I am making an NW.js app on macOS, and want to run the app in dev mode
by double-clicking on an icon.
In the first step, I'm trying to make my shell script work.
Using VS Code on Windows (I wanted to gain time), I have created a run-nw file at the root of my project, containing this:
#!/bin/bash
cd "src"
npm install
cd ..
./tools/nwjs-sdk-v0.17.3-osx-x64/nwjs.app/Contents/MacOS/nwjs "src" &
but I get this output:
$ sh ./run-nw
: command not found
: No such file or directory
: command not found
: No such file or directory
Usage: npm <command>
where <command> is one of: (snip commands list)
(snip npm help)
npm#3.10.3 /usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm
: command not found
: No such file or directory
: command not found
Some things I don't understand.
It seems that it takes empty lines as commands.
In my editor (VS Code) I have tried to replace \r\n with \n
(in case the \r creates problems) but it changes nothing.
It seems that it doesn't find the folders
(with or without the dirname instruction),
or maybe it doesn't know about the cd command ?
It seems that it doesn't understand the install argument to npm.
The part that really weirds me out, is that it still runs the app
(if I did an npm install manually)...
Not able to make it work properly, and suspecting something weird with
the file itself, I created a new one directly on the Mac, using vim this time.
I entered the exact same instructions, and... now it works without any
issues.
A diff on the two files reveals exactly zero difference.
What can be the difference? What can make the first script not work? How can I find out?
Update
Following the accepted answer's recommendations, after the wrong line
endings came back, I checked multiple things.
It turns out that since I copied my ~/.gitconfig from my Windows
machine, I had autocrlf=true, so every time I modified the bash
file under Windows, it re-set the line endings to \r\n.
So, in addition to running dos2unix (which you will have to
install using Homebrew on a Mac), if you're using Git, check your
.gitconfig file.
Yes. Bash scripts are sensitive to line-endings, both in the script itself and in data it processes. They should have Unix-style line-endings, i.e., each line is terminated with a Line Feed character (decimal 10, hex 0A in ASCII).
DOS/Windows line endings in the script
With Windows or DOS-style line endings , each line is terminated with a Carriage Return followed by a Line Feed character. You can see this otherwise invisible character in the output of cat -v yourfile:
$ cat -v yourfile
#!/bin/bash^M
^M
cd "src"^M
npm install^M
^M
cd ..^M
./tools/nwjs-sdk-v0.17.3-osx-x64/nwjs.app/Contents/MacOS/nwjs "src" &^M
In this case, the carriage return (^M in caret notation or \r in C escape notation) is not treated as whitespace. Bash interprets the first line after the shebang (consisting of a single carriage return character) as the name of a command/program to run.
Since there is no command named ^M, it prints : command not found
Since there is no directory named "src"^M (or src^M), it prints : No such file or directory
It passes install^M instead of install as an argument to npm which causes npm to complain.
DOS/Windows line endings in input data
Like above, if you have an input file with carriage returns:
hello^M
world^M
then it will look completely normal in editors and when writing it to screen, but tools may produce strange results. For example, grep will fail to find lines that are obviously there:
$ grep 'hello$' file.txt || grep -x "hello" file.txt
(no match because the line actually ends in ^M)
Appended text will instead overwrite the line because the carriage returns moves the cursor to the start of the line:
$ sed -e 's/$/!/' file.txt
!ello
!orld
String comparison will seem to fail, even though strings appear to be the same when writing to screen:
$ a="hello"; read b < file.txt
$ if [[ "$a" = "$b" ]]
then echo "Variables are equal."
else echo "Sorry, $a is not equal to $b"
fi
Sorry, hello is not equal to hello
Solutions
The solution is to convert the file to use Unix-style line endings. There are a number of ways this can be accomplished:
This can be done using the dos2unix program:
dos2unix filename
Open the file in a capable text editor (Sublime, Notepad++, not Notepad) and configure it to save files with Unix line endings, e.g., with Vim, run the following command before (re)saving:
:set fileformat=unix
If you have a version of the sed utility that supports the -i or --in-place option, e.g., GNU sed, you could run the following command to strip trailing carriage returns:
sed -i 's/\r$//' filename
With other versions of sed, you could use output redirection to write to a new file. Be sure to use a different filename for the redirection target (it can be renamed later).
sed 's/\r$//' filename > filename.unix
Similarly, the tr translation filter can be used to delete unwanted characters from its input:
tr -d '\r' <filename >filename.unix
Cygwin Bash
With the Bash port for Cygwin, there’s a custom igncr option that can be set to ignore the Carriage Return in line endings (presumably because many of its users use native Windows programs to edit their text files).
