Develop Reference

Git implementation in Dart / Flutter

As the title says, I want to implement a Git interface in my Flutter app: I need it to have basic functionality (commit, push, pull, merge) on an internal path repo (no external storage access). There is this git package for Dart, which is only a CLI interface, i.e. not compatible with Android, which is the main issue I'm facing, as I need my app to be compatible with that and Windows.
I happen to use GitJournal, an Android note-taking app that uses Git to sync. I found out that it is also built in Flutter -- it does essentially the same things I need out of this Git implementation, so eureka, maybe?
It seems to be using libgit2, along with both(?) this custom git_bindings Dart package (related pub.dev page) and this other dart-git custom implementation fully in Dart. This last package apparently isn't fully-featured, is experimental and maybe only used in parallel with the previous git_bindings thingy.
Last thing I found, one could write custom ffigen-libgit2 bindings, but I'm positive that some of the things I posted before are already using this in some way. Plus, I would have no clue on where to start with this.
I don't require a bullet-proof implementation, meaning that I'd be willing to play around with an experimental / bleeding-edge solution, as long as it does the job and doesn't require me to reinvent the wheel.
I have no familiarity with bindings, interfaces between languages and such trickeries, but I'd be willing to do some learning if necessary. Needless to say, the simplest the solution, the better -- I chose Flutter for a reason, after all :D
Thanks in advance

Implement camera lib with Kotlin multiplatform

I'm trying to understand what structure should have a multiplatform library. Checking on the Internet I've seen a huge number of examples explaining how to make a log or a "hello world" but there's a lack of complex examples, even in the official documentation (important to note that I'm only interested in mobile platform, iOS and Android).
So I want to create an example that simply opens the camera (as a lib, not as a multiplatform app) just to have an idea of how to work with a real feature which, also, is native. Right now I have created a project following the official example, so it has a common module (using expect) and one for Android and one for iOS (using actual), and now these are my doubts:
I've seen that the iOS module is also in Kotlin, Kotlin/Native as I understand. Should my project have also an wrapper in Swift, or will the library have no Swift code? And if it should, where should it be in the project structure?
Also in the Android module I've noticed I cannot import the class "Activity" nor the "Intent", which I will need to open the camera, why? is this code restricted to Java without the Android libs? Should it also have a wrapper to Android? If so, how can I configure this wrappers?
I know I can use the "expect" key when creating classes but, as I understand, the common and the native modules will always be separated classes. I mean, if I create a class in the common module, can I define methods of this class using "expect" and define them later in the native?
Can my lib have a Manifest?
Finally, does anyone knows a real example that really explain a more complex situation?
Thanks

Okay, let's go through your questions one-by-one.
I would recommend you to have a look at this example
The
iOS module produces an Objective-C framework as a result. It can be utilized by the Xcode project the same way as any other framework with non-Kotlin origins.
It looks like the unavailability to use
Android SDK is the result of using jvm("android") target instead
of android() one. To use the android target, one has to apply the android Gradle plugin in addition to kotlin-multiplatform one.
I
think you want to do something like that: just ordinary class
declaration in the common and extension function for it with an
expect modifier. And then actualize it in the platform-specific
code.
I think so.
I'd also recommend you to have a look at
this and this, maybe these examples will be complex enough for you.😁

How are your experiences with NativeScript?

Does anyone have experience with NativeScript and can compare it to developing native apps, especially for Android?
I have read all these articles:
FIRST THOUGHTS ON NATIVESCRIPT
SECOND THOUGHTS ON NATIVESCRIPT
Introduction to Native Script – Is It Worth Your Time?
My Experience Developing with Telerik NativeScript
I know especially three of them may be outdated. But I want to ask all of you developers:
How is your experience with NativeScript?
Are there any Android-Components you cannot use? Which are these ones?
Is styling really so limited?
Do apps really look so different at runtime as in the mockup as in the pictures of the first article referenced above?
Does loading of native Android objects into JavaScript Code always work correctly?
Does NativeScript generate Java-Code for Android-Platform out of the NativeScript code I write?
Is it possible to modifiy this code if I want to use some native-only features? What if I want to make UI changes then? Do I have to regenerate the code and do I miss my native extensions then?

