Flurry has an interface that always responds to 400 - android

I mainly use the Flurry Event function, my other management is normal, but there is always an interface 400(https://data.flurry.com/v1/flr.do),which shows the information
HTTP ERROR 400
Problem accessing /v1/flr.do. Reason:
X-Flurry-Api-Key apikey not present in header
Powered by Jetty://
My initialization code is as follows
FlurryAgent.Builder()
.withLogEnabled(true)
.withCaptureUncaughtExceptions(true)
.withContinueSessionMillis(10000)
.withLogLevel(Log.VERBOSE)
.build(this.context!!, this.context!!.getString(R.string.ID_Flurry))

Please make sure R.string.ID_Flurry returns your correct Flurry API-KEY.

Related

Deleting a user from Azure Active Directory B2C Android/Java

I have an Android application in which I'm using Azure AD B2C to authenticate users. Users login and logout of the application as needed. I would like to give the user the option to delete their own account.
I understand that I need to use the Azure AD Graph API to delete the user. This is what I have so far:
According to this link, it looks like deleting a user from a personal account (which is what the B2C users are using) is not possible. Is that correct?
Here's my code snippet for the Graph API call. Feel free to ignore it if I'm off track and there is a better way to solve this.
I believe I need a separate access token than what my app currently has (as the graph API requires other API consent). So, I'm getting the access token as follows:
AcquireTokenParameters parameters = new AcquireTokenParameters.Builder()
.startAuthorizationFromActivity(getActivity())
.fromAuthority(B2CConfiguration.getAuthorityFromPolicyName(B2CConfiguration.Policies.get("SignUpSignIn")))
.withScopes(B2CConfiguration.getGraphAPIScopes())
.withPrompt(Prompt.CONSENT)
.withCallback(getGraphAPIAuthCallback())
.build();
taxApp.acquireToken(parameters);
In the getGraphAPIAuthCallback() method, I'm calling the Graph API using a separate thread (in the background):
boolean resp = new DeleteUser().execute(authenticationResult.getAccessToken()).get();
Finally, in my DeleterUser() AsyncTask, I'm doing the following:
#Override
protected Boolean doInBackground(String... aToken) {
final String asToken = aToken[0];
//this method will be running on background thread so don't update UI from here
//do your long running http tasks here,you dont want to pass argument and u can access the parent class' variable url over here
IAuthenticationProvider mAuthenticationProvider = new IAuthenticationProvider() {
#Override
public void authenticateRequest(final IHttpRequest request) {
request.addHeader("Authorization",
"Bearer " + asToken);
}
};
final IClientConfig mClientConfig = DefaultClientConfig
.createWithAuthenticationProvider(mAuthenticationProvider);
final IGraphServiceClient graphClient = new GraphServiceClient.Builder()
.fromConfig(mClientConfig)
.buildClient();
try {
graphClient.getMe().buildRequest().delete();
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.d(AccountSettingFragment.class.toString(), "Error deleting user. Error Details: " + e.getStackTrace());
}
return true;
}
Currently, my app fails when trying to get an access token with a null pointer exception:
com.microsoft.identity.client.exception.MsalClientException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'long java.lang.Long.longValue()' on a null object reference
Any idea what I need to do to provide the user the option to users to delete their own account? Thank you!
Thanks for the help, #allen-wu. Due to his help, this azure feedback request and this azure doc, I was able to figure out how to get and delete users silently (without needing intervention).
As #allen-wu stated, you cannot have a user delete itself. So, I decided to have the mobile app call my server-side NodeJS API when the user clicks the 'Delete Account' button (as I do not want to store the client secret in the android app) and have the NodeJS API call the Azure AD endpoint to delete the user silently. The one caveat is that admin consent is needed the first time you try to auth. Also, I have only tested this for Graph API. I'm not a 100% sure if it works for other APIs as well.
Here are the steps:
Create your application in your AAD B2C tenant. Create a client secret and give it the following API permissions: Directory.ReadWrite.All ;
AuditLog.Read.All (I'm not a 100% sure if we need the AuditLog permission. I haven't tested without it yet).
In a browser, paste the following link:
GET https://login.microsoftonline.com/{tenant}/adminconsent?
client_id=6731de76-14a6-49ae-97bc-6eba6914391e
&state=12345
&redirect_uri=http://localhost/myapp/permissions
Login using an existing admin account and provide the consent to the app.
Once you've given admin consent, you do not have to repeat steps 1-3 again. Next, make the following call to get an access token:
POST https://login.microsoftonline.com/{B2c_tenant_name}.onmicrosoft.com/oauth2/v2.0/token
In the body, include your client_id, client_secret, grant_type (the value for which should be client_credentials) and scope (value should be 'https://graph.microsoft.com/.default')
Finally, you can call the Graph API to manage your users, including deleting them:
DELETE https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users/{upn}
Don't forget to include the access token in the header. I noticed that in Postman, the graph api had a bug and returned an error if I include the word 'Bearer' at the start of the Authorization header. Try without it and it works. I haven't tried it in my NodeJS API yet, so, can't comment on it so far.
#allen-wu also suggested using the ROPC flow, which I have not tried yet, so, cannot compare the two approaches.
I hope this helps!
There is a line of code: graphClient.getUsers("").buildRequest().delete();
It seems that you didn't put the user object id in it.
However, we can ignore this problem because Microsoft Graph doesn't allow a user to delete itself.
Here is the error when I try to do it.
{
"error": {
"code": "Request_BadRequest",
"message": "The principal performing this request cannot delete itself.",
"innerError": {
"request-id": "8f44118f-0e49-431f-a0a0-80bdd954a7f0",
"date": "2020-06-04T06:41:14"
}
}
}

