Develop Reference

ViewPager (RecyclerView) with custom item count doesn't update data properly

I've created an adapter (extending ListAdapter with DiffUtil.ItemCallback) for my RecyclerView. It's an ordinary adapter with several itemViewTypes, but it should be smth like cyclic, if API sends flag and dataset size is > 1 (made by overriding getItemCount() to return 1000 when conditions == true).
When I change app locale through app settings, my fragment recreates, data loads asynchronously (reactively, several times in a row, from different requests, depending on several rx fields, which causes data set to be a combination of data on different languages just after locale is changed (in the end all dataset is correctly translated btw) (make it more like synchronous is not possible because of feature specifics)), posting its values to LiveData, which triggers updates of recycler view, the problem appears:
After last data set update some of the views (nearest to currently displayed and currently displayed) appear not to be translated.
Final data set, which is posted to LiveData is translated correctly, it even has correct locale tag in its id. Also after views are recycled and we return back to them - they are also correct.
DiffUtil is computed correctly also (I've tried to return only false in item callbacks and recycler view still didn't update its view holders correctly).
When itemCount == list.size everything works fine.
When adapter is pretending to be cyclic and itemCount == 1000 - no.
Can somebody explain this behaviour and help to figure out how to solve this?
Adapter Code Sample:
private const val TYPE_0 = 0
private const val TYPE_1 = 1
class CyclicAdapter(
val onClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit,
val onCloseClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit,
) : ListAdapter<IViewData, RecyclerView.ViewHolder>(DataDiffCallback()) {
var isCyclic: Boolean = false
set(value) {
if (field != value) {
field = value
}
}
override fun getItemCount(): Int {
return if (isCyclic) {
AdapterUtils.MAX_ITEMS // 1000
} else {
currentList.size
}
}
override fun onCreateViewHolder(parent: ViewGroup, viewType: Int): RecyclerView.ViewHolder {
return when (viewType) {
TYPE_0 -> Type0.from(parent)
TYPE_1 -> Type1.from(parent)
else -> throw ClassCastException("View Holder for ${viewType} is not specified")
}
}
override fun onBindViewHolder(holder: RecyclerView.ViewHolder, position: Int) {
when (holder) {
is Type0 -> {
val item = getItem(
AdapterUtils.actualPosition(
position,
currentList.size
)
) as ViewData.Type0
holder.setData(item, onClickedCallback)
}
is Type1 -> {
val item = getItem(
AdapterUtils.actualPosition(
position,
currentList.size
)
) as ViewData.Type1
holder.setData(item, onClickedCallback, onCloseClickedCallback)
}
}
}
override fun getItemViewType(position: Int): Int {
return when (val item = getItem(AdapterUtils.actualPosition(position, currentList.size))) {
is ViewData.Type0 -> TYPE_0
is ViewData.Type1 -> TYPE_1
else -> throw ClassCastException("View Type for ${item.javaClass} is not specified")
}
}
class Type0 private constructor(itemView: View) :
RecyclerView.ViewHolder(itemView) {
fun setData(
viewData: ViewData.Type0,
onClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit
) {
(itemView as Type0View).apply {
acceptData(viewData)
setOnClickedCallback { url ->
onClickedCallback(viewData.id,)
}
}
}
companion object {
fun from(parent: ViewGroup): Type0 {
val view = Type0View(parent.context).apply {
layoutParams =
LayoutParams(LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT)
}
return Type0(view)
}
}
}
class Type1 private constructor(itemView: View) :
RecyclerView.ViewHolder(itemView) {
fun setData(
viewData: ViewData.Type1,
onClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit,
onCloseClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit
) {
(itemView as Type1View).apply {
acceptData(viewData)
setOnClickedCallback { url ->
onClickedCallback(viewData.id)
}
setOnCloseClickedCallback(onCloseClickedCallback)
}
}
companion object {
fun from(parent: ViewGroup): Type1 {
val view = Type1View(parent.context).apply {
layoutParams =
LayoutParams(LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT)
}
return Type1(view)
}
}
}
}
ViewPager Code Sample:
class CyclicViewPager #JvmOverloads constructor(
context: Context,
attrs: AttributeSet? = null,
defStyleAttr: Int = 0
) : FrameLayout(context, attrs, defStyleAttr),
ICyclicViewPager {
private val cyclicViewPager: ViewPager2
private lateinit var onClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit
private lateinit var onCloseClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit
private lateinit var adapter: CyclicAdapter
init {
LayoutInflater
.from(context)
.inflate(R.layout.v_cyclic_view_pager, this, true)
cyclicViewPager = findViewById(R.id.cyclic_view_pager)
(cyclicViewPager.getChildAt(0) as RecyclerView).apply {
addItemDecoration(SpacingDecorator().apply {
dpBetweenItems = 12
})
clipToPadding = false
clipChildren = false
overScrollMode = RecyclerView.OVER_SCROLL_NEVER
}
cyclicViewPager.offscreenPageLimit = 3
}
override fun initialize(
onClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit,
onCloseClickedCallback: (id: String) -> Unit
) {
this.onClickedCallback = onClickedCallback
this.onCloseClickedCallback = onCloseClickedCallback
adapter = CyclicAdapter(
onClickedCallback,
onCloseClickedCallback,
).apply {
stateRestorationPolicy = RecyclerView.Adapter.StateRestorationPolicy.PREVENT_WHEN_EMPTY
}
cyclicViewPager.adapter = adapter
}
override fun setState(viewPagerState: CyclicViewPagerState) {
when (viewPagerState.cyclicityState) {
is CyclicViewPagerState.CyclicityState.Enabled -> {
adapter.submitList(viewPagerState.pages) {
adapter.isCyclic = true
cyclicViewPager.post {
cyclicViewPager.setCurrentItem(
// Setting view pager item to +- 500
AdapterUtils.getCyclicInitialPosition(
adapter.currentList.size
), false
)
}
}
}
is CyclicViewPagerState.CyclicityState.Disabled -> {
if (viewPagerState.pages.size == 1 && adapter.isCyclic) {
cyclicViewPager.setCurrentItem(0, false)
adapter.isCyclic = false
}
adapter.submitList(viewPagerState.pages)
}
}
}
}
Adapter Utils Code:
object AdapterUtils {
const val MAX_ITEMS = 1000
fun actualPosition(position: Int, listSize: Int): Int {
return if (listSize == 0) {
0
} else {
(position + listSize) % listSize
}
}
fun getCyclicInitialPosition(listSize: Int): Int {
return if (listSize > 0) {
MAX_ITEMS / 2 - ((MAX_ITEMS / 2) % listSize)
} else {
0
}
}
}
Have tried not to use default itemView variable of RecyclerView (became even worse).
Tried to make diff utils always return false, to check if it calculates diff correctly (yes, correctly)
Tried to add locale tags to ids of data set items (didn't help to solve)
Tried to post empty dataset on locale change before setting new data to it (shame on me, shouldn't even think about it)
Tried do add debounce to rx to make it wait a bit before update (didn't help)
UPD: When I call adapter.notifyDatasetChanged() manually, which is not the preferred way, everything works fine, so the question is why ListAdapter doesn't dispatch notify callbacks properly in my case?