This can be enabled for the current shell by running set -o igncr.
Setting this option applies only to the current shell process so it can be useful when sourcing files with extraneous carriage returns. If you regularly encounter shell scripts with DOS line endings and want this option to be set permanently, you could set an environment variable called SHELLOPTS (all capital letters) to include igncr. This environment variable is used by Bash to set shell options when it starts (before reading any startup files).
Useful utilities
The file utility is useful for quickly seeing which line endings are used in a text file. Here’s what it prints for for each file type:
Unix line endings: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable
Mac line endings: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable, with CR line terminators
DOS line endings: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable, with CRLF line terminators
The GNU version of the cat utility has a -v, --show-nonprinting option that displays non-printing characters.
The dos2unix utility is specifically written for converting text files between Unix, Mac and DOS line endings.
Useful links
Wikipedia has an excellent article covering the many different ways of marking the end of a line of text, the history of such encodings and how newlines are treated in different operating systems, programming languages and Internet protocols (e.g., FTP).
Files with classic Mac OS line endings
With Classic Mac OS (pre-OS X), each line was terminated with a Carriage Return (decimal 13, hex 0D in ASCII). If a script file was saved with such line endings, Bash would only see one long line like so:
#!/bin/bash^M^Mcd "src"^Mnpm install^M^Mcd ..^M./tools/nwjs-sdk-v0.17.3-osx-x64/nwjs.app/Contents/MacOS/nwjs "src" &^M
Since this single long line begins with an octothorpe (#), Bash treats the line (and the whole file) as a single comment.
Note: In 2001, Apple launched Mac OS X which was based on the BSD-derived NeXTSTEP operating system. As a result, OS X also uses Unix-style LF-only line endings and since then, text files terminated with a CR have become extremely rare. Nevertheless, I think it’s worthwhile to show how Bash would attempt to interpret such files.
On JetBrains products (PyCharm, PHPStorm, IDEA, etc.), you'll need to click on CRLF/LF to toggle between the two types of line separators (\r\n and \n).
I was trying to startup my docker container from Windows and got this:
Bash script and /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
I was using git bash and the problem was about the git config, then I just did the steps below and it worked. It will configure Git to not convert line endings on checkout:
git config --global core.autocrlf input
delete your local repository
clone it again.
Many thanks to Jason Harmon in this link:
https://forums.docker.com/t/error-while-running-docker-code-in-powershell/34059/6
Before that, I tried this, that didn't works:
dos2unix scriptname.sh
sed -i -e 's/\r$//' scriptname.sh
sed -i -e 's/^M$//' scriptname.sh
If you're using the read command to read from a file (or pipe) that is (or might be) in DOS/Windows format, you can take advantage of the fact that read will trim whitespace from the beginning and ends of lines. If you tell it that carriage returns are whitespace (by adding them to the IFS variable), it'll trim them from the ends of lines.
In bash (or zsh or ksh), that means you'd replace this standard idiom:
IFS= read -r somevar # This will not trim CR
with this:
IFS=$'\r' read -r somevar # This *will* trim CR
(Note: the -r option isn't related to this, it's just usually a good idea to avoid mangling backslashes.)
If you're not using the IFS= prefix (e.g. because you want to split the data into fields), then you'd replace this:
read -r field1 field2 ... # This will not trim CR
with this:
IFS=$' \t\n\r' read -r field1 field2 ... # This *will* trim CR
If you're using a shell that doesn't support the $'...' quoting mode (e.g. dash, the default /bin/sh on some Linux distros), or your script even might be run with such a shell, then you need to get a little more complex:
cr="$(printf '\r')"
IFS="$cr" read -r somevar # Read trimming *only* CR
IFS="$IFS$cr" read -r field1 field2 ... # Read trimming CR and whitespace, and splitting fields
Note that normally, when you change IFS, you should put it back to normal as soon as possible to avoid weird side effects; but in all these cases, it's a prefix to the read command, so it only affects that one command and doesn't have to be reset afterward.
