine. However, you simply cannot use the second method.
First you are omitting the space after LIKE,
Then you are omitting the full test i.e. you have task_ tags LIKE ? OR ?? when it should be task_tags LIKE ? OR task_tags LIKE ?? ....
And even then, due to the way that a parameter is handled by room the entire parameter is wrapped/encased as a single string, so the OR/OR LIKE's all become part of what is being searched for as a single test.
The correct solution, as least from a database perspective, would be to not have a single column with a JSON representation of the list of the tags, but to have a table for the tags and then, as you want a many-many relationship (a task can have many tags and a single tag could be used by many tasks) an associative table and you could then do the test using a IN clause.
As a get around though, you could utilise a RawQuery where the SQL statement is built accordingly.
As an example:-
#RawQuery
fun rawQuery(qry: SimpleSQLiteQuery): Cursor
#SuppressLint("Range")
fun getTaskByManyTags(tags: List<String>): List<Task> {
val rv = ArrayList<Task>()
val sb=StringBuilder()
var afterFirst = false
for (tag in tags) {
if (afterFirst) {
sb.append(" OR task_tags ")
}
sb.append(" LIKE '%").append(tag).append("%'")
afterFirst = true
}
if (sb.isNotEmpty()) {
val csr: Cursor = rawQuery(SimpleSQLiteQuery("SELECT * FROM task WHERE task_tags $sb"))
while (csr.moveToNext()) {
rv.add(
Task(
csr.getLong(csr.getColumnIndex("tid")),
csr.getString(csr.getColumnIndex("task_title")),
csr.getString(csr.getColumnIndex("task_tags"))))
// other columns ....
}
csr.close()
}
return rv
}
Note that the complex string with the embedded double quotes is, in this example, passed rather than built into the function (relatively simple change to incorporate) e.g. could be called using
val tasks1 = taskDao.getTaskByManyTags(listOf()) would return no tasks (handling no passed tags something you would need to decide upon)
val tasks2 = taskDao.getTaskByManyTags(listOf("\"title\":\"Priority\""))
val tasks3 = taskDao.getTaskByManyTags(listOf("\"title\":\"Priority\"","\"title\":\"Priority\"","\"title\":\"Priority\"")) obviously the tags would change
Very limited testing has been undertaken (hence just the 3 columns) but the result of running all 3 (as per the above 3 invocations) against a very limited database (basically the same row) results in the expected (as per breakpoint):-
the first returns the empty list as there are no search arguments.
the second and third both return all 4 rows as "title":"Priority" is in all 4 rows
the main reason for the 3 search args was to check the syntax of multiple args, rather than whether or not the correct selections were made.
The resultant query of the last (3 passed tags) being (as extracted from the getTaskaByManyTags function):-
SELECT * FROM task WHERE task_tags LIKE '%"title":"Priority"%' OR task_tags LIKE '%"title":"Priority"%' OR task_tags LIKE '%"title":"Priority"%'
If I have the following class, how can I save a list of it with Proto DataStore?
data class Tag(
val id: int,
val name: String
)
All guides that I saw were teaching how to save only a single object. Is it possible to have a list of it?
You should consider storing list of content in Room, Even proto-datastore isnt a proper solution to store complex stuff,
If you still want then, I will suggest you to restrict the data stored to 10-15 items
to the code --->
Create your proto file, repeated is used to create list type for Java
message Student {
string id = 1;
string name = 2;
}
message ClassRoom {
string teacher = 1;
repeated Student students = 2; // repeated => list
}
Inside your proto-store,
dataStore.updateData { store ->
store.toBuilder()
.clearStudents() // clear previous list
.setAllStudents(students)// add the new list
.build()
}
if you want example checkout my sample app, read the data/domain layer
https://github.com/ch8n/Jetpack-compose-thatsMine
I want to add a field of type array inside a collection.
if the field doesn't exist create it. if it exists overwrite it with the new array value.
the field should be called macAddress and it's of type array of String
I have tried the following:
val macInput = setting_mac_text.text.toString()
val macArray = macInput.split(",")
val macList = Arrays.asList(macArray)
val data =
hashMapOf(Pair(FirebaseConstants.USER_MAC_ADDRESS, macArray))
//save it in firebase
db.collection(FirebaseConstants.ORGANIZATION)
.document(orgID + ".${FirebaseConstants.USER_MAC_ADDRESS}")
.set(FieldValue.arrayUnion(macList))
.addOnCompleteListener { task ->
if (task.isSuccessful) {
Log.d(TAG, "successfully inserted")
} else {
Log.d(TAG, " failed ${task.exception}")
}
}
also tried to insert the list itself and hash map like this
val data = hashMapOf(Pair(FirebaseConstants.USER_MAC_ADDRESS, macArray))
db.collection(FirebaseConstants.ORGANIZATION)
.document(orgID)
.set(data))
but it keeps giving me java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid data. Nested arrays are not supported
what am I doing wrong here?
You're doing three things wrong here:
FieldValue.arrayUnion() is only meant to be used as the value of a field to add elements to that field. The way you are using it now in the first sample, it's being taken as the entire contents of the document.
set() with one parameter is only intended to create or overwrite an entire document. It can't be used to update an existing document. You would have to pass in SetOptions to tell it to merge if you want an update. Or, you would simply use update() to modify an existing document.