The issue with ListAdapter is that it doesn't clearly state that you need to supply a new list for it to function.
In other words, the documentation says: (and I quote the source code):
/**
* Submits a new list to be diffed, and displayed.
* <p>
* If a list is already being displayed, a diff will be computed on a background thread, which
* will dispatch Adapter.notifyItem events on the main thread.
*
* #param list The new list to be displayed.
*/
public void submitList(#Nullable List<T> list) {
mDiffer.submitList(list);
}
The key word being new list.
However, as you can see there, all the adapter does is defer to the DiffUtil and calls submitList there.
So when you look at the actual source code of the AsyncListDiffer you will notice it does, at the beginning of its code block:
if (newList == mList) {
// nothing to do (Note - still had to inc generation, since may have ongoing work)
if (commitCallback != null) {
commitCallback.run();
}
return;
}
In other words, if the new list (reference) is the same as the old one, regardless of their contents, don't do anything.
This may sound cool but it means that if you have this code, the adapter will not really update:
(pseudo...)
var list1 = mutableListOf(...)
adapter.submitList(list1)
list1.add(...)
adapter.submitList(list1)
The reason is list1 is the same reference your adapter has, so the differ exits prematurely, and doesn't dispatch any changes to the adapter.
Quite obscure, I know.
The solution, as pointed in many SO answers is to create a copy of the list itself.
Most users do
var list1 = mutableListOf(...)
adapter.submitList(list1)
var list2 = list1.toMutableList()
list2.add(...)
adapter.submitList(list2)
The call to toMutableList() creates a new list containing the items of list1 and so the comparison above if (newList == mList) { should now be false and the normal code should execute.
UPDATE
Keep in mind that a lot of developers make the mistake of...
var list = mutableListOf...
adapter.submitList(list)
list.add(xxx)
adapter.submitList(list.toList())
This doesn't work, because the new list you create, is referencing the same objects the adapter has. This means that both lists list and list.toList() are pointing to the same things despite being two instances of an ArrayList.
But the side-effect is that DiffUtil compares the items and they are the same, so no diff is dispatched to the adapter either.
The correct sequence is...
val list = mutableListOf(...)
adapter.submitList(list.toList())
// Make a copy first, so we can alter it as we please without the *current list held by the adapter* from being affected.
var modified = list.toMutableList()
modified.add(...)
adapter.submitList(modified)