React-Native Firebase: Token refresh not working

I have an issue with react-native-firebase (or firebase) in which my app does not receive a trigger after the auth token refreshes. It's pretty much the same issue as [1], but they never posted a solution.
So, what happens is that both on an Android phone and on the Android emulator (no idea about iOS), signing up, logging in and logging out works perfectly, meaning the listeners correctly see when I do a logout() etc. But the listeners never fire when the token refreshes.
My first question is: Am I correct to assume that the onIdTokenChanged-listener should automatically fire after 60 minutes without having to do anything else, e.g. call any firebase function, such that the app just sits there doing nothing for 60 minutes and then receiving the event and replacing the token?
My main component which contains the listeners looks like this:
class ReduxAppWrapper extends Component {
componentDidMount() {
firebase.auth().onAuthStateChanged((user) => {
console.log('COMP DID MOUNT: AUTH STATE CHANGED! ' + JSON.stringify(user));
});
firebase.auth().onIdTokenChanged((user) => {
console.log('COMP DID MOUNT: TOKEN CHANGED! ' + JSON.stringify(user));
});
firebase.auth().onUserChanged((user) => {
console.log('COMP DID MOUNT: USER CHANGED! ' + JSON.stringify(user));
});
};
render() {
return (
<ReduxProvider store={store}>
<MenuProvider>
<PaperProvider>
<AppContainer />
</PaperProvider>
</MenuProvider>
</ReduxProvider>);
}
}
Normally inside the listener I have a function that dispatches a redux-action such that the authentication information is broadcast across my components. Inside those components I use the jwt token for http-requests to my backend.
Now the backend of course uses firebase to validate that token (and this is where the problem occurs after the 60 minutes since it retrieves an outdated jwt), but I think I am right to assume that the problem lies within the app since the refresh does not happen.
I'd be really glad if someone could point me to where to look, I also tried to find out in the firebase console whether a token refresh event was sent, but I could not find anything about that.
So basically:
1) Am I right to assume that the firebase.auth().onIdTokenChanged() function should be called without me doing anything else? Or is it not enough to define the listener once in the main component (also regarding the fact that other screens will be rendered on top of that due to the stack-nvigation).
2) If the code is fine, do you have any hints for where to look?
Thanks so much!
[1] https://github.com/invertase/react-native-firebase/issues/531
For anyone with the same issue, I ended up asking firebase asking for the token everytime I needed it. I still think this should not be necessary but I did not want to spend any more time analyzing why the refresh did not work automatically. So what I am doing in the app is
firebase.auth().currentUser.getIdToken().then((token) => {
fetch(url, {
method: 'GET',
headers: { Authorization: token }
})
}
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Apparently, with getIdToken, Firebase only makes a call to its server to get a new token if the current token has expired; it does not create unnecessary requests if it does not have to.
Quite a crucial detail which can be confusing if you are not aware of it and makes you (rightfully) assume that onIdTokenChanged is a listener which you would need to use to automatically update the token ...
https://firebase.google.com/docs/reference/js/firebase.User.html#getidtoken
Returns the current token if it has not expired. Otherwise, this will refresh the token and return a new one.

