Does an empty foreground service keep an android app alive? - android

I'm working on an app that keeps communicating with a device by Bluetooth(ble) when it's in both foreground mode and background mode.
I know I should implement ble jobs in a foreground service in Android, but the app is written in flutter and all codes are in dart.
It seems that for now even though there isn't a foreground service, the app keeps alive in background mode.
But I want it to be alive as long as possible.
So I'm thinking about making an empty foreground service...
Will an empty foreground service make an app has some priority in background mode?
And is it ok to do so?
Thanks.

The system can terminate an application in the background at any point. In practice if there is no need for its resources, it runs several minutes maybe more.
When using a foreground service, at some point only the service will run, so there is no real use of "empty service". Closing the application manually will leave only the service running.

Yes, an "empty" Foreground Service will usually prevent the app process from being killed automatically by the system, unless the device is critically low on memory.
How the code in the service class itself looks like does not matter. The important thing is that when a Foreground Service is running in the app process, the whole process will be prevented from being killed. This means that you can have Dart threads in the same process that won't be killed. Activities belonging to the same process that are in the background can still be "destroyed" though, i.e. the onDestroy callback can be called.
Since BLE connections in Android uses the Binder mechanism which are not tied to any of the standard Components (Service, Broadcast Receiver, Activity, ...) that otherwise control how the app process stays alive, having an "empty" Foreground Service is actually a common way to keep BLE connections alive.

Related

Android killing my foreground service 1 minute after the screen gets turned off

I'm developing a player app.
For this reason, it uses a foreground service to handle the playback.
Until recently the service was bound to my activities.
This is not the case anymore.
Since then, some specific devices (mostly Pixel 1/2/3) have been killing my app 1 minute after the screen has been turned off
The service is a foreground service not bound to anything.
Why would the device kill it?
As soon as the app is excluded from the device-optimized apps list the issue is solved
I'm not providing code, because I'm just trying to understand if this situation makes sense and if so what should I do to prevent this
BTW the app is using a receiver to act on Screen_ON/OFF messages. That's how I can see in the logs that the player service onDestroy() method gets killed exactly 1 minute after the screen has been turned off
what should I do to prevent this?
The key point here to keep the service alive is as said in official documentation :
While an app is in the foreground, it can create and run both
foreground and background services freely.
so, we can conclude that keeping the work in foreground and visible to the user has very minimal chances of being killed. And to do so we need to know that how android gets the idea that this process is in foreground ?
Here are the criteria's at which a process is said to be in foreground:
It has a visible activity, whether the activity is started or
paused.
It has a foreground service.
Another foreground app is connected to the app, either by binding to
one of its services or by making use of one of its content
providers. For example, the app is in the foreground if another app
binds to its:
-IME Wallpaper service
-Notification listener
-Voice or text service
If none of those conditions is true, the app is considered to be in
the background.
If none of the above criteria is fulfilled by your app process then thats the reason of your service being killed.
You can read more on this topic here :
Foreground service being killed by Android

Android long time running service

I am working on an Android project and I need the app to work even when the device is locked.
The idea is to open the app that will start the (Intent)Service, the service processes the data all the time. The device can be locked/put away and after some time when the app is opened the service is manually stopped. The service should be running all the time in the background.
I have found information online, but I am not sure what to use and in which way..
I have found that the IntentService can be used. Also the service should run in a new thread. I need to process the data from gps all the time, should I use WakefulBroadcastReceiver?
Thank you.
IntentService is not necessarily what you want to use. It will automatically spawn a new thread just to handle an incoming Intent. Once all incoming Intents have been handled it will stop the Service. To have a long running Service, you would need to derive from Service and when it is started return START_STICKY from the onStartCommand() method, plus spawn your own thread to handle your background work.
If you need to monitor GPS, you'll have to manage that along with keeping the device awake using a WakeLock. Note that in Marshmallow, this gets more complicated because of the new Doze mode where even wakelocks are ignored.
Also, note that the way Android is architected there is still a chance that your application running the background Service may be killed. Android uses a unique process management technique based on memory pressure and user perceived priority to determine how long a process should stick around. I recommend reading up on the Service lifecycle in the documentation.
In android their is no fool proof way to ensure that your service runs forever because the LMK(low memory killer) when the system needs resources (based on a certain memory threshold) , kills the service then if it can restarts it. If you handle the restart properly the service will continue to run.
Services that are given foreground priority are significantly less likely to be killed off, so this might be your best bet. However their will be a notification of your service running the in the background on the menu bar up top. Foreground Service