Very glad to see that you are evaluating NativeScript to eventually use it in present and future projects.
I'll try to condense answers to a few of the questions into one, as they really are mostly related.
Skipped.*
That depends on what has already been exposed through a custom view/plugin or module. The core-modules that every NativeScript app comes with contains the most basic of wrappers for both Android and iOS under a common API. There are plugins (nativescript npm modules) that provide additional wrappers on native android views (nativescript-telerik-ui for one, nativescript-carousel), most of which are created by the NS community.
As RexSplode mentioned before me - it's mostly the platform that imposes certain limitations. NS uses CSS to declare style, but you can also access the native components and manage their style and appearance programatically if what you need isn't readily available out of the box.
First I'd like to note that the first 3 articles you've linked are over a year old now, and trust me, NativeScript has evolved a lot since then. With all the available components (remember the npm modules I mentioned earlier?) there's a good chance that you will get a close to 1:1 similarity to a well-styled native Android mockup.
At build time metadata is generated for the Android/Java public API used in the project. When the JavaScript Engine (V8) fires up, that metadata is loaded into memory, prototype chains are constructed, and callbacks are attached, so that when you call new android.widget.Button(); in your JavaScript code, the proper virtual machine instructions will be called, and a native button will be created. Static methods are accessed similarly, check out the official docs to get a better understanding of how it all works.https://docs.nativescript.org/runtimes/android/advanced-topics/execution-flow
and 7., and a cont. of 2. Java code, or rather compiled Java code is generated whenever you wish to extend a native Android class that isn't available already in a module or in the native Framework. Extending classes is very similar to how you would do it in Java - you extend a class, and create new implementations of interfaces. That means that you won't have to open Android Studio to create a new class, build it into a native plugin and then add it to your project, since you can do it all in your NativeScript code using JavaScript/TypeScript. https://docs.nativescript.org/runtimes/android/generator/extend-class-interface
Disclaimer: I am on the NativeScript Engineering team

I investigated the Native Script a little and my colleague at work writes an app with it, so I can offer you a bit of information that I have.
1. skipped
There are limited amount of components you can use with native script out of the box. However, if you have a native-java developer who can write a wrapper for you - you can use everything.
It is limited to the platform you are using. Android itself has a lot of style limitations which cannot be easily overwhelmed.
don't know
It works a little different. Your JS object, or rather widgets are translated to java code. So with the items from the box - yes, they are okey. If you write a wrapper for your custom component, then all is up to you.
Yes it does.
No, the code is generated, how are you going to modify it? Changes will be undone on the next build. However, you can write a native module for your application and use any features you want. It is like defining an interface, which you can use in JS code afterwards.

Manage code/build for Android app stores (Google/Amazon/etc)?

I have an Android app that's downloaded primarily from Android Market (now, Google Play). We made a few tweaks to the source and also submitted to the Amazon App Store to see what sort of traction it gets. I'm now looking for a sustainable way to develop from a common code base and yet build so that I can submit to either/both.
Amazon's store has some restrictions about available APIs, and hence I'd like to conditionally remove/modify features from that version. Since Java doesn't support traditional conditional compilation, and conditionally including files in Eclipse doesn't seem trivial (is it even possible?), I wanted to ask what others are doing to solve this.
Admittedly, I'm no Eclipse/Java expert so feel free to school me.
What I'm looking for in a solution:
Building/debugging using Eclipse.
Static code files, with environment/settings toggles to control what to build.
No duplicate code or conditional logic in code to pick code flow at runtime
Is this something you've solved for Android apps specifically, or for other Java/Eclipse based projects? Suggestions for where to begin?

