Button overlap with view in jetpack compose - android

I want to make a button to bottom of screen, but I am seeing overlap with my button. I don't understand why this is happening in my application.
PairContentStateLess
#Composable
fun PairContentStateLess(
viewModel: XyzViewModel,
scanning: State<Boolean>,
onResume: () -> Unit,
onPause: () -> Unit,
tryAgainAction: () -> Unit,
openSettingAction: () -> Unit,
onResumeScan: () -> Unit,
onPauseScan: () -> Unit,
) {
AnimatedVisibility(visible = true) {
AppBarScaffold() {
Column(
modifier = Modifier
.padding(10.dp)
.fillMaxSize()
.verticalScroll(rememberScrollState()),
horizontalAlignment = Alignment.CenterHorizontally,
verticalArrangement = if (viewModel.isBluetoothEnabled) {
Arrangement.Top
} else {
Arrangement.SpaceBetween
}
) {
DisposeOnLifecycleManager(
onCreate = {
onResumeScan()
},
onResume = {
onResume()
},
onPause = {
onPause()
onPauseScan()
}
)
PairScreenImage()
PairDeviceDescription()
if (viewModel.isBluetoothEnabled) {
PressAndHoldDescription()
WaitingToPair(scanning.value)
UnableToPair(scanning.value)
} else {
BluetoothTurnOnWarning()
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.weight(1f))
TryAgainButtonView { tryAgainAction() }
OpenDeviceSettingsButtonView { openSettingAction() }
}
}
}
}
}
I divided all views into simple function. I am adding simple code in each function.
PairScreenImage
#Composable
fun PairScreenImage() {
// image only
}
PairDeviceDescription
#Composable
fun PairDeviceDescription() {
// text only
}
PressAndHoldDescription
#Composable
fun PressAndHoldDescription() {
// text only
}
WaitingToPair
#Composable
fun ColumnScope.WaitingToPair(scanning: Boolean) {
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(10.dp))
AnimatedVisibility(scanning) {
Row(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.background(OffWhite),
horizontalArrangement = Arrangement.Center,
verticalAlignment = Alignment.CenterVertically
) {
// more items here
}
}
}
UnableToPair
I am adding this function code which is overlap through my view. Can anyone know why TryAgainButtonView view overlap with WarningBoxView()?
#Composable
fun ColumnScope.UnableToPair(scanning: Boolean) {
AnimatedVisibility(!scanning) {
WarningBoxView()
TryAgainButtonView {
}
}
}
View overlap look like this
I want TryAgainButtonView to bottom of screen.
My Component tree from Layout inspector
Anyone guide me what I am doing here wrong? Thanks

I believe this is because you are using Column and not correctly fitting everything on the screen. You hide the image and description composables and it is ok but I think you are giving static dp values in these composables. Rather than giving a size with either .width, .height or .size modifiers, use .padding and / or calculate width|height of the composables by using LocalConfiguration.current to properly size the composables. I believe you will see better results.
Additionally, your Column takes space of the whole screen and tries to fit every child on the possible available space. If you are ok with a scrolling screen, use LazyColumn.

