Develop Reference

Why does Flow (kotlinx.coroutines.flow) not working with Retry even though I manually set as null in Android?

So basically, on the snackbar action button, I want to Retry API call if user click on Retry.
I have used core MVVM architecture with Flow. I even used Flow between Viewmodel and view as well. Please note that I was already using livedata between view and ViewModel, but now the requirement has been changed and I have to use Flow only. Also I'm not using and shared or state flow, that is not required.
Code:
Fragment:
private fun apiCall() {
viewModel.fetchUserReviewData()
}
private fun setObservers() {
lifecycleScope.launch {
viewModel.userReviewData?.collect {
LogUtils.d("Hello it: " + it.code)
setLoadingState(it.state)
when (it.status) {
Resource.Status.ERROR -> showErrorSnackBarLayout(-1, it.message, {
// Retry action button logic
viewModel.userReviewData = null
apiCall()
})
}
}
}
Viewmodel:
var userReviewData: Flow<Resource<ReviewResponse>>? = emptyFlow<Resource<ReviewResponse>>()
fun fetchUserReviewData() {
LogUtils.d("Hello fetchUserReviewData: " + userReviewData)
userReviewData = flow {
emit(Resource.loading(true))
repository.getUserReviewData().collect {
emit(it)
}
}
}
EDIT in ViewModel:
// var userReviewData = MutableStateFlow<Resource<ReviewResponse>>(Resource.loading(false))
var userReviewData = MutableSharedFlow<Resource<ReviewResponse>>()
fun fetchUserReviewData() {
viewModelScope.launch {
userReviewData.emit(Resource.loading(true))
repository.getUserReviewData().collect {
userReviewData.emit(it)
}
}
}
override fun onCreate() {}
}
EDIT in Activity:
private fun setObservers() {
lifecycleScope.launchWhenStarted {
viewModel.userReviewData.collect {
setLoadingState(it.state)
when (it.status) {
Resource.Status.SUCCESS ->
if (it.data != null) {
val reviewResponse: ReviewResponse = it.data
if (!AppUtils.isNull(reviewResponse)) {
setReviewData(reviewResponse.data)
}
}
Resource.Status.ERROR -> showErrorSnackBarLayout(it.code, it.message) {
viewModel.fetchUserReviewData()
}
}
}
}
}
Now, I have only single doubt, should I use state one or shared one? I saw Phillip Lackener video and understood the difference, but still thinking what to use!
The thing is we only support Portrait orientation, but what in future requirement comes? In that case I think I have to use state one so that it can survive configuration changes! Don't know what to do!

Because of the single responsibility principle, the ViewModel alone should be updating its flow to show the latest requested data, rather than having to cancel the ongoing request and resubscribe to a new one from the Fragment side.
Here is one way you could do it. Use a MutableSharedFlow for triggering fetch requests and flatMapLatest to restart the downstream flow on a new request.
A Channel could also be used as a trigger, but it's a little more concise with MutableSharedFlow.
//In ViewModel
private val fetchRequest = MutableSharedFlow<Unit>(replay = 1, BufferOverflow.DROP_OLDEST)
var userReviewData = fetchRequest.flatMapLatest {
flow {
emit(Resource.loading(true))
emitAll(repository.getUserReviewData())
}
}.shareIn(viewModelScope, SharingStarted.WhlieSubscribed(5000), 1)
fun fetchUserReviewData() {
LogUtils.d("Hello fetchUserReviewData: " + userReviewData)
fetchRequest.tryEmit(Unit)
}
Your existing Fragment code above should work with this, but you no longer need the ?. null-safe call since the flow is not nullable.
However, if the coroutine does anything to views, you should use viewLifecycle.lifecycleScope instead of just lifecycleScope.

How to handle callbacks in Jetpack compose?