After taking a look at your sample in GitHub, I was able to reproduce the issue. With only about 30-40 minutes of playing with it, I can say that I'm not 100% sure what component is not updating.
Things I've noticed.
The onBindViewHolder method is not called when you change the locale (except maybe the 1st time?).
I do not understand why the need to post to the adapter after you've submitted the list in the callback:
cyclicViewPager.setCurrentItem(
// Setting view pager item to +- 500
AdapterUtils.getCyclicInitialPosition(
adapter.currentList.size
), false
)
Why ? This means the user loses their current position.
Why not keep the existing?
I noticed you do cyclicViewPager.offscreenPageLimit = 3 this effectively disables the RecyclerView "logic" for handling changes, and uses instead the usual ViewPager state adapter logic of "prefetching/keeping" N (3 in your case) pages in "advance".
At first I thought this was causing issues, but removing it (which sets it to -1 which is the default and the "use RecyclerView" value, didn't make a big change (though I did notice some changes here and there, as in it would sometimes update the current one -but not the next ones within 2~3 pages).
The documentation says:
Set the number of pages that should be retained to either side of the currently visible page(s). Pages beyond this limit will be recreated from the adapter when needed. Set this to OFFSCREEN_PAGE_LIMIT_DEFAULT to use RecyclerView's caching strategy.
So I would have imagined that the default value would be aided by the ListAdapter and its DiffUtil. Doesn't seem to be the case.
What I did try (among a few other things) was to see if the issue was in the actual adapter (or at least the viewPager dependency on its adapter). I ran out of time (work!) but I noticed that if you do:
override fun setState(viewPagerState: CyclicViewPagerState) {
when (viewPagerState.cyclicityState) {
is CyclicViewPagerState.CyclicityState.Enabled -> {
// call initialize again, to recreate the adapter
initialize(this.onClickedCallback, this.onCloseClickedCallback)
adapter.submitList(viewPagerState.pages) {
adapter.isCyclic = true
// Setting vp item to ... (code omitted for brevity)
}
This works. It's theoretically less efficient as you're recreating the whole adapter, but in your example you're effectively creating an ENTIRE new set of data changing every ID, so in terms of performance, I'd argue this is more efficient as there's no need to recalculate changes and dispatch them, since to the eyes of the Diff Util, all the rows are different. By recreating the adapter, well... the VP has to reinit anyway.
I noticed this worked fine in your example.
I went ahead and added two more things, because the "silly" adapter cannot reliably tell you which position is the current... you can naively save it:
In CyclicViewPager:
var currentPos: Int = 0
init {
...
this.cyclicViewPager.registerOnPageChangeCallback(object : OnPageChangeCallback() {
override fun onPageSelected(position: Int)
currentPos = position
}
})
}
And then
is CyclicViewPagerState.CyclicityState.Enabled -> {
initialize(this.onClickedCallback, this.onCloseClickedCallback)
adapter.submitList(viewPagerState.pages) {
adapter.isCyclic = true
if (adapter.currentList.size <= currentPos) {
cyclicViewPager.setCurrentItem(currentPos, false)
} else {
cyclicViewPager.setCurrentItem(
// Setting view pager item to +- 500
AdapterUtils.getCyclicInitialPosition(
adapter.currentList.size
), false
)
}
}
}
This does work, but of course, you're recreating the entire VP adapter again, so it may not be desired.
At this point, I'd either need to spend much more time trying to figure out which part of VP, RV, or its dependencies is not "dispatching" the correct data. My guess would be somewhere around some silly ViewPager optimization combined with Android terribly unreliable View system, not picking a message in the queue; but I may be also terribly wrong ;)
I hope someone smarter and/or with more coffee in their system can find out a simpler solution.
(all in all, I found the sample project relatively easy to navigate, but the design of your data a bit convoluted, but... as it was a sample, it's hard to tell what "real-life" data structures you really have).

DiffUtil not refreshing view in Observer call android kotlin

Hey I am using diff util with ListAdapter. The updating of list works but I can only see those new values by scrolling the list, I need to view the updates even without recycling the view (when scrolling) just like notifyItemChanged(). I tried everything inside this answer ListAdapter not updating item in RecyclerView only working for me is notifyItemChanged or setting adapter again. I am adding some code. Please someone know how to fix this problem?
Data and Enum class
data class GroupKey(
val type: Type,
val abc: Abc? = null,
val closeAt: String? = null
)
data class Group(
val key: GroupKey,
val value: MutableList<Item?> = ArrayDeque()
)
enum class Type{
ONE,
TWO
}
data class Abc(
val qq: String? = null,
val bb: String? = null,
val rr: RType? = null,
val id: String? = null
)
data class RType(
val id: String? = null,
val name: String? = null
)
data class Item(
val text: String? = null,
var abc: Abc? = null,
val rr: rType? = null,
val id: String? = null
)
viewmodel.kt
var list: MutableLiveData<MutableList<Group>?> = MutableLiveData(ArrayDeque())
fun populateList(){
// logic to call api
list.postValue(data)
}
fun addItemTop(){
// logic to add item on top
list.postValue(data)
}
inside view model I am filling data by api call inside viewmodel function and return value to list. Also another function which item is inserting at top of list so that's why is used ArrayDeque
Now I am adding nested reyclerview diff util callback.
FirstAdapter.kt
class FirstAdapter :
ListAdapter<Group, RecyclerView.ViewHolder>(comp) {
companion object {
private val comp = object : DiffUtil.ItemCallback<Group>() {
override fun areItemsTheSame(oldItem: Group, newItem: Group): Boolean {
return oldItem == newItem
}
override fun areContentsTheSame(oldItem: Group, newItem: Group): Boolean {
return ((oldItem.value == newItem.value) && (oldItem.key == newItem.key))
}
}
}
......... more function of adapter
}
FirstViewHolder
val adapter = SecondAdapter()
binding.recyclerView.adapter = adapter
adapter.submitList(item.value)
SecondAdapter.kt
class SecondAdapter : ListAdapter<Item, OutgoingMessagesViewHolder>(comp) {
companion object {
private val comp = object : DiffUtil.ItemCallback<Item>() {
override fun areItemsTheSame(oldItem: Item, newItem: Item): Boolean {
return oldItem.id == newItem.id
}
override fun areContentsTheSame(oldItem: Item, newItem: Item): Boolean {
return ((oldItem.rr == newItem.rr) &&
(oldItem.text == oldItem.text) && (oldItem.abc == newItem.abc))
}
}
}
..... more function
}
Activity.kt
viewModel.list.observe(this, { value ->
submitList(value)
})
private fun submitList(list: MutableList<Group>?) {
adapter?.submitList(list)
// adapter?.notifyDataSetChanged()
}
I am 100% sure that my list is updating and my observer is calling when my new list is added. I debug that through debug view. But problem is I can only see those new values by scrolling the list, I need to view the updates even without recycling the view (when scrolling) just like notifyItemChanged()
UPDATE
viewmodel.kt
class viewModel : BaseViewModel(){
var list: MutableLiveData<MutableList<Group>?> = MutableLiveData()
//... more variables...
fun fetchData(context: Context) {
viewModelScope.launch {
val response = retroitApiCall()
response.handleResult(
onSuccess = { response ->
list.postValue(GroupData(response?.items, context))
},
onError = { error ->
Log.e("error" ,"$error")
}
)
}
}
}
internal fun GroupData(items: List<CItem>?, context: Context): MutableList<Group> {
val result: MutableList<Group> = MutableList()
items?.iterator()?.forEach { item ->
// adding item in list by add function and then return list.
return result
}
private fun addItemOnTop(text: String) {
list.value?.let { oldlist ->
// logic to add items on top of oldlist variable
if(top != null){
oldlist.add(0,item)
}else{
val firstGroup = oldlist[0]
firstGroup.value.add(item)
}
list.postValue(oldlist)
}
}
}
I am using sealed class something like this but not this one Example. And Something similar to these when call api Retrofit Example. Both link I am giving you example. What I am using in my viewmodel.