Related

PullRefreshIndicator overlaps with ScrollableTabRow

I'm starting to learn about Jetpack Compose. I put together this app where I explore different day-to-day use cases, each of the feature modules within this project is supposed to tackle different scenarios.
One of this feature modules – the chatexample feature module, tries to implement a simple ViewPager where each of the pages is a Fragment, the first page "Messages" is supposed to display a paginated RecyclerView wrapped around a SwipeRefreshLayout. Now, the goal is to implement all this using Jetpack Compose. This is the issue I'm having right now:
The PullRefreshIndicator that I'm using to implement the Pull-To-Refresh action works as expected and everything seems pretty straightforward so far, but I cannot figure out why the ProgresBar stays there on top.
So far I've tried; Carrying on the Modifier from the parent Scaffold all the way through. Making sure I explicitly set the sizes to fit the max height and width. Add an empty Box in the when statement - but nothing has worked so far, I'm guessing I could just remove the PullRefreshIndicator if I see that the ViewModel isn't supposed to be refreshing, but I don't think that's the right thing to do.
To quickly explain the Composables that I'm using here I have:
<Surface>
<Scaffold> // Set with a topBar
<Column>
<ScrollableTabRow>
<Tab/> // Set for the first "Messages" tab
<Tab/> // Set for the second "Dashboard" tab
</ScrollableTabRow>
<HorizontalPager>
// ChatExampleScreen
<Box> // A Box set with the pullRefresh modifier
// Depending on the ChatExamleViewModel we might pull different composables here
</PullRefreshIndicator>
</Box>
// Another ChatExampleScreen for the second tab
</HorizontalPager>
</Column>
<Scaffold>
</Surface>
Honestly, I don't get how the PullRefreshIndicator that is in a completely different Composable (ChatExampleScreen) gets to overlap with the ScrollableTabRow that is outside.
Hope this makes digesting the UI a bit easier. Any tip, advice, or recommendation is appreciated. Thanks! 🙇
Edit: Just to be completely clear, what I'm trying to achieve here is to have a PullRefreshIndicator on each page. Something like this:
On each page, you pull down, see the ProgressBar appear, and when it is done, it goes away, within the same page. Not overlapping with the tabs above.
A comparatively easier solution in my case was to simply give the Box that contains my vertically scrollable Composable and my PullRefreshIndicator a zIndex of -1f:
Box(Modifier.fillMaxSize().zIndex(-1f)) {
LazyColumn(...)
PullRefreshIndicator(...)
}
And that already did the trick for me. I have a very similar setup to the OP, a Scaffold containing a ScrollableTabRow and a HorizontalPager with refreshable lists on the individual tabs.
I want to leave my first answer as I feel it will still be useful to future readers, so heres another one you might consider.
One of the Box in the tabs has a scroll modifier though, because according to the Accompanist Docs and the actual functionality.
… The content needs to be 'vertically scrollable' for SwipeRefresh()
to be able to react to swipe gestures. Layouts such as LazyColumn are
automatically vertically scrollable, but others such as Column or
LazyRow are not. In those instances, you can provide a
Modifier.verticalScroll modifier…
It's from accompanist documentation about the migration of the API but it still applies to this current one in compose framework.
The way I understand it is a scroll event should be present for the PullRefresh to get activated manually (i.e a layout/container with a vertical scroll modifier or a LazyColumn), something that will consume a drag/swipe event in the screen.
Here's the short working sample. All of these are copy-and-paste-able.
Activity:
class PullRefreshActivity: ComponentActivity() {
private val viewModel: MyViewModel by viewModels()
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContent {
MyAppTheme {
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Scaffold(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
topBar = { TopAppBarSample() }
) {
MyScreen(
modifier = Modifier.padding(it),
viewModel = viewModel
)
}
}
}
}
}
}
Some data classes:
data class MessageItems(
val message: String = "",
val author: String = ""
)
data class DashboardBanner(
val bannerMessage: String = "",
val content: String = ""
)
ViewModel:
class MyViewModel: ViewModel() {
var isLoading by mutableStateOf(false)
private val _messageState = MutableStateFlow(mutableStateListOf<MessageItems>())
val messageState = _messageState.asStateFlow()
private val _dashboardState = MutableStateFlow(DashboardBanner())
val dashboardState = _dashboardState.asStateFlow()
fun fetchMessages() {
viewModelScope.launch {