Android Background Process

I am wondering that why there is still a process running even I had already left(pressing back button) the Flickr and the Messenger apps in the picture above?
Recently I wrote an app that contains a service, I've found that if there is still a process running, the service will less likely be killed by the system.
So how does the apps above keep processes running in background?
They uses background service that will stay alive even if you quit the app.. as the documentation said
The Android system will attempt to keep the process hosting a service around as long as the service has been started or has clients bound to it
As long the app is not ended service will stay alive unless there is no memory left.
When running low on memory and needing to kill existing processes, the priority of a process hosting the service will be the higher of the following possibilities:
If the service is currently executing code in its onCreate(), onStartCommand(), or onDestroy() methods, then the hosting process will be a foreground process to ensure this code can execute without being killed.
If the service has been started, then its hosting process is considered to be less important than any processes that are currently visible to the user on-screen, but more important than any process not visible. Because only a few processes are generally visible to the user, this means that the service should not be killed except in extreme low memory conditions.
If there are clients bound to the service, then the service's hosting process is never less important than the most important client. That is, if one of its clients is visible to the user, then the service itself is considered to be visible.
A started service can use the startForeground(int, Notification) API to put the service in a foreground state, where the system considers it to be something the user is actively aware of and thus not a candidate for killing when low on memory. (It is still theoretically possible for the service to be killed under extreme memory pressure from the current foreground application, but in practice this should not be a concern.)
you can learn more about Service here
The back button doesn't end the app, its like minimizing them in Windows. TO end them they need to be call finish. Androiud's design (which I think is a stupid, insecure idea, but its how it works) is that apps will not exit unless they exit themselves with finish or you run low on memory and the OS kills them.

Is Android Service useful when I don't need interprocess communication?

It seems that when I don't need interprocess communication, there's almost no reason to use a Service. The only reason I am aware of is this: if my process has a started Service, the process is less likely to be killed.
I could just have a utility class with dontWantToBeKilled() and canBeKilled() methods, which would start / stop a dummy Service. Apart from that, I won't use Services. Is this right?
Yes, there are other reasons.
Your application runs in a process which can be killed by the system whenever it needs more resources.
According to this a running service has a higher priority than an Activity that isn't in the foreground, meaning that the system is more likely to kill an application process that has an Activity in the background than one that has a Service running in the background.
The documentation for Service states that:
If the service has been started, then its hosting process is
considered to be less important than any processes that are currently
visible to the user on-screen, but more important than any process not
visible. Because only a few processes are generally visible to the
user, this means that the service should not be killed except in
extreme low memory conditions.
So, you can use Services to decrease the likelihood of your application process being killed.
Even though the Service runs in the same process as an Activity nothing guarantees you that your Activity will not be killed.
From Processes and Threads:
For example, an activity that's uploading a picture to a web site
should start a service to perform the upload so that the upload can
continue in the background even if the user leaves the activity. Using
a service guarantees that the operation will have at least "service
process" priority, regardless of what happens to the activity. This is
the same reason that broadcast receivers should employ services rather
than simply put time-consuming operations in a thread.
Conclusion:
If you want to do a background operation that will take a while and it's important it finishes correctly, use a Service.
Its not necessary that if A process started service then,Process is likely to be killed.Actually process remain alive or not it does not affect service.As its completely background procedure.May be the situation that you have started a process to just start a service.So process and service can not interrelated like that.
AFAIK i did not got your final question properly.

Android: Creating a service that survives the application that started it

I'm developing an Android application that consists of:
a lightweight background service that logs events to a DB
a heavier GUI application that summarizes these events and displays graphs.
I'm having trouble creating the service part, though. The graphic application can use quite some RAM, and when it goes to the background, the OS closes it after some time of not being used.
The problem is, when the application gets shut down, so does the service. This is bad because this keeps me from recording further events. I don't care if the application gets terminated, but the service needs to keep on running.
I have tried numerous ways to keep the service alive, like having it use threads or a differently named process than the main app. Nothing has worked, and I have found no help on any of the android developer pages or forums.
Thank you for your advice!
Try to return START_STICKY in your service's onStartCommand(). Also how do you start your service? If you use bindService() with BIND_AUTO_CREATE flag it will be stopped automatically on unbindService(). You should explicitly start it with startService() and stop calling stopSelf(). Than OS keep your process running on the background after activity will be closed. Note: the activity and the service run in one process and it's imposible: "application gets terminated, but the service needs to keep on running". But it is possible to keep the process running without activities, with service running on the background.
Read the detailed info http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Service.html.
good luck!
You should use the AlarmManager to respawn your service. You just can't keep your service alive eternally.
Check about the lifecycle : http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals.html

Categories

Resources