I don't know what's going on, but I can tell you two things that caught my attention.
First Adapter:
override fun areItemsTheSame(oldItem: Group, newItem: Group): Boolean {
return oldItem == newItem
}
You're not comparing if the items are the same, you're comparing the items and their contents are the same. Don't you have an Id like you did in your second adapter?
I'd probably check oldItem.key == newItem.key.
Submitting the List
As indicated in the answer you linked, submitList has a very strange logic where it compares if the reference of the actual list is the same, and if it is, it does nothing.
In your question, you didn't show where the list comes from (it's observed through what appears to be liveData or RXJava), but the souce of where the list is constructed is not visible.
In other words:
// P S E U D O C O D E
val item1 = ...
val item2 = ...
val list1 = mutableListOf(item1, item2)
adapter.submitList(list1) // works fine
item1.xxx = ""
adapter.submitList(list1) // doesn't work well.
WHY?
Unfortunately, submitList's source code shows us that if the reference to the list is the same, the diff is not calculated. This is really not on the adapter, but rather on AsyncListDiffer, used by ListAdapter internally. It is this differ's responsibility to trigger the calculation(s). But if the list references are the same, it doesn't, and it silently ignores it.
My suspicion is that you're not creating a new list. This rather undocumented and silent behavior hurts more than it helps, because more often than not, developers aren't expecting to duplicate a list supplied to an object whose purpose and promise is to offer the ability to "magically" (and more importantly, automatically) calculate its differences between the previous.
I understand why they did it, but I would have at the very least emitted a log WARNING, indicating you're supplying the same list. Or, if you want to avoid polluting the already polluted logCat, then at least be much more explicit about it in its official documentation.
The only hint is this simple phrase:
you can use submitList(List) when new lists are available.
The key here being the word new lists. So not the same list with new items, but simply a new List reference (regardless of whether the items are the same or not).
What should you try?
I'd start by modifying your submitList method:
private fun submitList(list: MutableList<Group>?) {
adapter?.submitList(list.toMutableList())
}
For Java users out there:
adapter.submitList(new ArrayList(oldList));
The change is to create a copy of the list you receive: list.ToMutableList(). This way the AsyncListDiffer's check for list equality will return false and the code will continue.
UPDATE / DEBUG
Unfortunately, I don't know what is going on with your code; I assure you that ListAdapter works, as I use it myself on a daily basis; If you think you've found a case where there are problems with it, I suggest you create a small prototype and publish it on github or similar so we can reproduce it.
I would start by using debug/breakpoints in key areas:
ViewModel; write down the reference fromthe list you "return".
DiffUtil methods, is diffUtil being called?
Your submitList() method, is the list reference the same as the one you had in your ViewModel?
etc.
You need to dig a bit deeper until you find out who is not doing what.
On Deep vs Shallow copy and Java and whatever...
Please keep in mind, ListAdapter (through AsyncDiff) checks if the reference to the list is the same. In other words, if you have a list val x = mutableListOf(...) and you give this to the adapter, it will work the 1st time.
If you then modify the list...
val x = mutableListOf(...)
adapter.submitList(x)
x.clear()
adapter.submitList(x)
This will NOT WORK correctly, because to the eyes of the Adapter both lists are the same (they actually are the same list).
The fact that the list is mutable is irrelevant. (I still frown upon the mutable list; why does submitList accept a mutable list if you cannot mutate it and submit it again, escapes my knowledge but I would not have approved that Pull Request like so) It would have avoided most problems if they only took a non-mutable list, therefore implying you must supply a new list every time if you mutate it. Anyway...
as I was saying, duplicating a list is simple, in either Kotlin or Java there are multiple variations:
val newListWithSameContents = list1.toList()
List newListWithSameContents = ArrayList(list1);
now if list1 has an item...
list1.add("hello")
When you copy list1 into newList... The reference to "Hello" (the string) is the same. If String were mutable (it's not, but assume it is), and you modified that string somehow... you would be modifying both strings at the same time or rather, the same string, referenced in both lists.
data class Thing(var id: Int)
val thing = Thing(1)
val list1: MutableList<Thing> = mutableListOf(thing)
val list2: MutableList<Thing> = list1.toMutableList()
println(list1)
println(list2)
// This prints
[Thing(id=1)]
[Thing(id=1)]
Now modify the thing...
thing.id = 2
println(list1)
println(list2)
As expected, both lists, pointing to the same object:
[Thing(id=2)]
[Thing(id=2)]
This was a shallow copy because the items were not copied. They still point to the same thing in memory.
ListAdapter/DiffUtil do not care if the objects are the same in that regard (depending how you implemented your diffutil that is); but they certainly care if the lists are the same. As in the above example.
I hope this clarifies what is needed for ListAdapter to dispatch updates. If it fails to do so, then check if you're effectively doing the right thing.