isLoading = true
delay(2000L)
_messageState.update {
it.add(
MessageItems(
message = "Hello First Message",
author = "Author 1"
),
)
it.add(
MessageItems(
message = "Hello Second Message",
author = "Author 2"
)
)
it
}
isLoading = false
}
}
fun fetchDashboard() {
viewModelScope.launch {
isLoading = true
delay(2000L)
_dashboardState.update {
it.copy(
bannerMessage = "Hello World!!",
content = "Welcome to Pull Refresh Content!"
)
}
isLoading = false
}
}
}
Tab Screen Composables:
#Composable
fun MessageTab(
myViewModel : MyViewModel
) {
val messages by myViewModel.messageState.collectAsState()
LazyColumn(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()
) {
items(messages) { item ->
Column(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.border(BorderStroke(Dp.Hairline, Color.DarkGray)),
horizontalAlignment = Alignment.CenterHorizontally
) {
Text(text = item.message)
Text(text = item.author)
}
}
}
}
#Composable
fun DashboardTab(
myViewModel: MyViewModel
) {
val banner by myViewModel.dashboardState.collectAsState()
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxSize()
.verticalScroll(rememberScrollState()),
contentAlignment = Alignment.Center
) {
Column {
Text(
text = banner.bannerMessage,
fontSize = 52.sp
)
Text(
text = banner.content,
fontSize = 16.sp
)
}
}
}
Finally, the composable that contains the PullRefresh and the Pager/Tab components, and all of them are direct children of a ConstraintLayout. So to achieve a PullRefresh behind the Tabs but still on top of the HorizontalPager, first I had to put the HorizontalPager as the first child, the PullRefresh as the second and the Tabs as the last one, constraining them accordingly to preserve the visual arrangement of a Tab Pager.
#OptIn(ExperimentalMaterialApi::class, ExperimentalPagerApi::class)
#Composable
fun MyScreen(
modifier : Modifier = Modifier,
viewModel: MyViewModel
) {
val refreshing = viewModel.isLoading
val pagerState = rememberPagerState()
val pullRefreshState = rememberPullRefreshState(
refreshing = refreshing,
onRefresh = {
when (pagerState.currentPage) {
0 -> {
viewModel.fetchMessages()
}
1 -> {
viewModel.fetchDashboard()
}
}
},
refreshingOffset = 100.dp // just an arbitrary offset where the refresh will animate
)
ConstraintLayout(
modifier = modifier
.fillMaxSize()
.pullRefresh(pullRefreshState)
) {
val (pager, pullRefresh, tabs) = createRefs()
HorizontalPager(
count = 2,
state = pagerState,
modifier = Modifier.constrainAs(pager) {
top.linkTo(tabs.bottom)
start.linkTo(parent.start)
end.linkTo(parent.end)
bottom.linkTo(parent.bottom)
height = Dimension.fillToConstraints
}
) { page ->
when (page) {
0 -> {
MessageTab(
myViewModel = viewModel
)
}
1 -> {
DashboardTab(
myViewModel = viewModel
)
}
}
}
PullRefreshIndicator(
modifier = Modifier.constrainAs(pullRefresh) {
top.linkTo(parent.top)
start.linkTo(parent.start)
end.linkTo(parent.end)
},
refreshing = refreshing,
state = pullRefreshState,
)
ScrollableTabRow(
modifier = Modifier.constrainAs(tabs) {
top.linkTo(parent.top)
start.linkTo(parent.start)
end.linkTo(parent.end)
},
selectedTabIndex = pagerState.currentPage,
indicator = { tabPositions ->
TabRowDefaults.Indicator(
modifier = Modifier.tabIndicatorOffset(
currentTabPosition = tabPositions[pagerState.currentPage],
)
)
},
) {
Tab(
selected = pagerState.currentPage == 0,
onClick = {},
text = {
Text(
text = "Messages"
)
}
)
Tab(
selected = pagerState.currentPage == 1,
onClick = {},
text = {
Text(
text = "Dashboard"
)
}
)
}
}
}
output:
<Surface>
<Scaffold>
<ConstraintLayout>
// top to ScrollableTabRow's bottom
// start, end, bottom to parent's start, end and bottom
// 0.dp (view), fillToConstraints (compose)
<HorizontalPager>
<PagerScreens/>
</HorizontalPager>
// top, start, end of parent
<PullRefreshIndicator/>
// top, start and end of parent
<ScrollableTabRow>
<Tab/> // Set for the first "Messages" tab
<Tab/> // Set for the second "Dashboard" tab
</ScrollableTabRow>
</ConstraintLayout>
<Scaffold>
</Surface>
I think there's nothing wrong with the PullRefresh api and the Compose/Accompanist Tab/Pager api being used together, it seems like the PullRefresh is just respecting the placement structure of the layout/container it is put into.
Consider this code, no tabs, no pager, just a simple set-up of widgets that is identical to your set-up
Column(
modifier = Modifier.padding(it)
) {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.height(80.dp)
.background(Color.Blue)
)
val pullRefreshState = rememberPullRefreshState(
refreshing = false,
onRefresh = { viewModel.fetchMessages() }
)
Box(
modifier = Modifier.pullRefresh(pullRefreshState)
) {
PullRefreshIndicator(
modifier = Modifier.align(Alignment.TopCenter),
refreshing = false,
state = pullRefreshState,
)
}
}
What it looks like.
