E.g. I have next data in my Firebase Realtime Database (my json file contains json array of some objects):
I would like to get all objects starting from a specific index (position) to the end of this array (in Firebase DB json array is converted to simple object which contains children with keys 001, 002 and so on)
So I need something like this but for Firebase query:
list.subList(10, list.size)
I know there are limitToFirst, limitToLast methods but it's different
fireDatabaseReference.child("episodes").limitToLast(10)
It won't do what I need. Because I need to know the size of this array and I need to be sure that this array won't become bigger at the moment someone makes such request (at some point this array can get become bigger due to adding new objects)
Would be great to have a method like from to get all children from 10 to the end (so first 9 children are excluded):
fireDatabaseReference.child("episodes").from(10)
But there is no such method
Is there any solution for this?
Solved :)
fireDatabaseReference.child("episodes").orderByKey().startAt("10")
Related
Question
I have a collection named Users with a field named friendEmails which is an array that contains Strings.
I have a document with friendEmails = {joe#gmail.com, dan#gmail.com}, and I want to append newEmails = {mat#gmail.com, sharon#gmail.com} to it.
Problem
The only options I know for this are:
Reading the friendEmails array first, then adding the union of it and newEmails to the document.
Iterating over the elements of newEmails (let's and each iteration doing:
myCurrentDocumentReference.update(FieldValue.arrayUnion, singleStringElement);
(Since FieldValue.arrayUnion only lets me pass comma-separated elements, and all I have is an array of elements).
These two options aren't good since the first requires an unnecessary read operation (unnecessary since FireStore seems to "know" how to append items to arrays), and the second requires many write operations.
The solution I'm looking for
I'd expect Firestore to give me the option to append an entire array, and not just single elements.
Something like this:
ArrayList<String> newEmails = Arrays.asList("mat#gmail.com", "sharon#gmail.com");
void appendNewArray() {
FirebaseFirestore firestore = FirebaseFirestore.getInstance();
firestore.collection("Users").document("userID").update("friendEmails", FieldValue.arrayUnion(newEmails));
}
Am I missing something? Wouldn't this be a sensible operation to expect?
How else could I go about performing this action, without all the unnecessary read/write operations?
Thanks!
You can add multiple items to an array field like this using FieldValue.arrayUnion() as the value of a field update:
docRef.update("friendEmails", FieldValue.arrayUnion(email1, email2));
If you need to convert an ArrayList to an array for use with varargs arguments:
docRef.update("friendEmails", FieldValue.arrayUnion(
newEmails.toArray(new String[newEmails.size()])
));
How to make history score in Array
I try u make score in array like this
this my firestore
And this is my code
String uid = auth.getCurrentUser().getUid();
muridref.document(uid).update("nilai", FieldValue.arrayUnion(skortampil));
When I get the same score the array field doesn't make new Array data,
without see data there or not in array
As mentioned in the documentation Update elements in an array about this behavior:
If your document contains an array field, you can use arrayUnion() and arrayRemove() to add and remove elements. arrayUnion() adds elements to an array but only elements not already present.
Considering that, it's working as expected, since it's not adding values that are equal. So, this means that you won't be able to add values that are equal using the method arrayUnion() directly.
This other question from the Community - accessible here - indicates that for you to achieve this goal, you will need to read all the values from the array in your client side, update your values in the array outside the database and then, writing/updating it back in the database.
Let me know if the information helped you!
One string size is about 200 bytes,
and it stores 10~20 size in a daily array.
(Store 10~20 strings of 200bytes, as array type)
I have found a way to convert an array to a string
and store it in SQLite.
However, I do not know it's a good idea
because the size of the string is large.
1.
If large arrays of strings,
is it a good idea to store arrays as a string?
2.
or is there a better way?
I would like advice. Thank you.
You're actually placing your concern onto the wrong part of your database design.
For SQLite, the maximum length of a String is 1 billion bytes, so your worries about your 10-20 strings of 200 bytes each actually isn't considered that large.