Update a row in recyclerview with ListAdapter

I am trying to perform update & delete operation in a recyclerview with ListAdapter. For this example I am using LiveData to get updates as soon as data is updated.
I don't know why list doesn't shows updated data, but when I see logs it shows correct data.
Code:
#AndroidEntryPoint
class DemoActivity : AppCompatActivity() {
var binding: ActivityDemoBinding? = null
private val demoAdapter = DemoAdapter()
private val demoViewModel: DemoViewModel by viewModels()
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
binding = ActivityDemoBinding.inflate(layoutInflater)
setContentView(binding?.root)
initData()
}
private fun initData() {
binding?.apply {
btnUpdate.setOnClickListener {
demoViewModel.updateData(pos = 2, newName = "This is updated data!")
}
btnDelete.setOnClickListener {
demoViewModel.deleteData(0)
}
rvData.apply {
layoutManager = LinearLayoutManager(this#DemoActivity)
adapter = demoAdapter
}
}
demoViewModel.demoLiveData.observe(this, {
it ?: return#observe
demoAdapter.submitList(it)
Log.d("TAG", "initData: $it")
})
}
}
activity_demo.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RelativeLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
tools:context=".activities.DemoActivity">
<Button
android:id="#+id/btn_update"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:layout_alignParentStart="true"
android:text="Update Data" />
<Button
android:id="#+id/btn_delete"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:layout_alignParentEnd="true"
android:text="Delete Data" />
<androidx.recyclerview.widget.RecyclerView
android:id="#+id/rv_data"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:layout_below="#id/btn_update" />
</RelativeLayout>
DemoAdapter:
class DemoAdapter() : ListAdapter<DemoModel, DemoAdapter.DemoViewHolder>(DiffCallback()) {
override fun onCreateViewHolder(parent: ViewGroup, viewType: Int): DemoViewHolder {
val binding =
ListItemDeleteBinding.inflate(LayoutInflater.from(parent.context), parent, false)
return DemoViewHolder(binding)
}
override fun onBindViewHolder(holder: DemoViewHolder, position: Int) {
val currentItem = getItem(position)
holder.bind(currentItem)
}
inner class DemoViewHolder(private val binding: ListItemDeleteBinding) :
RecyclerView.ViewHolder(binding.root) {
fun bind(student: DemoModel) {
binding.apply {
txtData.text = student.name + " " + student.visible
if (student.visible) txtData.visible()
else txtData.inVisible()
}
}
}
class DiffCallback : DiffUtil.ItemCallback<DemoModel>() {
override fun areItemsTheSame(oldItem: DemoModel, newItem: DemoModel) =
oldItem.id == newItem.id
override fun areContentsTheSame(oldItem: DemoModel, newItem: DemoModel) =
(oldItem.id == newItem.id) &&
(oldItem.visible == newItem.visible) &&
(oldItem.name == newItem.name)
}
}
DemoViewModel:
class DemoViewModel : ViewModel() {
var demoListData = listOf(
DemoModel(1, "One", true),
DemoModel(2, "Two", true),
DemoModel(3, "Three", true),
DemoModel(4, "Four", true),
DemoModel(5, "Five", true),
DemoModel(6, "Six", true),
DemoModel(7, "Seven", true),
DemoModel(8, "Eight", true)
)
var demoLiveData = MutableLiveData(demoListData)
fun updateData(pos: Int, newName: String) {
val listData = demoLiveData.value?.toMutableList()!!
listData[pos].name = newName
demoLiveData.postValue(listData)
}
fun deleteData(pos: Int) {
val listData = demoLiveData.value?.toMutableList()!!
listData.removeAt(pos)
demoLiveData.postValue(listData)
}
}
Martin's Solution: https://github.com/Gryzor/TheSimplestRV

