I'm working with Android MediaCodec and use it for a realtime H264 encoding and decoding frames from camera. I use MediaCodec in synchronous manner and render the output to the Surface of decoder and everething works fine except that I have a long latency from a realtime, it takes 1.5-2 seconds and I'm very confused why is it so.
I measured a total time of encoding and decoding processes and it keeps around 50-65 milliseconds so I think the problem isn't in them.
I tried to change the configuration of the encoder but it didn't help and currently it configured like this:
val formatEncoder = MediaFormat.createVideoFormat("video/avc", 1920, 1080)
formatEncoder.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_FRAME_RATE, 30)
formatEncoder.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_I_FRAME_INTERVAL, 5)
formatEncoder.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_BIT_RATE, 1920 * 1080)
formatEncoder.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_COLOR_FORMAT, MediaCodecInfo.CodecCapabilities.COLOR_FormatSurface)
val encoder = MediaCodec.createEncoderByType("video/avc")
encoder.configure(formatEncoder, null, null, MediaCodec.CONFIGURE_FLAG_ENCODE)
val inputSurface = encoder.createInputSurface() // I use it to send frames from camera to encoder
encoder.start()
Changing the configuration of the decoder also didn't help me at all and currently I configured it like this:
val formatDecoder = MediaFormat.createVideoFormat("video/avc", 1920, 1080)
val decoder = MediaCodec.createDecoderByType("video/avc")
decoder.configure(formatDecoder , outputSurface, null, 0) // I use outputSurface to render decoded frames into it
decoder.start()
I use the following timeouts for waiting for available encoder/decoder buffers I tried to reduce their values but it didn't help me and I left them like this:
var TIMEOUT_IN_BUFFER = 10000L // microseconds
var TIMEOUT_OUT_BUFFER = 10000L // microseconds
Also I measured the time of consuming the inputSurface a frame and this time takes 0.03-0.05 milliseconds so it isn't a bottleneck. Actually I measured all the places where a bottleneck could be, but I wasn't found anything and I think the problem is in the encoder or decoder itself or in their configurations, or maybe I should use some special routine for sending frames to encoding/decoding..
I also tried to use HW accelerated codec and it's the only thing that helped me, when I use it the latency reduces to ~ 500-800 milliseconds but it still doesn't fit me for a realtime streaming.
It seems to me that the encoder or decoder buffers several frames before start displaying them on the surface and eventually it leads to the latency and if it really so then how can I disable bufferization or reduce the time of it?
Please help me I'm stucking on this problem for about half a year and have no idea how to reduce the latency, I'm sure that it's possible because popular apps like Telegram, Viber, WhatsApp etc. work fine and without latency so what's the secret here?
UPD 07.07.2021:
I still haven't found a solution to get rid of the latency. I've tried to change h264 profiles, increase and decrease I-frame inteval, bitrate, framerate, but result the same, the only thing that hepls a little to reduce the latency - downgrade the resolution from 1920x1080 to e.g. 640x480, but this "solution" doesn't suit me because I want to encode/decode a realtime video with 1920x1080 resolution.
UPD 08.07.2021:
I found out that if I change the values of TIMEOUT_IN_BUFFER and TIMEOUT_OUT_BUFFER from 10_000L to 100_000L it decreases the latency a bit but increases the delay of showing the first frame quite a lot after start encoding/decoding process.
It's possible your encoder is producing B frames -- bilinear interpolation frames. They increase quality and latency, and are great for movies. But no good for low-latency applications.
Key frames = I (interframes)
Predicted frames = P (difference from previous frames)
Interpolated frames = B
A sequence of frames including B frames might look like this:
IBBBPBBBPBBBPBBBI
11111111
12345678901234567
The encoder must encode each P frame, and the decoder must decode it, before the preceding B frames make any sense. So in this example the frames get encoded out of order like this:
1 5 2 3 4 9 6 7 8 13 10 11 12 17 17 13 14 15
In this example the decoder can't handle frame 2 until the encoder has sent frame 5.
On the other hand, this sequence without B frames allows coding and decoding the frames in order.
IPPPPPPPPPPIPPPPPPPPP
Try using the Constrained Baseline Profile setting. It's designed for low latency and low power use. It suppresses B frames. I think this works.
mediaFormat.setInteger(
"profile",
CodecProfileLevel.AVCProfileConstrainedBaseline);
I believe android h264 decoder have latency (at-least in most cases i've tried). Probably that's why android developers added PARAMETER_KEY_LOW_LATENCY from API level 30.
However I could decrease the delay some frames by querying for the output some more times.