I am migrating my multiple activity app to single activity app.
In the activity I am observing a live data from view model. When the observable triggers, I start a payment activity from a third party SDK as shown below.
onCreate() {
viewmodel.orderCreation.observe {
thirdpartysdk.startPaymentWithThisOrder(context)
}
}
onActivityResult() {
// use payment result
}
As I will be using a Composable now,
#Composable
fun PaymentScreen(onOrderCreated: () -> Unit) {
val orderCreation by viewmodel.orderCreation.observeAsState()
// How to use order creation once here to call onOrderCreated here only once as composable is called again and again
}

Here's my suggestion:
In your viewmodel, create a function to reset your orderCreation. And another field + function to store the payment result.
Something like:
fun resetOrderCreation() {
_orderCreation.value = null
}
fun paymentResult(value: SomeType) {
_paymentResult.value = value
}
Now, in your composable, you can do the following:
#Composable
fun PaymentScreen(onOrderCreated: () -> Unit) {
// 1
val orderCreation by viewmodel.orderCreation.observeAsState()
var paymentResult by viewmodel.paymentResult.observeAsState()
// 2
val launcher = rememberLauncherForActivityResult(
PaymentActivityResultContract()
) { result ->
viewModel.paymentResult(result)
}
...
// 3
LaunchedEffect(orderCreation) {
if (orderCreation != null) {
launcher.launch()
viewModel.resetOrderCreation()
}
}
// 4
if (paymentStatus != null) {
// Show some UI showing the payment status
}
}
Explaining the code:
I'm assuming that you're using LiveData. But I really suggest you move to StateFlow instead. See more here.
You will probably need to write a ActivityResultContact to your third party lib. I wrote a post about (it's in Portuguese, but I think you can get the idea translating it to English).
As soon the orderCreation has changed, the LaunchedEffect block will run, then you can start the third party activity using launcher.launch() (the parameters for this call are defined in your ActivityResultContract).
Finally, when the payment status changed, you can show something different to the user.

How to cancel a combine of flows when one of them emits a certain value?

I am doing multiple network requests in parallel and monitoring the result using a Stateflow.
Each network request is done in a separate flow, and I use combine to push the latest status on my Stateflow. Here's my code:
Repo class:
fun networkRequest1(id: Int): Flow<Resource<List<Area>>> =
flow {
emit(Resource.Loading())
try {
val areas = retrofitInterface.getAreas(id)
emit(Resource.Success(areas))
} catch (throwable: Throwable) {
emit(
Resource.Error()
)
)
}
}
fun networkRequest2(id: Int): Flow<Resource<List<Area>>> = //same code as above for simplicity
fun networkRequest3(id: Int): Flow<Resource<List<Area>>> = //same code as above for simplicity
fun networkRequest4(id: Int): Flow<Resource<List<Area>>> = //same code as above for simplicity
ViewModel class:
val getDataCombinedStateFlow: StateFlow<Resource<HashMap<String, Resource<out List<Any>>>>?> =
getDataTrigger.flatMapLatest {
withContext(it) {
combine(
repo.networkRequest1(id: Int),
repo.networkRequest2(id: Int),
repo.networkRequest3(id: Int),
repo.networkRequest4(id: Int)
) { a,
b,
c,
d
->
hashMapOf(
Pair("1", a),
Pair("2",b),
Pair("3", c),
Pair("4", d),
)
}.flatMapLatest {
val progress = it
var isLoading = false
flow<Resource<HashMap<String, Resource<out List<Any>>>>?> {
emit(Resource.Loading())
progress.forEach { (t, u) ->
if (u is Resource.Error) {
emit(Resource.Error(error = u.error!!))
// I want to cancel here, as I no longer care if 1 request fails
return#flow
}
if (u is Resource.Loading) {
isLoading = true
}
}
if (isLoading) {
emit(Resource.Loading())
return#flow
}
if (!isLoading) {
emit(Resource.Success(progress))
}
}
}
}
}.stateIn(viewModelScope, SharingStarted.Lazily, null)
View class:
viewLifecycleOwner.lifecycleScope.launchWhenCreated() {
viewModel.getDataCombinedStateFlow.collect {
val result = it ?: return#collect
binding.loadingErrorState.apply {
if (result is Resource.Loading) {
//show smth
}
if (result is Resource.Error) {
//show error msg
}
if (result is Resource.Success) {
//done
}
}
}
}
I want to be able to cancel all work after a Resource.Error is emitted, as I no longer want to wait or do any related work for the response of other API calls in case one of them fails.
How can I achieve that?
I tried to cancel the collect, but the flows that build the Stateflow keep working and emmit results. I know that they won't be collected but still, I find this a waste of resources.