I suggest you:
Do yourself a favor and add a proper ViewModel/Sealed Class to encapsulate your state.
Initialize your adapter in the usual order:
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
binding = ActivityDeleteBinding.inflate(layoutInflater)
setContentView(binding?.root)
binding.recyclerView.layoutManager = ... (tip: if you won't change the layout manager, I suggest you declare it in the XML directly, skipping this line here. E.g.: app:layoutManager="androidx.recyclerview.widget.LinearLayoutManager")
binding.recyclerView.adapter = yourAdapter
//now observe data which will ultimately lead to `adapter.submitList(...)`
initData()
}
Make sure your DiffUtil.ItemCallback is properly comparing your models. You did old == new in Content, but that's not comparing the content, that's comparing the whole thing. It's the same in this case (I assume, but we haven't seen your Delete model class), but it's best to be explicit about it; the id is not the "content" theoretically speaking for the purposes of this callback thing.
delAdapter.submitList(it.toMutableList()) this is fine, but if you do it (and you do) before the adapter is set, and the LayoutManager is set (as you do), then it's likely possible that the ListAdapter is not magically recomputing it.
Update After Seeing More of Your Code
Let's look at your mutation code (one of the various):
fun updateData(pos: Int, newName: String) {
val listData = demoLiveData.value?.toMutableList()!!
listData[pos].name = newName
demoLiveData.postValue(listData)
}
I see various problems here.
You're grabbing the value from the LiveData. No-Go. LiveData is a value-holder, but I wouldn't "pull it from there" at any time, expect when I receive it via the observation. LiveData is not a repository, it's just holding the value and offering you "guarantees" that it will be managed in conjunction with your lifecycleOwner.
You then use toMutableList() and while this creates a new instance of the List (List<DemoModel> in your case), it does not create a deep copy of the references in the list. Meaning the items in the new (and old) list, are the same, pointing to the exact same spot in memory.
You then perform this operation listData[pos].name = newName in the "new list" but you're effectively modifying the old list as well (you can set a breakpoint there, and inspect the contents of all the lists involved and notice how the same item at pos is now changed to the newName everywhere.
If you want to see even more, put a breakpoint here:
demoViewModel.demoLiveData.observe(this, {
demoAdapter.submitList(it) <--> BREAKPOINT HERE
})
Also put a breakpoint in ListAdapter.java (the android class) in the submitList method:
public void submitList(#Nullable List<T> list) {
mDiffer.submitList(list); ---> BREAKPOINT HERE
}
And when stopped at the 1st breakpoint, observe the value of the list (it) and it's reference. (the first time the breakpoints hit, continue, since we want to observe the list AFTER you mutate the list and not on the "first creation").
Now press your button to change something (update the list) and the breakpoint(s) are going to be hit again, now the submitList call will have a list and it's gonna look like:
notice the Reference: it's (in my example) ArrayList#100073.
Now continue... (the debugger), it will stop again in the mDiffer.submitList(list) line of ListAdapter.
Let's compare.
For the record, this is what I do:
binding.updateButton.setOnClickListener {
viewModel.updateData(0, "Hello World " + 5)
}
So The item at position "0" should be called "Hello World 5" now.
This is already visible here in the debugger:
It's correctly changed in the list, but we're submitting to the adapter... let's see what the adapter has internally (before this is applied), let's jump to the next breakpoint in ListAdapter#submitList():
Notice something strange here?
The item at position 0, is already modified. How?!
Simple, the reference to that object DemoModel is the same. In my example: it's DemoModel#10078.
So how can you prevent this?
Never pass a mutable list to your adapter, always pass a copy (and immutable!)
your Live Data should have been:
var demoLiveData = MutableLiveData(demoList.toList()) //To List creates a new copy of the list, immutable.
This reinforces the concept of a Single Source of Truth. When you mutate data, you need to be sure you know what the scope of the mutation is. The reason why you saw no "change" is because by mutating the data behind the scenes of the adapter, by the time the DiffUtil (Which is async) was called and the change dispatched, the list was already mutated and the Diff Util computed zero changes, which meant the adapter had nothing else to do.
Changing an item in the list, does not (and will never) trigger an adapter to "notify the data was changed", since the adapter is "not observing" the list.
I hope this clarifies your confusion and the importance of not using mutable data all over the place.
Last but not least, I created a super simple project to exercise your problem and pushed it to https://github.com/Gryzor/TheSimplestRV (or if you prefer to see the viewModel alone).
Feel free to look at it (I used one of the default templates so the code is in a Fragment, but... irrelevant of course).
Good luck! :)
Why does NOTIFY DATA SET CHANGED WORK THEN?!
Well, when you do that, you FORCE the adapter to rebind every item, therefore it has to go through the list again (which is changed) and the change is reflected, at the expense of CPU, Battery, flickering, position lost, annoyance to the user(s), etc.

Internally, ListAdapter checks reference of the lists you submit. So you need to create a new list for each update so new one directs another reference different from previous list. Additionally, when you need to update an object in this list, you should create a new object otherwise diff util won't work.

ListAdapter Diff does not dispatch updates on same list instance, but neither on different list from LiveData

it is a known issue that ListAdapter (actually the AsyncListDiffer from its implementation) does not update the list if the new list only has modified items but has the same instance. The updates do not work on new instance list either if you use the same objects inside.
For all of this to work, you have to create a hard copy of the entire list and objects inside.
Easiest way to achieve this:
items.toMutableList().map { it.copy() }
But I am facing a rather weird issue. I have a parse function in my ViewModel that finally posts the items.toMutableList().map { it.copy() } to the LiveData and gets observes in the fragment. Even with the hard copy, DiffUtil does not work. If I move the hard copy inside the fragment, then it works.
To get this easier, if I do this:
IN VIEW MODEL:
[ ... ] parse stuff here
items.toMutableList().map { it.copy() }
restaurants.postValue(items)
IN FRAGMENT:
restaurants.observe(viewLifecycleOwner, Observer { items ->
adapter.submitList(items)
... then, it doesn't work. But if I do this:
IN VIEW MODEL:
[ ... ] parse stuff here
restaurants.postValue(items)
IN FRAGMENT:
restaurants.observe(viewLifecycleOwner, Observer { items ->
adapter.submitList(items.toMutableList().map { it.copy() })
... then it works.
Can anybody explain why this doesn't work?
In the mean time, I have opened an issue on the Google Issue Tracker because maybe they will fix the AsyncListDiffer not updating same instance lists or items. It defeats the purpose of the new adapter. The AsyncListDiffer SHOULD ALWAYS accept same instance lists or items, and fully update using the diff logic that the user customises in the adapter.

