I would like to pass along an array of bundles to FirebaseAnalytics as described here but FirebaseAnalytics.Param does not contain an ITEMS value. In fact, it only seems to contain a subset of the values it should contain as shown here:
I have firebaseanalytics version 17.4.4 and I tried to fill in the Param.ITEMS constant value myself ("items" according to the docs) but DebugView shows a firebase error (20 - Event array parameter name is invalid). All other events and parameters seem to work just fine according to DebugView and I found nobody with similar problems. Does anyone have any ideas as to why I only see a subset of the parameters?
Make sure you perform a Gradle sync, as FirebaseAnalytics.Param.ITEMS is definitely available in v17.4.4.
Here it is in my project, note the version number in the bottom right:
If you're still having trouble, mouseover one of the options in your dropdown and it should show you the version being used.
Related
How do I implement this condition as shown in this image.
That's just in 2..4, i.e. in the integer range from 2 to 4, including the 4.
The ≤ is just some hint text provided by the IDE, similar to how you can see argument names in function calls - it's not part of the code, it's not really there. They added it to make it clearer what the .. operator does (vs until)
This might be because they're introducing a new operator, ..< which seems intended to replace until, or maybe they've been there a while! You can turn them on and off here in the settings:
I have been searching high and low for an answer on this and I am completly dumbfounded.
I am implementing simple click and page tracking in my Android app using GA, running this through GTM. All my "Screens" are visible in realtime in GA but I can't get "Events" to appear at all.
Well actually I can but the behaviour seems very bizarre. If I do not include a "Label" and a "Value" I can see the events appear. However if I add them (either as just a constant or a data layer variable) all events stop. I have confirmed the variables I want in "Label" and "Value" are coming through as I made a container with those values as "Category" and "Action" and could see them as expected in real time.
This leads me to think the app side implementation is perfectly fine but there is an issue with my tag in GTM. (Obviously not the Trigger as that too works when expected).
Ideally I would like to do something like this (the variables are data layer variables):
But this doesn't work. I see no Events.
The Event Value should be a number, not a string. Shuffle the fields, for example - Action - Click on: {{GTM - Click Target}}, Label - {{GTM - Click Value}}, and leave the value empty, this will fix your problem.
Make sure, you have correctly setted up Click listener.
Enable when defines when is listener available and where is applied to the all DOM elements.
Fire ON defines conditions, so in your case it could be {{event}} equals gtm.click or {{event}} equals gtm.linkClick .
This is the most common pitfall when setting listeners
How can I attach a custom metric value to HitBuilders.TransactionBuilder in the following fashion? I want to associate a transaction with a value.
tracker.send(new HitBuilders.TransactionBuilder()
.setOtherAttributes(...)
.setCustomMetric(1, 10)
.build());
The rest of the data are successfully sent, but the custom metric is always 0.
It seems your code is correct. You can try to setCustomDimension instead of setCustomMetric, you only have to transform float to string.
Your code is correct. What you need to check is the server side reports you build.
Make sure you created a Custom metric in Admin - Custom Definitions - Custom metrics. Once created, custom metrics will initially appear with a 3 to 4 hours delay on the server. Give them some time to appear there. Finally, you need to create a report to see the result. Make sure you choose the right time intervals and don't add too many metric and filters, otherwise you won't see data. Make first reposts as simple as possible. I hope this helps.
The problem was with that the scope of the custom metric was not Hit and that I was looking at a custom report widget matched by Product. The value appeared when I changed the column.
When using copyToRealmOrUpdate it also overrides fields with existing values. I would expect it would only update the fields I gave and use the existing values for the other fields.
I saw this issue for createOrUpdateFromJson: https://github.com/realm/realm-java/issues/933
cmelchior says this:
It is impossible to tell the difference between an value not set and
it's default value, so there it should override all properties.
I wanted to create an issue with label enhancement for realm, but instead I ask it here first. Is it really impossible? Because it would be a great improvement to me.
Thanks!
Note there is difference between using Realm.copyToRealmOrupdate(RealmObject) and Realm.createOrUpdateFromJson(Json)
The answer I gave is true for copyToRealmOrUpdate() eg. you cannot tell the difference between the following in Java:
boolean bool1;
boolean bool2 = false;
It is different for JSON where you can tell if a property is missing altogether. However the current implementation doesn't work that way. We are currently in process of merging a Pull Request that actually has the behaviour you are looking for. You can follow the progress here: https://github.com/realm/realm-java/pull/1022
I had read the .dex format document on Google, but I still got some confuses with some layer.
link_size & link_off : Google said it left unspecified and then said it's hook for runtime, so what it is? The static hook for global or local? or the hook to native library?
map_off : Why it need this redundancy IDs list? is it some kinda like the file address table?
proto_size & proto_off : Not quite sure what it actually is. I had de-assembled an randomly picked dex and look on this section, this section contained some short sign like DD/LL/JLJJ/...brabrabra, that made me more confused about this section. What exactly this section doing for?
Can anyone enlighten me?
The link section has never been specified or used. You might run across some dex files that have a garbage value for these fields, as an attempt to prevent baksmali from being able to be run on them (due to an old bug, that has been fixed for a while).
For the map item, Yes, there is redundancy for the locations of the indexed item sections - the location for these are specified in both the header item and the map item. But the map item is the only place the locations of the offset item sections are specified (the variable size items in the data section)
The prototype section defines the prototype for a method, i.e. the parameters and return type. If you look in the method_id_item, you'll see that it has a reference to a prototype item.