I think this whole situation is complicated by the fact that you have source flows just to precede what would otherwise be suspend functions with a Loading state. So then you're having to merge them and filter out various loading states, and your end result flow keeps repeatedly emitting a loading state until all the sources are ready.
If you instead have basic suspend functions for your network operations, for example:
suspend fun networkRequest1(id: Int): List<Area> =
retrofitInterface.getAreas(id)
Then your view model flow becomes simpler. It doesn't make sense to use a specific context just to call a flow builder function, so I left that part out. (I'm also confused as to why you have a flow of CoroutineContexts.)
I also think it's much cleaner if you break out the request call into a separate function.
private fun makeParallelRequests(id: Int): Map<String, Resource<out List<Any>> = coroutineScope {
val results = listOf(
async { networkRequest1(id) },
async { networkRequest2(id) },
async { networkRequest2(id) },
async { networkRequest4(id) }
).awaitAll()
.map { Resource.Success(it) }
listOf("1", "2", "3", "4").zip(results).toMap()
}
val dataCombinedStateFlow: StateFlow<Resource<Map<String, Resource<out List<Any>>>>?> =
getDataTrigger.flatMapLatest {
flow {
emit(Resource.Loading())
try {
val result = makeParallelRequests(id)
emit(Resource.Success(result))
catch (e: Throwable) {
emit(Resource.Error(e))
}
}
}

I agree with #Tenfour04 that those nested flows are overly complicated and there are several ways to simplify this (#Tenfour04's solution is a good one).
If you don't want to rewrite everything then you can fix that one line that breaks the structured concurrency:
.stateIn(viewModelScope, SharingStarted.Lazily, null)
With this the whole ViewModel flow is started in the ViewModel's scope while the view starts the collect from a separate scope (viewLifecycleOwner.lifecycleScope which would be the Fragment / Activity scope).
If you want to cancel the flow from the view, you need to use either the same scope or expose a cancel function that would cancel the ViewModel's scope.
If you want to cancel the flow from the ViewModel itself (at the return#flow statement) then you can simply add:
viewModelScope.cancel()

conditional navigation in compose, without click

I am working on a compose screen, where on application open, i redirect user to profile page. And if profile is complete, then redirect to user list page.
my code is like below
#Composable
fun UserProfile(navigateToProviderList: () -> Unit) {
val viewModel: MainActivityViewModel = viewModel()
if(viewModel.userProfileComplete == true) {
navigateToProviderList()
return
}
else {
//compose elements here
}
}
but the app is blinking and when logged, i can see its calling the above redirect condition again and again. when going through doc, its mentioned that we should navigate only through callbacks. How do i handle this condition here? i don't have onCLick condition here.

Content of composable function can be called many times.
If you need to do some action inside composable, you need to use side effects
In this case LaunchedEffect should work:
LaunchedEffect(viewModel.userProfileComplete == true) {
if(viewModel.userProfileComplete == true) {
navigateToProviderList()
}
}
In the key(first argument of LaunchedEffect) you need to specify some key. Each time this key changes since the last recomposition, the inner code will be called. You may put Unit there, in this case it'll only be called once, when the view appears at the first place

The LaunchedEffect did not work for me since I wanted to use it in UI thread but it wasn't for some reason :/
However, I made this for my self:
#Composable
fun <T> SelfDestructEvent(liveData: LiveData<T>, onEvent: (argument: T) -> Unit) {
val previousState = remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
val state by liveData.observeAsState(null)
if (state != null && !previousState.value) {
previousState.value = true
onEvent.invoke(state!!)
}
}
and you use it like this in any other composables:
SingleEvent(viewModel.someLiveData) {
//your action with that data, whenever it was triggered, but only once
}

How to get activity in compose

Is there a way to get current activity in compose function?
#Composable
fun CameraPreviewScreen() {
val context = ContextAmbient.current
if (ActivityCompat.checkSelfPermission(
context,
Manifest.permission.CAMERA
) != PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED
) {
ActivityCompat.requestPermissions(
this, MainActivity.REQUIRED_PERMISSIONS, MainActivity.REQUEST_CODE_PERMISSIONS // get activity for `this`
)
return
}
}

While the previous answer (which is ContextWrapper-aware) is indeed the correct one,
I'd like to provide a more idiomatic implementation to copy-paste.
fun Context.getActivity(): AppCompatActivity? = when (this) {
is AppCompatActivity -> this
is ContextWrapper -> baseContext.getActivity()
else -> null
}
As ContextWrappers can't possibly wrap each other significant number of times, recursion is fine here.

