I'm trying to make a layout like on the scheme below:
I've already found a solution with a weighted Row() inside other Row(). But it looks too complicated for such a simple problem.
Row() {
Icon() // Fix width
Row(modifier = Modifier.weight(1f)) {
Text(modifier = Modifier.weight(1f)) // Max width
Icon() // Fix width
}
}
Surely many have faced such an issue. Are there more beautiful ways to solve it?
You need not use a nested Row here. Just give the weight(1f) modifier to center element.
Row {
Icon() // View 1 (Fix width)
CenterPiece(
modifier = Modifier
.weight(1f)
.padding(horizontal = 8.dp) // For the spacing between components
)
Icon() // View 3 (Fix width)
}
You might also want to add verticalAlignment = Alignment.CenterVertically to the Row so that the three components are centered vertically.
This code fills the full screen if i specify the size to be 100.dp.
ComposeTheme {
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.width(100.dp)
.height(100.dp)
.clip(RoundedCornerShape(12.dp))
.background(color = Color.Red)
) {
}
}
}
This code behave properly by filling the required size.
ComposeTheme {
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Column(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.width(100.dp)
.height(100.dp)
.clip(RoundedCornerShape(12.dp))
.background(color = Color.Red)
) {
}
}
}
}
Can somebody please explain why is it happening?
This is how Box works with the propagateMinConstraints parameter set to true. Surface is using it under the hood.
As an example, setting propagateMinConstraints to true can be useful when the Box has content on which modifiers cannot be specified directly and setting a min size on the content of the Box is needed. If propagateMinConstraints is set to true, the min size set on the Box will also be applied to the content, whereas otherwise the min size will only apply to the Box.
Therefore, the first-level Surface children will have min size constraints equal to the size of Surface.
Here is how one of the maintainers explains the reasons for this decision:
Surface is not really a layout. We had such issue with FloatingActionButton - We set min width and height on it according to the specification, but users can set larger size if they need. And now the content (icon) inside FloatingActionButton needs to be fill the whole size of Surface so we apply a ripple on it, and then ripple is clipped by the Surface shape. If we just set Modifier.fillMaxSize() it will fill the whole screen as FloatingActionButton has no max size specified. And there is no such which as Modifier.fillMinSize() as this information is not propagated by Box because of how the system works. So we come up with propagateMinConstraints=true idea, now the content inside Surface has to fill the min size applied on Surface. To be honest I am not sure the explanation is clear enough :). But yeah, if you need to have some real layout and multiple elements inside your Surface you need to add it manually, so add your own Box.
It can be overridden by Modifier.requiredSize, or, as you did in your second code example - by using an other container. The Column in your example still have size equal to the parent Surface.
This code fills the full screen if i specify the size to be 100.dp.
ComposeTheme {
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.width(100.dp)
.height(100.dp)
.clip(RoundedCornerShape(12.dp))
.background(color = Color.Red)
) {
}
}
}
This code behave properly by filling the required size.
ComposeTheme {
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Column(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.width(100.dp)
.height(100.dp)
.clip(RoundedCornerShape(12.dp))
.background(color = Color.Red)
) {
}
}
}
}
Can somebody please explain why is it happening?
This is how Box works with the propagateMinConstraints parameter set to true. Surface is using it under the hood.
As an example, setting propagateMinConstraints to true can be useful when the Box has content on which modifiers cannot be specified directly and setting a min size on the content of the Box is needed. If propagateMinConstraints is set to true, the min size set on the Box will also be applied to the content, whereas otherwise the min size will only apply to the Box.
Therefore, the first-level Surface children will have min size constraints equal to the size of Surface.
Here is how one of the maintainers explains the reasons for this decision:
Surface is not really a layout. We had such issue with FloatingActionButton - We set min width and height on it according to the specification, but users can set larger size if they need. And now the content (icon) inside FloatingActionButton needs to be fill the whole size of Surface so we apply a ripple on it, and then ripple is clipped by the Surface shape. If we just set Modifier.fillMaxSize() it will fill the whole screen as FloatingActionButton has no max size specified. And there is no such which as Modifier.fillMinSize() as this information is not propagated by Box because of how the system works. So we come up with propagateMinConstraints=true idea, now the content inside Surface has to fill the min size applied on Surface. To be honest I am not sure the explanation is clear enough :). But yeah, if you need to have some real layout and multiple elements inside your Surface you need to add it manually, so add your own Box.
It can be overridden by Modifier.requiredSize, or, as you did in your second code example - by using an other container. The Column in your example still have size equal to the parent Surface.
This code fills the full screen if i specify the size to be 100.dp.
ComposeTheme {
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.width(100.dp)
.height(100.dp)
.clip(RoundedCornerShape(12.dp))
.background(color = Color.Red)
) {
}
}
}
This code behave properly by filling the required size.
ComposeTheme {
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Column(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.width(100.dp)
.height(100.dp)
.clip(RoundedCornerShape(12.dp))
.background(color = Color.Red)
) {
}
}
}
}
Can somebody please explain why is it happening?