The PullRefresh is placed inside a component(Box) that is placed below another component in a Column vertical placement, and since it's below another widget, its initial position will not be hidden like the image sample.
With your set-up, since I noticed that the ViewModel is being shared by the tabs and also the reason why I was confirming if you are decided with your architecture is because the only fix I can think of is moving the PullRefresh up in the sequence of the composable widgets.
First changes I made is in your ChatExampleScreen composable, which ended up like this, all PullRefresh components are removed.
#Composable
fun ChatExampleScreen(
chatexampleViewModel: ChatExampleViewModel,
modifier: Modifier = Modifier
) {
val chatexampleViewModelState by chatexampleViewModel.state.observeAsState()
Box(
modifier = modifier
.fillMaxSize()
) {
when (val result = chatexampleViewModelState) {
is ChatExampleViewModel.State.SuccessfullyLoadedMessages -> {
ChatExampleScreenSuccessfullyLoadedMessages(
chatexampleMessages = result.list,
modifier = modifier,
)
}
is ChatExampleViewModel.State.NoMessagesFetched -> {
ChatExampleScreenEmptyState(
modifier = modifier
)
}
is ChatExampleViewModel.State.NoInternetConnectivity -> {
NoInternetConnectivityScreen(
modifier = modifier
)
}
else -> {
// Agus - Do nothing???
Box(modifier = modifier.fillMaxSize())
}
}
}
}
and in your Activity I moved all the setContent{…} scope into another function named ChatTabsContent and placed everything inside it including the PullRefresh components.
#OptIn(ExperimentalMaterialApi::class)
#Composable
fun ChatTabsContent(
modifier : Modifier = Modifier,
viewModel : ChatExampleViewModel
) {
val chatexampleViewModelIsLoadingState by viewModel.isLoading.observeAsState()
val pullRefreshState = rememberPullRefreshState(
refreshing = chatexampleViewModelIsLoadingState == true,
onRefresh = { viewModel.fetchMessages() }
)
Box(
modifier = modifier
.pullRefresh(pullRefreshState)
) {
Column(
Modifier
.fillMaxSize()
) {
val pagerState = rememberPagerState()
ScrollableTabRow(
selectedTabIndex = pagerState.currentPage,
indicator = { tabPositions ->
TabRowDefaults.Indicator(
modifier = Modifier.tabIndicatorOffset(
currentTabPosition = tabPositions[pagerState.currentPage],
)
)
}
) {
Tab(
selected = pagerState.currentPage == 0,
onClick = { },
text = {
Text(
text = "Messages"
)
}
)
Tab(
selected = pagerState.currentPage == 1,
onClick = { },
text = {
Text(
text = "Dashboard"
)
}
)
}
HorizontalPager(
count = 2,
state = pagerState,
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth(),
) { page ->
when (page) {
0 -> {
ChatExampleScreen(
chatexampleViewModel = viewModel,
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()
)
}
1 -> {
ChatExampleScreen(
chatexampleViewModel = viewModel,
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth()
)
}
}
}
}
PullRefreshIndicator(
modifier = Modifier.align(Alignment.TopCenter),
refreshing = chatexampleViewModelIsLoadingState == true,
state = pullRefreshState,
)
}
}
which ended up like this
setContent {
TheOneAppTheme {
// A surface container using the 'background' color from the theme
Surface(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
color = MaterialTheme.colors.background
) {
Scaffold(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
topBar = { TopAppBarSample() }
) {
ChatTabsContent(
modifier = Modifier.padding(it),
viewModel = viewModel
)
}
}
}
}
Result:
Structural changes.
<Surface>
<Scaffold> // Set with a topBar
<Box>
<Column>
<ScrollableTabRow>
<Tab/> // Set for the first "Messages" tab
<Tab/> // Set for the second "Dashboard" tab
</ScrollableTabRow>
<HorizontalPager>
<Box/>
</HorizontalPager>
</Column>
// pull refresh is now at the most "z" index of the
// box, overlapping the content (tabs/pager)
<PullRefreshIndicator/>
</Box>
<Scaffold>
</Surface>
I haven't explored this API yet, but it looks like it should be used directly in a z-oriented layout/container parent such as Box as the last child.
I just want to share more details about the issue here and what the solution is. I appreciate a lot the solutions shared above and these were definitely key to figuring the problem out.
The bare-minimum solution here is to replace the Box with a ConstraintLayout in the ChatScreenExample composable:
Why? Because as #z.y shared above the PullRefreshIndicator needs to be contained on a "vertically scrollable" composable, and while the Box composable can be set with the vericalScroll() modifier we need to make sure we constraint the height of the content, that's why we had to change to a ConstraintLayout.
Feel free to correct me if I'm missing something.
There is yet another solution to this problem, which is using a .clipToBounds() modifier over the tab content container.