Coming from a duplicate, if the problem is that you have files whose names contain ^M at the end, you can rename them with
for f in *$'\r'; do
mv "$f" "${f%$'\r'}"
done
You properly want to fix whatever caused these files to have broken names in the first place (probably a script which created them should be dos2unixed and then rerun?) but sometimes this is not feasible.
The $'\r' syntax is Bash-specific; if you have a different shell, maybe you need to use some other notation. Perhaps see also Difference between sh and bash
Since VS Code is being used, we can see CRLF or LF in the bottom right depending on what's being used and if we click on it we can change between them (LF is being used in below example):
We can also use the "Change End of Line Sequence" command from the command pallet. Whatever's easier to remember since they're functionally the same.
One more way to get rid of the unwanted CR ('\r') character is to run the tr command, for example:
$ tr -d '\r' < dosScript.py > nixScript.py
I ran into this issue when I use git with WSL.
git has a feature where it changes the line-ending of files according to the OS you are using, on Windows it make sure the line endings are \r\n which is not compatible with Linux which uses only \n.
You can resolve this problem by adding a file name .gitattributes to your git root directory and add lines as following:
config/* text eol=lf
run.sh text eol=lf
In this example all files inside config directory will have only line-feed line ending and run.sh file as well.
For Notepad++ users, this can be solved by:
The simplest way on MAC / Linux - create a file using 'touch' command, open this file with VI or VIM editor, paste your code and save. This would automatically remove the windows characters.
If you are using a text editor like BBEdit you can do it at the status bar. There is a selection where you can switch.
For IntelliJ users, here is the solution for writing Linux script.
Use LF - Unix and masOS (\n)
Scripts may call each other.
An even better magic solution is to convert all scripts in the folder/subfolders:
find . -name "*.sh" -exec sed -i -e 's/\r$//' {} +
You can use dos2unix too but many servers do not have it installed by default.
For the sake of completeness, I'll point out another solution which can solve this problem permanently without the need to run dos2unix all the time:
sudo ln -s /bin/bash `printf 'bash\r'`
I want to rename all files in my /sdcard/Android/data/com.miui.gallery/files/gallery_disk_cache/small_size folder to shorter names.
Each file is 65 characters long and i would like that to be as short as possible, there are +- 9000 files in my folder. The file names contain both letters and numbers.
I have acces to adb debugging with my windows pc and USB-Debugging is turned on
I however cant acces my phone, it is stuck in a bootloop and turns off after 20 seconds, touch is only usable to enter my passcode so that i can acces the above named directory.
I have pulled 5GB so far, but cmd is limited to 8000 characters and it would take ages to pull everything without renaming files first
This is certainly possible with tasker, though I cannot give you the "complete recipe". Basically, you could create a task like this:
Execute Command: ls -1 /path/to/your/files, and capture the output into a variable
the command will list all files in the given directory, one file per line
Work on the variable. There are possibilities to convert it into an array, so you can use a for loop to handle each file
again with variables, you can setup the rename command (e.g. using Variable Search Replace) in a new variable. Pseudo-Code: mv "$old_name" "$(s/ /_/,$old_name)"
But it is much easier to use a simple shell script in some terminal app (or via adb shell) to achieve the same:
cd /path/to/your/files
for file in $(ls -1); do mv "$file" "$(echo $file|sed 's/ /_/g')"; done
I'm restoring my Linux partition from backups (mostly non compressed tarballs). I'm facing a problem while extracting a tarball which is backup of synced android repo. I tared my existing repo by simple tar -cf command and i'm extracting it using tar -xf blah.tar. I'm getting the following error.
http://pastebin.com/rkyu9qvD
Dump of tar -tvf blah.tar
http://pastebin.com/WyrwU3v2 (truncated)
I think the problem is symlinks. For example consider failed extraction of
.repo/projects/packages/providers/DownloadProvider.git/info/exclude
If the files are extracted serially as show by -t (correct me if i'm wrong) then first it should extract .repo/projects/packages/providers/DownloadProvider.git/info because it is symlink (Look at dump
lrwxrwxrwx bootmgr/bootmgr 0 2014-03-23 11:02 .repo/projects/packages/providers/DownloadProvider.git/info -> ../../../../project-objects/platform/packages/providers/DownloadProvider.git/info
) I thinks that is why it is getting error while extracting it.