I made a quick sample using DiffUtil.Callback and ListAdapter<T, K> (so I called submitList(...) on the adapter), and had no issues.
Then I modified the adapter to be a normal RecyclerView.Adapter and constructed an AsyncDiffUtil inside of it (using the same DiffUtil.Callback from above).
The architecture is:
Activity -> Fragment (contains RecyclerView).
Adapter
ViewModel
"Fake Repository" that simply holds a val source: MutableList<Thing> = mutableListOf()
Model
I've created a Thing object: data class Thing(val name: String = "", val age: Int = 0).
For readability I added typealias Things = List<Thing> (less typing). ;)
Repository
It's fake in the sense that items are created like:
private fun makeThings(total: Int = 20): List<Thing> {
val things: MutableList<Thing> = mutableListOf()
for (i in 1..total) {
things.add(Thing("Name: $i", age = i + 18))
}
return things
}
But the "source" is a mutableList of (the typealias).
The other thing the repo can do is "simulate" a modification on a random item. I simply create a new data class instance, since it's obviously all immutable data types (as they should be). Remember this is just simulating a real change that may have come from an API or DB.
fun modifyItemAt(pos: Int = 0) {
if (source.isEmpty() || source.size <= pos) return
val thing = source[pos]
val newAge = thing.age + 1
val newThing = Thing("Name: $newAge", newAge)
source.removeAt(pos)
source.add(pos, newThing)
}
ViewModel
Nothing fancy here, it talks and holds the reference to the ThingsRepository, and exposes a LiveData:
private val _state = MutableLiveData<ThingsState>(ThingsState.Empty)
val state: LiveData<ThingsState> = _state
And the "state" is:
sealed class ThingsState {
object Empty : ThingsState()
object Loading : ThingsState()
data class Loaded(val things: Things) : ThingsState()
}
The viewModel has two public methods (Aside from the val state):
fun fetchData() {
viewModelScope.launch(Dispatchers.IO) {
_state.postValue(ThingsState.Loaded(repository.fetchAllTheThings()))
}
}
fun modifyData(atPosition: Int) {
repository.modifyItemAt(atPosition)
fetchData()
}
Nothing special, just a way to modify a random item by position (remember this is just a quick hack to test it).
So FetchData, launches the async code in IO to "fetch" (in reality, if the list is there, the cached list is returned, only the 1st time the data is "made" in the repo).
Modify data is simpler, calls modify on the repo and fetch data to post the new value.
Adapter
Lots of boilerplate... but as discussed, it's just an Adapter:
class ThingAdapter(private val itemClickCallback: ThingClickCallback) :
RecyclerView.Adapter<RecyclerView.ViewHolder>() {
The ThingClickCallback is just:
interface ThingClickCallback {
fun onThingClicked(atPosition: Int)
}
This Adapter now has an AsyncDiffer...
private val differ = AsyncListDiffer(this, DiffUtilCallback())
this in this context is the actual adapter (needed by the differ) and DiffUtilCallback is just a DiffUtil.Callback implementation:
internal class DiffUtilCallback : DiffUtil.ItemCallback<Thing>() {
override fun areItemsTheSame(oldItem: Thing, newItem: Thing): Boolean {
return oldItem.name == newItem.name
}
override fun areContentsTheSame(oldItem: Thing, newItem: Thing): Boolean {
return oldItem.age == newItem.age && oldItem.name == oldItem.name
}
nothing special here.
The only special methods in the adapter (aside from onCreateViewHolder and onBindViewHolder) are these:
fun submitList(list: Things) {
differ.submitList(list)
}
override fun getItemCount(): Int = differ.currentList.size
private fun getItem(position: Int) = differ.currentList[position]
So we ask the differ to do these for us and expose the public method submitList to emulate a listAdapter#submitList(...), except we delegate to the differ.
Because you may be wondering, here's the ViewHolder:
internal class ViewHolder(itemView: View, private val callback: ThingClickCallback) :
RecyclerView.ViewHolder(itemView) {
private val title: TextView = itemView.findViewById(R.id.thingName)
private val age: TextView = itemView.findViewById(R.id.thingAge)
fun bind(data: Thing) {
title.text = data.name
age.text = data.age.toString()
itemView.setOnClickListener { callback.onThingClicked(adapterPosition) }
}
}
Don't be too harsh, I know i passed the click listener directly, I only had about 1 hour to do all this, but nothing special, the layout it's just two text views (age and name) and we set the whole row clickable to pass the position to the callback. Nothing special here either.
Last but not least, the Fragment.
Fragment
class ThingListFragment : Fragment() {
private lateinit var viewModel: ThingsViewModel
private var binding: ThingsListFragmentBinding? = null
private val adapter = ThingAdapter(object : ThingClickCallback {
override fun onThingClicked(atPosition: Int) {
viewModel.modifyData(atPosition)
}
})
...
It has 3 member variables. The ViewModel, the Binding (I used ViewBinding why not it's just 1 liner in gradle), and the Adapter (which takes the Click listener in the ctor for convenience).
In this impl., I simply call the viewmodel with "modify item at position (X)" where X = the position of the item clicked in the adapter. (I know this could be better abstracted but this is irrelevant here).
there's only two other implemented methods in this fragment...
onDestroy:
override fun onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy()
binding = null
}
(I wonder if Google will ever accept their mistake with Fragment's lifecycle that we still have to care for this).
Anyway, the other is unsurprisingly, onCreateView.
override fun onCreateView(
inflater: LayoutInflater,
container: ViewGroup?,
savedInstanceState: Bundle?
): View? {
val root = inflater.inflate(R.layout.things_list_fragment, container, false)
binding = ThingsListFragmentBinding.bind(root)
viewModel = ViewModelProvider(this).get(ThingsViewModel::class.java)
viewModel.state.observe(viewLifecycleOwner) { state ->
when (state) {
is ThingsState.Empty -> adapter.submitList(emptyList())
is ThingsState.Loaded -> adapter.submitList(state.things)
is ThingsState.Loading -> doNothing // Show Loading? :)
}
}
binding?.thingsRecyclerView?.adapter = adapter
viewModel.fetchData()
return root
}
Bind the thing (root/binding), get the viewModel, observe the "state", set the adapter in the recyclerView, and call the viewModel to start fetching data.
That's all.
How does it work then?
The app starts, the fragment is created, subscribes to the VM state LiveData, and triggers the Fetch of data.
The ViewModel calls the repo, which is empty (new), so makeItems is called the list now has items and cached in the repo's "source" list. The viewModel receives this list asynchronously (in a coroutine) and posts the LiveData state.
The fragment receives the state and posts (submit) to the Adapter to finally show something.
When you "click" on an Item, ViewHolder (which has a click listener) triggers the "call back" towards the fragment which receives a position, this is then passed onto the Viewmodel and here the data is mutated in the Repo, which again, pushes the same list, but with a different reference on the clicked item that was modified. This causes the ViewModel to push a new LIveData state with the same list reference as before, towards the fragment, which -again- receives this, and does adapter.submitList(...).
The Adapter asynchronously calculates this and the UI updates.
It works, I can put all this in GitHub if you want to have fun, but my point is, while the concerns about the AsyncDiffer are valid (and may be or been true), this doesn't seem to be my (super limited) experience.
Are you using this differently?
When I tap on any row, the change is propagated from the Repository
UPDATE: forgot to include the doNothing function:
val doNothing: Unit
get() = Unit
I've used this for a while, I normally use it because it reads better than XXX -> {} to me. :)