Reason: no idea. It's just result of boring trial and errors
int inputIndex = m_codec.dequeueInputBuffer(-1);// Pass in -1 here bc we don't have a playback time reference
if (inputIndex >= 0) {
ByteBuffer buffer;
if (android.os.Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= android.os.Build.VERSION_CODES.LOLLIPOP) {
buffer = m_codec.getInputBuffer(inputIndex);
} else {
ByteBuffer[] bbuf = m_codec.getInputBuffers();
buffer = bbuf[inputIndex];
}
buffer.put(frame);
// tell the decoder to process the frame
m_codec.queueInputBuffer(inputIndex, 0, frame.length, 0, 0);
}
MediaCodec.BufferInfo info = new MediaCodec.BufferInfo();
int outputIndex = m_codec.dequeueOutputBuffer(info, 0);
if (outputIndex >= 0) {
m_codec.releaseOutputBuffer(outputIndex, true);
}
outputIndex = m_codec.dequeueOutputBuffer(info, 0);
if (outputIndex >= 0) {
m_codec.releaseOutputBuffer(outputIndex, true);
}
outputIndex = m_codec.dequeueOutputBuffer(info, 0);
if (outputIndex >= 0) {
m_codec.releaseOutputBuffer(outputIndex, true);
}
You need to configure customized(or KEY_LOW_LATENCY if it is supported) low latency parameters for different cpu venders. It is a common problem for android phone.
Check this code https://github.com/moonlight-stream/moonlight-android/blob/master/app/src/main/java/com/limelight/binding/video/MediaCodecHelper.java
Related
Android MediaCodec decode takes a super long time, about 115 to 118 msecs per frame. This is a h264 frame. The Android device has a qualcomm snapdragon 845 processor, so I assume the Android MediaCodec APIs target the qualcomm GPU and not the ARM core CPU.
Wondering if anyone has experienced such issue/s before and can provide guidance on how to make this decode go faster?
The code is all native code, no java at all. With no Java, I have no active window, no surface texture... so Grafika examples don't help here. I am using AndroidP(9.0) API 28. NDK 19.2.5x.
Here's how my code is setup:
Step1: I have two codec instances configured on two separate threads as follows:
codecData.codec = AMediaCodec_createDecoderByType("video/avc");
AMediaFormat_setString(codecData.format_eye, AMEDIAFORMAT_KEY_MIME, "video/avc");
AMediaFormat_setInt32(codecData.format_eye, AMEDIAFORMAT_KEY_HEIGHT, 1920);
AMediaFormat_setInt32(codecData.format_eye, AMEDIAFORMAT_KEY_WIDTH, 1080);
AMediaFormat_setFloat(codecData.format_eye, AMEDIAFORMAT_KEY_FRAME_RATE, 60.0f);
Step2: I enqueue the encoded buffer using these calls which take 14 to 17 msecs on 60 FPS input with two separate threads populating the individual codec Qs:
bufIdx = AMediaCodec_dequeueInputBuffer(codecData.codec, -1); //-1 makes it blocking call
auto buf = AMediaCodec_getInputBuffer(codecData.codec, bufIdx, &bufSize);
uint64_t presentTime = presentTimer.getTimeUs();
memcpy(buf, data, size);
AMediaCodec_queueInputBuffer(codecData.codec, bufIdx, 0, size, presentTime, 0);
Step3: I dequeue the decoded buffer as follows, these takes 115 to 118 msecs per frame per codec on 60 FPS output. The dequeue for both the codecs are done by one consumer thread which goes through both the codec instances one at a time:
AMediaCodecBufferInfo info_eye;
bufIdx = AMediaCodec_dequeueOutputBuffer(codecData.codec, &info_eye, 1);
auto decodedBuf = AMediaCodec_getOutputBuffer(codecData.codec, bufIdx, &bufSize);
Step4: The decoded buffer is then fed to a NV12toRGBA shader on the render thread that populates the texture which takes about 2 msecs. This texture then gets displayed.
I am expecting 60 FPS but get about 50 FPS due to the delays in Step3 i.e. the 115 to 118 msecs latency is killing me :-(
Any ideas? Appreciate any and all help.
I'm using MediaCodec to encode H.264 video from camera, the problem is, when I move my phone, the output video's quality is very pool, full of mosaic/visual blocks in the video.
Belows are some details:
My encoder bitrate is 500 kbps, and bitrate-mode is BITRATE_MODE_VBR.
I try to change bitrate to 800 kbps, the output video quality improves a lot, and if I change bitrate-mode into BITRATE_MODE_CQ, the output video quality is perfect, but the bitrate will increase up to 1400 kbps.