How can I show full screen dialog or navigate to other screen when I click a Layout function?

I have AppBarNavGraph and RootNavGraph.
I'd like to know two methods, Full Screen Dialog and also Navigating to a new Screen.
What I am trying to is..
Column(
modifier = Modifier
.width(97.dp)
.clickable {
Dialog(onDismissResult = { /*TODO*/ }) {
}
}
,
horizontalAlignment = Alignment.CenterHorizontally
But in clickable, composable function is not callable.
So, What I tried is using this,
val isClicked = remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
Column(
modifier = Modifier
.width(97.dp)
.clickable {
isClicked.value = !isClicked.value
},
horizontalAlignment = Alignment.CenterHorizontally
)
if(isClicked.value){
// show full screen dialog or navigate to some screen.
}
Here are two problems.
I tried with Dialog function.
Dialog(
onDismissResult: () -> Unit,
properties: DialogProperties = DialogProperties(),
content: #Composable () -> Unit
)
but, this doesn't show full screen but just next item. (it's in GridLayout and when I click an item, the dialog needs to shows up to add the item.)
For navigation, I tried, varies ways, but I haven't found any clear solutions...
Could you please help me out? or any advices?
This should do the trick for a simple full screen popup
var showPopup by remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
Box(Modifier
.background(Color.Blue)
.fillMaxSize()) {
Button(onClick = { showPopup = true }) {
Text("Show popup")
}
}
if (showPopup) {
Popup(
onDismissRequest = { showPopup = false }
) {
Box(Modifier
.background(Color.Red)
.fillMaxSize()) {
Button(onClick = { showPopup = false },
modifier = Modifier.align(Alignment.Center)) {
Text("Hide popup")
}
}
}
}
Though if you want proper navigation you should probably use this

