I would like to detect whether the device (Android and ios) has been previously rebooted before opening the apps. I noticed that there would be many possible ways to achieve it if we could rely on the device clock's time like what has been elaborated here. My concern would be; the device clock can be changed, and the apps can work in offline mode.
Android
My idea would be to store a boolean variable using Android SharedPreferences after device has been rebooted, and set as true. Then check the variable after user opens the apps. If true, then we can confirm that the device is previously rebooted, else not.
ios
I have no idea on how to implement it for ios, but the link above might gives me a hint.
Solution that might works in both platform (not try yet)
If RAM usage cleared after device restart, then I would assume that if RAM usage is on certain level,the device has been rebooted.
Of all the possible ways to achieve the objective, I would prefer to use existing package. But I would happy if you can give your feedbacks for the above ideas.
So my questions would be :
I hate to reinvent the wheel, so any existing Flutter package or any other library which can't be found on https://pub.dev/packages that can be used to detect whether the device has been previously rebooted before opening the apps?
Is there any other possible solution that I missed which already have in Flutter architecture to solve the issue?
Update
I've found a package called boot_completed which only supported on Android.
..and I've found an interesting feature for Android running API level 24
BOOT_COUNT. Horray!
I'm planning to deploy an app on my android smartphone which is supposed to be used by multiple other persons. Now of course I do not want them to do things with the device they are not supposed to do so I informed myself about several different ways to make it as safe as possible (Lock-down apps, Kiosk mode, Mobile-device-management, Code-tweaks and so on).
I found some solutions that look really promising but they all share the same problem that a user could just restart the device and boot it in safe-mode where those helpful apps won't be started. However, there is one exception: I've installed a MDM app called maas360 which somehow manages to apply the restrictions that I defined even in safe-mode, for example by blocking access to the menu settings. How is that even possible? The thing is just that this is not a free app and it offers a huge variety of functions - overall it seems to be a bit excessive for my goals.
So my general question would be: is it somehow possible to restrict access to the safe-mode somehow? Maybe like a password? From what I understand it is not even possible to set a system password for Android devices that you'd have to enter once it boots (except if you set up a password for unlocking the screen first which would then be the same one... very redundant).
Disabling physical switch of volume down (in case of samsung devices) will stop access to safe mode on device. I dont find any other way to do so.
I'm trying to develop an app that would normally be considered to be malware, but the customer's demands are very specific and logical. We have around 50-100 cheapset Android phones that are bolted down, plugged in, and the app is supposed to send some of the sensor data via tcp to a remote server. It sounds simple enough, but there are two features that I struggle with (since I'm not an experienced Android developer, and have never rooted a phone):
#1 The app should be always on. If it crashes, server should get the error report (stack trace), and the app should be restarted after 10 minutes one more time before giving up. Also, the OS could theoretically kill the app (although I did my best to minimize the memory usage). I'd like to somehow handle that as well.
#2 It would be great if the app could be remotely updated, or auto-updated, with no user interaction whatsoever (since there is no conventional user).
To implement #1, I see no other solution than to root the phone (AlarmsManager doesn't seem to work as I expected, and adding another application to take care of the first one just feels wrong). Is there anything I'm missing?
I don't know how to approach implementing feature #2 at all. If I put the app on the market and check the "keep this application always up to date" checkbox while installing it, will that work? I fear that the auto-update would not occur while the service is running, and even if it did, that the OS would not restart the service after installing the update (unless feature #1 is implemented). If I programatically download the latest .apk and open it, I still need the user to click the "Install" button. I'm even considering implementing the updateable part in some scripting language.
Is there a solution to these problems within the limits of Android API?
EDIT: Thank you all for your answers, you've been very helpful. It seems that the only way to make Android behave as a non-user piece of hardware is to root it. That's the only way to do silent auto-updates. Always on can then be implemented by enabling cron (AlarmManager apparently doesn't fire the event in case of service termination via crash, but it could be used by another trivial, non-crashable service to keep the first one running).