I want to keep the average bitrate at a low level, e.g. 500 kbps, but allowing the bitrate burst into some bigger bitrate when the phone is moving, e.g. 800 kbps. In iOS VideoToolBox, there is an API kVTCompressionPropertyKey_DataRateLimits to set the average bitrate and the max bitrate, but in Android, how could I achieve that average-max bitrate control?
I noticed that there is a hide "max-bitrate" parameter when configure the MediaCodec, but it has no effect (because Android framework ignore this parameter, see http://androidxref.com/7.1.1_r6/xref/frameworks/av/media/libstagefright/ACodec.cpp#configureCodec), I also noticed that there is a hide “quality” parameter, but it also has no effect.
From the android source code, it looks like KEY_MAX_BIT_RATE will set the max bit rate. See below the snapshot from media/java/android/media/MediaCodecInfo.java
private static boolean supportsBitrate(
Range<Integer> bitrateRange, MediaFormat format) {
Map<String, Object> map = format.getMap();
// consider max bitrate over average bitrate for support
Integer maxBitrate = (Integer)map.get(MediaFormat.KEY_MAX_BIT_RATE);
Integer bitrate = (Integer)map.get(MediaFormat.KEY_BIT_RATE);
if (bitrate == null) {
bitrate = maxBitrate;
} else if (maxBitrate != null) {
bitrate = Math.max(bitrate, maxBitrate);
}
if (bitrate != null && bitrate > 0) {
return bitrateRange.contains(bitrate);
}
return true;
}
I would suggest you to put a higher value depending on video resolution. For example, 1080p video won't look good at 500kbps VBR or CBR.
I am trying to save image sequences with fixed framerates (preferably up to 30) on an android device with FULL capability for camera2 (Galaxy S7), but I am unable to a) get a steady framerate, b) reach even 20fps (with jpeg encoding). I already included the suggestions from Android camera2 capture burst is too slow.
The minimum frame duration for JPEG is 33.33 milliseconds (for resolutions below 1920x1080) according to
characteristics.get(CameraCharacteristics.SCALER_STREAM_CONFIGURATION_MAP).getOutputMinFrameDuration(ImageFormat.JPEG, size);
and the stallduration is 0ms for every size (similar for YUV_420_888).
My capture builder looks as follows:
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.CONTROL_AE_MODE, CONTROL_AE_MODE_OFF);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.SENSOR_EXPOSURE_TIME, _exp_time);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.CONTROL_AE_LOCK, true);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.SENSOR_SENSITIVITY, _iso_value);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.LENS_FOCUS_DISTANCE, _foc_dist);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.CONTROL_AF_MODE, CONTROL_AF_MODE_OFF);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.CONTROL_AWB_MODE, _wb_value);
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29265126/android-camera2-capture-burst-is-too-slow
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.EDGE_MODE,CaptureRequest.EDGE_MODE_OFF);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.COLOR_CORRECTION_ABERRATION_MODE, CaptureRequest.COLOR_CORRECTION_ABERRATION_MODE_OFF);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.NOISE_REDUCTION_MODE, CaptureRequest.NOISE_REDUCTION_MODE_OFF);
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.CONTROL_AF_TRIGGER, CaptureRequest.CONTROL_AF_TRIGGER_CANCEL);
// Orientation
int rotation = getWindowManager().getDefaultDisplay().getRotation();
captureBuilder.set(CaptureRequest.JPEG_ORIENTATION,ORIENTATIONS.get(rotation));
Focus distance is set to 0.0 (inf), iso is set to 100, exposure-time 5ms. Whitebalance can be set to OFF/AUTO/ANY VALUE, it does not impact the times below.
I start the capture session with the following command:
session.setRepeatingRequest(_capReq.build(), captureListener, mBackgroundHandler);
Note: It does not make a difference if I request RepeatingRequest or RepeatingBurst..
In the preview (only texture surface attached), everything is at 30fps.
However, as soon as I attach an image reader (listener running on HandlerThread) which I instantiate like follows (without saving, only measuring time between frames):
reader = ImageReader.newInstance(_img_width, _img_height, ImageFormat.JPEG, 2);
reader.setOnImageAvailableListener(readerListener, mBackgroundHandler);
With time-measuring code:
ImageReader.OnImageAvailableListener readerListener = new ImageReader.OnImageAvailableListener() {
#Override
public void onImageAvailable(ImageReader myreader) {
Image image = null;
image = myreader.acquireNextImage();
if (image == null) {
return;
}
long curr = image.getTimestamp();
Log.d("curr- _last_ts", "" + ((curr - last_ts) / 1000000) + " ms");
last_ts = curr;
image.close();
}
}
I get periodically repeating time differences like this:
99 ms - 66 ms - 66 ms - 99 ms - 66 ms - 66 ms ...