It's quite easy to do in the newest versions of ADT (version 17), though I do find it makes compilation a bit longer:
Create a new Android project (proj-A)
Go to Project->Properties, select Android, and check "Is Library"
Move all your common code to proj-A, import all the necessary libraries
Create a new Android project for Google Play (proj-B)
Go to Project->Properties, select Android, and add Proj-A to the Library
Repeat #4&5 for the Amazon version
If you have some variables that should be set differently for each sub project (i.e. boolean GOOGLE_PLAY_VERSION to enable Google Play specific functions), you have to create another project to contain these values since you can't have projects that reference one-another in a circular fashion. You can solve this by adding the following steps:
Pull all of your sub-project specific variables into one or more Classes that just serves as container(s) for these variables
Create a "dummy" Java project (dummy)
Config proj-A to add a new Source link to the bin directory of dummy
Add the config Classes in each sub-project with project-specific changes
Profits!
Note that the variables in dummy should not be set as final, otherwise it will override sub-project's setting.
This may seem like quite a bit of up-front work, but has worked quite well for me as far as version control goes.
Edit:
Now with Google's move to Android Studio & Gradle, it may be better to move to that if you are starting a new project if you want to support multiple APKs, see Android dev site's Building Your Project with Gradle#Work with build variants. It definitely doesn't hurt to evaluate that option before deciding.

Unfortunately, it's sort of a convention in Android to change flow at runtime based on what would be in C/C++-land conditional compilation.
Our app has to maintain different behavior for different API levels, so we've created some application-level constants that are initialized statically based on API-level information available to us, and used throughout the code. This is the way that Google does things in their examples (for example, see the ActionBarCompat compatibility library, and in particular the factory method used here).
You could create an interface CustomBuild, and implement it in AmazonBuild and GooglePlayBuild, then use a static getBuild() method to switch functionality as necessary:
if(getBuild().shouldEnableFeatureX()){
doStuff();
} else {
doDifferentStuff();
}
Then all you've got to worry about switching between builds is a line or two of code in the factory along with maintaining which things you want enabled in which versions. Or you could include a different version of a static class CustomBuild for each build.
I'm going to second the suggestion of others above re: switching to something like Maven for building; it should make your life much easier once you have it set up.
I'm also going to say you should make the core of the app a library as suggested above, and have two different modules (one for amazon, one for play store) that depend on the library but each only contain the one custom factory file (or just a static class for each type of build that contains the same "should I do this thing?" methods... once you have the infrastructure it's just a matter of preference).

I haven't actually tried this yet, but it's something I've thought about.
How about using Eclipse's ability to link to files from a directory outside your workspace?
Start with one Eclipse project: for the sake of argument, say it's the Google Play version.
Now build a second project, beginning with asking Eclipse to link (not copy) the source files from your first project.
To develop the second project, add classes that subclass ones from the original project to realize your modifications. For resources, you can use some combination of includes, attribute overrides, and selectors.
Where it's not possible to subclass or extend, then obviously you'll have to just copy the original source file and hack on it. If you're really OCD about it, you can probably just maintain a patch set rather than a whole redundant set of files.
What do you think, will it work?

You may create manually two projects in Eclipse pointing to the same source folders but with different inclusion/exclusion filters and different target directories.
Then two Ant targets using properties to switch excluded files from javac fileset are enough to generate corresponding jar files.
The aim is to get a clean application for each target, without any code from the other one.
With features listed as pluggable behaviors in a property file or XML configuration, your runtime will adapt itself with the addition of menu entries.

Are there Android compatible alternatives to Property Utils?

Is there a handy-dandy equivalent to org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtils on Android?
I can't seem to use bean utils in my android app due to some dependencies on PropertyDescriptor,and IndexedPropertyDescriptor. So I'm wondering if there are any alternatives?
Basically all I want to do is use a method name as a string "someMethod" and feed that into setMethod(anObject, "someMethod", value), much like PropertyUtils does; but without having to resort to the nasties of reflection...
Or are my hands tied and I need to use Reflection?

There is bridge library which works on Android: android-java-air-bridge.jar. Just include into project path and use all apache beanutils features in your Android project as you could use in ordinary java application. Moreover, there are lot of other classes which moved to this Android supporting library. Look at the list.

There is a possibilty to use libraries or write own code depending on the PropertyUtils. But it sure isn't dandy. You can get the general idea about what has to be done in this thread.
There are apparently some projects who have successfully solved the issue, so you can study thier solution. Take a look at Drawingpad-base and libgdx. You can find PropertyUtils in the package com.madrobot.beans in the first project and com.badlogic.gdx.beans in the second.