There's really no harm in storing your array as a single long String in your database. Especially when it's nowhere close to the maximum limit of a String.
Your database query time won't become longer due to your String being long. The real concern here is the processing you'll be doing on that String to turn it back into an Array. Typically, if the String is extremely long, the real performance hit is when you're flattening the array into a String and when you're transforming that String back into an Array.
However, typically, this is something you'll show a loading indicator for to your users.
For storing an Array into a database, there's really only two ways to do so:
Flatten array into a single String and store the String as TEXT
Create a table meant to store the individual elements of the string, and include a column for a Foreign Key that allows you to associate those rows with the same array. Then you'll store each element of your String arrays as a row in this table.
Depending on what you need, one design is better than the other.
For example, you would normally prefer the second implementation if your app requires you to constantly edit individual elements of an array.
For such an example, it wouldn't make much sense to use the first solution, because this means every time you want to edit the contents of an array, you'll be fetching back the complete array in it's entirety. This is impractical when you only want to fetch or edit a particular portion of that String.
Therefore, in such an example, it is much more practical to store the individual elements of the arrays into individual rows of a Table meant for this type of data. You'll be querying only the row you want and updating only the row you want.
So to answer your questions, there's really only two ways to store your String array as a TEXT type in your SQLite database. Both ways work and the real concern is to consider which solution fits your needs best.
If your app only requires you to store and fetch the array in it's entirety each time, then the single String method might be more preferable.
But if your app requires you to work with individual elements of your array, then using the table method would be more convenient.
I am using PHP as a middleman to access a MySql database and it returns the result of the query as a json string using json_encode, then display it within the TableLayout of the app, this is why order is important so I can line up the data and the headers.
After some research I found out that json does not enforce order so any time I call new JSONArray(result) it scrambles the json returned by PHP. Is there any way to preserve the order of the returned string? Or maybe I'm using the incorrect data structure on either end.
Relevant PHP result:
[{"FIELD1":"vsa","FIELD2":"dfs","FIELD3":"dsfa","FIELD4":"adsf","FIELD5":"23","ZIPCODE":"asdf","USERNAME":"asd","PASSWORD":"as","DATE1":"dsfa"}]
Relevant Android Result After JSONArray(result):
[{"ZIPCODE":"asdf","DATE1":"dsfa","FIELD3":"dsfa","FIELD2":"dfs","FIELD5":"23","FIELD4":"adsf","USERNAME":"asd","FIELD1":"vsa","PASSWORD":"as"}]
I believe the reordering inside a JSON object is due to the fact that JSON objects are key/value pairs (not an indexed array), which by default are unordered. However, the JSON array is an ordered sequence of values (JSON objects).
Don't rely on order!
Source: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt
I've never seen new JSONArray(String) change the order of anything, and I've used it a lot. However, what you have seems to be an array of length 1. Using myJsonArray.getJsonObject(0).getString("ZIPCODE") should still return the correct data, and as long as you query in the correct order (FIELD1, FIELD2, FIELD3, etc), you should be fine.
I have a small issue with ArrayList. I have to fetch the document from the server.
The document contains 7 fields of data. I have to show the document names in the list view.
For this I have added different fields data to the different ArrayList. So when I click on the document name, based on the position of the document, I fetched the all fields data from the different Arraylist based on the position.
But Have a small issue using by using the above procedure. Is there any procedure that is not depend on the position, what I want is irrespective of position if I click on the Document,based on the keyword document data to be extract.
Any Help Appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.
I got your point. If you try to manage different ArrayLists then it would be difficult to manage it. I mean if you delete item from particular position from particular ArrayList then you will have to delete items from same position from other ArrayList, if you forgot to do so then it will be unbalanced.
Solution:
Instead feasible solution is to create ArrayList<Object> or ArrayList<HashMap<String,String>>, so your every item is the type of particular object, and every object contains detail and everything of particular items.
For example: ArrayList<Documents>, here ArrayList will contains list of Documents objects, and every objects contains values of 7 fields.
Its simply easy to define Documents class with getter/setter attributes.