This is how Box works with the propagateMinConstraints parameter set to true. Surface is using it under the hood.
As an example, setting propagateMinConstraints to true can be useful when the Box has content on which modifiers cannot be specified directly and setting a min size on the content of the Box is needed. If propagateMinConstraints is set to true, the min size set on the Box will also be applied to the content, whereas otherwise the min size will only apply to the Box.
Therefore, the first-level Surface children will have min size constraints equal to the size of Surface.
Here is how one of the maintainers explains the reasons for this decision:
Surface is not really a layout. We had such issue with FloatingActionButton - We set min width and height on it according to the specification, but users can set larger size if they need. And now the content (icon) inside FloatingActionButton needs to be fill the whole size of Surface so we apply a ripple on it, and then ripple is clipped by the Surface shape. If we just set Modifier.fillMaxSize() it will fill the whole screen as FloatingActionButton has no max size specified. And there is no such which as Modifier.fillMinSize() as this information is not propagated by Box because of how the system works. So we come up with propagateMinConstraints=true idea, now the content inside Surface has to fill the min size applied on Surface. To be honest I am not sure the explanation is clear enough :). But yeah, if you need to have some real layout and multiple elements inside your Surface you need to add it manually, so add your own Box.
It can be overridden by Modifier.requiredSize, or, as you did in your second code example - by using an other container. The Column in your example still have size equal to the parent Surface.
Documentation says that Modifiers are applied from the left.
But from this example it looks like they are applied from the right:
First border and then padding because there is no space between text and border
Text("Hi there!", Modifier.padding(10.dp).border(2.dp, Color.Magenta))
There’s Layouts in Jetpack Compose codelab containing Layout modifiers under the hood step which explains the modifier order, see "Order matters" section.
order matters when chaining modifiers as they're applied to the composable they modify from earlier to later, meaning that the measurement and layout of the modifiers on the left will affect the modifier on the right. The final size of the composable depends on all modifiers passed as a parameter. First, modifiers will update the constraints from left to right, and then, they return back the size from right to left.
To understand it better I'd recommend to figure out how layouts work in Compose. In short, padding() is a LayoutModifer, it takes in some constraints, measures its child size based on a projection of that constraints and places the child at some coordinates.
Let’s see an example:
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.border(1.dp, Color.Red)
.size(32.dp)
.padding(8.dp)
.border(1.dp, Color.Blue)
)
And the result:
But let's swap the .size() and the .padding()
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.border(1.dp, Color.Red)
.padding(8.dp)
.size(32.dp)
.border(1.dp, Color.Blue)
)
Now we have a different result:
I hope this sample helps you to figure out how the modifiers are applied.
One can expect that the red border should be the closest to the box since it was added first, so the order might seem reversed, but such an order has pros too. Let’s take a look at this composable:
#Composable
fun MyFancyButton(modifier: Modifier = Modifier) {
Text(
text = "Ok",
modifier = modifier
.clickable(onClick = { /*do something*/ })
.background(Color.Blue, RoundedCornerShape(4.dp))
.padding(8.dp)
)
}
Just by moving the modifier to the arguments the composable allows its parents to add additional modifiers such as extra margin. Because the lastly added modifiers are the closest to the button, the border and the inner padding won’t be affected.
In Android Compose resulting Image is being constructed from the outside layer toward the Composable in the center.
This means that first defined Green border is outer border and the last defined Red border is inner border .
This is very confusing since Green Modifier that is closest to Text Composable in the Code is furthest from it in the result.
This is in contrast to SwiftUI where Modifiers appear in the same order both in the Code and in the resulting Image.
Modifier that is closest to the Composable in the Code is also closest to it in the resulting Image.
If you want to imagine that resulting Image is being constructed from the center where your Composable is positioned (like in SwiftUI) then Modifiers are applied in the opposite order from which they are given (from the bottom upward).
So if you have Text Composable with two border Modifiers
border Modifier that is furthest away from the Text Composable in the Code (the bottom Red one)
will be closest to the Text Composable in the resulting Image
Modifiers are applied from outer toward inner layer
Applying .border(2.dp, Color.Green) to the outmost layer
Applying .padding(50.dp) going inward
Applying .border(2.dp, Color.Red) to the innermost layer
package com.example.myapplication
import android.os.Bundle
import androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatActivity
import androidx.compose.foundation.*
import androidx.compose.foundation.layout.padding
import androidx.compose.ui.Modifier
import androidx.compose.ui.graphics.Color
import androidx.compose.ui.platform.setContent
import androidx.compose.ui.unit.dp
class MainActivity : AppCompatActivity() {
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContent {
Text("Hi there!",
Modifier
.border(2.dp, Color.Green)
.padding(50.dp)
.border(2.dp, Color.Red)
)
}
}
}
The first padding is like the margin for the element in this case.
Compare these Composables and you will see the difference.