While doing
items.toMutableList().map { it.copy() }
restaurants.postValue(items)
you are creating a new list but items remains the same. You have to store that new list into a variable or passing that operation directly as a param to postItem.

OnBindViewHolder does not apply after notifyitemmoved () in Android Recyclerview

The code above is the RecyclerViewAdapter, which changes color only when it is the first item, as shown below.
class TestAdapter : RecyclerView.Adapter<RecyclerView.ViewHolder>() {
private val textColor1 = Color.BLACK
private val textColor2 = Color.YELLOW
private val items = ArrayList<String>()
override fun onBindViewHolder(holder: RecyclerView.ViewHolder, position: Int) {
val textColor = if(position==0) textColor1 else textColor2
holder.itemView.textView.setTextColor(textColor)
holder.itemView.textView.text = items[position]
}
fun move(from:Int,to:Int){
val item = items[from]
items.remove(item)
items.add(to,item)
notifyItemMoved(from,to)
}
}
In this state I would like to move Value 3 to the first position using the move function. The results I want are shown below.
But in fact, it shows the following results
When using notifyDataSetChanged, I can not see the animation transition effect,
Running the onBindViewHolder manually using findViewHolderForAdapterPosition results in what I wanted, but it is very unstable. (Causing other parts of the error that I did not fix)
fun move(from:Int,to:Int){
val item = items[from]
val originTopHolder = recyclerView.findViewHolderForAdapterPosition(0)
val afterTopHolder = recyclerView.findViewHolderForAdapterPosition(from)
items.remove(item)
items.add(to,item)
notifyItemMoved(from,to)
if(to==0){
onBindViewHolder(originTopHolder,1)
onBindViewHolder(afterTopHolder,0)
}
}
Is there any other way to solve this?

Using the various notifyItemFoo() methods, like moved/inserted/removed, doesn't re-bind views. This is by design. You could call
if (from == 0 || to == 0) {
notifyItemChanged(from, Boolean.FALSE);
notifyItemChanged(to, Boolean.FALSE);
}
in order to re-bind the views that moved.

notifyItemMoved will not update it. According to documentation:
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/support/v7/widget/RecyclerView.Adapter
This is a structural change event. Representations of other existing items in the data set are still considered up to date and will not be rebound, though their positions may be altered.
What you're seeing is expected.
Might want to look into using notifyItemChanged, or dig through the documentation and see what works best for you.