Your code that deals with macArray and macList isn't working the way you expect. You are creating a list with one element, which is itself an array. The error message is telling you that you can't have nested arrays like this.
I suggest taking a step back and simplifying your code, removing all the moving parts that don't have to do with Firestore. Just hard code values in your Firestore update until the update works the way you want, then add in the code that works with actual values. Get one simple thing to work, then add to it. If you get an error, you will know that the code you just added was incorrect.
To overwrite an array, you would simply call the set method and have the merge option set to true:
try {
const query = await DatabaseService.queryBuilder({
collection: CollectionName,
});
return await query
.doc(insuranceId)
.set(
{ DOCUMENT_PROPERTY_HERE: ARRAY_HERE },
{ merge: true }
);
} catch (exception) {
return Promise.reject(exception);
}
Lets say that i have a list of AccountDto (getContats() -> List)that each has a column accountId
List<Int> list = accountsDao.getContactIds()
and i have a list of MessageDto, where messageDto has a field 'fromAccountId'.
I want to loop through the messageList and find what new fromAccountId i have that dont exist in my DB.
getAccounts().value?.let {
for ((every accountId from it.accountDto) in --(every fromAccountId in newMessages.list)--) {
if (it.contains(newFromAccountId))
println("fount $newFromAccountId")
}
}
Is there an elegant way to do that in Kotlin...?
You are using nested loops which is not a very good idea, since time complexity of this operation is O(n^2), performace will degrade very fast as the size of your lists increase.
Better approach on the expense of some extra memory would be to first create a set of all the accountId's from your Database, and then iterate over the messageList and for every accoutId check if the set contains this accountId.
// Store all the accountId's in a Set so that lookup is fast
var accountIds = getAccounts().map{it.accountId}.toSet()
// Iterate over the messageList and find the Id's that are not in Set
messageList.asSequence()
.filter { !accountIds.contains(it.fromAccountId) }
.forEach { println("fount $it") }
I have a database schema set up using Android Room, Dao, and Entity classes set up as POJOs. Except the POJO entity isn't so "plain" and that it actually holds a reference to another object. I thought this was a great idea at the time as it allowed me more flexibility in changing the object and using it in other places in the app and only saving to the database as needed.
The problem I'm facing now is that the migration guideline only mentions how to migrate the database by altering the SQL, but I changed the object itself. My typeconverter class simply converts the object to and from a string.
Because it's being saved as a long string I know I essentially have to do a simple REPLACE(string, old_string, new_string) in the SQL
migration code block with the updated object being the new string. How can I retrieve the old objects and update values before running the replace SQL command in the migration block?
UPDATE: I'm using GSON in my typeconverter class to change the object to a string, so the solution that comes to mind is to simply download the old object and upload the new one with the added fields. Only problem is that you can't access the database and download the json, convert it to the object, add the new data fields, then reconvert to a new json string.
I'm lucky I'm not at scale yet because this would be a tricky thing to do for so many users. (So I recommend that anyone reading this not do what I did and implement object nesting. It's easier to convert the Entry objects to the other portable objects instead of nesting when it comes to updating the data you want saved.)
I think if you already did what I did and can't go back, the best bet is to simply create the new portable object and make new typeconverter functions for that one and add the SQL COLUMN for the new object. The problem then lies in how you then retrieve those objects from the Entry Dao, which will cause a lot more code to write and possible errors to debug if not done carefully.
Long story short, if anyone is reading this, DO NOT nest objects in Room DBs on Android unless you are 100% sure it's a final form of your model... but is there such a thing anyways?
I just ran into this issue, but fortunately I only needed to add a new key/value pair to a "flat" object model. So hopefully my answer can be expanded on to fully answer #Mr.Drew question.
Assuming you have a table town with a column star_citizen that is the object model being typeconverted:
{"name":"John", "age":30, "car":false}
and you want to update the object to have an extra property "house": true
you could add a migration to your App's Room Database class like this (Kotlin example):
#Database(entities = [Town::class], version = 2, exportSchema = true)
#TypeConverters(DataConverters::class)
abstract class AppDatabase : RoomDatabase() {
abstract val sharedDao : SharedDao
companion object {
private val MIGRATION_1_2 = object : Migration(1, 2) {
override fun migrate(database: SupportSQLiteDatabase) {
val cursor = database.query("SELECT * FROM `town`")
// iterate through each row in `town`, and update the json
// of the StarCitizen object model
cursor.moveToFirst()
while (!cursor.isAfterLast) {
val colIdIdx = cursor.getColumnIndex("id")
val id = cursor.getInt(colIdIdx)
val colStarCitizenIdx = cursor.getColumnIndex("star_citizen")
val rawJson = cursor.getString(colStarCitizenIdx)
val updatedRawJson = starCitizenModelV1ToV2(rawJson)
database.execSQL("""UPDATE town SET star_citizen ='${updatedRawJson}' WHERE ID = $id""")
cursor.moveToNext()
}
}
}
//[...]
private fun starCitizenModelV1ToV2(rawJson: String): String {
val rawJsonOpenEnded = rawJson.dropLast(1)
val newProperty = "\"house\":true"
return "$rawJsonOpenEnded,$newProperty}"
}
}
}