AnimatedVisibility doing weried behaviour when using Spacebetween in column

I want to use verticalArrangement = Arrangement.SpaceBetween in Column to align view top and bottom. I did this before without any problem. Now I added AnimatedVisibility to look good animation when my condition true. But It overlapping the view. I can't understand that things.
PairContentStateLess
#Composable
fun PairContentStateLess(
viewModel: XyzPairViewModel,
scanning: State<Boolean>,
onResume: () -> Unit,
onPause: () -> Unit,
tryAgainAction: () -> Unit,
openSettingAction: () -> Unit,
onResumeScan: () -> Unit,
onPauseScan: () -> Unit,
) {
AnimatedVisibility(visible = true) {
AppBarScaffold() {
Column(
modifier = Modifier
.padding(10.dp)
.fillMaxSize()
.verticalScroll(rememberScrollState()),
horizontalAlignment = Alignment.CenterHorizontally,
verticalArrangement = if (viewModel.isBluetoothEnabled && scanning.value) {
Arrangement.Top
} else {
Arrangement.SpaceBetween
}
) {
PairScreenImage()
PairDeviceDescription()
if (viewModel.isBluetoothEnabled) {
PressAndHoldDescription()
WaitingToPair(scanning.value)
UnableToPair(scanning.value)
} else {
BluetoothTurnOnWarning()
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.weight(1f))
TryAgainButtonView { tryAgainAction() }
OpenDeviceSettingsButtonView { openSettingAction() }
}
}
}
}
}
I am only adding UnableToPair code now. If I am using it working fine without any problem.
UnableToPair
fun ColumnScope.UnableToPair(scanning: Boolean) {
if (!scanning) {
WarningBoxView()
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.weight(1f))
TryAgainButtonView {
}
}
}
UI look like this
Now main problems come
when I tried to use AnimatedVisibility. I don't know what happened in the WarningBoxView and TryAgainButtonView.
#Composable
fun ColumnScope.UnableToPair(scanning: Boolean) {
AnimatedVisibility (!scanning) {
WarningBoxView()
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.weight(1f))
TryAgainButtonView {
}
}
}
UI look like this and I hide sensitive data from black box in image. Please notice only button and warning box.
Thanks
use column inside animated visibility again

Jetpack compose - lazycolumn fillMaxHeight modifier hides widgets below, but not destroying widgets above

I'm trying to build a simple chat screen, with a header, a footer (text field) and the messages part which is a lazycolumn. I've seen many people using such methods like the ones below: (fill parent max height, size etc.)
https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/compose/foundation/lazy/LazyItemScope
All I can put in lazycolumn modifiers is fillMaxHeight, width or size, if I use fillMaxHeight, it destroys the footer, if I don't use anything, the lazycolumn expands until the bottom of the screen, so it does the same behaviour. What am I doing wrong? Why does it behave like this? I can't put images because I don't have enough reputation...
Here is the full code:
class MainActivity : ComponentActivity() {
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContent {
Surface() {
Column(Modifier.background(Color.Green)) {
ProfileCard("Kate", "Available")
Conversation(messages = SampleData.conversationSample)
SimpleTextField()
}
}
}
}
}
#Composable
fun Conversation(messages: List<Message>) {
LazyColumn(
modifier = Modifier
.background(color = MainBg).fillMaxHeight(),
reverseLayout = true,
) {
items(messages) { message ->
MessageCard(message)
}
}
}
#Composable
fun MessageCard(message: Message) {
var isExpanded by remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
Column() {
Text(
text = message.message,
color = com.boradincer.hellojetpack.ui.theme.PrimaryText,
modifier = Modifier
.padding(vertical = 4.dp, horizontal = 16.dp)
.clip(RoundedCornerShape(4.dp))
.background(color = LightBg)
.clickable { isExpanded = !isExpanded }
.padding(horizontal = 8.dp, vertical = 5.dp),
maxLines = if (isExpanded) Int.MAX_VALUE else 2
)
}
}
Apply Modifier.weight(1f) to the LazyColumn
Column(){
Header()
LazyColumn(Modifier.weight(1f)) {
//....
}
Footer()
}
Using fillMaxHeight() the modifier will make the LazyColumn fill the whole available height.
The weight modifier requires a ColumnScope.
In your case use the modifier as parameter:
#Composable
fun Conversation(
modifier: Modifier = Modifier,
messages: List<Message>
){
LazyColumn(modifier) {
//...
}
}
Column(){
//
Conversation(
modifier = Modifier.weight(1f),
messsages = list
) {
//....
}
}

Android Jetpack Compose, How to get Semantics from Another Composable?