For #1 you can use an foreground service. I don't know how often you need to get sensor data, but what's the problem with AlarmManager? I don't see how rooting could help with #1 though. You can't really do #2 without rooting or building your firmware. If you install your app as a system app (in /system/app) you can use a hidden PackageManager to silently install the new version. Using Market/Play autoupdate should work as well, but you have no way to control the update schedule. And, yes, it won't restart your service, but if you use AlaramManager, this shouldn't be a issue.
All in all, stock Android is not exactly an embedded system that gives you full control, so depending on how much time/effort you are willing to spend, you might want to customize it somewhat (or find a custom ROM that gets close to your requirements).
Re: question #2, there are a few open-source (licensed under the Apache Software License 2.0) options you may check and see how it works.
https://github.com/lazydroid/auto-update-apk-client is the android client for the auto update service (i'm affiliated with), which is small, easy to implement and supports silent updates on rooted devices.
https://github.com/commonsguy/cwac-updater is written by Mark Murphy, however it might require you to run your own update server and I'm not sure about silent updates.
I'm a C# Windows Phone 7 developer looking to port some apps over to Android and I'm new to both Java and android...
I have been through the Android Application Fundamentals and have developed some of the "View" app examples and have a couple questions...
1 - In WP7 we can run code in the "background" when our app is not running. The OS wakes up our background program every half hour or so so we can quickly accomplish some task. How is this done in Android?
2 - In WP7 we can post info to our "Tiles" so a user can, for instance, see the number of friends within a certain proximity just by looking at the phone. I know Android does not have "tiles" but can we post info the application icon? Or something like that?
Obviously I would have to be able to do #1 before I could do #2
Thanks,
Gary
For the first question, take a look at AlarmManager. You can set it up to periodically call up your code to do some work. You can even tell it to wake/not wake the phone from standby to do your job. So for instance if your app is updating weather info you can choose not to wake up the phone to do that (since the user wont see the update anyway) and save battery.
Second, to provide information at a glance on Android you use Widgets which the user can add to his homescreen if he wishes. You can think of them as a special kind of View.
We are currently developing an Android app that is a fitness-tracker application. It runs constantly in the background, and it works fine on most devices, but we've been having issues with the application dying completely on some Samsung devices. After some investigation, it seems like some Samsung devices has a completely custom "App Optimisation" feature (http://forums.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-s6/599408-app-optimisation-after-updating.html), which is basically a (very) primitive version of the Doze feature that exists in later versions of Android which basically just murders apps if they haven't been used for three days.
As this app is more or less only doing logging, and doesn't open the activity, it presents a big problem for us, because this feature is pre-enabled on many Samsung devices. The problem is solved by using a foreground service, but that is a sledgehammer of a solution that requires disturbing the user with a constant notification, and we really don't need the app to be in the foreground - we are fine with the normal power management of Android.
The Samsung App Optimisation feature clearly states that it will "optimise" apps if they have not been used for three days. Does anyone have insight in what Samsung considers to be "used" and can I somehow trigger that?
Side-rant: In my opinion, this is a badly implemented feature that makes development on Android more hostile. Besides our use case, it will any messenger applications break. If it were not for the fact that Facebook Messenger and Whatsapp are hard-wired to be exempt for the app, users would be going crazy because it would be breaking their experiences.
I've owned (and currently own) Samsung devices, so I know a little as to how it works from the user's point of view. The technical specifications and how it works on the inside is an entirely separate issue, and one I can't answer.
The system can detect if you open an app. Samsung uses that in their app optimization, and will save power on apps that haven't been used in over three days. It is a terrible system though.
It ignores background-processes that may be critical to apps, and even if it is an app you actively use, like a fitness tracker, it will have issues. To quote what it says inside the app optimization-list:
"To save battery power, apps that haven't been used for more than 3 days will be designated to save power. Apps designated to save power may not show notifications"
(Rough translation from Norwegian, originally taken from an S6 running Android 6)
Therefore, apps that have been manually, or automatically set (3 days of no use) may give various issues with background processes. But remember that the user can set any app to never save battery, and ignoring the automatic setting. So with this in mind, let's consider possible solutions.