#Composable
fun Example() {
// Default
Box(modifier = Modifier.background(Color.Cyan), alignment = Alignment.Center){
Text("Hi there!", Modifier.border(2.dp, Color.Magenta))
}
Divider()
// 10dp margin
Box(modifier = Modifier.background(Color.Cyan), alignment = Alignment.Center){
Text("Hi there!", Modifier.padding(10.dp).border(2.dp, Color.Magenta))
}
Divider()
// 10dp margin and 10dp padding
Box(modifier = Modifier.background(Color.Cyan), alignment = Alignment.Center){
Text("Hi there!", Modifier.padding(10.dp).border(2.dp, Color.Magenta).padding(10.dp))
}
}
"Modifier elements may be combined using then. Order is significant; modifier elements that appear first will be applied first." #here
It applies to the outer layer first with padding 10.dp, then the border with color.Magenta, and so on ("left to right"). The 80.dp padding applies last to the inner layer.
#Composable
fun test() {
Text("Hi there!",
Modifier.background(color = Color.Green)
.padding(10.dp)
.border(2.dp, Color.Magenta)
.padding(30.dp)
.border(2.dp, Color.Red)
.padding(80.dp)
)
}
The Modifier allows us to customize the appearance of the composable. Using it, you can:
Change a Composable’s appearance, size, offset, padding or margin
Add interactions, like making an element clickable, scrollable, draggable, or zoomable
Change its scale, position in screen while its layout somewhere different entirely, or shape that changes its touch area.
Based on which order you place these modifiers your Composable's visual and behavioral structure is shaped.
Most of the modifiers are applied from from top to bottom or left to right. One exception is Modifier.pointerInput() it gets applied from right to left or bottom to top by default pass.
Modifier.padding()
Modifier.padding() in Jetpack Compose acts as padding or margin depending on order.
Modifier.padding(10.dp).size(200.dp) adds space before setting size you have a Composable with 200.dp size
Modifier.size(200.dp).padding(10.dp) adds padding which you have 180.dp width and height after setting 10.dp padding on each side.
Box(
Modifier
.border(2.dp, Color.Green)
.padding(10.dp)
.border(2.dp, Color.Red)
.size(200.dp)
)
Box(
Modifier
.border(2.dp, Color.Cyan)
.size(200.dp)
.padding(10.dp)
.border(2.dp, Color.Magenta)
)
And padding modifiers are cumulative. Modifier.padding(20.dp).padding(20.dp) is summed as 40.dp.
Box(
Modifier
.border(2.dp, Color.Green)
.padding(20.dp)
.border(2.dp, Color.Red)
.size(200.dp)
)
Box(
Modifier
.border(2.dp, Color.Green)
.padding(20.dp)
.padding(20.dp)
.border(2.dp, Color.Red)
.size(200.dp)
)
Modifier.shadow()
Another modifier that changes appearance of Composable based on which order it's applied. For shadow to be applied as outside of Composable it should be applied before background or other modifiers. If you apply it after Modifier.background you can have outer shadow.
Box(
Modifier
.shadow(5.dp, RoundedCornerShape(8.dp))
.background(Color.White)
.size(100.dp)
)
Box(
Modifier
.background(Color.White)
.size(100.dp)
.shadow(5.dp, RoundedCornerShape(8.dp))
)
Modifier.clip()
This Modifier also clips the Modifiers depending on order it's placed. Good thing with this modifier if you place it before Modifier.clickable{} you can change or clip clickable area of a Composable. Having a circle, triangle or diamond circle area or creating before/after layout is possible using this modifier and Shapes.
It's Modifier.graphicsLayer{} under the hood, you can check out my detailed answer about it here, here and here. It helps you create complex layouts using scale, shape, clip, translate, and other cool properties.
Modifier.offset()
This Modifier is useful for changing position of a Composable after it's laid out unlike Modifier.padding changing value of this Modifier does not change position of a Composable relative to its sibling Composable. However depending on where you set Modifier.offset you can change touch area of a Composable and it has two variants. One that takes lambda defers state read which is advised by google over the one that takes value.
I used one with value for demonstration. You can see if offset is applied first ever modifier that follow offset is moved as Slider changes values. In second example touch area of Composable is not changed because Modifier.clickable{} is applied before Modifier.offset{}
var offset by remember {
mutableStateOf(0f)
}
Box(
Modifier
.offset(x = offset.dp)
.clickable {}
.background(Color.Red)
.size(100.dp)
)
Box(
Modifier
.clickable {}
.offset(x = offset.dp)
.background(Color.Red)
.size(100.dp)
)
Slider(value = offset, onValueChange = { offset = it }, valueRange = 0f..200f)
Modifier.pointerInput(keys)
This modifier is basis of gesture and touch events. Using it drag, tap, press, double tap, zoom, rotation and many gesturer can be invoked. In this answer how it's used is explained to build onTouchEvent counterpart of View system.
Unlike Modifiers above it propagates by default from bottom to top unless you consume PointerInputChange. In Compose gesture system consuming continuous events cancel next one in line to receive it. So you can prevent gestures like scroll not happening when you zoom an image for instance.
Modifier
.pointerInput() // Second one that is invoked
.pointerInput() // First one that is invoked