Introduction
I made a wrapper which gives a Composable a disabled look and prevents click events from being passed to it.
#Composable
fun DisableOverlay(enabled: Boolean, alpha: Float = 0.45F, content: #Composable () -> Unit) {
if (enabled) {
content()
} else {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.wrapContentWidth()
.wrapContentHeight()
.alpha(alpha)
) {
content()
Box(modifier = Modifier
.matchParentSize()
.clickable(enabled = false){
//absorb the clicks
}
)
}
}
}
Below is an example usage.
DisableOverlay(enabled = false) {
Column{
Text(text = "Some Text")
}
}
The Problem
It works fine but has some issues with accessibility reader (TalkBack) is on. The reader does not read the content Composable on some devices. It reads the text on Pixel devices but not Samsung. I noticed on the Pixel device it read the text content but does not honour any semantics set on it i.e. a contentDescription.
For example, the reader would not read "my content description" on this Text.
DisableOverlay(enabled = false) {
Column{
Text(text = "Some Text",
modifier = Modifier.semantics {
contentDescription = "my content description"
})
}
}
Attempted Solution 1 (FAILED)
I added clearAndSetSemantics on the Box that overlaps the content composable. My theory was the reader can ignore the element and just read out content. This did not work, the reader completely skips the content.
fun DisableOverlay(enabled: Boolean, alpha: Float = 0.45F, content: #Composable () -> Unit) {
if (enabled) {
content()
} else {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.wrapContentWidth()
.wrapContentHeight()
.alpha(alpha)
) {
content()
Box(modifier = Modifier
.matchParentSize()
.clearAndSetSemantics {
}
.clickable(enabled = false){
//absorb the clicks
}
)
}
}
}
Attempted Solution 2 (FAILED)
I found a property called invisibleToUser(). This had the same effect as clearAndSetSemantics seen in Solution 1.
.semantics {
invisibleToUser()
}
Attempted Solution 3 (FAILED)
I looked up a different way to disable click events using a blank pointerInput implementation. Since there is no clickable modifier the accessibility reader reads out the content composable and honours its semantics.
There is a deal breaker though. While this blocked touch events the accessibility reader is still able to select it.
#Composable
fun DisableOverlay(enabled: Boolean, alpha: Float = 0.45F, content: #Composable () -> Unit) {
if (enabled) {
content()
} else {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.wrapContentWidth()
.wrapContentHeight()
.alpha(alpha)
) {
content()
Box(modifier = Modifier
.matchParentSize()
.pointerInput(Unit){
//absorb the clicks
}
)
}
}
}
Idea 1
If I set contentDescription on the Box that overlaps content, the reader reads it as expected. Ideally, I don't want to pass through a contentDescription, I want to just extract the semantics from content and just read it out. Is this possible?
#Composable
fun DisableOverlay(enabled: Boolean, alpha: Float = 0.45F, content: #Composable () -> Unit) {
if (enabled) {
content()
} else {
Box(
modifier = Modifier
.wrapContentWidth()
.wrapContentHeight()
.alpha(alpha)
) {
content()
Box(modifier = Modifier
.matchParentSize()
.clickable(enabled = false){
//absorb the clicks
}
.semantics {
contentDescription = "test"
}
)
}
}
}
Idea 2
My overall goal is to allow a Composable to be disabled just by wrapping it in another Composable. If anyone has an alternative solution to the above, please let me know.
Thanks for reading my question.

Categories

Resources