There is one scenario where you do not need to worry about the app and app optimization: When app optimization is disabled entirely.
Looking aside that, there is really only two things you can do:
Ask users on Samsung to disable battery optimization for your app to prevent issues
As #MinaSamy suggested (in their now deleted answer), SyncAdapter and having a periodic synchronization. Note that I haven't tested this, so I don't know whether it works or not.
And there's also a third option, which really isn't a solution, but you can ignore it and gamble on app optimization being disabled, or just not care about it at all.
Does anyone have insight in what Samsung considers to be "used" and can I somehow trigger that?
As far as I know, unless Samsung added some safeguards against accidental opening or added some kind of minimum activity requirement, opening is enough. It appears to be a "stupid" feature, which runs on hard-coded rules rather than a dynamic system that actually detects app use and sets power saving relative to that. It's "easy to enable", but fortunately easy to disable as well.
Meaning you cannot trigger an event that will keep it alive (unless SyncAdapter does the trick)
And to make the facts clear, from #Neil's answer:
It does seem like the user can do this, so there must be some database or setting somewhere that controls it.
There kinda is. There are a total of four settings, three of which are app-specific, and it is stored in a database (or some other form of data storage). These four settings can be used, although extremely shallow, to alter the behavior of the app optimization:
Always optimize
Automatic optimization
Never optimize
Disable app optimization
The first three options are on a per-app basis, which means each app can have separate settings. Disabling app optimization is exactly what you'd expect: it disables the entire feature for all apps. If it's disabled entirely, nothing is optimized.
There's also a website listing ways of bypassing optimizations on a per-brand basis. The entry for Samsung is more or less what I've said: tell the user to manually disable optimization. There are no developer solutions.
In settings>device health>battery there's an option to "put unused apps to sleep". You can turn it off, or change the amount of time it takes, which is 3 days by default.
Sounds like that's your problem.
https://forums.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-s10-s10-plus/964083-whats-disabling-some-my-apps-background.html
Is there a reason you can't add your service to the 'don't optimise' list?
It does seem like the user can do this, so there must be some database or setting somewhere that controls it.
Alternatively, if you detect you are installing on one of the devices, open the optimise activity page, and show a message saying "Don't optimise us!".
As a workaround, i implemented the SyncAdapter mechanism, using this link as a good starting point: https://github.com/bmeike/MiniSync
It doesn't work perfectly (for testing, in my app i write a log every 1h, and after 3 days, it starts not respecting this scheduling), but at least it doesn't stop after 3 days, without the need to put the app in ignored optimization mode.
UPDATE: After the update to android PIE, scheduling stopped again after 3 days.
On another device, same app with android Oreo, scheduling is working (even if not completely respected).
On Samsung phones, the culprit is this Sleep setting:
You have got to take your users to this system settings screen and ask them to turn the feature off.
In my opinion you should implement a 'Broadcast Receiver' that listens to a custom 'Intent' and this 'Intent' to be Broadcasted by the 'Service' from 'onDestroy()' method of the 'Service' because when the 'System' kill the 'Service' this method will be called definitely.
And when the 'Broadcast Receiver' receives the 'Intent' you should start the 'Service' again.
And to distinguish between you stopping the 'Service' or the 'System' stopping the 'Service' just use some 'booleans' stored in 'SharedPreferences' and then in the 'Broadcast Receiver' you decide whether to activate the 'Service' or not
we are fine with the normal power management of Android
Are you? From the Android docs
However, since the user is not directly aware of a background service, in that state it is considered a valid candidate to kill, and you should be prepared for this to happen. In particular, long-running services will be increasingly likely to kill and are guaranteed to be killed (and restarted if appropriate) if they remain started long enough.
Three days seems like it would fall under "long-running...guaranteed to be killed".
If the problem is not that your service is killed but that it isn't restarted, you could use the AlarmManager to regularly check the status of your service and restart, if necessary.