Codename one GoogleConnect setScope is not effective

I am using the new GoogleConnect thing and set the scope like
Login gc = GoogleConnect.getInstance();
gc.setScope("https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.profile.emails.read https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.file");
...
gc.doLogin();
However, when the access token is generated and checked in
https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/tokeninfo?access_token=(accesstoken)
, it shows
"scope": "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.me https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.profile"
Is it related to any recent updates or new build hint?
I am totally lost here. It is an Android build.
Thanks.
Edited to add gc.doLogin() code, to clarify that I am NOT trying to set the scope after the access token is generated.
Same problem here, setScope only works on the simulator
"scope": "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.me https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.profile",
My scopes (for reference):
google.auth.scopes=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.me email profile

Getting "You cannot access body after reading from request's data stream" while using django-rest-framework

My first question here, & a newbie to everything including coding.
I am using django-rest-framework to call a rest api from an android app I am building.
I am calling another view's method from the api_view method of django-rest-framework.
This works great with the GET method, but fails while using the POST method.
Below is the code:
View 1:
#api_view(['GET', 'POST'])
def get_dos(request):
return View2.get_data(request)
View 2:
def get_data(request):
#if I print request.body, it goes through without problems
#print request.body
#but commenting it fails when I read from request.POST.get below:
var1 = int(request.POST.get('test', 0))
#fails in the above statement.
I have tried commenting all middleware classes in the settings file, but no luck :(. I keep getting "You cannot access body after reading from request's data stream" error.
Am I doing something silly? Any assistance appreciated. Thanks!

Nest ETA update not working: No write permission(s) for field(s): eta

I'm building an Application that integrates with your Nest devices (both the thermostat and the Nest Protect, but this issue is about the thermostat).
What I'm trying to do is set my thermostat's ETA to be in x minutes (2 hours for example so 120 minutes).
This is my code that I'm executing:
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSZ");
final String path = buildStructureFieldPath(structureID, Keys.STRUCTURE.ETA);
Structure.ETA eta = new Structure.ETA.Builder()
.setTripID(tripId)
.setEstimatedArrivalWindowBegin(sdf.format(estimatedArrivalBegin))
.setEstimatedArrivalWindowEnd(sdf.format(estimatedArrivalEnd))
.build();
sendRequest(path, eta.toJSON().toString(), listener);
The path is /structures/MY_STRUCTURE_ID/eta
Unfortunately that's not working. I'm always getting an error code -2 and error message: No write permission(s) for field(s): eta
And that's were it gets strange. No permission, but I did request the permission and I did an authenticate, which is successful, before launching the update call.
In the two attached screenshots you can see first my Nest Developer Account where you can find the ETA write permission and in the second you can see the logging from within my app (using the NestAPI as can be found on GitHub, just added the ETA feature myself).
Anyone have any idea on how to solve this issue?
Can you print out the exact JSON blob you're sending and post it here? (the value of eta.toJSON().toString())
Best guess is that it isn't formatted exactly correctly and as such is maybe attempting to write in such a way that doesn't adhere to the api-reference.
This is the format that it needs to match:
"eta": {
"trip_id": "myTripHome1024" ,
"estimated_arrival_window_begin": "2015-10-31T22:42:59.000Z" ,
"estimated_arrival_window_end": "2015-10-31T23:59:59.000Z"
}
Single line:
{"eta":{"trip_id":"myTripHome1024","estimated_arrival_window_begin":"2015-10-31T22:42:59.000Z","estimated_arrival_window_end": "2015-10-31T23:59:59.000Z"}}
To pinpoint exactly which field may be erroneous, try sending just one change at a time for each ie: structures/ID/eta/trip_id, etc for the others.
Useful JSON Validator: http://jsonlint.com/
You could also try to send it to /structures/MY_STRUCTURE_ID.json?auth=[TOKEN] instead of /structures/MY_STRUCTURE_ID/eta.

Categories

Resources