I do not understand why these take double or triple the time that the stream configuration map advertised for jpeg? The exposure time is well below the frame duration of 33ms. Is there some other internal processing happening that I am not aware of?
I tried the same for the YUV_420_888 format, which resulted in constant time-differences of 33ms. The problem I have here is that the cellphone lacks the bandwidth to store the images fast enough (I tried the method described in How to save a YUV_420_888 image?). If you know of any method to compress or encode these images fast enough myself, please let me know.
Edit: From the documentation of getOutputStallDuration: "In other words, using a repeating YUV request would result in a steady frame rate (let's say it's 30 FPS). If a single JPEG request is submitted periodically, the frame rate will stay at 30 FPS (as long as we wait for the previous JPEG to return each time). If we try to submit a repeating YUV + JPEG request, then the frame rate will drop from 30 FPS." Does this imply that I need to periodically request a single capture()?
Edit2: From https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/camera2/CaptureRequest.html: "The necessary information for the application, given the model above, is provided via the android.scaler.streamConfigurationMap field using getOutputMinFrameDuration(int, Size). These are used to determine the maximum frame rate / minimum frame duration that is possible for a given stream configuration.
Specifically, the application can use the following rules to determine the minimum frame duration it can request from the camera device:
Let the set of currently configured input/output streams be called S.
Find the minimum frame durations for each stream in S, by looking it up in android.scaler.streamConfigurationMap using getOutputMinFrameDuration(int, Size) (with its respective size/format). Let this set of frame durations be called F.
For any given request R, the minimum frame duration allowed for R is the maximum out of all values in F. Let the streams used in R be called S_r.
If none of the streams in S_r have a stall time (listed in getOutputStallDuration(int, Size) using its respective size/format), then the frame duration in F determines the steady state frame rate that the application will get if it uses R as a repeating request."
The JPEG output is by way not the fastest way to fetch frames. You can accomplish this a lot faster by drawing the frames directly onto a Quad using OpenGL.
For burst capture, a faster solution would be capturing the images to RAM without encoding them, then encoding and saving them asynchronously.
On this website you can find a lot of excellent code related to android multimedia in general.
This specific program uses OpenGL to fetch the pixel data from an MPEG video. It's not difficult to use the camera as input instead of a video. You can basically use the texture used in the CodecOutputSurface class from the mentioned program as output texture for your capture request.
A possible solution I found consists of using and dumping YUV without encoding it as JPEG in combination with a micro Sd-card that is able to save up to 95Mb per second. (I had the misconception that YUV images would be larger, so with a cellphone that has full support for the camera2-pipeline, the write speed should be the limiting factor.
With this setup, I was able to achieve the following stable rates:
1920x1080, 15fps (approx. 4Mb * 15 == 60Mb/sec)
960x720, 30fps. (approx. 1.5Mb * 30 == 45Mb/sec)
I then encode the images offline from YUV to PNG using a python script.
I'm using ffmpeg in Android project via JNI to decode real-time H264 video stream. On the Java side I'm only sending the the byte arrays into native module. Native code is running a loop and checking data buffers for new data to decode. Each data chunk is processed with:
int bytesLeft = data->GetSize();
int paserLength = 0;
int decodeDataLength = 0;
int gotPicture = 0;
const uint8_t* buffer = data->GetData();
while (bytesLeft > 0) {
AVPacket packet;
av_init_packet(&packet);
paserLength = av_parser_parse2(_codecPaser, _codecCtx, &packet.data, &packet.size, buffer, bytesLeft, AV_NOPTS_VALUE, AV_NOPTS_VALUE, AV_NOPTS_VALUE);
bytesLeft -= paserLength;
buffer += paserLength;
if (packet.size > 0) {
decodeDataLength = avcodec_decode_video2(_codecCtx, _frame, &gotPicture, &packet);
}
else {
break;
}
av_free_packet(&packet);
}
if (gotPicture) {
// pass the frame to rendering
}
The system works pretty well until incoming video's resolution changes. I need to handle transition between 4:3 and 16:9 aspect ratios. While having AVCodecContext configured as follows:
_codecCtx->flags2|=CODEC_FLAG2_FAST;
_codecCtx->thread_count = 2;
_codecCtx->thread_type = FF_THREAD_FRAME;
if(_codec->capabilities&CODEC_FLAG_LOW_DELAY){
_codecCtx->flags|=CODEC_FLAG_LOW_DELAY;
}
I wasn't able to continue decoding new frames after video resolution change. The got_picture_ptr flag that avcodec_decode_video2 enables when whole frame is available was never true after that.