Many other files are extracted wrongly in this way for ex, first it'll create a/b/c.x path to extract c.x but later founds that b is symlink to another directory and then throws error like file already exist
So any ideas how i should extract it or it is impossible.
If it is impossible then any other better way to backup existing Android repo so that i can move it to other HDD.
From the tar documentation:
Normally, when tar archives a symbolic link, it writes a block to the archive naming the target of the link. In that way, the tar archive is a faithful record of the file system contents. When--dereference' (-h') is used with--create' (-c'), tar archives the files symbolic links point to, instead of the links themselves.
So try to archive with tar -chf ... and I guess your issues will be solved.
I'm trying to test the Expansion Pack Files (OBB) In Android following the guide here:
http://developer.android.com/google/play/expansion-files.html
I'm in the step where I need to test my app on my Nexus 4.
I generated my .obb file with jobb and adb-pushed it in the device in this location:
/mnt/shell/emulated/0/Android/obb/my.package/main.1.my.package.obb
When the app run it doesn't find the file.
Method:
Helpers.doesFileExist(context, fileName, xf.mFileSize, false)
return false for my file.
I debugged and found out it is looking for the file in:
/storage/emulated/0/Android/obb/my.package/main.1.my.package.obb
Specifically this is the path returned by:
Helpers.generateSaveFileName(c, fileName)
The /storage/emulated/0, returned by Environment.getExternalStorageDirectory() doesn't exist browsing the device with adb shell.
But it DOES at runtime, inside the app, I also checked what it contains: it contains almost the same things I found in /mnt/shell/emulated/0, it contains the Android/obb dir, which is empty.
How I found out the path /mnt/shell/emulated/0/Android/obb/my.package/main.1.my.package.obb where I placed my obb file:
$ adb shell
$ ls -ld sdcard
lrwxrwxrwx root root 2013-10-16 17:34 sdcard -> /storage/emulated/legacy
$ ls -ld /storage/emulated/legacy
lrwxrwxrwx root root 2013-10-16 17:34 legacy -> /mnt/shell/emulated/0
And inside that I already found the Android/obb directory, empty.
So the question is: where should I put my obb file for it to be in the right position at runtime?
I did everything said there:
created a draft application in the Market to get the public key
generated a random array of 20 byte (salt)
integrated play_licensing/library and play_apk_expansion/download_library
wrote my Service / Receiver
did the check using the Helpers etc.. exactly like the documentation say.
I suppose everything works but I can't just yet release on Play Store! I need to test locally and I'll have the need to change my obb file pretty often in this initial phase of development.
I can't test on the Emulator because I use 3D and device camera.
Since Android 4.2 multi users support have been added.
To support that Android mount an emulated disk for each users acting as a sandbox layer around the actual filesystem: this let Android handle gracefully either sharing of files between users either personal files.
Long story short:
/storage/emulated
is the emulated filesystem.
if you enter that directory from adb shell you may see a
/storage/emulated/obb
directory. Sometimes it doesn't show up, for some reason (see below for what to do if this happen)
It's not in /Android/obb but that's the right directory where to place your app package / obb file!
If you don't see that directory try looking in:
/mnt/shell/emulated/obb
You should be able to put your file there.
It will be correctly picked up at runtime ending at the
/storage/emulated/0/Android/obb/my.package/main.1.my.package.obb
path.
I think the Android documentation should explain this.
(I answer my own question because I found out how to solve it while writing it.)
For me the correct location is : mnt/sdcard/Android/obb/nameofyourpackage/
NOT "/mnt/shell"
For academic/forensic reasons I want to get an image from my SmartPhone and study it.
The File System is YAFFS2.
From adb shell and using 'cat proc/mtd' I can see that I have for partitions: system,appslog,cache,userdata.
I can get the four images using dd command, like 'dd if=/dev/mtd/mtd1 of=/mnt/sdcard/appslog.img bs=4096',
and then using pull command to get data.
-> Is it a good idea to have a format file like .img?
-> How to study (mount/ just read) these *.img files?
..I am using Ubuntu 13.10.
An .img file is less likely to be read as an image file by the Open Source forensic tool Autopsy 3.3.3 (+ Sleuth Kit) [Latest Release at the time being]. However, it can still be opened as a logical file set.Nonetheless, I suggest that you should save it in .dd format instead.