You can get the activity from your composables casting the context (I haven't found a single case where the context wasn't the activity). However, has Jim mentioned, is not a good practice to do so.
val activity = LocalContext.current as Activity
Personally I use it when I'm just playing around some code that requires the activity (permissions is a good example) but once I've got it working, I simply move it to the activity and use parameters/callback.
Edit: As mentioned in the comments, using this in production code can be dangerous, as it can crash because current is a context wrapper, my suggestion is mostly for testing code.

To get the context
val context = LocalContext.current
Then get activity using the context. Create an extension function, and call this extension function with your context like context.getActivity().
fun Context.getActivity(): AppCompatActivity? {
var currentContext = this
while (currentContext is ContextWrapper) {
if (currentContext is AppCompatActivity) {
return currentContext
}
currentContext = currentContext.baseContext
}
return null
}

Rather than casting the Context to an Activity, you can safely use it by creating a LocalActivity.
val LocalActivity = staticCompositionLocalOf<ComponentActivity> {
noLocalProvidedFor("LocalActivity")
}
private fun noLocalProvidedFor(name: String): Nothing {
error("CompositionLocal $name not present")
}
Usage:
CompositionLocalProvider(LocalActivity provides this) {
val activity = LocalActivity.current
// your content
}

For requesting runtime permission in Jetpack Compose use Accompanist library: https://github.com/google/accompanist/tree/main/permissions
Usage example from docs:
#Composable
private fun FeatureThatRequiresCameraPermission(
navigateToSettingsScreen: () -> Unit
) {
// Track if the user doesn't want to see the rationale any more.
var doNotShowRationale by rememberSaveable { mutableStateOf(false) }
val cameraPermissionState = rememberPermissionState(android.Manifest.permission.CAMERA)
PermissionRequired(
permissionState = cameraPermissionState,
permissionNotGrantedContent = {
if (doNotShowRationale) {
Text("Feature not available")
} else {
Column {
Text("The camera is important for this app. Please grant the permission.")
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(8.dp))
Row {
Button(onClick = { cameraPermissionState.launchPermissionRequest() }) {
Text("Ok!")
}
Spacer(Modifier.width(8.dp))
Button(onClick = { doNotShowRationale = true }) {
Text("Nope")
}
}
}
}
},
permissionNotAvailableContent = {
Column {
Text(
"Camera permission denied. See this FAQ with information about why we " +
"need this permission. Please, grant us access on the Settings screen."
)
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(8.dp))
Button(onClick = navigateToSettingsScreen) {
Text("Open Settings")
}
}
}
) {
Text("Camera permission Granted")
}
}
Also, if you check the source, you will find out, that Google uses same workaround as provided by Rajeev answer, so Jim's answer about bad practice is somewhat disputable.

This extention function allows you to specify activity you want to get:
inline fun <reified Activity : ComponentActivity> Context.getActivity(): Activity? {
return when (this) {
is Activity -> this
else -> {
var context = this
while (context is ContextWrapper) {
context = context.baseContext
if (context is Activity) return context
}
null
}
}
}
Example:
class MainActivity : ComponentActivity() {
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContent { HomeScreen() }
}
}
#Composable
fun HomeScreen() {
val activity = LocalContext.current.getActivity<MainActivity>()
}

Getting an activity from within a Composable function is considered a bad practice, as your composables should not be tightly coupled with the rest of your app. Among other things, a tight coupling will prevent you from unit-testing your composable and generally make reuse harder.
Looking at your code, it looks like you are requesting permissions from within the composable. Again, this is not something you want to be doing inside your composable, as composable functions can run as often as every frame, which means you would keep calling that function every frame.
Instead, setup your camera permissions in your activity, and pass down (via parameters) any information that is needed by your composable in order to render pixels.

Below is a slight modification to #Jeffset answer since Compose activities are based off of ComponentActivity and not AppCompatActivity.
fun Context.getActivity(): ComponentActivity? = when (this) {
is ComponentActivity -> this
is ContextWrapper -> baseContext.findActivity()
else -> null
}

I actually found this really cool extension function inside the accompanist
library to do this:
internal fun Context.findActivity(): Activity {
var context = this
while (context is ContextWrapper) {
if (context is Activity) return context
context = context.baseContext
}
throw IllegalStateException("Permissions should be called in the context of an Activity")
}
which gets used inside a composable function like this:
#Composable
fun composableFunc(){
val context = LocalContext.current
val activity = context.findActivity()
}