This ticket made me wonder if the issue isn't connected with multithreading. Only useful thing I've noticed is that when I change thread_type to FF_THREAD_SLICE the decoder is not always blocked after resolution change, about half of my attempts were successfull. Switching to single-threaded processing is not possible, I need more computing power. Setting up the context to one thread does not solve the problem and makes the decoder not keeping up with processing incoming data.
Everything work well after app restart.
I can only think of one workoround (it doesn't really solve the problem): unloading and loading the whole library after stream resolution change (e.g as mentioned in here). I don't think it's good tho, it will propably introduce other bugs and take a lot of time (from user's viewpoint).
Is it possible to fix this issue?
EDIT:
I've dumped the stream data that is passed to decoding pipeline. I've changed the resolution few times while stream was being captured. Playing it with ffplay showed that in moment when resolution changed and preview in application froze, ffplay managed to continue, but preview is glitchy for a second or so. You can see full ffplay log here. In this case video preview stopped when I changed resolution to 960x720 for the second time. (Reinit context to 960x720, pix_fmt: yuv420p in log).
I have a problem with rtmp streaming of android surface to a client application. My solution has a very big latency, because my surface is not producing frames 60 times a second, it can produce it in any time (once in 30 seconds for example). So I want to show each new produced frame to the client immediately.
Android is pushing every frame, it looks fine. Client app (jwplayer or vlc) receives it, but it waiting for something. It becomes showing video only after receiving a number of frames. But I need to see every incoming frame on the client side when it just have been received.
How it is working now:
I have a Surface object, obtained from MediaCodec class. MediaCodec is set for h264 video encoding.
MediaCodec mEncoder;
.....
MediaFormat format = MediaFormat.createVideoFormat("video/avc", width, height);
format.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_COLOR_FORMAT, colorFormat);
format.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_BIT_RATE, videoBitrate);
format.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_FRAME_RATE, videoFramePerSecond);
format.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_I_FRAME_INTERVAL, iframeInterval);
try {
mEncoder = MediaCodec.createEncoderByType("video/avc");
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
mEncoder.configure(format, null, null, MediaCodec.CONFIGURE_FLAG_ENCODE);
mSurface = mEncoder.createInputSurface();
if (mSurfaceCallback!=null)
mSurfaceCallback.onSurfaceCreated(mSurface);
mEncoder.start();
Sometimes android is drawing to the surface. I can't control the rate of this drawings. Also I can't draw anything to that surface. When something is changed on the surface, MediaCodec is producing new byteBuffer with h264 frame. I send this frame by rtmp.
On a client side I have html page with jwplayer
<pre id="myElement"></pre>
<script>
var playerInstance = jwplayer("myElement");
playerInstance.setup({
file:"rtmp://127.0.0.1:1935/live/stream",
height: 800,
width: 480,
autostart: true,
controls: false,
rtmp: {
bufferlength: 0.1
}
});
</script>
I've tried to change iframeInterval, fps of encoding, bufferlength.. Nothing is really helpful.
Is there is any possibility to show incomming frames immeditely?
What do you mean?
If I understood right - you have:
vlc(client) ---- rtmp protocol ---- android (producer)
You encode video from something (may be camera) using MediaCodec and in vlc there is time latency? right?
At first - what are you using - direct input buffer or MediaCodec.Callback() ?
In callback - you can check every frame in onOutputBufferAvailable and calculate time from one frame to another - this will show you - is this problem on android side.
Then you can try to resolve frame transef problem
You can use WireShark to determine frame sending timing and chek - may be this is network problem
Than - vlc and other players try to fill some internal buffer and only after this starting to show video. Try to turn of vlc buffer (https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?t=40408). Then - there is common that vlc waiting for IDR frame. You can set interval for sending IDR frames in code
format.setInteger(MediaFormat.KEY_I_FRAME_INTERVAL, iframeInterval);
iframeInterval in seconds (try to set 1 second)
(this will increase streaming size)
Sorry for my bad english
You can hopefully generate video frames at constant rate, even more than 20 fps to produce smooth video with acceptable latency. h264 encoder will handle a stable picture (one changing once in ~30 sec) gracefully, and when there is no change, frame size will be minimal.